• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

ogracian

Vectors math programming...

2 posts in this topic

Hello I am building a simple vector math class to support basic vector operations, currently I only use a simple 3 floats to represent each vector''s component, but I have seen some implementations wich use unions, and structs for that, so I really appreciate if anyone explainme why use unions for that, and how implement a really optimized vector and matrices class? Thanks in advance!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There''s no single way to do what you want: it depends a lot on your choice of language, target platform/processor and tools/compiler. But there are some general points which may be of use.

First I would recoomend structs over unions: you don''t need unions to implement vectors and I think you''re more likely to trip up with them.

The advantages of structures [for vectors] are:
Simpler code: e.g. only one line to add two vectors, not three.
Easier to work with and debug: because it''s easier to tell what you are dealing with. Without structs you use the same types for vectors and scalars and it can be difficult to tell them apart.
Quicker code: this depends on how they are implemented, but often you can take advantage of processor features such as a vector/SIMD unit to accelerate vector operations.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
unions are quite useful in a vector implementation, especially if you''re using opengl which lets you specify your arguments as an array. As a quick example, here''s some code:

  
class Vector
{
public:
union
{
struct { float x, y, z; };
float v[3];
}

// blah, blah, blah....

};


This way, you can access the members of the vector with either:

  
Vector v = {0,0,1};
v.x = ...;
v.v[0] = ...;
glVertex3fv( v.v );
glVertex3f( v.x, v.y, v.z );
...


It''s really just a convenience thing though. There''s no real need for it. Also, you can define an operator like this:

  
float *Vector::operator float *()
{
return v;
}
;

That way, you can do stuff like this:

  
Vector v = {0,0,1};
glVertex3fv( v );


Pretty nifty, eh?


War Worlds - A 3D Real-Time Strategy game in development.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites