Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Depth Buffer and deferred rendering

This topic is 2728 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I'm currently working on a deferred renderer and now trying to optimize the lighting calculation. The way I have done it so far is the a color attachment to store depth value linearly, which I then use to reconstruct position. Then, I figured that I need to do depth testing for more efficient lighting calculation - or rather not to do the calculations. However, early z does only work with the default depth buffer as far as I understand, and thus I have to duplicate depth information, stored in two different ways.

How do you normally solve this? Use the default depth buffer and letting opengl write to that itself (possibly flipping far and near for more precision), or are you simply saving the info in a dedicated color attachment? If you save it in a depth attachment, do you do it as a texture or as a renderbuffer? Can you do depth testing on a MRT with an attached texture as depth attachment, and is there a performance penalty for this?

(The way I currently store depth is the negated view-space z value divided by zfar, and I figure I need to fetch it much differently if I get it as z/w after perspective transformation from the standard depth buffer)

Thanks in advance.

Tell me if I need to elaborate anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I understand you correctly you want the precision of linear depth and are worried about using two depth buffers. You have no choice. You simply have to choose between using the hyperbolic depth alone, or using both the hyperbolic depth and linear depth. Do you need the extra precision? If so, use two textures. If you don't then just reconstruct your position from the hyperbolic depth. I'm assuming you are using OpenGL which should allow you access to reading the depth buffer. DirectX 9 and below do not allow you to do this. You can find more information from the articles below.

You can find more information about the depth buffere and precision here:
http://mynameismjp.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/attack-of-the-depth-buffer/

You can find more information about reconstructing position from depth here:
http://mynameismjp.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/reconstructing-position-from-depth/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks - hyperbolic depth might have been the keyword I was looking for when describing the situation.

I have read those articles, but thanks for the link anyway. If I deciphered your message correctly, then you recommend that I just use the hyperbolic depth buffer, and then reconstruct the position from that, given it provides me with enough precision.

Then, for the second part. Yes, I am using OpenGL. For reading back from the depth buffer, can you read the depthbuffer directly or do I need to attach a texture to a depth attachment, ie:

glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, depth);
glTexParameterf(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR);
glTexParameterf(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR);
glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, width, height, 0, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, NULL);
glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, GL_TEXTURE_2D, depth, 0);



Or is it possible to read from the "default" depth buffer where I do not add a depth attachment? (glReadPixels is slow, so I guess another way ;) )

What if I use a renderbuffer as a depth attachment, i.e.:

glGenRenderbuffers(1, &fbo.depth);
glBindRenderbuffer(GL_RENDERBUFFER, fbo.depth);
glRenderbufferStorage(GL_RENDERBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24, fbo.width, fbo.height);
glFramebufferRenderbuffer(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, GL_RENDERBUFFER, fbo.depth);


I'm not quite sure what the driver does internally. Does it always reserve RAM for the "standard" depth buffer, and does adding my own as either a texture or renderbuffer have any cons?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I use a perspective z/w depth buffer (the native opengl depth buffer format) of 24-bits for my deferred renderer and am able to reconstruct position with no problem.

To be able to read the depth buffer you should: 1) use a depth format texture attached to the depth attachment of your FBO on your first pass 2) bind the depth format texture on your second pass. If you do "glTexParameteri(texture_target, GL_DEPTH_TEXTURE_MODE, GL_LUMINANCE);" you can (inside your shader) just sample from the depth texture like any other texture, and you'll get the full-precision floating point value back in (for example) the .r swizzle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks.

If I write depth info to a texture attached as a depth attachment in my geometry pass, how will I then be able to reuse that particular texture as depth buffer for z-fail testing afterwards? I know how to sample it, but would like the glEnable(GL_DEPTH_TEST) to work. :)

Thanks so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So far I am rendering to a depthbuffer attached as a GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE_ARB, and then for the lighting pass retrieving the information as non-linear depth, converting it and everything is fine. However, I would like to know how I can reuse the depth texture for standard glDepthTest afterwards, when I have unbound the framebuffer object in order to draw to the window framebuffer.

Any help is appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you add a depth attachment to the render target where you do your final lighting pass, you can copy the depth buffer from your gbuffer over to it with glBlitFramebuffer and then enable GL_DEPTH_TEST like you want. As far as I can tell though you can't use glBlitFramebuffer to blit depth to the back buffer, so I do it to an intermediate render target and then blit the color from that to the screen at the end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You wanted 1 depth buffer right? I'll assume so in the following.

Are you trying to write to a depth buffer manually and then get the hardware to do depth testing with it? That seems a little odd. You should simply let the hardware write its depth buffer like normal and then read from it only. If you only read from it you should prevent any performance hits you might take by doing it manually. I have a feeling I'm just misunderstand what you are saying though. Unfortunately I don't know any OpenGL specifics, that's why I haven't responded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the help - either I am not getting you or you are not getting my, so I'll try again.

In my first geometry pass I do the following:
I first render to a MRT with a GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE as GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT and a few buffers as GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENTn. I just let OpenGL store its own depth in the texture, as I do not write to gl_FragDepth. That is, OpenGL stores its own hyperbolic depth just as usual, but in a texture I have attached.

