• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Problems with combining Rotations, Translations and pivot points

This topic is 2486 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hi!

I am currently writing a game in C++ using OpenGL. I have implemented a Quaternion class to handle 6DOF movement and it worked great until the day I realised that I need a pivot point systmem in wich each of my models would rotate around a pivot point. If I were using glRotate I would write the translation for each separate mesh like this:
[code]
// add pivot offset
glTranslatef( pivotVec.x, pivotVec.y, pivotVec.z );

// rotate
glRotate( orientation.x, 1, 0, 0 );
glRotate( orientation.y, 0, 1, 0 );
glRotate( orientation.z, 0, 0, 1 );

// remove pivot offset
glTranslatef( -pivotVec.x, -pivotVec.y, -pivotVec.z );

// translate to position
glTranslatef( position.x, position.y, position.z );
[/code]

It seems so simple, the matrix derived from the quaternion would be sent to OpenGL with a glMultMatrix call. The thing that confuses me is that to translate and rotate correctly, I had to place the glTranslate command before the glMultMatrix command. I have re-read chapter 3 in red book a few times and I am still convinced that something is wrong as it clearly states that if you what to translate an object globaly with the rotation applied at the translated local origin, you should call glRotate first. I have also tried to make the best out of thing to try and achieve my pivot point effect with my current system, but no matter what I do, just could not come up with a way to achieve that effect. I am not dumb so I realised that if any one would be kind enough to help me, he/she would probably want some source code of my quaternion class and my transformation code, so here it is:

Quaternion to Matrix:
[code]
void Quaternion::CreateMatrix(float *Matrix)
{
if(!Matrix)
return;

Matrix[0] = 1.0f - 2.0f * (y * y + z * z);
Matrix[1] = 2.0f * (x * y + z * w);
Matrix[2] = 2.0f * (x * z - y * w);
Matrix[3] = 0.0f;

Matrix[4] = 2.0f * (x * y - z * w);
Matrix[5] = 1.0f - 2.0f * ( x * x + z * z );
Matrix[6] = 2.0f * (z * y + x * w);
Matrix[7] = 0.0f;

Matrix[8] = 2.0f * (x * z + y * w);
Matrix[9] = 2.0f * (y * z - x * w);
Matrix[10] = 1.0f - 2.0f * (x * x + y * y );
Matrix[11] = 0.0f;

Matrix[12] = 0;
Matrix[13] = 0;
Matrix[14] = 0;
Matrix[15] = 1.0f;
}
[/code]

Transformation code:
[code]

//create our local object matrix
glPushMatrix();

//translate
glTranslatef(pos.x, pos.y , pos.z);

//convert the orientation quaternion into a rotation matrix for OpenGL use
float * rotMatrix;
rotMatrix = new float[16];
ori.CreateMatrix(rotMatrix);
glMultMatrixf(rotMatrix);
delete [] rotMatrix;

//draw stuff
// Drawing code goes here...

glPopMatrix();
[/code]

All replies will be greatly appreciated!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
If you compute a transformation matrix [b]M[/b] from a rotation [b]R[/b] and a translation [b]T[/b] in the following order (using column vectors as is usual for OpenGL)
[b]M[/b] := [b]T[/b] * [b]R[/b]
and apply it to a vertex position [b]v[/b]
[b]v[/b]' := [b]M[/b] * [b]v[/b] = ( [b]T[/b] * [b]R[/b] ) * [b]v[/b] = [b]T[/b] * ( [b]R[/b] * [b]v[/b] )
then it appears as that [b]R[/b] is applied on the original [b]v[/b], and [b]T[/b] is applied on the rotated [b]v[/b] (i.e. on [b]R[/b] * [b]v[/b]).

In OpenGL, the equivalent sequence of commands looks like
glLoadIdentity
glTranslate
glRotate
glVertex
Notice that the commands from top to bottom have the same order as the formula terms from left to right. The command sequence is headed by loading a identity matrix, because glTranslate (as well as glRotate and glScale and glMultMatrix) is multiplicative, so in fact the formula
[b]v[/b]' := [b]I *[/b] [b]T[/b] * [b]R[/b] * [b]v[/b]
is computed.

Now, the point [b]0[/b] counts ever to the rotation axis, because [b]0[/b] is the one point that cannot be changed by multiplication with a pure rotation matrix
[b]R[/b] * [b]0[/b] == [b]0[/b]
and such an invariance is a criteria for the rotation axis. Hence, at the moment when you apply the rotation, you must ensure that any point you want the rotation axis pass through, is shifted to [b]0[/b]. The translation to accomplish this must obviously be on the right of [b]R[/b] to be already "active" when [b]R[/b] is applied (see the explanation above). Let us assume that [b]A[/b] is the translation that describes the point through which the axis passes. Then
[b]R[/b] * [b]A[/b][sup]-1[/sup]
will do it (notice that the inverse [b]A[/b] is used; this is equivalent to a negated translation).

