Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
krausest

OpenGL [Slimdx] D3D Performance Issue In Comparison With Opengl

This topic is 2716 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I'm currently porting some OpenGL (LWJGL), Java based demo to SlimDX (.NET 4.0, DirectX 11), but I'm running into massive performance problems. The demo uses cascaded shadow maps. I don't think there should be a large difference in performance between DirectX11 and OpenGL.
I tried a few things to find the reason for DirectX performing slower:
The demo loop takes equally long (commenting DrawIndexed out)
The main impact can already be seen when I render the shadow geometry to the screen (instead of a texture array which would be used in the CSM scenario). Just rendering all the model's triangle with a solid color takes 7.1 msecs for DirectX and 4.3 for OpenGL, so it's a way too big difference to ignore.
Currently I'm stuck and have no idea where the penalty could come from.
Here's the shader (Couldn't be any simpler...):


float4x4 worldViewProj;

float4 VS( float4 pos : POSITION ) : SV_POSITION {
float4 output;

output = mul(pos, worldViewProj);
return output;
}

float4 PS( ) : SV_Target {
return float4(1.0, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0);
}

technique10 Render {
pass P0 {
SetGeometryShader( 0 );
SetVertexShader( CompileShader( vs_5_0, VS() ) );
SetPixelShader( CompileShader( ps_5_0, PS() ) );
}
}


And here's the code using the shader:


public void Load(Device device)
{
var bytecode = ShaderBytecode.CompileFromFile("ZOnly.fx", "fx_5_0", ShaderFlags.WarningsAreErrors, EffectFlags.None);
effect = new Effect(device, bytecode);
technique = effect.GetTechniqueByIndex(0);
pass = technique.GetPassByIndex(0);

ShaderSignature signature = pass.Description.Signature;
inputLayout = new InputLayout(device, signature, new[] {
new InputElement("POSITION", 0, SlimDX.DXGI.Format.R32G32B32_Float, 0, 0),
});

var solidParentOp = new BlendStateDescription();
solidParentOp.RenderTargets[0].BlendOperationAlpha = BlendOperation.Add;
solidParentOp.RenderTargets[0].BlendOperation = BlendOperation.Add;
solidParentOp.RenderTargets[0].DestinationBlend = BlendOption.Zero;
solidParentOp.RenderTargets[0].DestinationBlendAlpha = BlendOption.Zero;
solidParentOp.RenderTargets[0].SourceBlend = BlendOption.One;
solidParentOp.RenderTargets[0].SourceBlendAlpha = BlendOption.One;
solidParentOp.RenderTargets[0].RenderTargetWriteMask = ColorWriteMaskFlags.All;
solidParentOp.RenderTargets[0].BlendEnable = false;
solidParentOp.AlphaToCoverageEnable = false;
solidParentOp.IndependentBlendEnable = false;
solidBlendState = BlendState.FromDescription(device, solidParentOp);

var dssdSolid = new DepthStencilStateDescription
{
IsDepthEnabled = true,
IsStencilEnabled = false,
DepthWriteMask = DepthWriteMask.All,
DepthComparison = Comparison.Less
};
depthStencilState = DepthStencilState.FromDescription(device, dssdSolid);

var rsDesc = new RasterizerStateDescription {
FillMode = FillMode.Solid,
CullMode = CullMode.Back,
IsScissorEnabled = false,
IsFrontCounterclockwise = false,
DepthBias = 0,
SlopeScaledDepthBias = 0,
IsMultisampleEnabled = false,
IsDepthClipEnabled = false,
IsAntialiasedLineEnabled = false
};
rasterizerState = RasterizerState.FromDescription(device, rsDesc);

MVPVariable = effect.GetVariableByName("worldViewProj").AsMatrix();
}

public void Init(Device device)
{
device.ImmediateContext.OutputMerger.DepthStencilState = depthStencilState;
device.ImmediateContext.OutputMerger.BlendState = solidBlendState;
device.ImmediateContext.Rasterizer.State = rasterizerState;
device.ImmediateContext.InputAssembler.InputLayout = inputLayout;
device.ImmediateContext.InputAssembler.PrimitiveTopology = SlimDX.Direct3D11.PrimitiveTopology.TriangleList;
device.ImmediateContext.InputAssembler.SetVertexBuffers(0, new VertexBufferBinding(BasicVertexData.GlobalVertexBuffer, BasicVertexData.GlobalVertexStride, 0));
device.ImmediateContext.InputAssembler.SetIndexBuffer(BasicVertexData.GlobalIndexBuffer, SlimDX.DXGI.Format.R32_UInt, 0);
}

