Sign in to follow this  
Geri

OpenGL TitaniumGL, opengl multiwrapper for your game (opengl,d3d,multicore soft-render)

Recommended Posts

Geri    367
This tool can be very usefull for some developers, so i post it here, i hope this is the right place, becouse i dont want to spam.

Let me introduct TitaniumGL:TitaniumGL for windows is an opengl to d3d wrapper (its more a whole virtual graphics card implementation anyways) to your application, targetted to end users who got broken opengl drivers on they systems. And of course, developers who are developing C/B category games, and want d3d support, by adding my dll to their softwares.

TitaniumGL can come with your game: no separate installation or programming needed. You just only need to copy TitaniumGL to your application's .exe directory. You not need to program d3d rendering path.

WHY this is good for you?
Currently, the most built-in drivers in Windows has no OpenGL acceleration, only D3D. Most end-users does not even know, what is a ,,driver''. With TitaniumGL, you can reach them easilly. Some users has old SiS/Intel/etc based hardware in they computer, and they got no OpenGL acceleration. Reach these peoples easilly, get bigger market, than your comptetitors.

...Or at least, be an emo to get d3d and opengl support also :D

Its also good if you dont want titaniumgl in your game. But maybee its a good idea to test your game with TitaniumGL too: the software alreday has 20.000 user (2011 04 11).

[url="http://TitaniumGL.tk"]http://TitaniumGL.tk[/url]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jyk    2094
This seems interesting (although I imagine it'll get moved to Your Announcements). A couple of suggestions though. I think in general, announcements that are easily readable and nicely formatted and that have clickable links tend to get more attention and interest (usually when I see a mess of text and raw URLs I just skip over it, and I imagine I'm not the only one). You can edit your post easily though using the 'edit' button in the upper right.

I had a thread a while back about OpenGL support on Windows. I don't remember there being any clear consensus on the matter, but from what I've read on these forums and elsewhere, I do get the impression that use of OpenGL might present casual users with potential roadblocks that they wouldn't encounter with Direct3D. Of course there are cross-platform solutions available that hide these details from the developer, more or less (Unity, Ogre), but for someone who wants to write their own renderer for whatever reason, the problem remains.

Anyway, maybe you could at least make your links clickable - that would make your post a little easier to navigate, I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geri    367
Thank you for the replys!

jyk: i will edit the opening thread's links, after i found out how to use this forum (i used it long time ago) :3
I am happy that you enjoy the project. i was tought that i will get a much more negative reply on the project, becouse the most of developers dont see this kind of problems.

Kambiz: issues can happend, becouse this is the first release. i am not even yet tested it on several newer os-es, like win7 or vista (of course i tested it all computers that i was can reach until now to ensure maximal compatibility). After i will get bugreports from various systems, i will able to found this bugs and fix them. The crash you noticed probably happends on newer systems, i am alreday on the fixing of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geri    367
Kambiz: i investigated your report. I tryed the first three demo from that site. Second and third runs. First is crashing, but it seems that the bug is in the demo's code.

i also got some new screenshots

http://legend.uw.hu/kepek/tgl/quake3_5.jpg

(minor bugs: some blending bugs)

http://legend.uw.hu/kepek/tgl/wolf.jpg

(minor bugs: white textures on a few places)

both shots from d3d mode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geri    367
in d3d and software mode, i support the folowing extensions:

GL_ARB_multitexture
GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar
GL_ARB_texture_non_power_of_two
GL_ARB_transpose_matrix
GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object
GL_EXT_abgr
GL_EXT_bgr
GL_EXT_bgra
GL_EXT_blend_logic_op
GL_EXT_cmyka
GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array
GL_EXT_draw_range_elements
GL_EXT_generate_mipmap
GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays
GL_EXT_rescale_normal
GL_EXT_texture_env_combine
GL_EXT_texture_object
GL_EXT_vertex_array
GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap
WGL_ARB_extensions_string
WGL_EXT_extension_string
WGL_EXT_extensions_string
WGL_EXT_swap_control

i return 1.3 as version string

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geri    367
i made some fixes on the webpage (in the english), but the qualify of the language is still projecting the feeling of a ,,oh look its a cheap shaddy eastern european product'' - according to UK persons report :3 :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geri    367
I will rise the price after a few weeks (i am not yet know how much, but probably around ~30 eur), so who not yet buyd it, and want it, i suggest to buy it NOW.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geri    367
I saw that you are from Chile, i understand your problem with the price, so if you want the software, you can get it for 5 EUR if you want ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kambiz    758
I am also skeptic about the usefulness of your library.
Quote:
Original post by Geri
FIRST CASE: Most of end-users are not informaticans, and cant install device drivers.