Now, after rotation you don't want the pivot point to rest at [b]0[/b]. You want it back where it was formerly. Hence undo the translation. This must be done obviously left of [b]R[/b] because you want to translate the already rotated vertex back. Hence in summary
[b]A[/b] * [b]R[/b] * [b]A[/b][sup]-1[/sup]
is the rotation around a pivot point.


Together with the object translation [b]T[/b] (i.e. applied on the pivot rotated vertex) you'll have
[b]T[/b] * [b]A[/b] * [b]R[/b] * [b]A[/b][sup]-1[/sup]

That said, I assume that the correct order of your example would be

[code]
// translate to position
glTranslatef( position.x, position.y, position.z );

// add pivot offset
glTranslatef( pivotVec.x, pivotVec.y, pivotVec.z );

// rotate
glRotate( orientation.x, 1, 0, 0 );
glRotate( orientation.y, 0, 1, 0 );
glRotate( orientation.z, 0, 0, 1 );

// remove pivot offset
glTranslatef( -pivotVec.x, -pivotVec.y, -pivotVec.z );
[/code]
or alternatively with a glMultMatrix (from the quaternion) instead of the glRotate invocations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks a lot for answering my question so quickly!

I tried your approach and it was quite good! One problem is still left and that is that objects transformed by the following code gets a bit offset depending on how they are oriented. An object oriented with the global axes have perfect pivot point offset in the direction I wanted the offset to be in. But objects with other orientations are moved along the global axes at the first glTranslate and are rotated along the local axes during the second glTranslate call. I wonder if it is possible to make it so that this offset is always moved along the local axes all the time, perhaps with a quaternion multiplication on the pivotOffset vector?

[code]
glTranslatef(pos.x, pos.y , pos.z);

glTranslatef(pivotOffset.x, pivotOffset.y, pivotOffset.z);

float * rotMatrix;
rotMatrix = new float[16];
ori.CreateMatrix(rotMatrix);
glMultMatrixf(rotMatrix);
delete [] rotMatrix;

glTranslatef(-pivotOffset.x, -pivotOffset.y, -pivotOffset.z);
[/code]


EDIT:
I realise that multiplying the pivotOffset vector with the orientation quaternion before the later of the glTranslate calls won´t work as it would just neutralise the pivot effect I am after, is there any way I could achieve the effect described earlier in this thread?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Zarl' timestamp='1301508355' post='4792252']
I tried your approach and it was quite good! One problem is still left and that is that objects transformed by the following code gets a bit offset depending on how they are oriented. An object oriented with the global axes have perfect pivot point offset in the direction I wanted the offset to be in. But objects with other orientations are moved along the global axes at the first glTranslate and are rotated along the local axes during the second glTranslate call. I wonder if it is possible to make it so that this offset is always moved along the local axes all the time, perhaps with a quaternion multiplication on the pivotOffset vector?
[/quote]
A transformation is ever to be interpreted w.r.t. the space that is active at the moment when the transformation is applied. So each transformation can be understood as changing the space. See for example the [b]A[/b][sup]-1[/sup] transformation we've used above: Its sense was to change the space into one where the pivot point is at [b]0[/b], so that the rotation could be applied as desired.

Because the pivot point translation is applied first, its co-ordinates are given in the same space in which the vertices are given (usually called the "model space" or "local space"). At this moment the model space and the global space (which is the usual name of the space that is active after you've applied a (not to say the last) transformation) are coincident, because you haven't applied any transformation yet.

This concept works for other situations, too. If your pivot point isn't given in the correct space, you need to transform first into the space where the pivot point is defined in.

Unfortunately I haven't understood what you want to achieve. The [b]A[/b] .. [b]A[/b][sup]-1[/sup] translations don't change the rotation axis in any way, and the rotation doesn't change the pivot point in any way (all this when seen from the global space). How do objects have "other orientations"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote] Unfortunately I haven't understood what you want to achieve. [/quote]

Just to make it clear, I want my mesh class (from which the transformation code comes) to transform each object by the position vector in global co-ordinates, I also want it to rotate the object using a quaternion, and that rotation should occur around a point specified by a vector in relation to the position specified by the position variable. I think a image would explain this much better:

[url="http://img690.imageshack.us/i/whatiwanttoachieve.jpg/"]http://img690.images...ttoachieve.jpg/[/url]

Do you see what I mean now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
From the image I would say that you want to use the pivot point not only as pivot point but as the origin of the model. This is because the right figure shows that the pivot point comes to rest at the co-ordinates of position.