public void UpdateParams(Device device, MatricesInfo matricesInfo, Light light)
{
MVPVariable.AsMatrix().SetMatrix(matricesInfo.getMVP());
pass.Apply(device.ImmediateContext);
}

public void Render(Device device, BasicVertexData bvd)
{
if (bvd.Indices.Length > 0)
{
device.ImmediateContext.DrawIndexed(bvd.Indices.Length, bvd.StartIndex, 0);
}
}

Load is called only once during intialisation. Init is called once per frame, UpdateParams whenever the MVP-matrix changes and Render for each object.

Do you have any idea what I'm missing here? (I guess it's as simple as forgetting to disable alpha testing, preventing early-z rejection, disabling back face culling)

Thanks,
Stefan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement

The main impact can already be seen when I render the shadow geometry to the screen (instead of a texture array which would be used in the CSM scenario). Just rendering all the model's triangle with a solid color takes 7.1 msecs for DirectX and 4.3 for OpenGL, so it's a way too big difference to ignore.


Are we talking CPU or GPU performance here? How exactly are you measuring the time difference?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we talking CPU or GPU performance here? How exactly are you measuring the time difference?


GPU performance. As I said the performance is comparable when the rendering call itself (e.g. DrawIndexed) is commented out. The shader does in this case nothing more than render many red triangles directly on the screen.
The measurement happens from frame to frame in the render loop where the current time is stored to a member and an averaged difference is computed. (Ah yes - and VSync is not enabled).

EDIT: Just to make sure I just double checked my FPS and durations with the results of FRAPS and my measurement is fine.

Yours,
Stefan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well you can't accurately profile GPU or CPU performance just by measuring your frame time. That will just tell you your overall performance, which is basically a max of your CPU time and your GPU time. Ideally you want to use PIX or another GPU tool that will perform the necessary GPU timing so that you can better isolate your bottleneck. It's really easy to do in PIX...just create a new experiment targeting your executable with the "Statistics for each frame" option checked, and then let it run for a little while. Then when you're done, the timeline view up top will show a graph of CPU time and GPU time for each frame.

Either way 7.3ms (or even 4.3ms for that matter) sounds like a realllllly long time just for some depth-only rendering, unless you're doing this on a very weak GPU.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you can't accurately profile GPU or CPU performance just by measuring your frame time. That will just tell you your overall performance, which is basically a max of your CPU time and your GPU time. Ideally you want to use PIX or another GPU tool that will perform the necessary GPU timing so that you can better isolate your bottleneck. It's really easy to do in PIX...just create a new experiment targeting your executable with the "Statistics for each frame" option checked, and then let it run for a little while. Then when you're done, the timeline view up top will show a graph of CPU time and GPU time for each frame.

Either way 7.3ms (or even 4.3ms for that matter) sounds like a realllllly long time just for some depth-only rendering, unless you're doing this on a very weak GPU.


You're certainly right that the measured time is the overall performance, still commenting out the draw calls shows that the rendering causes the difference between DirectX and OpenGL (and since the rendering takes much more time I'd say it's not a CPU performance problem).

I'm rendering 1,673,088 triangles per frame, I don't think that this is acutally very bad for a laptop (if I'm not completely wrong that's about 400 MTris / sec with OpenGL)

Using PIX I didn't give me new information. I see that per frame there are 1104 DIP calls, no DPUP, DIPUP, Locks, 12 SetRenderState calls, 12 SetVertexShader calls, 12 SetPixelShader calls, 0 SetRenderTarget calls, 0 SetTextureStageState, 0 Misc FF state changes and the time spent in DIP calls is 281373.1.

Any ideas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Commenting out the Draw call isn't a good performance experiment, since Draw calls are a major source of API/Driver overhead on the CPU. In fact with such a high number of DIP calls, it's very likely that the driver overhead is what's slowing you down. Did you look at the graph in the timeline view in PIX to see what your CPU/GPU timings are for each frame? That was the important part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Commenting out the Draw call isn't a good performance experiment, since Draw calls are a major source of API/Driver overhead on the CPU. In fact with such a high number of DIP calls, it's very likely that the driver overhead is what's slowing you down. Did you look at the graph in the timeline view in PIX to see what your CPU/GPU timings are for each frame? That was the important part.