People who use 3d application and play games have also drivers installed, it is unlikely that my game is the only application on someones PC that requires hardware accelerations. There are exceptions but I don't think that "most" users will have no proper drivers installed. Can you reference any statistic to verify your claim?
I think if the user can install my application, he can install drivers too. It is the same procedure.

Quote:
Original post by Geri
SECOND CASE: Some end users has very low-end and old VGA card (old integrated intel, Neomagic, old SiS, 3dlabs or S3 vga-s), and they does not even support OpenGL, or they are using newer operating system that does not contains OpenGL acceleration to it anymore. Probably the power of these systems are enough to your game to run.

When we use OpenGL in our software we want hardware acceleration. If we could live without or if we were developing for very low end hardware we would use other API. There are also high level 2D APIs available that have software and hardware accelerated back-ends (QT, Cairo).
When using your library one has to use GL 1.3, but then what about all the users who have 'gaming cards' and propers drivers installed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geri    367
If the proper drivers are installed, TitaniumGL is like a glass, it would not ruin the qualify of the vga-driver.

(installing a driver and an application is does not the same procedure. If he/she installs your game, she just place dvdrom in, then press next - next - finish probably. to install a driver, need to know the graphics card, need to know where he/she can found the drivers. Its like charging the accumulator in your car. You can drive it does not means that you can charge its accumulator too. If your application is MEANT only for hardcore gamers, your community will of course know, how to install a vga driver, otherwise, its not so sure. I am even sucked with some stuffs becouse some end users never seen .rar files, and they wasnt able to google it... ;))

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kambiz    758
Quote:
Original post by Geri
If the proper drivers are installed, TitaniumGL is like a glass, it would not ruin the qualify of the vga-driver.

This is not what I meant, I mean we develop with a minimum specification in mind, if the minimum is Netbook, we have no reason to use OpenGL at all. If it is an average gaming PC, we would target OpenGL 2 at least (1.3 is very very old) and use shaders but then the code becomes in compatible with your library.
There is no scenario where your library is useful as fall-back.

You should really show us statistics and tell us in numbers how much bigger our target group will be if we use your library.

For example
http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/
shows that 95% of the users have DX9 cards (~OGL 2).
While your library is cheap, it restricts one to GL 1.3 and it is a potential source of bugs. One would need to debug not only on different hardware but also using your library.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geri    367
Quote:
Original post by Geri
we would target OpenGL 2 at least


Who want to create a shader based AAA game with very much money, should be able to get time and write a d3d rendering core to it anyways. But well, as i see it (i tested a bounch of shareware games of nowdays on the internet), some of them was only used opengl 1.1, most of them only needed multitexture and vbo as extension. I was found only a few that requied 2.0 features to run, like 1 from 10. It seems the most of succesfull game-developers just want to create games, not shader effects, and i want to help them.


About the statistics: i don't has any other statistics, except that two on my webpage. About market share statistics, i dont have current values, but as you can see, most of PC-s are comes with preinstalled windows. Most of windows drivers has no built-in opengl acceleration. Only the 4-5% of the peoples are informatics and/or gamers - others will be never in they life will change they vga driver. This reason is existed even before windows xp: Quake2 also has built in d3d drivers, and some versions of Quake3 demo can also fallback to d3d rendering (quake3 demo even uses a compiled-in opengl to d3d wrapper in this situations) so it wasnt me to first come up with this idea. It was Carmack :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HuntsMan    368
Quote:
Original post by Geri
Quote:
Original post by Geri
we would target OpenGL 2 at least


Who want to create a shader based AAA game with very much money, should be able to get time and write a d3d rendering core to it anyways. But well, as i see it (i tested a bounch of shareware games of nowdays on the internet), some of them was only used opengl 1.1, most of them only needed multitexture and vbo as extension. I was found only a few that requied 2.0 features to run, like 1 from 10. It seems the most of succesfull game-developers just want to create games, not shader effects, and i want to help them.


That's wrong. Creating games includes creating shaders to do some effects. But anyways, GL is moving away from fixed function in favour to shaders. See OpenGL 3 for that.

Consider, if i were to develop a game, i wouldn't like to be constrained by some random library.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SimonForsman    7642
Quote:
Original post by Geri
Quote:
Original post by Geri
we would target OpenGL 2 at least


Who want to create a shader based AAA game with very much money, should be able to get time and write a d3d rendering core to it anyways. But well, as i see it (i tested a bounch of shareware games of nowdays on the internet), some of them was only used opengl 1.1, most of them only needed multitexture and vbo as extension. I was found only a few that requied 2.0 features to run, like 1 from 10. It seems the most of succesfull game-developers just want to create games, not shader effects, and i want to help them.


Windows Vista and Windows7 however allready have a OpenGL1.4 -> D3D wrapper, so your software is only really useful for XP machines (Which only have a OpenGL1.1 software driver by default), the number of XP machines being used is decreasing quite rapidly though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geri    367
HuntsMan:

If you call my library random wich is working and has tryable version, then i call you as a ,,random people'' who are not a code writer (you even called yourself as ,,if i were develop a game'')

Kambiz, HuntsMan:

http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_of_search=soft&words=opengl+game&search=Search

Here, some OpenGL games. I just looked the first ~100 of them. I just typed opengl and game keyword. I looked the screenshots randomly there, i checked source codes also, and i saw mostly only fixed function, and a few that requied shaders. Of course this not means that my wrapper will be compatible with them for first try! This is just for correcting the misinformations that you both posted.

The reality is different than imagination - therefore i ask you two to please stop placing disinformations to my topic, becouse it can affray some developers who are want to buy.

Please ask only technically things and not philisophically - i suggest to create a new topic for you if you both want to just wondering about the shader usage in today's video games.

(this NOT means that i am now angry at you, dudes!)



SimonForsman: Thank you for the information. As some bugreports what i recived, most computers even on win7 was returned ,,generic gdi'' ogl 1.1 software renderer with built-in drivers for some reason (d3d was worked fine), so there also can be this to be a problem. And i hope this will be the same in win8 too :3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geri    367
PS: oh, rating thumbdown to a person who just have better arguments than you isnt a constructive behavior, and undeserving on a civilisated forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Daaark    3553
Quote:
Original post by SimonForsman
Windows Vista and Windows7 however allready have a OpenGL1.4 -> D3D wrapper, so your software is only really useful for XP machines (Which only have a OpenGL1.1 software driver by default), the number of XP machines being used is decreasing quite rapidly though.
Microsoft has been including the proper driver downloads in Windows Update for like 5 years now...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geri    367
Windows update needs internet. Only 26,6% of peoples has internet access according to internet usage statics, wich can be viewed on http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Daaark    3553
Quote:
Original post by Geri
Windows update needs internet. Only 26,6% of peoples has internet access according to internet usage statics, wich can be viewed on http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
Otherwise, the proper drivers are pre-installed by the system manufacturer. They just aren't updated without internet access.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hodgman    51345
I like the idea of your library, but I would only use it if it had GL2.0 suppport :/
Developing with GLSL shaders is much less effort for me than using the old fixed-function pipeline. It lets me focus on writing my game and not on learning obscure API details!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geri    367
Daaark: lot of manufacturers just check the device manager, and if they see the card name, they are install no drivers for the vga. This can mostly happend with small computer stores. Also can happend for computers buyd without os, and os installed by the neighbour ,,Stevie'' :D

Hodgman: currently i am not planning to expand it above OpenGL 1.3, but *MAYBEE* if recive a lot of request, i can add a extension that allows to acces d3d9 pixel shaders. Or if i found some LGPL-ed glsl to hlsl conversion tool, it would be much compatibyer. But this would not result opengl 2.0 features to come in, and the compatibility would be very crap anyway. So if you got no fixed funct fallback in your engine, i suggest you to not buy the software, as you sayd. Later if you will write a fallback in your software becouse of different reasons, and you would use the wrapper, contact me and i help you to place the library into your software.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ysaneya    1383
If your market are small indy developers that release small plat-form/puzzle games, there could be an interest for it.

However I agree with other posters that to be more generally useful, it needs to support GL 2. No offense, but Quake 3 and Return to Castle Wolfenstein are almost a decade old. You're not proving anything by supporting them.