The pivot point is at [b]0[/b] before and after the rotation [b]R[/b]. It should be at the position defined by [b]T[/b]. So far we have used
[b]T[/b] * [b]A[/b] * [b]R[/b] * [b]A[/b][sup]-1[/sup]
and hence the [b]0[/b] after the rotation was translated by [b]T[/b] * [b]A[/b] and that is obviously in general not equal to [b]T[/b]. So drop the translation by [b]A[/b]
[b]T[/b] * [b]R[/b] * [b]A[/b][sup]-1[/sup]
to let the pivot point and the origin coincident for [b]T[/b].[size="2"] [/size]
[size="3"][size=2]
[/size][/size][size=2]However, from the textual description the statement "rotation should occur around a point specified by a vector in relation to the position specified by the position variable" means IMHO something different. It means that the center of rotation is the sum of position and pivot. That would not match the right figure in the image, so I assume it is wrong!?[/size]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh! I get it now! I have been a bit confused as you can probably tell and you have made my day by making me realising that I was in fact asking for something I did not want. What I want is what I drew in that image, and I have achieved that thanks to your algebra, showing that what I really wanted is [b]T[/b] * [b]R[/b] * [b]A[/b][sup]-1[/sup] and nothing else. So I thank you from the bottom of heart for helping me sole my problem!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Advertisement
  • Similar Content

    • By Balma Alparisi
      i got error 1282 in my code.
      sf::ContextSettings settings; settings.majorVersion = 4; settings.minorVersion = 5; settings.attributeFlags = settings.Core; sf::Window window; window.create(sf::VideoMode(1600, 900), "Texture Unit Rectangle", sf::Style::Close, settings); window.setActive(true); window.setVerticalSyncEnabled(true); glewInit(); GLuint shaderProgram = createShaderProgram("FX/Rectangle.vss", "FX/Rectangle.fss"); float vertex[] = { -0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,0.0f, -0.5f,-0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,1.0f, 0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,0.0f, 0.5,-0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,1.0f, }; GLuint indices[] = { 0,1,2, 1,2,3, }; GLuint vao; glGenVertexArrays(1, &vao); glBindVertexArray(vao); GLuint vbo; glGenBuffers(1, &vbo); glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vbo); glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(vertex), vertex, GL_STATIC_DRAW); GLuint ebo; glGenBuffers(1, &ebo); glBindBuffer(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, ebo); glBufferData(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(indices), indices,GL_STATIC_DRAW); glVertexAttribPointer(0, 3, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)0); glEnableVertexAttribArray(0); glVertexAttribPointer(1, 2, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)(sizeof(float) * 3)); glEnableVertexAttribArray(1); GLuint texture[2]; glGenTextures(2, texture); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageOne = new sf::Image; bool isImageOneLoaded = imageOne->loadFromFile("Texture/container.jpg"); if (isImageOneLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageOne->getSize().x, imageOne->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageOne->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageOne; glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageTwo = new sf::Image; bool isImageTwoLoaded = imageTwo->loadFromFile("Texture/awesomeface.png"); if (isImageTwoLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageTwo->getSize().x, imageTwo->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageTwo->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageTwo; glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureOne"), 0); glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureTwo"), 1); GLenum error = glGetError(); std::cout << error << std::endl; sf::Event event; bool isRunning = true; while (isRunning) { while (window.pollEvent(event)) { if (event.type == event.Closed) { isRunning = false; } } glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); if (isImageOneLoaded && isImageTwoLoaded) { glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glUseProgram(shaderProgram); } glBindVertexArray(vao); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, 6, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, nullptr); glBindVertexArray(0); window.display(); } glDeleteVertexArrays(1, &vao); glDeleteBuffers(1, &vbo); glDeleteBuffers(1, &ebo); glDeleteProgram(shaderProgram); glDeleteTextures(2,texture); return 0; } and this is the vertex shader
      #version 450 core layout(location=0) in vec3 inPos; layout(location=1) in vec2 inTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; void main() { gl_Position=vec4(inPos,1.0); TexCoord=inTexCoord; } and the fragment shader
      #version 450 core in vec2 TexCoord; uniform sampler2D inTextureOne; uniform sampler2D inTextureTwo; out vec4 FragmentColor; void main() { FragmentColor=mix(texture(inTextureOne,TexCoord),texture(inTextureTwo,TexCoord),0.2); } I was expecting awesomeface.png on top of container.jpg

    • By khawk
      We've just released all of the source code for the NeHe OpenGL lessons on our Github page at https://github.com/gamedev-net/nehe-opengl. code - 43 total platforms, configurations, and languages are included.
      Now operated by GameDev.net, NeHe is located at http://nehe.gamedev.net where it has been a valuable resource for developers wanting to learn OpenGL and graphics programming.

      View full story
    • By TheChubu
      The Khronos™ Group, an open consortium of leading hardware and software companies, announces from the SIGGRAPH 2017 Conference the immediate public availability of the OpenGL® 4.6 specification. OpenGL 4.6 integrates the functionality of numerous ARB and EXT extensions created by Khronos members AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA into core, including the capability to ingest SPIR-V™ shaders.
      SPIR-V is a Khronos-defined standard intermediate language for parallel compute and graphics, which enables content creators to simplify their shader authoring and management pipelines while providing significant source shading language flexibility. OpenGL 4.6 adds support for ingesting SPIR-V shaders to the core specification, guaranteeing that SPIR-V shaders will be widely supported by OpenGL implementations.
      OpenGL 4.6 adds the functionality of these ARB extensions to OpenGL’s core specification:
      GL_ARB_gl_spirv and GL_ARB_spirv_extensions to standardize SPIR-V support for OpenGL GL_ARB_indirect_parameters and GL_ARB_shader_draw_parameters for reducing the CPU overhead associated with rendering batches of geometry GL_ARB_pipeline_statistics_query and GL_ARB_transform_feedback_overflow_querystandardize OpenGL support for features available in Direct3D GL_ARB_texture_filter_anisotropic (based on GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic) brings previously IP encumbered functionality into OpenGL to improve the visual quality of textured scenes GL_ARB_polygon_offset_clamp (based on GL_EXT_polygon_offset_clamp) suppresses a common visual artifact known as a “light leak” associated with rendering shadows GL_ARB_shader_atomic_counter_ops and GL_ARB_shader_group_vote add shader intrinsics supported by all desktop vendors to improve functionality and performance GL_KHR_no_error reduces driver overhead by allowing the application to indicate that it expects error-free operation so errors need not be generated In addition to the above features being added to OpenGL 4.6, the following are being released as extensions:
      GL_KHR_parallel_shader_compile allows applications to launch multiple shader compile threads to improve shader compile throughput WGL_ARB_create_context_no_error and GXL_ARB_create_context_no_error allow no error contexts to be created with WGL or GLX that support the GL_KHR_no_error extension “I’m proud to announce OpenGL 4.6 as the most feature-rich version of OpenGL yet. We've brought together the most popular, widely-supported extensions into a new core specification to give OpenGL developers and end users an improved baseline feature set. This includes resolving previous intellectual property roadblocks to bringing anisotropic texture filtering and polygon offset clamping into the core specification to enable widespread implementation and usage,” said Piers Daniell, chair of the OpenGL Working Group at Khronos. “The OpenGL working group will continue to respond to market needs and work with GPU vendors to ensure OpenGL remains a viable and evolving graphics API for all its customers and users across many vital industries.“
      The OpenGL 4.6 specification can be found at https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php. The GLSL to SPIR-V compiler glslang has been updated with GLSL 4.60 support, and can be found at https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glslang.
      Sophisticated graphics applications will also benefit from a set of newly released extensions for both OpenGL and OpenGL ES to enable interoperability with Vulkan and Direct3D. These extensions are named:
      GL_EXT_memory_object GL_EXT_memory_object_fd GL_EXT_memory_object_win32 GL_EXT_semaphore GL_EXT_semaphore_fd GL_EXT_semaphore_win32 GL_EXT_win32_keyed_mutex They can be found at: https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php
      Industry Support for OpenGL 4.6
      “With OpenGL 4.6 our customers have an improved set of core features available on our full range of OpenGL 4.x capable GPUs. These features provide improved rendering quality, performance and functionality. As the graphics industry’s most popular API, we fully support OpenGL and will continue to work closely with the Khronos Group on the development of new OpenGL specifications and extensions for our customers. NVIDIA has released beta OpenGL 4.6 drivers today at https://developer.nvidia.com/opengl-driver so developers can use these new features right away,” said Bob Pette, vice president, Professional Graphics at NVIDIA.
      "OpenGL 4.6 will be the first OpenGL release where conformant open source implementations based on the Mesa project will be deliverable in a reasonable timeframe after release. The open sourcing of the OpenGL conformance test suite and ongoing work between Khronos and X.org will also allow for non-vendor led open source implementations to achieve conformance in the near future," said David Airlie, senior principal engineer at Red Hat, and developer on Mesa/X.org projects.

      View full story
    • By _OskaR
      Hi,
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
  • Advertisement