I've attached a screenshot from the timeline.
[attachment=976:pix_timeline.jpg]
What conclusions do you draw from that picture? Am I right with the interpretation, that the GPU has quite a lot of idle time that could be used for rendering?

Another thing I noticed is that the performance difference depends on the way the depth values are stored.
In the first case "depth texture" I'm rendering to a depth texture and have no color texture bound. The second case "color texture" I have a depth and color target and render the linear depth value to the color channel and use that color texture as a shader resource.
In the "depth texture" case the difference between OpenGL and DirectX is really large (128 FPS for OpenGL vs. 89 FPS for DirectX). OpenGL uses texture array with the format GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT32F and DirectX uses R32_Typeless for the texture2d, D32_Float for the DepthStencilView and R32_Float for the ShaderResourceView.
In the "color texture" case both are much closer (95 FPS in OpenGL vs. 89 in DirectX). OpenGL uses a GL_R32F color texture array and a single GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT32F depth rendertarget. DirectX11 a R32_Float texture array (same format for the RenderTarget and ShaderResourceView) and a single D32_Float texture for the depth buffer.

What can be seen is that OpenGL slows down quite a bit when I use a color texture for the depth value (somehow expected), whereas it has no impact in DirectX!?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The idle time indicates that your CPU is taking much longer than the GPU to finish a frame, and is idling while waiting for more CPU commands. In other words, you're heavily CPU-bound. I would suspect that the large number of Draw calls is what's slowing you down. You can try running a profiler to ensure that you're actually spending lots of time in DX functions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The idle time indicates that your CPU is taking much longer than the GPU to finish a frame, and is idling while waiting for more CPU commands. In other words, you're heavily CPU-bound. I would suspect that the large number of Draw calls is what's slowing you down. You can try running a profiler to ensure that you're actually spending lots of time in DX functions.


First off all: Thanks a lot for your patience, MJP!
I've modified the model such that it consists of a single mesh only. Since the scene consists of three of those models and I'm rendering 4 CSM-Layers + 1 Color Pass I'm now at 15 DIP calls.
Instead of 89 FPS I get now 90,9 FPS. The PIX timeline is attached. (For OpenGL the FPS go up from 128 to 136.)
The empty demo loop (only DIP calls commented out) takes 0,5 msecs.

All in all I'm just puzzled. The demo renders just as fast as before, but now the GPU is never idle. The GPU frames look very strange and appear to overlap in the timeline view (I've overlayed frame 148 and 150 in the screenshot):
[attachment=989:pix_timeline2.jpg]

The GPU duration in the event view looks more sensible (ranging from 9623084 to 12773134).
Now I'm lost. The FPS don't show much difference, such that reducing the DIP calls and reducing materials doesn't help. The CPU bound issue is gone but nothing is gained.
The demo loop allows for 2000 FPS, so I can't see that this would cause any blocking. Any ideas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Similar Content

