# OpenGL Understanding OpenGL ... again

## Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have been playing with opengl for a 2 years now. So far, I have been using the following files:

gl.h, glu.h, opengl32.lib, glu.lib

I read a bunch of articles on opengl.org and some other places but still don't fully understand how to get the lastest opengl. Hope someone can verify what I know (pertaining to windows for a start):

1. Windows never updates gl.h (but why would the others do so?)
2. New features in later versions of opengl are declared in glext.h i.e. this file keeps growing bigger.
3. glext.h contains all declarations of every single vendor's routine for every opengl specification.
4. opengl32.lib /opengl32.dll is the combined compiled binary of glext.h and gl.h
5. glew.h/glew.lib provides the functions to determine if a specific glext function is available on the current host/GPU.
6. glee is just a less popular glew?
7. when a routine in opengl32.dll is run, it loads and runs the graphics card's driver.dll which will always be the latest opengl.
8. hence, wglCreateContext() always creates the lastest context?

I am sure I didn't quite get that right.. please correct me. Thanks.

##### Share on other sites
I'm not up to date with latest GL so I want to share my opinions to have a double check with other users as well. Take this with some salt.
Quote:
 Original post by jakesee1. Windows never updates gl.h (but why would the others do so?)
You must think this question in reverse. A good OS will sooner or later get its gl.h updated as this is the right way to do things. Windows does not update it because it considers GL a legacy API to be deprecated. This is awful, but D3D is fairly good and they'll use all the ways they can to get you into it.
Quote:
 Original post by jakesee2. New features in later versions of opengl are declared in glext.h i.e. this file keeps growing bigger.
Correct. It will never get smaller as this would break something (which is likely already broken anyway). So much for 15+ year compatibility.
This is probably GL's biggest drawback. Old stuff never really goes away.
Quote:
 Original post by jakesee3. glext.h contains all declarations of every single vendor's routine for every opengl specification.
Not quite. Most of the time, the routine you're looking for "is there" but sometimes you might have to declare your own pointers.
Quote:
 Original post by jakesee4. opengl32.lib /opengl32.dll is the combined compiled binary of glext.h and gl.h
No. Not in general at least. Just update your glext.h and this statement becomes false. This is probably partially true out of the box. The question is a bit odd as header files don't have to produce code - I am unsure right now if GL's headers would produce code, I think not. The DLL is likely to contain fairly more stuff, at least to implement all the functions which are only "declared" as function pointers in glext.h.

I cannot tell about {5} and {6}.

Quote:
 Original post by jakesee7. when a routine in opengl32.dll is run, it loads and runs the graphics card's driver.dll which will always be the latest opengl.
More or less. Let's say yes by cutting some corners.
Quote:
 Original post by jakesee8. hence, wglCreateContext() always creates the lastest context?
Sort of. It will create the best context it can figure out, but its logic is defined in WGL's static lib so for example you cannot have antialiasing. This is why you need stuff as WGL_ARB_create_context, WGL_ARB_create_context_profile, WGL_ARB_create_context_robustness...

##### Share on other sites
To make it short: Yes. You'll have to rip your ass and study WTF is going on with the "last" version of OpenGL when you just installed XP/Vista/7.

But hey! Millions of Linux users would be willing to pay you big bucks for your effort. So it's worth it as a way of saving money for your retirement.

##### Share on other sites
@Krohm
Thanks for the explainations and confirmations.

There's still one issue, regarding whether Windows should update gl.h.

General impression I gather is that Microsoft is to blame for not updating gl.h. However, if the opengl standard is to provide additional functionality through "extensions" in the glext.h, why would there be a need to update gl.h? That's what I don't understand.

Any reason why they wouldn't name the gl according to version number?

// gl.h (provided by OS)#pragma comment("lib", "opengl32.lib") // lastest lib provided by OS...// gl2.h (download from opengl.org repository)#include <gl/gl.h>...// gl3.h (download from opengl.org repository)#include <gl/gl2.h>...// etc..

##### Share on other sites
The OGL headers are declarations, not definitions. Whether gl.h contains declarations for version 1.0 or 4.0 is immaterial as once new extensions are available you'll have to either make the additional declarations yourself or download a newer header. IIRC opengl32.dll (and the accompanying .lib) contain Microsoft's software implementation of OGL 1.1 (and most likely all the wiggle stuff). The actual hardware accelerated implementation will be provided by the gfx vendor's driver. This is why you need to query extensions to ensure that your vendor provides an implementation for whatever features you desire.

I think you're getting the header declarations that come bundled with MS's compilers (gl.h) with the actual implementation of whatever version of OGL is supported by the gfx vendor. Why don't MS update the headers? Well, for starters they back their own propriety gfx API but also because there's an existing repository for such things @ opengl.org, as well as various extension management libs (GLEE, GLEW, etc.)

##### Share on other sites
Quote:
 Original post by jakeseeHi,I have been playing with opengl for a 2 years now. So far, I have been using the following files:gl.h, glu.h, opengl32.lib, glu.libI read a bunch of articles on opengl.org and some other places but still don't fully understand how to get the lastest opengl. Hope someone can verify what I know (pertaining to windows for a start):1. Windows never updates gl.h (but why would the others do so?)2. New features in later versions of opengl are declared in glext.h i.e. this file keeps growing bigger.3. glext.h contains all declarations of every single vendor's routine for every opengl specification.4. opengl32.lib /opengl32.dll is the combined compiled binary of glext.h and gl.h5. glew.h/glew.lib provides the functions to determine if a specific glext function is available on the current host/GPU.6. glee is just a less popular glew?7. when a routine in opengl32.dll is run, it loads and runs the graphics card's driver.dll which will always be the latest opengl.8. hence, wglCreateContext() always creates the lastest context?I am sure I didn't quite get that right.. please correct me. Thanks.

All that is explained in the Wiki at www.opengl.org/wiki
but I'll make clarifications.

1. yes, that's correct, but it doesn't matter. The ARB gives us glext.h and these days they give us gl3.h

3. glext.h also contains new core GL functions. These are not extensions.

4. no. they have nothing to do with glext.h
opengl32.dll comes with Windows and is almost never changed. I believe it offers GL 1.4 with Vista and 7 but this doesn't matter. It doesn't matter because it is not a true device driver. The true device driver would be ati...dll or nvogl....dll or intelGFX.....dll

5. yes
6. Perhaps. I use glew because I prefer to call glewInit(). I don't like GLEE's automatic shit.

7. Yup, you get GL 2.1
WGL_ARB_create_context is for making GL 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, etc.

8. For simplicity, let's say yes

## Create an account

Register a new account

• ### Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
628388
• Total Posts
2982403
• ### Similar Content

• Hi all,

I'm starting OpenGL using a tut on the Web. But at this point I would like to know the primitives needed for creating a window using OpenGL. So on Windows and using MS VS 2017, what is the simplest code required to render a window with the title of "First Rectangle", please?

• Hi, New here.
I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc....
I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn?
How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want?
Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn.
So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started.
Thanks,
Dejay Hextrix
• By mellinoe
Hi all,
First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
• By aejt
I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
I have these classes:
For GPU resources:
Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).
And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
Factory classes for resources:
For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
Factory classes for assets:
Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).

Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
Thanks!
• By nedondev
I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
Thanks.

• 10
• 9
• 16
• 24
• 11