#### Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

# OpenGL CodeWarrior Pro 6 and OpenGL

This topic is 6040 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

## Recommended Posts

I stil can''t get CodeWarrior to compile an OpenGL program. When I create a new OpenGL program and go to "Add Files" to add the OpenGL libraries GLAUX.LIB, GLU32.LIB, and OPENGL32.LIB and then try to include from these libraries with:  #include // Header File For The OpenGL32 Library #include // Header File For The GLu32 Library #include // Header File For The Glaux Library  it gives me these errors:  Error : the file ''GL/gl.h'' cannot be opened GLU.H line 22 #include Error : the file ''GL/gl.h'' cannot be opened GLAUX.H line 57 #include Error : the file ''GL/glu.h'' cannot be opened GLAUX.H line 58 #include  There are those header files in the Win32 support folder in the headers folder. Also, when I try using  #include #include #include  What''s going on? why does my new project with the opengl libraries added not compile?

##### Share on other sites
I found the solution. I''ll post it here for others who had my same problem.
Step 1) Download the Win32 glut libraries, they are available at http://www.xmission.com/~nate/glut.html
Step 2) place a copy of glut.h into CodeWarrior/Win32-x86 Support/Headers/Win32 SDK/gl/
Step 3) Place a copy of glut32.lib in CodeWarrior/Win32-x86 Support/Libraries/Win32 SDK/
For a glut application:
Step 4) Create a new project in codeWarrior
Step 5) Select Win32 C++ console application and create the project
Step 6) Go to add files, and select glut32.lib that you just copied to your codewarrior folder.
For a non-glut application:
Step 4) Create a new project in codeWarrior
Step 5) Select Win32 GUI and create a project
---- then for both types
Step 6/7) Add glu32.lib, opengl32.lib, and maybe glaux.lib if you want to use glaux to your project.
Step 8) Copy glut32.dll into your project folder, not your project in codewarrior, just into the same folder as your executable will be
Step 9) Add your glut code to the project, remove the placeholder source file (hello32.cp or something similar)
Step 10) change your includes from to , (CodeWarrior automatically searches the entire Win32 SDK headers file for headers, you don''t need to specify that it''s in the gl folder when you compile with codewarrior. If you want portable code, then do something like:
#define COMPILE_FOR_CODEWARRIOR// #define COMPILE_FOR_GCC#ifndef COMPILE_FOR_GCC#include gl/glut.h...#endif#ifndef COMPILE_FOR_CODEWARRIOR#include glut.h...#endif
Dont know if that actually works, but something like that.

##### Share on other sites
There''s an alternative.
The behaviour of automatic recursive search of includes only works when the files are not prefixed with "somepath/to/include/glut.h". If a path like this one occurs in your sourcecode then you need to add the directory before the somepath directory to your include pathes.

In your case you need to add the path "CodeWarrior/Win32-x86 Support/Headers/Win32 SDK" to your acces pathes in the project preferences. This should do the trick

