• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Geri

OpenGL
TitaniumGL, opengl multiwrapper for your game (opengl,d3d,multicore soft-render)

41 posts in this topic

Quote:
Original post by Geri
Daaark: lot of manufacturers just check the device manager, and if they see the card name, they are install no drivers for the vga. This can mostly happend with small computer stores. Also can happend for computers buyd without os, and os installed by the neighbour ,,Stevie'' :D
People who buy from small shops, and get PCs custom built like that generally have internet access, and know how to install drivers. (which Windows update will automatically provide anyways, I haven't downloaded a driver from nVidia's site in years.)

Not supporting Shaders in 2010 is like not supporting texture mapping ten years ago. We are a decade into the age of the programmable pipeline.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Daaark: well, we are in the age of programmable pipeline since ~6 years now (according to Radeon9800/9600), but except the AAA games, nothing is changed.

Ysaneya: yes, you can found a benchmark result on the project's webpage that has tested with multicore cpu rendering (a quake3 and a nehe tutorial), in benchmark d3d mode, the software rendering mode, and to cpmpare, the mesa3d software renderer can be also found.

Of course the wrapper can be forced to software rendering, so can be tryed with quake3 demo at your home. I suggest everyone, who want, to try the wrapper at home, with wolfenstein3d, or everybody-s own game software. It tells much more than some screenshot or benchmark result.

The software renderer is using a multicore cpu rasterizer, that i has rewrited three times to reach this quality and speed.

[Edited by - Geri on April 15, 2010 4:01:08 AM]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by Geri
Daaark: well, we are in the age of programmable pipeline since ~6 years now (according to Radeon9800/9600), but except the AAA games, nothing is changed.
Geforce 3 and DX8 introduced that stuff in 2001. Everything is done in the programmable pipeline now, fixed function doesn't exist, it's only emulated.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, fixed function is emulated with shaders by the driver nowdays, its true. Yeah, i know that gf3 (and a bit later radeon 8xxx from ati) was the first shader capable cards, but at that time, massive shader usage was unpopular. Even GeForce4 MX contained no pixel shaders, this is why i told radeon 9500+ cards, those was the first cards meant really to the new shader world order.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by Geri
Yes, fixed function is emulated with shaders by the driver nowdays, its true. Yeah, i know that gf3 (and a bit later radeon 8xxx from ati) was the first shader capable cards, but at that time, massive shader usage was unpopular. Even GeForce4 MX contained no pixel shaders, this is why i told radeon 9500+ cards, those was the first cards meant really to the new shader world order.

Those GF4s were rebranded GF2s for their budget line. Just like the Geforce2 MX was a rebranded GF-256.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yup. but users just looked the number: it sayd 4. and ohh, 128 mbyte ram. ,,it shall be a famous card'', and they buyd. }:->
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by Geri
yup. but users just looked the number: it sayd 4. and ohh, 128 mbyte ram. ,,it shall be a famous card'', and they buyd. }:->


I bought my last graphic card from ARLT. The cheapest graphic card they are selling currently is a GeForce 7500LE for about 26€ and it supports OGL 2.
You have wrote an interesting library and probably put a lot of time in it, but GL 1.3 is history in my option.

Still the multi-core rendering is interesting, may I ask what resolution the benchmarks on your webpage correspond to? Also how does your library compare to mesa on 1 or 2 cores?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
huhh, i dont know the res, i think with quake3 it was 640x480 or maximum 800x600, and the nehe tutorial was benchmarked on its default window size (it would be much effective and trustable to write everything from that computer, but i just dropped some fast benchmarks to the webpage in a very hurry. i will may replace them later, and add some new results also).

The speed of the software rendering:
Its not realy a multipler that i can say.
-mesa3d is mostly a bit faster, same, or a bit slower on a 1 core cpu'd machine.
-titaniumgl is ~5% - 70% faster than mesa3d on a 2 core cpu machine.
-titaniumgl is 2x-3x faster on a 4 core cpu machine tipically.

(mesa3d is capable to single core rendering only)

Typically.
but in reality, it is depending on the application (may can happend that a game cannot rendered normally on multi-core, becouse they use too few geometry).
Like, quake3 runs very nice with my renderer, but glxgears runs very-very bad on tgl software renderer, and its runs beautifully with mesa.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
new version:
2010/05/03
http://legend.uw.hu/TitaniumGL/TitaniumGL_2010_05_03.zip

updates:
-speed sightly improved with 4 cpu-core machines
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just a side note: I use NVidia CG for my shaders, so I can write them once and use them with D3D and OpenGL. Maybe you could incoporate it into your library as well.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No, unless I understood something completely wrong the CG compiler actually compiles the CG shaders into GLSL or HLSL (it might directly compile them to their binary form, I didn't check that yet).

