• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dingojohn

OpenGL
Depth Buffer and deferred rendering

13 posts in this topic

Hi,

I'm currently working on a deferred renderer and now trying to optimize the lighting calculation. The way I have done it so far is the a color attachment to store depth value linearly, which I then use to reconstruct position. Then, I figured that I need to do depth testing for more efficient lighting calculation - or rather not to do the calculations. However, early z does only work with the default depth buffer as far as I understand, and thus I have to duplicate depth information, stored in two different ways.

How do you normally solve this? Use the default depth buffer and letting opengl write to that itself (possibly flipping far and near for more precision), or are you simply saving the info in a dedicated color attachment? If you save it in a depth attachment, do you do it as a texture or as a renderbuffer? Can you do depth testing on a MRT with an attached texture as depth attachment, and is there a performance penalty for this?

(The way I currently store depth is the negated view-space z value divided by zfar, and I figure I need to fetch it much differently if I get it as z/w after perspective transformation from the standard depth buffer)

Thanks in advance.

Tell me if I need to elaborate anything.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If I understand you correctly you want the precision of linear depth and are worried about using two depth buffers. You have no choice. You simply have to choose between using the hyperbolic depth alone, or using both the hyperbolic depth and linear depth. Do you need the extra precision? If so, use two textures. If you don't then just reconstruct your position from the hyperbolic depth. I'm assuming you are using OpenGL which should allow you access to reading the depth buffer. DirectX 9 and below do not allow you to do this. You can find more information from the articles below.

You can find more information about the depth buffere and precision here:
http://mynameismjp.wordpress.com/2010/03/22/attack-of-the-depth-buffer/

You can find more information about reconstructing position from depth here:
http://mynameismjp.wordpress.com/2009/03/10/reconstructing-position-from-depth/
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks - hyperbolic depth might have been the keyword I was looking for when describing the situation.

I have read those articles, but thanks for the link anyway. If I deciphered your message correctly, then you recommend that I just use the hyperbolic depth buffer, and then reconstruct the position from that, given it provides me with enough precision.

Then, for the second part. Yes, I am using OpenGL. For reading back from the depth buffer, can you read the depthbuffer directly or do I need to attach a texture to a depth attachment, ie:

glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, depth);
glTexParameterf(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR);
glTexParameterf(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR);
glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, width, height, 0, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, NULL);
glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, GL_TEXTURE_2D, depth, 0);



Or is it possible to read from the "default" depth buffer where I do not add a depth attachment? (glReadPixels is slow, so I guess another way ;) )

What if I use a renderbuffer as a depth attachment, i.e.:

glGenRenderbuffers(1, &fbo.depth);
glBindRenderbuffer(GL_RENDERBUFFER, fbo.depth);
glRenderbufferStorage(GL_RENDERBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24, fbo.width, fbo.height);
glFramebufferRenderbuffer(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, GL_RENDERBUFFER, fbo.depth);


I'm not quite sure what the driver does internally. Does it always reserve RAM for the "standard" depth buffer, and does adding my own as either a texture or renderbuffer have any cons?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I use a perspective z/w depth buffer (the native opengl depth buffer format) of 24-bits for my deferred renderer and am able to reconstruct position with no problem.

To be able to read the depth buffer you should: 1) use a depth format texture attached to the depth attachment of your FBO on your first pass 2) bind the depth format texture on your second pass. If you do "glTexParameteri(texture_target, GL_DEPTH_TEXTURE_MODE, GL_LUMINANCE);" you can (inside your shader) just sample from the depth texture like any other texture, and you'll get the full-precision floating point value back in (for example) the .r swizzle.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks.

If I write depth info to a texture attached as a depth attachment in my geometry pass, how will I then be able to reuse that particular texture as depth buffer for z-fail testing afterwards? I know how to sample it, but would like the glEnable(GL_DEPTH_TEST) to work. :)

Thanks so far.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So far I am rendering to a depthbuffer attached as a GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE_ARB, and then for the lighting pass retrieving the information as non-linear depth, converting it and everything is fine. However, I would like to know how I can reuse the depth texture for standard glDepthTest afterwards, when I have unbound the framebuffer object in order to draw to the window framebuffer.

Any help is appreciated.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you add a depth attachment to the render target where you do your final lighting pass, you can copy the depth buffer from your gbuffer over to it with glBlitFramebuffer and then enable GL_DEPTH_TEST like you want. As far as I can tell though you can't use glBlitFramebuffer to blit depth to the back buffer, so I do it to an intermediate render target and then blit the color from that to the screen at the end.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You wanted 1 depth buffer right? I'll assume so in the following.

Are you trying to write to a depth buffer manually and then get the hardware to do depth testing with it? That seems a little odd. You should simply let the hardware write its depth buffer like normal and then read from it only. If you only read from it you should prevent any performance hits you might take by doing it manually. I have a feeling I'm just misunderstand what you are saying though. Unfortunately I don't know any OpenGL specifics, that's why I haven't responded.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the help - either I am not getting you or you are not getting my, so I'll try again.

In my first geometry pass I do the following:
I first render to a MRT with a GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE as GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT and a few buffers as GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENTn. I just let OpenGL store its own depth in the texture, as I do not write to gl_FragDepth. That is, OpenGL stores its own hyperbolic depth just as usual, but in a texture I have attached.

In the second pass I do the following:
Bind my color buffer textures for normals etc., AND bind my depth buffer texture so I can fetch data from it, as I need to reconstruct position.

However, before reconstructing the position I'd like to do a pass (or two) where I only write to the stencil buffer so I can use that to discard pixels, so I do not run my expensive light shader more than needed. For this I need to utilize the depth that is written to the texture to do depth testing against backfaces of the light volume (and perhaps also front faces), but I'm not sure how I can do that, as for the second pass I draw directly to the window's default framebuffer.

Did that make it more clear?

Thanks so far.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I see. It seems like we are on the same page, and it seems like you've solved your depth problem. Now you just have deferred rendering stencil volume problems.

Stencil volumes work something like this:
1) Render front face of stencil volume, and increment stencil buffer.
2) Render back face of stencil volume, and decrement stencil buffer.
3) Render light only where stencil volume is 1, and set stencil buffer to 0.

Special case: when camera is inside the stencil volume. I don't remember what I did here at the moment, but for now you can simply render a full screen quad when you are inside.

I don't know the OpenGL specifics, but it might help you to start a new thread.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I forgot to say a couple things.

1) Turn off color writes for stencil volumes.
2) Turn off depth writes for stencil volumes and lights.
3) Turn on depth reads for stencil volumes.
4) Turn off depth reads for lights. (doesn't really matter here)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah, that was what I was thinking. However, "solved" my depth problems is not exactly right, as I still have no clue as to how I am going to utilize the texture as the depth buffer for the second pass, as I am not using MRT for that, due to the fact that I render to the window. Depth testing that I have to use for the stencil generation works with the current depthbuffer unless I am mistaken. In this case as I do not use MRT that would be the window's own depth buffer, and not my custom texture that I just rendered to in order to use the info to reconstruct position.

I might be missing something quite simple, but I'm still not getting anywhere.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote:
Original post by dingojohn
For this I need to utilize the depth that is written to the texture to do depth testing against backfaces of the light volume (and perhaps also front faces), but I'm not sure how I can do that, as for the second pass I draw directly to the window's default framebuffer.


To do depth testing using a depth texture that you've previously written to, you need to attach it to your FBO. As far as I know, you can't attach depth textures to the special framebuffer FBO 0. Your options are:
1) draw your second pass to an FBO with your depth texture attached (which will make opengl use it for depth testing) and also a new color texture attached, then do a third full-screen pass to simply write the color texture to the framebuffer. This is what I do, and it's when I apply my tonemapping.
2) insert a full screen pass before your second pass. In this new pass, draw to the special framebuffer FBO 0 and you read from your depth texture and in your fragment shader set the fragment's depth to what you read from your depth texture.

I'd strongly recommend option 1 because then you have you scene's color in a texture, which is useful for all kinds of post-processing.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the info. There's flying some rate++ towards you!

I'll try this now and hopefully everything will work out brilliantly.

Thanks a bunch!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By Toastmastern
      So it's been a while since I took a break from my whole creating a planet in DX11. Last time around I got stuck on fixing a nice LOD.
      A week back or so I got help to find this:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD
      In general this is what I'm trying to recreate in DX11, he that made that planet LOD uses OpenGL but that is a minor issue and something I can solve. But I have a question regarding the code
      He gets the position using this row
      vec4d pos = b.var.vec4d["position"]; Which is then used further down when he sends the variable "center" into the drawing function:
      if (pos.len() < 1) pos.norm(); world::draw(vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z));  
      Inside the draw function this happens:
      draw_recursive(p3[0], p3[1], p3[2], center); Basically the 3 vertices of the triangle and the center of details that he sent as a parameter earlier: vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z)
      Now onto my real question, he does vec3d edge_center[3] = { (p1 + p2) / 2, (p2 + p3) / 2, (p3 + p1) / 2 }; to get the edge center of each edge, nothing weird there.
      But this is used later on with:
      vec3d d = center + edge_center[i]; edge_test[i] = d.len() > ratio_size; edge_test is then used to evaluate if there should be a triangle drawn or if it should be split up into 3 new triangles instead. Why is it working for him? shouldn't it be like center - edge_center or something like that? Why adding them togheter? I asume here that the center is the center of details for the LOD. the position of the camera if stood on the ground of the planet and not up int he air like it is now.

      Full code can be seen here:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD/blob/master/src.simple/Main.cpp
      If anyone would like to take a look and try to help me understand this code I would love this person. I'm running out of ideas on how to solve this in my own head, most likely twisted it one time to many up in my head
      Thanks in advance
      Toastmastern
       
       
    • By fllwr0491
      I googled around but are unable to find source code or details of implementation.
      What keywords should I search for this topic?
      Things I would like to know:
      A. How to ensure that partially covered pixels are rasterized?
         Apparently by expanding each triangle by 1 pixel or so, rasterization problem is almost solved.
         But it will result in an unindexable triangle list without tons of overlaps. Will it incur a large performance penalty?
      B. A-buffer like bitmask needs a read-modiry-write operation.
         How to ensure proper synchronizations in GLSL?
         GLSL seems to only allow int32 atomics on image.
      C. Is there some simple ways to estimate coverage on-the-fly?
         In case I am to draw 2D shapes onto an exisitng target:
         1. A multi-pass whatever-buffer seems overkill.
         2. Multisampling could cost a lot memory though all I need is better coverage.
            Besides, I have to blit twice, if draw target is not multisampled.
       
    • By mapra99
      Hello

      I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

      To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

      Thanks!
    • By Solid_Spy
      Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
      In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
      My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
      Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
    • By KarimIO
      EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
      Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
      Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
      static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));  
  • Popular Now