    • By McGrane
      Hey
      My laptop recently decided to die, so Ive been transferring my project to my work laptop just to get it up to date, and commit it. I was banging my head against the wall all day, as my textures where not displaying in my program- I was getting no errors and no indication of why it was occurring so I have been just trying to figure it out- I know the image loading was working ok, as im using image data elsewhere, I was pretty confident that the code was fine also, as ive never had an issue with displaying textures before, so I thought it might be the drivers on this laptop, (my old one was just using the built in IntelHD, while this laptop has a NVIDIA graphics card) but all seems to be up to date.
      Below are my basic shaders:
      Vertex Shader
      #version 330 core layout(location = 0) in vec3 position; layout(location = 1) in vec3 color; layout(location = 2) in vec3 normal; layout(location = 3) in vec2 texCoord; uniform mat4 Projection; uniform mat4 Model; out vec3 Color; out vec3 Normal; out vec2 TexCoord; void main() { gl_Position = Projection * Model * vec4( position, 1.0 ); Color = color; Normal = normal; TexCoord = vec2( texCoord.x, texCoord.y); } Fragment Shader
      #version 330 core in vec3 Color; in vec3 Normal; in vec2 TexCoord; uniform sampler2D textureData; void main() { vec4 textureColor = texture( textureData, TexCoord ); vec4 finalColor = textureColor * vec4( Color, 1.0f); gl_FragColor = finalColor; } Calling Code
      glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textureID); glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderID, "textureData"), textureID); Now this is the part i dont understand, I worked through my program, until I got to the above 'Calling Code'. This just displays a black texture.. my original issue. Out of desperation, I just tried changing the name in glGetUniformLocation from "textureData" to "textureData_invalid" to see if my error checks would through up something, but in actual fact, it is now displaying the texture as expected. Can anyone fathom a guess as too why this is occurring.. im assuming the random text is just picking up the correct location by c++ witchcraft, but why is the original one not getting picked up correctly and/or not working as expected
      I realize more code is probably needed to see how it all hangs together.. but it seems to come down to this as the issue
    • By QQemka
      Hello. So far i got decently looking 3d scene. I also managed to render a truetype font, on my way to implementing gui (windows, buttons and textboxes). There are several issues i am facing, would love to hear your feedback.
      1) I render text using atlas with VBO containing x/y/u/v of every digit in the atlas (calculated basing on x/y/z/width/height/xoffset/yoffset/xadvance data in binary .fnt format file, screenshot 1). I generated a Comic Sans MS with 32 size and times new roman with size 12 (screenshot 2 and 3). The first issue is the font looks horrible when rescaling. I guess it is because i am using fixed -1 to 1 screen space coords. This is where ortho matrix should be used, right?
      2) Rendering GUI. Situation is similar to above. I guess the widgets should NOT scale when scaling window, am i right? So what am i looking for is saying "this should be always in the middle, 200x200 size no matter the display window xy", and "this should stick to the bottom left corner". Is ortho matrix the cure for all such problems?
      3) The game is 3D but i have to go 2D to render static gui elements over the scene - and i want to do it properly! At the moment i am using matrix 3x3 for 2d transformations and vec3 for all kinds of coordinates. In shaders tho i technically still IS 3D. I have to set all 4 x y z w of the gl_Position while it would be much much more conventient to... just do the maths in 2d space. Can i achieve it somehow?
      4) Text again. I am kind of confused what is the reason of artifacts in Times New Roman font displaying (screenshot 1). I render from left to right, letter after letter. You can clearly see that letters on the right (so the ones rendered after ones on the left are covered by the previous one). I was toying around with blending options but no luck. I do not support kerning at the moment but that's definitely not the cause of error. The display of the small font looks dirty aliased too. I am knd of confused how to interpret the integer data and how should be scaled/adapted to the screen view. Is it just store the data as constant size and again - use ortho matrix?
      Thanks in advance for all your ideas and suggestions!
      https://i.imgur.com/4rd1VC3.png
      https://i.imgur.com/uHrSXfe.png
      https://i.imgur.com/xRTffPn.png
    • By plz717
      Hello, everyone! I hope my problem isn't too 'beginnerish'. I'm doing research on motion synthesis now, trying to implement the Deep Mimic paper (DeepMimic) by BINPENG XUE, in this paper, I need to first retarget character A's motion to another character B to make the reference motion clips for character B, since we don't have character B‘s reference motion. The most important thing is that in the paper, the author copied character A's joint's rotation with respective to joint's local coordinate system (not the parent) to character B. In my personal understanding, the joint's rotation with respective to joint's local coordinate system is something like that in the attached photo, where for the Elbow joint, i need to get the Elbow's rotation in the elbow's local coordinate system (i'm very grateful for you to share your ideas if i have misunderstanding about it 🙂)
      I have searched many materials on the internet about how to extract the local joint's information from FBX, the most relative one i found is the pivot rotation( and geometric transformation, object offset transformation). I'm a beginner in computer graphics, and i'm confused about whether the pivot rotation( or geometric transformation, object offset transformation) is exactly the joint's local rotation i'm seeking? I hope someone that have any ideas can help me, I'd be very grateful for any pointers in the right direction. Thanks in advance! 

