• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Belgium

C++ Unknown number of arguments.

4 posts in this topic

Below is a mock up of what I'm trying to make better.

I have a object (House) which takes a number of other objects (Cat) in it's constructor. The number of objects it takes is unknown but there is a maximum number. The order the Cats are placed in the constructor is important as they will be acted on in that order. Currently, I'm default filling them. I had thought of using a vector in the House parameter list but there are several hundred possibilities and I'm not sure I'd want to generate a vector for each of them. Creating a function which generates a vector based on Cat objects seems to run into the same problem as the House Constructor.

Ultimately, what happens is a vector of Houses is constructed. However, only one of them is selected for use later. Once selected the Cat objects it holds are acted upon. Is there a better way?

Thanks.

[code]class House
{
public:
House(const Cat& a = Cat(), const Cat& b = Cat(), const Cat& c = Cat(),
const Cat& d = Cat(), const Cat& e = Cat(), const Cat& f = Cat())

{
if (a.isValid() == true) m_vCats.push_back(a);
if (b.isValid() == true) m_vCats.push_back(B);
if (c.isValid() == true) m_vCats.push_back(c);
if (d.isValid() == true) m_vCats.push_back(d);
if (e.isValid() == true) m_vCats.push_back(e);
if (f.isValid() == true) m_vCats.push_back(f);
}

private:

std::vector m_vCats;

};



int main()

{
Cat felix( Cat("felix") );
Cat morris( Cat("morris") );
Cat slyvester( Cat("sylvester") );
Cat fluffy( Cat("fluffy") );
Cat garfield( Cat("garfield") );
Cat heathcliff( Cat("heathcliff") );
Cat eric( Cat("eric the cat") );

std::vector vHouses;
vHouses.push_back( House(felix) );
vHouses.push_back( House(felix, garfield) );
vHouses.push_back( House(felix, heathcliff) );
vHouses.push_back( House(morris, slyvester) );
vHouses.push_back( House(eric, morris, garfield, slyvester) );
vHouses.push_back( House(felix, morris, eric, fluffy, garfield) );
vHouses.push_back( House(morris, felix, eric, fluffy, garfield) );

// Blah blah blah
// Do some stuff with one of the elements of vHouses.

}[/code]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If your compiler supports them, you could use variadic templates, but this is unfortunately rather uncommon right now. You could manually create overloads from one to six arguments, though this would be a pain. Alternately you could use something like boost::preprocessor to create the overloads for multiple arguments.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You could overload operator << to be
[code]House &operator <<( House &h, const Cat &c ) { h.add_cat( c ); return h; }[/code]
And create an add_cat function
[code]void House::add_cat( const Cat &c ) { m_vCats.push_back( c ); }[/code]
Then your add section would look like:
[code]vHouses.push_back( (House() << morris << felix << eric << fluffy << garfield) );[/code]
I don't know if that is uglier or not, but the << and >> operators tend to be overloaded in C++ for stream operations where (...) would be used in C.

Tangental note:
[code]Cat felix( Cat("felix") );[/code]
Should probably be written as just
[code]Cat felix("felix");[/code]:
The first way creates a temporary Cat, then copies it into felix. The second one just initializes felix.
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='KulSeran' timestamp='1295108993' post='4759311']
You could overload operator << to be
[code]House &operator <<( House &h, const Cat &c ) { h.add_cat( c ); return h; }[/code]
And create an add_cat function
[code]void House::add_cat( const Cat &c ) { m_vCats.push_back( c ); }[/code]
[/quote]
If you made operator<< a member function instead of a free function (and a free function seems unnecessary in this case) then you won't need to create add_cat because operator<< will be able to do m_vCats.push_back( c ); directly instead of indirectly
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In some classes of Luabind the "," operator is overloaded to support variable numbers of arguments. I didn't even know that was possible.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0