Sign in to follow this  
viertara

OpenGL modern rendering engines: some questions

Recommended Posts

viertara    100
Hi all, recently I started learning OpenGL and graphics programming in general. So while reading some books and articles I gained some perspective into what happens in a modern rendering engine, but I'm not sure if all my assumptions are correct.

1. We should sort the objects we want to render by material (to minimize the number of times we change a material, put them in one giant array and send it to the GPU).

2. We should render vertices back to front and the sorting is done in application stage. What do modern rendering engines use for that purpose? Is it still BSP trees? Or can we just use the z prepass? Or both?

3. Given 1. and 2. are true, it can be problematic to fullfill both of them (2 different sorting orders)

Hope someone can clarify those for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dietepiet    157
Back to front rendering is only necessary for translucent materials.
For all solid materials, you sort on material and render all visible objects in batches.

Writing all sorted vertices in one big array on the CPU and sending this to the GPU is usually not the best way to go. Usually, the geometry of static and almost static objects are stored on the GPU in vertex and index buffers. You sort all visible objects according to material (or depth for translucent objects) and render the objects in this order, one after the other.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dpadam450    2357
Sorting back to front is ONLY useful for transparency, and even then you can't really do it per-triangle. You store a full 20K vertices model on the graphics card and you tell it to draw. If it gets rotated, the triangles will still be drawn in the same order. So you should draw those back to front per-object.

The best thing you can do is draw front to back for non-transparent objects. Image you have objects A,B,C (a is closest to you and c is furthest). If you draw back to front, you draw C (which takes up 200 pixels on your screen), you draw B, which over-writes those 200 pixels, and then A is really close and overwrites all the pixels drawn by b,c. You drew 200 pixels on the screen 3 times (effectively drawing 600 pixels). You want to draw A first, and then due to depth testing B,C will never actually draw any pixels. This is really useful when doing shaders that do tons of per-pixel operations.

Any calls to the gpu slow your program down. If you want to use a texture, it swaps the old one out and puts the new one in to be used. The order should be:

Draw by Model
Draw by Texture

You won't need to worry much about any of this though. Just start hacking away and getting stuff to work. Optimization is only needed when you come to need it which will most likely be a while.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By povilaslt2
      Hello. I'm Programmer who is in search of 2D game project who preferably uses OpenGL and C++. You can see my projects in GitHub. Project genre doesn't matter (except MMO's :D).
    • By ZeldaFan555
      Hello, My name is Matt. I am a programmer. I mostly use Java, but can use C++ and various other languages. I'm looking for someone to partner up with for random projects, preferably using OpenGL, though I'd be open to just about anything. If you're interested you can contact me on Skype or on here, thank you!
      Skype: Mangodoor408
    • By tyhender
      Hello, my name is Mark. I'm hobby programmer. 
      So recently,I thought that it's good idea to find people to create a full 3D engine. I'm looking for people experienced in scripting 3D shaders and implementing physics into engine(game)(we are going to use the React physics engine). 
      And,ye,no money =D I'm just looking for hobbyists that will be proud of their work. If engine(or game) will have financial succes,well,then maybe =D
      Sorry for late replies.
      I mostly give more information when people PM me,but this post is REALLY short,even for me =D
      So here's few more points:
      Engine will use openGL and SDL for graphics. It will use React3D physics library for physics simulation. Engine(most probably,atleast for the first part) won't have graphical fron-end,it will be a framework . I think final engine should be enough to set up an FPS in a couple of minutes. A bit about my self:
      I've been programming for 7 years total. I learned very slowly it as "secondary interesting thing" for like 3 years, but then began to script more seriously.  My primary language is C++,which we are going to use for the engine. Yes,I did 3D graphics with physics simulation before. No, my portfolio isn't very impressive. I'm working on that No,I wasn't employed officially. If anybody need to know more PM me. 
       
    • By Zaphyk
      I am developing my engine using the OpenGL 3.3 compatibility profile. It runs as expected on my NVIDIA card and on my Intel Card however when I tried it on an AMD setup it ran 3 times worse than on the other setups. Could this be a AMD driver thing or is this probably a problem with my OGL code? Could a different code standard create such bad performance?
    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      Question:
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
       
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
  • Popular Now