• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
RezonAce

Making srand ignore certain values?

11 posts in this topic

I'm trying to make an RPG game (my first project), but I want to make the srand function skip certain values in my enemy array so I can have certain enemies not come up as random encounters,but rather boss fights at fixed points. Is it possible to do this in C++?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All rand() and friends do is generate a series of (more or less) random numbers. If you want any higher logic you have to implement it yourself.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can srand() % range but you cannot make srand skip values. You can skip them yourself, either bump the return value up to the next eligible encounter or call srand() again, though calling it again could introduce more randomness into your system than you'd want.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sounds like you want to implement a fixed set of positions chosen at random. If so, try something like:
[code]
float frand = float(rand())/RAND_MAX; // frand in range 0-1
int choice = int( frand*(numPositions-1) );
vector position = bossPositions[choice];
[/code]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Buckeye' timestamp='1296444007' post='4767288']
Sounds like you want to implement a fixed set of positions chosen at random. If so, try something like:
[code]
float frand = float(rand())/RAND_MAX; // frand in range 0-1
int choice = int( frand*(numPositions-1) );
vector position = bossPositions[choice];
[/code]
[/quote]

That code doesn't seem right: It would pick the last choice very infrequently. I think this should do the right thing:

[code]double drand = rand()/(RAND_MAX+1.0); // drand in range [0,1)
int choice = int(drand*numPositions);
vector position = bossPositions[choice];[/code]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='alvaro' timestamp='1296452087' post='4767341']
[quote name='Buckeye' timestamp='1296444007' post='4767288']
Sounds like you want to implement a fixed set of positions chosen at random. If so, try something like:
[code]
float frand = float(rand())/RAND_MAX; // frand in range 0-1
int choice = int( frand*(numPositions-1) );
vector position = bossPositions[choice];
[/code]
[/quote]

That code doesn't seem right: It would pick the last choice very infrequently. I think this should do the right thing:

[code]double drand = rand()/(RAND_MAX+1.0); // drand in range [0,1)
int choice = int(drand*numPositions);
vector position = bossPositions[choice];[/code]
[/quote]
You're correct about using numPositions (vs numPositions-1) and RAND_MAX+1.0. Good observation. Why a double vs. float?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='alvaro' timestamp='1296452087' post='4767341']
[quote name='Buckeye' timestamp='1296444007' post='4767288']
Sounds like you want to implement a fixed set of positions chosen at random. If so, try something like:
[code]
float frand = float(rand())/RAND_MAX; // frand in range 0-1
int choice = int( frand*(numPositions-1) );
vector position = bossPositions[choice];
[/code]
[/quote]

That code doesn't seem right: It would pick the last choice very infrequently.

I think this should do the right thing:

[code]double drand = rand()/(RAND_MAX+1.0); // drand in range [0,1)
int choice = int(drand*numPositions);
vector position = bossPositions[choice];[/code]
[/quote]

This may be wrong, but it seems like there is a lot of code for something pretty trivial, and it doesn't seem to deal with the OP's problem.

[code]
// choice in range [0, NUM_BASIC_ENEMIES) if you want (0, NUM_BASIC_ENEMIES)
//change to srand(PUTYOURSEEDHERE)%NUM_BASIC_ENEMIES+1)
int choice = (srand(PUTYOURSEEDHERE)%NUM_BASIC_ENEMIES)+1;
Enemy chosenEnemy = enemyChoices[choice];
//All enemies up to NUM_BASIC_ENEMIES are basic. Add your bosses to array indices after NUM_BASIC_ENEMIES
[/code]

Since I appear to have a little more spare time I can elaborate a decent way to do it.

You can save your enemy indices in an enum like this :

[code]
enum{
BASIC_ENEMY_ONE,
BASIC_ENEMY_TWO,
NUM_BASIC_ENEMIES,
SUPER_BOSS_ENEMY
}EnemyId;
[/code]

then you store your enemy definitions in an array with indices corresponding to their EnemyId:

[code]
Enemy BasicEnemies[NUM_BASIC_ENEMIES];
BasicEnemies[BASIC_ENEMY_ONE] = //however you define your enemies ;
etc.
[/code]

Then randomly choose a basic enemy:

[code]
int choice = (srand(PUTYOURSEEDHERE)%NUM_BASIC_ENEMIES);
Enemy chosenEnemy = enemyChoices[choice];
[/code]

You could separate your Boss and Basic enemies further by storing their ids in separate enums and separate arrays (probably what I'd be inclined to do).
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Buckeye' timestamp='1296452591' post='4767342']
You're correct about using numPositions (vs numPositions-1) and RAND_MAX+1.0. Good observation. Why a double vs. float?
[/quote]
At a guess, it is because of the minimum precision of the numbers.

Generally a float has 24 bits of precision, a double has 53 bits.

Compare to the RAND_MAX constant that must be at least 15 bits (0x7fff), but many systems use a 31-bit value (0x7fffffff) for the constant.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='frob' timestamp='1296492857' post='4767544']
[quote name='Buckeye' timestamp='1296452591' post='4767342']
You're correct about using numPositions (vs numPositions-1) and RAND_MAX+1.0. Good observation. Why a double vs. float?
[/quote]
At a guess, it is because of the minimum precision of the numbers.

Generally a float has 24 bits of precision, a double has 53 bits.

Compare to the RAND_MAX constant that must be at least 15 bits (0x7fff), but many systems use a 31-bit value (0x7fffffff) for the constant.
[/quote]

That's right. In many systems rand() returns more bits than what the float will keep, and if numPositions is large, using a float can result in some numbers being significantly more likely than others. This always happens to some degree, but using `double' may lessen the effect in some systems.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Be careful not to confuse rand() and srand(). srand() seeds the RNG, you typically call this once, and rand() gets the next value in the sequence, which you call when you need a random number.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0