    • By nOoNEE
      hello guys , i have some questions  what does glLinkProgram  and  glBindAttribLocation do?  i searched but there wasnt any good resource 
    • By owenjr
      Hi, I'm a Multimedia Engineering student. I am about to finish my dergree and I'm already thinking about what topic to cover in my final college project.
      I'm interested in the procedural animation with c++ and OpenGL of creatures, something like a spider for example. Can someone tell me what are the issues I should investigate to carry it out? I understand that it has some dependence on artificial intelligence but I do not know to what extent. Can someone help me to find information about it? Thank you very much.
       
      Examples: 
      - Procedural multi-legged walking animation
      - Procedural Locomotion of Multi-Legged Characters in Dynamic Environments
    • By Lewa
      So, i'm still on my quest to unterstanding the intricacies of HDR and implementing this into my engine. Currently i'm at the step to implementing tonemapping. I stumbled upon this blogposts:
      http://filmicworlds.com/blog/filmic-tonemapping-operators/
      http://frictionalgames.blogspot.com/2012/09/tech-feature-hdr-lightning.html
      and tried to implement some of those mentioned tonemapping methods into my postprocessing shader.
      The issue is that none of them creates the same results as shown in the blogpost which definitely has to do with the initial range in which the values are stored in the HDR buffer. For simplicity sake i store the values between 0 and 1 in the HDR buffer (ambient light is 0.3, directional light is 0.7)
      This is the tonemapping code:
      vec3 Uncharted2Tonemap(vec3 x) { float A = 0.15; float B = 0.50; float C = 0.10; float D = 0.20; float E = 0.02; float F = 0.30; return ((x*(A*x+C*B)+D*E)/(x*(A*x+B)+D*F))-E/F; } This is without the uncharted tonemapping:
      This is with the uncharted tonemapping:
      Which makes the image a lot darker.
      The shader code looks like this:
      void main() { vec3 color = texture2D(texture_diffuse, vTexcoord).rgb; color = Uncharted2Tonemap(color); //gamma correction (use only if not done in tonemapping code) color = gammaCorrection(color); outputF = vec4(color,1.0f); } Now, from my understanding is that tonemapping should bring the range down from HDR to 0-1.
      But the output of the tonemapping function heavily depends on the initial range of the values in the HDR buffer. (You can't expect to set the sun intensity the first time to 10 and the second time to 1000 and excpect the same result if you feed that into the tonemapper.) So i suppose that this also depends on the exposure which i have to implement?
      To check this i plotted the tonemapping curve:
      You can see that the curve goes only up to around to a value of 0.21 (while being fed a value of 1) and then basically flattens out. (which would explain why the image got darker.)
       
      My guestion is: In what range should the values in the HDR buffer be which then get tonemapped? Do i have to bring them down to a range of 0-1 by multiplying with the exposure?
      For example, if i increase the values of the light by 10 (directional light would be 7 and ambient light 3) then i would need to divide HDR values by 10 in order to get a value range of 0-1 which then could be fed into the tonemapping curve. Is that correct?
    • By nOoNEE
      i am reading this book : link
      in the OpenGL Rendering Pipeline section there is a picture like this: link
      but the question is this i dont really understand why it is necessary to turn pixel data in to fragment and then fragment into pixel could please give me a source or a clear Explanation that why it is necessary ? thank you so mu
       
       
    • By Inbar_xz
      I'm using the OPENGL with eclipse+JOGL.
      My goal is to create movement of the camera and the player.
      I create main class, which create some box in 3D and hold 
      an object of PlayerAxis.
      I create PlayerAxis class which hold the axis of the player.
      If we want to move the camera, then in the main class I call to 
      the func "cameraMove"(from PlayerAxis) and it update the player axis.
      That's work good.
      The problem start if I move the camera on 2 axis, 
      for example if I move with the camera right(that's on the y axis)
      and then down(on the x axis) -
      in some point the move front is not to the front anymore..
      In order to move to the front, I do
      player.playerMoving(0, 0, 1);
      And I learn that in order to keep the front move, 
      I need to convert (0, 0, 1) to the player axis, and then add this.
      I think I dont do the convert right.. 
      I will be glad for help!

