• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

What Does Everyone Think About The New Site Layout?

This topic is 2477 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Advertisement

It appears that there's something similar on the Community section, as "Recent Forum Posts". But it's pretty hidden away, and is a bit short with only the last 5 posts shown...

I also miss the old-style Active Topics page, which is where I spend most of my time.

Well there is this Active content page now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On my iPad, when I tap in the Fast Reply field, Safari minimizes itself. At first I thought it crashed. The regular reply field just ignored me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Polls? Really?


what's wrong with them? If anything it's just an added feature that may be useful.

The switch to IPboard (that's what I heard someone say it was, but I am not sure) I think is a good switch just because there are so many preexisting things that could be useful in the long run. If I'm not mistaken it supports per user templates for people that might like a darker background, the only problem being finding one or creating one.

I haven't noticed the thinness because my home PC size is a laptop, which is probably the width it would be at anyway, but having it scale would be nice. There really does seem to be a lot of wasted useless space, which actually was one of the huge selling points of the old forum. If you look at the old forums, there's just so much more useful information on a screen than on the new one. It's actually pretty shocking.

A lot of the complaints so far are just growing pains. Once people relearn the site I think a lot of them will go away.

I think the most important complaints to address are the ones that aren't feature related; things like darker backgrounds, width, and the amount of wasted space make the ok features seem bad by association.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm against using a floating width layout. When you introduce variability into the template, you are going to create different user experiences for different people, and it will invariably lead to problems with some pages at some widths.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what's wrong with them? If anything it's just an added feature that may be useful.


As for spacing and color schemes, neither bothers me, because it's very similar to the previous .NET and I'm fortunate enough to have a big enough monitor that the spacing is little issue, but I can understand where others are coming from, especially when I switch to my laptop.

As for poll and what's wrong with them:

A site should be tailored to it's definition, and it's content should reflect this. GameDev.net I would assume would be a site about game development. If we're talking forums here, it should be questions and answers on how to approach certain aspects, be it programming, art, etc. I guess it comes down to my opinion, that outside of very specialized instances, polls are really nothing more than a Lounge addition. And while the Lounge is a nice place to post off topic threads, I guess I don't really see it as being the main reason for visiting this site. (Yes, I haven't posted outside the Lounge in awhile, but mainly what I want to ask has been asked, and I've found it while searching the forums, or the questions I feel I'm qualified to answer have already been answered by another person. Just because my posting stays in the Lounge does not necessarily equate to the Lounge being my main area of focus on this site.)

The polls are similar to a lot of other additions. They look great and give the site a more recent look and appeal, but at the same time, they detract from the actual game development aspects of the site imho. While I have my opinions on such, it wouldn't feel right to rate the site's effectiveness. Maybe it's just because I was too comfortable with the previous GameDev, or am just getting old an afraid of new things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is great. I really like that you guys moved to PHP. Now I can actually contribute code when you guys need me to ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is great. I really like that you guys moved to PHP. Now I can actually contribute code when you guys need me to ;)


Yeah. I think we know better than to do that :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm against using a floating width layout. When you introduce variability into the template, you are going to create different user experiences for different people, and it will invariably lead to problems with some pages at some widths.

I think for the rest of the site this is the case, but forums lend themselves very well to floating widths because a lot of the action on a forum page is just scrolling up and down to read all the posts.


As for spacing and color schemes, neither bothers me, because it's very similar to the previous .NET and I'm fortunate enough to have a big enough monitor that the spacing is little issue, but I can understand where others are coming from, especially when I switch to my laptop.

One important color difference in the old one is that the background is light gray, not white. Even that small change makes a huge difference on the harshness.

On polls: I guess I'm just of the opinion that since it's there it won't hurt anything. If it were a decision to put them in or work on something more pressing, then I might think less of the feature. Since it's already there, it may as well stay there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What's the difference between New content and Active content? I want the old "Active topics" page.

Front page should have the recent posts box near the top.
The box should be compact to show a lot of posts in a small space.

Actually, everything about the old site seemed to be about efficiently getting across a lot of information in a compact form... In comparison here, everything is supersized and bloated.


Also, IOTD should feature prominently on the front page!! I have discovered so many great ideas over the years by reading GD.net's IOTD religiously.

I guess this is the new IOTD area? Will the content from the old site be migrated to the new IOTD?


"Thumbs up" per post is ok, but there needs to be a "thumbs down" as well. "Thumbs down" can be disconnected from the "reputation" system, but a visual identifier to show bad information (or unpopular opinions) is a decent community self-policing tool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It pretty much functions the same as a quote, but now you don't have to have multiple windows open, if you need to quote multiple posts, or have to manually enter things.

That being said, there still do seem to be a few layout issues with IE9. I'm having a very difficult time going back to the lounge because my nametag in the upper left of the screen overlaps most of the links that I use to use, so I have to hit the community button now (which seems to also have it's own issues).