By the way:

Quote:
TitaniumGL is also capable, to render your game with multicore cpu rendering


Can you elaborate ? How can it do that ? Have you done some benchmarks ?

Y.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Partner Spotlight

  • Similar Content

    • By pseudomarvin
      I assumed that if a shader is computationally expensive then the execution is just slower. But running the following GLSL FS instead just crashes
      void main() { float x = 0; float y = 0; int sum = 0; for (float x = 0; x < 10; x += 0.00005) { for (float y = 0; y < 10; y += 0.00005) { sum++; } } fragColor = vec4(1, 1, 1 , 1.0); } with unhandled exception in nvoglv32.dll. Are there any hard limits on the number of steps/time that a shader can take before it is shut down? I was thinking about implementing some time intensive computation in shaders where it would take on the order of seconds to compute a frame, is that possible? Thanks.
    • By Arulbabu Donbosco
      There are studios selling applications which is just copying any 3Dgraphic content and regenerating into another new window. especially for CAVE Virtual reality experience. so that the user opens REvite or CAD or any other 3D applications and opens a model. then when the user selects the rendered window the VR application copies the 3D model information from the OpenGL window. 
      I got the clue that the VR application replaces the windows opengl32.dll file. how this is possible ... how can we copy the 3d content from the current OpenGL window.
      anyone, please help me .. how to go further... to create an application like VR CAVE. 
       
      Thanks
    • By cebugdev
      hi all,

      i am trying to build an OpenGL 2D GUI system, (yeah yeah, i know i should not be re inventing the wheel, but this is for educational and some other purpose only),
      i have built GUI system before using 2D systems such as that of HTML/JS canvas, but in 2D system, i can directly match a mouse coordinates to the actual graphic coordinates with additional computation for screen size/ratio/scale ofcourse.
      now i want to port it to OpenGL, i know that to render a 2D object in OpenGL we specify coordiantes in Clip space or use the orthographic projection, now heres what i need help about.
      1. what is the right way of rendering the GUI? is it thru drawing in clip space or switching to ortho projection?
      2. from screen coordinates (top left is 0,0 nd bottom right is width height), how can i map the mouse coordinates to OpenGL 2D so that mouse events such as button click works? In consideration ofcourse to the current screen/size dimension.
      3. when let say if the screen size/dimension is different, how to handle this? in my previous javascript 2D engine using canvas, i just have my working coordinates and then just perform the bitblk or copying my working canvas to screen canvas and scale the mouse coordinates from there, in OpenGL how to work on a multiple screen sizes (more like an OpenGL ES question).
      lastly, if you guys know any books, resources, links or tutorials that handle or discuss this, i found one with marekknows opengl game engine website but its not free,
      Just let me know. Did not have any luck finding resource in google for writing our own OpenGL GUI framework.
      IF there are no any available online, just let me know, what things do i need to look into for OpenGL and i will study them one by one to make it work.
      thank you, and looking forward to positive replies.
    • By fllwr0491
      I have a few beginner questions about tesselation that I really have no clue.
      The opengl wiki doesn't seem to talk anything about the details.
       
      What is the relationship between TCS layout out and TES layout in?
      How does the tesselator know how control points are organized?
          e.g. If TES input requests triangles, but TCS can output N vertices.
             What happens in this case?
      In this article,
      http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=2120983
      the isoline example TCS out=4, but TES in=isoline.
      And gl_TessCoord is only a single one.
      So which ones are the control points?
      How are tesselator building primitives?
    • By Orella
      I've been developing a 2D Engine using SFML + ImGui.
      Here you can see an image
      The editor is rendered using ImGui and the scene window is a sf::RenderTexture where I draw the GameObjects and then is converted to ImGui::Image to render it in the editor.
      Now I need to create a 3D Engine during this year in my Bachelor Degree but using SDL2 + ImGui and I want to recreate what I did with the 2D Engine. 
      I've managed to render the editor like I did in the 2D Engine using this example that comes with ImGui. 
      3D Editor preview
      But I don't know how to create an equivalent of sf::RenderTexture in SDL2, so I can draw the 3D scene there and convert it to ImGui::Image to show it in the editor.
      If you can provide code will be better. And if you want me to provide any specific code tell me.
      Thanks!
  • Popular Now