      Here is part of my PlayerAxis class:
       
      //player coordinate float x[] = new float[3]; float y[] = new float[3]; float z[] = new float[3]; public PlayerAxis(float move_step, float angle_move) { x[0] = 1; y[1] = 1; z[2] = -1; step = move_step; angle = angle_move; setTransMatrix(); } public void cameraMoving(float angle_step, String axis) { float[] new_x = x; float[] new_y = y; float[] new_z = z; float alfa = angle_step * angle; switch(axis) { case "x": new_z = addVectors(multScalar(z, COS(alfa)), multScalar(y, SIN(alfa))); new_y = subVectors(multScalar(y, COS(alfa)), multScalar(z, SIN(alfa))); break; case "y": new_x = addVectors(multScalar(x, COS(alfa)), multScalar(z, SIN(alfa))); new_z = subVectors(multScalar(z, COS(alfa)), multScalar(x, SIN(alfa))); break; case "z": new_x = addVectors(multScalar(x, COS(alfa)), multScalar(y, SIN(alfa))); new_y = subVectors(multScalar(y, COS(alfa)), multScalar(x, SIN(alfa))); } x = new_x; y = new_y; z = new_z; normalization(); } public void playerMoving(float x_move, float y_move, float z_move) { float[] move = new float[3]; move[0] = x_move; move[1] = y_move; move[2] = z_move; setTransMatrix(); float[] trans_move = transVector(move); position[0] = position[0] + step*trans_move[0]; position[1] = position[1] + step*trans_move[1]; position[2] = position[2] + step*trans_move[2]; } public void setTransMatrix() { for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) { coordiTrans[0][i] = x[i]; coordiTrans[1][i] = y[i]; coordiTrans[2][i] = z[i]; } } public float[] transVector(float[] v) { return multiplyMatrixInVector(coordiTrans, v); }  
      and in the main class i have this:
       
      public void keyPressed(KeyEvent e) { if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_ESCAPE) { System.exit(0); //player move } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_W) { //front //moveAmount[2] += -0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 0, 1); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_S) { //back //moveAmount[2] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 0, -1); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_A) { //left //moveAmount[0] += -0.1f; player.playerMoving(-1, 0, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_D) { //right //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(1, 0, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_E) { //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, 1, 0); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_Q) { //moveAmount[0] += 0.1f; player.playerMoving(0, -1, 0); //camera move } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_I) { //up player.cameraMoving(1, "x"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_K) { //down player.cameraMoving(-1, "x"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_L) { //right player.cameraMoving(-1, "y"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_J) { //left player.cameraMoving(1, "y"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_O) { //right round player.cameraMoving(-1, "z"); } else if (e.getKeyCode()== KeyEvent.VK_U) { //left round player.cameraMoving(1, "z"); } }  
      finallt found it.... i confused with the transformation matrix row and col. thanks anyway!
    • By Lewa
      So, i'm currently trying to implement an SSAO shader from THIS tutorial and i'm running into a few issues here.
      Now, this SSAO method requires view space positions and normals. I'm storing the normals in my deferred renderer in world-space so i had to do a conversion and reconstruct the position from the depth buffer.
      And something there goes horribly wrong (which has probably to do with worldspace to viewspace transformations).
      (here is the full shader source code if someone wants to take a look at it)
      Now, i suspect that the normals are the culprit.
      vec3 normal = ((uNormalViewMatrix*vec4(normalize(texture2D(sNormals, vTexcoord).rgb),1.0)).xyz); "sNormals" is a 2D texture which stores the normals in world space in a RGB FP16 buffer.
      Now i can't use the camera viewspace matrix to transform the normals into viewspace as the cameras position isn't set at (0,0,0), thus skewing the result.
      So what i did is to create a new viewmatrix specifically for this normal without the position at vec3(0,0,0);
      //"camera" is the camera which was used for rendering the normal buffer renderer.setUniform4m(ressources->shaderSSAO->getUniform("uNormalViewMatrix"), glmExt::createViewMatrix(glm::vec3(0,0,0),camera.getForward(),camera.getUp())//parameters are (position,forwardVector,upVector) ); Though i have the feeling this is the wrong approach. Is this right or is there a better/correct way of transforming a world space normal into viewspace?
    • By HawkDeath
      Hi,
      I'm trying mix two textures using own shader system, but I have a problem (I think) with uniforms.
      Code: https://github.com/HawkDeath/shader/tree/test
      To debug I use RenderDocs, but I did not receive good results. In the first attachment is my result, in the second attachment is what should be.
      PS. I base on this tutorial https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Textures.


  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      631398
    • Total Posts
      2999840
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

Participate in the game development conversation and more when you create an account on GameDev.net!

Sign me up!