Edit: you might have to be careful with the newest features, though. They might not be supported by ATI hardware (yet). However, you might be able to use profiles to restrict shaders to the common features supported by both NVidia and ATI.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Updated. New version is:
------------------------
TitaniumGL_2010_05_08


Extension list:
---------------
GL_ARB_multitexture
GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar
GL_ARB_texture_non_power_of_two
GL_ARB_transpose_matrix
GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object
GL_EXT_abgr
GL_EXT_bgr
GL_ARB_texture_env_combine
GL_EXT_blend_func_separate
GL_EXT_bgra
GL_EXT_blend_logic_op
GL_EXT_cmyka
GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array
GL_EXT_draw_range_elements
GL_EXT_generate_mipmap
GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays
GL_EXT_rescale_normal
GL_EXT_texture_env_combine
GL_EXT_texture_object
GL_EXT_vertex_array
GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap
WGL_ARB_extensions_string
GL_ARB_multisample
WGL_EXT_extension_string
WGL_EXT_extensions_string
WGL_EXT_swap_control
GL_EXT_texture_env_add


Changements:
------------
(d3d) D3D wrapping speed is improved around 20%
(d3d) Some pixel line flickering was fixed when multitexturing or alpha blending
(d3d) Fixed bugs in device lost recovery code
(d3d) Now the d3d mode inits with antialiasing at default
DLL-s image base modifyed
(d3d) glGetString returns the graphics card name as RENDERER
(d3d) Some texture filtering bugs has been fixed
(d3d) Scissor test has been fixed

[url="http://TitaniumGL.tk"]http://TitaniumGL.tk[/url]



---------------------------------------
new version shortly arrives.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
updates:
[i][b]what happend since the last reply?[/b][/i]
Improvements:
-Extension added: GL_ARB_map_buffer_range
-Extension added: GL_OES_matrix_get
-Color buffer writemask support has been added
-Speed-up around matrix calculations
-Thread handle leaking fixed
-Strange protch has been fixed in windowed rendering
-Number of acessible TMU's incared from 3 to 4
-Added a bounch of missing texture formats, like 4_4_4_4, 10_10_10_2, etc...
-Added fixed-point support
-Added experimental OpenGL ES 1.x support and ES context creation
-glPushAttrib was broken
-Fixed some bugs with Tuxracer
-Fixed some bugs in Tuxkart
-Default variables around light handling was broken
-Fixed missing colors with porrasturvat
-Fixed crash with stepmania
-Some fixes around lighting and material handling
-Fixed display list drawing when texturing is disabled
-Improved multi-cpu support
-Added some missing parameters to glGet
-Added some missing caps to glIsEnabled
-Improved SEGFAULT protection in VBO data mapper
-Added multisampling support under linux
-Scissoring now affects clear
-Big data blocks can now processed on multiple cpu cores
-Default viewport is fixed with SDL's buggy window init
-A small speed improvement in vertex processing
-A matrix calculation bug fixed with some complex matrixes
-Direct access to Directx's Hardware T&L pipeline in some situations
-Texture loading time improved for big textures.
-Perspective vertex flickering fixed
-Around total 50-300% speed-up.

-OpenGL version is 1.4, software now shows graphics card name and graphics memory in the renderer string.
-My software reaches 20 000 user. According to this, [b]who calimed that nobody needs my software, failed brutally[/b].
-Newest release finally smashes competitive softwares to the ground, it finally gained enough speed, and compatibility to overtake the lead.
-The software is now donationware.
-Some games now includes my software as default. Some of the developers played few, some of them played lot for my software.
Actually, its now donationware. You pay what you want!
-A Gamedev donator who sends more than *contact with me and we deal the price (dont worry, not so lot)*, gets the source code to view.
-A Gamedev donator who sends more than *contact with me and we deal the price*, gets an own source code fork.
-You see a bug? Contact me!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TitaniumGL 2014, 01. released

 