NextS

• 10
• 12
• 10
• 10
• 11
• ### Similar Content

• Good Evening,
I want to make a 2D game which involves displaying some debug information. Especially for collision, enemy sights and so on ...
First of I was thinking about all those shapes which I need will need for debugging purposes: circles, rectangles, lines, polygons.
I am really stucked right now because of the fundamental question:
Where do I store my vertices positions for each line (object)? Currently I am not using a model matrix because I am using orthographic projection and set the final position within the VBO. That means that if I add a new line I would have to expand the "points" array and re-upload (recall glBufferData) it every time. The other method would be to use a model matrix and a fixed vbo for a line but it would be also messy to exactly create a line from (0,0) to (100,20) calculating the rotation and scale to make it fit.
If I proceed with option 1 "updating the array each frame" I was thinking of having 4 draw calls every frame for the lines vao, polygons vao and so on.
In addition to that I am planning to use some sort of ECS based architecture. So the other question would be:
Should I treat those debug objects as entities/components?
For me it would make sense to treat them as entities but that's creates a new issue with the previous array approach because it would have for example a transform and render component. A special render component for debug objects (no texture etc) ... For me the transform component is also just a matrix but how would I then define a line?
Treating them as components would'nt be a good idea in my eyes because then I would always need an entity. Well entity is just an id !? So maybe its a component?
Regards,
LifeArtist
• By QQemka
Hello. I am coding a small thingy in my spare time. All i want to achieve is to load a heightmap (as the lowest possible walking terrain), some static meshes (elements of the environment) and a dynamic character (meaning i can move, collide with heightmap/static meshes and hold a varying item in a hand ). Got a bunch of questions, or rather problems i can't find solution to myself. Nearly all are deal with graphics/gpu, not the coding part. My c++ is on high enough level.
Let's go:
Heightmap - i obviously want it to be textured, size is hardcoded to 256x256 squares. I can't have one huge texture stretched over entire terrain cause every pixel would be enormous. Thats why i decided to use 2 specified textures. First will be a tileset consisting of 16 square tiles (u v range from 0 to 0.25 for first tile and so on) and second a 256x256 buffer with 0-15 value representing index of the tile from tileset for every heigtmap square. Problem is, how do i blend the edges nicely and make some computationally cheap changes so its not obvious there are only 16 tiles? Is it possible to generate such terrain with some existing program?
Collisions - i want to use bounding sphere and aabb. But should i store them for a model or entity instance? Meaning i have 20 same trees spawned using the same tree model, but every entity got its own transformation (position, scale etc). Storing collision component per instance grats faster access + is precalculated and transformed (takes additional memory, but who cares?), so i stick with this, right? What should i do if object is dynamically rotated? The aabb is no longer aligned and calculating per vertex min/max everytime object rotates/scales is pretty expensive, right?
Drawing aabb - problem similar to above (storing aabb data per instance or model). This time in my opinion per model is enough since every instance also does not have own vertex buffer but uses the shared one (so 20 trees share reference to one tree model). So rendering aabb is about taking the model's aabb, transforming with instance matrix and voila. What about aabb vertex buffer (this is more of a cosmetic question, just curious, bumped onto it in time of writing this). Is it better to make it as 8 points and index buffer (12 lines), or only 2 vertices with min/max x/y/z and having the shaders dynamically generate 6 other vertices and draw the box? Or maybe there should be just ONE 1x1x1 cube box template moved/scaled per entity?
What if one model got a diffuse texture and a normal map, and other has only diffuse? Should i pass some bool flag to shader with that info, or just assume that my game supports only diffuse maps without fancy stuff?
There were several more but i forgot/solved them at time of writing
• By RenanRR
Hi All,
I'm reading the tutorials from learnOpengl site (nice site) and I'm having a question on the camera (https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Camera).
I always saw the camera being manipulated with the lookat, but in tutorial I saw the camera being changed through the MVP arrays, which do not seem to be camera, but rather the scene that changes:
#version 330 core layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos; layout (location = 1) in vec2 aTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; uniform mat4 model; uniform mat4 view; uniform mat4 projection; void main() { gl_Position = projection * view * model * vec4(aPos, 1.0f); TexCoord = vec2(aTexCoord.x, aTexCoord.y); } then, the matrix manipulated:
..... glm::mat4 projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(fov), (float)SCR_WIDTH / (float)SCR_HEIGHT, 0.1f, 100.0f); ourShader.setMat4("projection", projection); .... glm::mat4 view = glm::lookAt(cameraPos, cameraPos + cameraFront, cameraUp); ourShader.setMat4("view", view); .... model = glm::rotate(model, glm::radians(angle), glm::vec3(1.0f, 0.3f, 0.5f)); ourShader.setMat4("model", model);
So, some doubts:
- Why use it like that?
- Is it okay to manipulate the camera that way?
-in this way, are not the vertex's positions that changes instead of the camera?
- I need to pass MVP to all shaders of object in my scenes ?

What it seems, is that the camera stands still and the scenery that changes...
it's right?

Thank you

• Sampling a floating point texture where the alpha channel holds 4-bytes of packed data into the float. I don't know how to cast the raw memory to treat it as an integer so I can perform bit-shifting operations.

int rgbValue = int(textureSample.w);//4 bytes of data packed as color
// algorithm might not be correct and endianness might need switching.
vec3 extractedData = vec3(  rgbValue & 0xFF000000,  (rgbValue << 8) & 0xFF000000, (rgbValue << 16) & 0xFF000000);
extractedData /= 255.0f;

• While writing a simple renderer using OpenGL, I faced an issue with the glGetUniformLocation function. For some reason, the location is coming to be -1.
Anyone has any idea .. what should I do?