Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
samgzman

generic programming troubles with numeric_limits

This topic is 3093 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I'm implementing a generic algorithm which needs to determine the "largest negative" and "largest positive" representable values for a given type. For an integral type, these would simply be numeric_limits<integral_type>::min() and numeric_limits<integral_type>::max() respectively. However, for floating-point types, numeric_limits<floating_point_type>::min() returns the smallest positive representable quantity which is not what I want. For floating point types, the values I need are -numeric_limits<floating_point_type>::max() and numeric_limits<floating_point_type>::max(). Is there an existing solution to this problem available that I am missing, or is the best solution to implment my own traits type?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
IEEE 754, CRAY, IBM S/390 and VAX floating point have a sign bit, making the maximum positive and negative magnitudes equal. http://owen.sj.ca.us/~rk/howto/fltpt/index.html

So that should cover the vast majority of platforms you'd likely be aiming at.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2234468/do-any-real-world-cpus-not-use-ieee-754

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
May-be something like this would help:


#include <iostream>
#include <limits>
#include <boost/utility/enable_if.hpp>

template <class T>
typename boost::enable_if_c<std::numeric_limits<T>::is_integer, T>::type min_value()
{
return std::numeric_limits<T>::min();
}

template <class T>
typename boost::disable_if_c<std::numeric_limits<T>::is_integer, T>::type min_value()
{
return -std::numeric_limits<T>::max();
}

int main()
{
std::cout << min_value<short>() << ' ' << min_value<double>() << '\n';
}



(enable_if_c and disable_if_c should be easy to implement yourself if you don't want boost)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!