In the second pass I do the following:
Bind my color buffer textures for normals etc., AND bind my depth buffer texture so I can fetch data from it, as I need to reconstruct position.

However, before reconstructing the position I'd like to do a pass (or two) where I only write to the stencil buffer so I can use that to discard pixels, so I do not run my expensive light shader more than needed. For this I need to utilize the depth that is written to the texture to do depth testing against backfaces of the light volume (and perhaps also front faces), but I'm not sure how I can do that, as for the second pass I draw directly to the window's default framebuffer.

Did that make it more clear?

Thanks so far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I see. It seems like we are on the same page, and it seems like you've solved your depth problem. Now you just have deferred rendering stencil volume problems.

Stencil volumes work something like this:
1) Render front face of stencil volume, and increment stencil buffer.
2) Render back face of stencil volume, and decrement stencil buffer.
3) Render light only where stencil volume is 1, and set stencil buffer to 0.

Special case: when camera is inside the stencil volume. I don't remember what I did here at the moment, but for now you can simply render a full screen quad when you are inside.

I don't know the OpenGL specifics, but it might help you to start a new thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I forgot to say a couple things.

1) Turn off color writes for stencil volumes.
2) Turn off depth writes for stencil volumes and lights.
3) Turn on depth reads for stencil volumes.
4) Turn off depth reads for lights. (doesn't really matter here)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, that was what I was thinking. However, "solved" my depth problems is not exactly right, as I still have no clue as to how I am going to utilize the texture as the depth buffer for the second pass, as I am not using MRT for that, due to the fact that I render to the window. Depth testing that I have to use for the stencil generation works with the current depthbuffer unless I am mistaken. In this case as I do not use MRT that would be the window's own depth buffer, and not my custom texture that I just rendered to in order to use the info to reconstruct position.

I might be missing something quite simple, but I'm still not getting anywhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by dingojohn
For this I need to utilize the depth that is written to the texture to do depth testing against backfaces of the light volume (and perhaps also front faces), but I'm not sure how I can do that, as for the second pass I draw directly to the window's default framebuffer.


To do depth testing using a depth texture that you've previously written to, you need to attach it to your FBO. As far as I know, you can't attach depth textures to the special framebuffer FBO 0. Your options are:
1) draw your second pass to an FBO with your depth texture attached (which will make opengl use it for depth testing) and also a new color texture attached, then do a third full-screen pass to simply write the color texture to the framebuffer. This is what I do, and it's when I apply my tonemapping.
2) insert a full screen pass before your second pass. In this new pass, draw to the special framebuffer FBO 0 and you read from your depth texture and in your fragment shader set the fragment's depth to what you read from your depth texture.

I'd strongly recommend option 1 because then you have you scene's color in a texture, which is useful for all kinds of post-processing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the info. There's flying some rate++ towards you!

I'll try this now and hopefully everything will work out brilliantly.

Thanks a bunch!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
       
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
      {
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      };
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
       
       
    • By pr033r
      Hello,
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
      Thanks for any help...

    • By Andrija
      I am currently trying to implement shadow mapping into my project , but although i can render my depth map to the screen and it looks okay , when i sample it with shadowCoords there is no shadow.
      Here is my light space matrix calculation
      mat4x4 lightViewMatrix; vec3 sun_pos = {SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[0], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[1], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[2]}; mat4x4_look_at(lightViewMatrix,sun_pos,player->pos,up); mat4x4_mul(lightSpaceMatrix,lightProjMatrix,lightViewMatrix); I will tweak the values for the size and frustum of the shadow map, but for now i just want to draw shadows around the player position
      the_sun->direction is a normalized vector so i multiply it by a constant to get the position.
      player->pos is the camera position in world space
      the light projection matrix is calculated like this:
      mat4x4_ortho(lightProjMatrix,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,NEAR,SHADOW_FAR); Shadow vertex shader:
      uniform mat4 light_space_matrix; void main() { gl_Position = light_space_matrix * transfMatrix * vec4(position, 1.0f); } Shadow fragment shader:
      out float fragDepth; void main() { fragDepth = gl_FragCoord.z; } I am using deferred rendering so i have all my world positions in the g_positions buffer
      My shadow calculation in the deferred fragment shader:
      float get_shadow_fac(vec4 light_space_pos) { vec3 shadow_coords = light_space_pos.xyz / light_space_pos.w; shadow_coords = shadow_coords * 0.5 + 0.5; float closest_depth = texture(shadow_map, shadow_coords.xy).r; float current_depth = shadow_coords.z; float shadow_fac = 1.0; if(closest_depth < current_depth) shadow_fac = 0.5; return shadow_fac; } I call the function like this:
      get_shadow_fac(light_space_matrix * vec4(position,1.0)); Where position is the value i got from sampling the g_position buffer
      Here is my depth texture (i know it will produce low quality shadows but i just want to get it working for now):
      sorry because of the compression , the black smudges are trees ... https://i.stack.imgur.com/T43aK.jpg
      EDIT: Depth texture attachment:
      glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24,fbo->width,fbo->height,0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT,GL_FLOAT,NULL); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, GL_TEXTURE_2D, fbo->depthTexture, 0);
  • Popular Now