-Well a few days still left until 2014, whatever
-Added mip-mapping support for the software renderer
-5-25% generic performance gain
-Fixed some ,,dotting'' bugs with the software renderer
-Fixed some segmentation fault bugs (texture upload forgot to lock rendering...)
-Fixed a memory-pool related crash on linux
-32 bit binary now compiled again with i686 flag
-Software renderer now supports up to 128 threads instead of 24

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't Windows Vista and newer already come with a D3D9 based OpenGL 1.5 implementation and WARP software render device?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no, they dropped that plan

 

vista and win7 have the same opengl fallback that windows xp had. both xp, vista and win7 have a software rendered opengl fallback, and a special d3d9 based fallback which is deactivated. this last does not work with generic softwares at all, becouse its deactivated and not oficially exist, it cant be accessed, only can be turned on by installing some special tools to allow it. the opengl software renderer of microsoft, which is the generic fallback, can render a few thousand polygon around half or 1 fps even on the newest core i7 cpus, so it not really works in practice, and does not works with generic games or softwares at all. microsoft wrappers supports opengl 1.1 without any extension except to control vsync and abgr, and they crash from the most texture formats or even from the most basic functions. microsoft have this fallback unchanged since ~2001. in practice, both its useless, no software is compatible with them. microsoft was unable to deliver they opengl 1.5 wrapper/implementation at all, they discontinued the development after a few month of struggling. they opengl 1.5 plans are not available any more. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ee417756%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

 

(the case is the same with directx, they originally planned to have a fast and good multithreaded software renderer fallback for directx, but they cancelled that too, software renderer only available after installing directx sdk only after special linking and initialization of the software, its cant be used in practice. also thats 0.5-1 fps so its useless in practice again)

Edited by Geri
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By Toastmastern
      So it's been a while since I took a break from my whole creating a planet in DX11. Last time around I got stuck on fixing a nice LOD.
      A week back or so I got help to find this:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD
      In general this is what I'm trying to recreate in DX11, he that made that planet LOD uses OpenGL but that is a minor issue and something I can solve. But I have a question regarding the code
      He gets the position using this row
      vec4d pos = b.var.vec4d["position"]; Which is then used further down when he sends the variable "center" into the drawing function:
      if (pos.len() < 1) pos.norm(); world::draw(vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z));  
      Inside the draw function this happens:
      draw_recursive(p3[0], p3[1], p3[2], center); Basically the 3 vertices of the triangle and the center of details that he sent as a parameter earlier: vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z)
      Now onto my real question, he does vec3d edge_center[3] = { (p1 + p2) / 2, (p2 + p3) / 2, (p3 + p1) / 2 }; to get the edge center of each edge, nothing weird there.
      But this is used later on with:
      vec3d d = center + edge_center[i]; edge_test[i] = d.len() > ratio_size; edge_test is then used to evaluate if there should be a triangle drawn or if it should be split up into 3 new triangles instead. Why is it working for him? shouldn't it be like center - edge_center or something like that? Why adding them togheter? I asume here that the center is the center of details for the LOD. the position of the camera if stood on the ground of the planet and not up int he air like it is now.

      Full code can be seen here:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD/blob/master/src.simple/Main.cpp
      If anyone would like to take a look and try to help me understand this code I would love this person. I'm running out of ideas on how to solve this in my own head, most likely twisted it one time to many up in my head
      Thanks in advance
      Toastmastern
       
       
    • By fllwr0491
      I googled around but are unable to find source code or details of implementation.
      What keywords should I search for this topic?
      Things I would like to know:
      A. How to ensure that partially covered pixels are rasterized?
         Apparently by expanding each triangle by 1 pixel or so, rasterization problem is almost solved.
         But it will result in an unindexable triangle list without tons of overlaps. Will it incur a large performance penalty?
      B. A-buffer like bitmask needs a read-modiry-write operation.
         How to ensure proper synchronizations in GLSL?
         GLSL seems to only allow int32 atomics on image.
      C. Is there some simple ways to estimate coverage on-the-fly?
         In case I am to draw 2D shapes onto an exisitng target:
         1. A multi-pass whatever-buffer seems overkill.
         2. Multisampling could cost a lot memory though all I need is better coverage.
            Besides, I have to blit twice, if draw target is not multisampled.
       
    • By mapra99
      Hello

      I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

      To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

      Thanks!
    • By Solid_Spy
      Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
      In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
      My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
      Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
    • By KarimIO
      EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
      Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
      Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
      static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));  
  • Popular Now