That's what I thought it was supposed to do... only it doesn't do it in (my copy of) IE9.
Oh well, time to re-install Chrome.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think for the rest of the site this is the case, but forums lend themselves very well to floating widths because a lot of the action on a forum page is just scrolling up and down to read all the posts.[/quote]
True, but there isn't a strict distinction between forum and other pages on this site. Should blogs be floating width as well? Should some pages be fixed width, and other floating? That's not good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I could vote this up more than once, I damn well would.


I think a "dark" theme should be added to GDNet+. That's far more monetizable than extra mailbox storage, I'm sure.


I don't think people should pay for basic functionality that works on every other forum in the world--stuff like avatars and themes.

I think it would be a great idea to focus some effort on making the job board worthwhile, for example, or creating a marketplace for assets. Even just improving the articles posted would boost ad revenue. There are lots of options.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like it alot.

Can someone give us a breakdown of the ratings categories? I have 756 that is 'Excellent' and stupid_programmer has 75 and is also 'Excellent', for example. Maybe it's a bug?


I couldn't find my rating. I've zero reputation. That's old news tough...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One important color difference in the old one is that the background is light gray, not white. Even that small change makes a huge difference on the harshness.


I guess this is attributed to your monitor. The background for me is a light gray. I can understand cheaper monitors not being able to distinguish though. (Unless you were talking about outside the actual frame, which is white, but that doesn't really bother me too much as there's nothing there, and I shrink my window to avoid that.


That's what I thought it was supposed to do... only it doesn't do it in (my copy of) IE9.
Oh well, time to re-install Chrome.


As way2lazy2care posted on page 3, you need to hit multiquote, and then hit the Add Reply button at the bottom of the page and not just the Reply button. Also, I've found that you need to run GameDev in compatibility mode with IE9. As I've previously posted, there are way too many formatting errors with the site if you don't run it and it really becomes difficult to use the forums.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah. I think we know better than to do that :D


You would think so, but I was actually helping superpig with a flickr module last GDC. It would have been easy, but I couldn't get the FSO object working ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't find my rating. I've zero reputation. That's old news tough...



Click on My Profile. On the left side of the screen, under Display name history, and above your Group and Active Posts will be a green bar. Inside this bar will be Reputation: XYZ, XYZ being your reputation minus 1000 when compared to the old site.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Click on My Profile. On the left side of the screen, under Display name history, and above your Group and Active Posts will be a green bar. Inside this bar will be Reputation: XYZ, XYZ being your reputation minus 1000 when compared to the old site.


If I'm not wrong I used to have 1240.. Thanks god now I got 1.

I has 1 reputation!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[font="Arial"]I'm liking the new site and forums. Sure wouldn't mind having a dark theme, though.

This is a new account btw; thought it was time to finally change. I used to be LockePick (it was a looooooong time ago I made that account...)[/font]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm curious why reputation doesn't show up on your posts? It certainly seems like a relevant piece of information when trying to judge the quality of answer you receive from someone, more so than number of posts or joined date.

Seems like there would plenty of white space to fit this little piece of information, I guess it was deliberately decided to not show it? Seems like a strange choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, your old profile says 1247.
Strange... my new reputation is exactly my old rating minus 1000.


It looks like all of the moderators and staff members also reverted to zero. I claim that because owl changed his name from "xaxa" to "owl" on the old forums at some point that the code used to migrate the ratings lost track of his.


[font="Arial"]I'm liking the new site and forums. Sure wouldn't mind having a dark theme, though.

This is a new account btw; thought it was time to finally change. I used to be LockePick (it was a looooooong time ago I made that account...)[/font]


Speaking of which, it looks as though you can change your posting name on the forums pretty easily. You may want to try this on your old account as long as you want to keep all of your old posts and stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As for poll and what's wrong with them:

A site should be tailored to it's definition, and it's content should reflect this. GameDev.net I would assume would be a site about game development. If we're talking forums here, it should be questions and answers on how to approach certain aspects, be it programming, art, etc. I guess it comes down to my opinion, that outside of very specialized instances, polls are really nothing more than a Lounge addition. And while the Lounge is a nice place to post off topic threads, I guess I don't really see it as being the main reason for visiting this site. (Yes, I haven't posted outside the Lounge in awhile, but mainly what I want to ask has been asked, and I've found it while searching the forums, or the questions I feel I'm qualified to answer have already been answered by another person. Just because my posting stays in the Lounge does not necessarily equate to the Lounge being my main area of focus on this site.)

The polls are similar to a lot of other additions. They look great and give the site a more recent look and appeal, but at the same time, they detract from the actual game development aspects of the site imho. While I have my opinions on such, it wouldn't feel right to rate the site's effectiveness. Maybe it's just because I was too comfortable with the previous GameDev, or am just getting old an afraid of new things.


How exactly do polls detract from topics about game development? There are several cases where polls are a valuable tool for easily comparing data, especially in the Game Design Forum. It isn't like all the tech forums are doing to suddenly become thread after thread of "Trumped up Teen Idol A vs Fake Teen Idol B" or something like that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement