Sign in to follow this  
homer_3

Getting P3 from P1, P2. Dist P3-P1 > Dist P1-P2 & P3 on line P1-P2

Recommended Posts

homer_3    173
I'm trying to get point 3 from points 1 and 2 such that point 3 is on the same line that points 1 and 2 form, the distance between P1 and P3 is greater than P1 and P2, and the vector direction from P1 to P3 is the same as P1 to P2. This is what I have, but it doesn't work at all. Can anyone point out where I went wrong?


Origin is top left. +X is right. +Y is down.
[code]

lv_destPos = OrderGetTargetPoint(EventUnitOrder());
lv_destX = PointGetX(lv_destPos);
lv_destY = PointGetY(lv_destPos);

lv_curX = PointGetX(lv_curPos);
lv_curY = PointGetY(lv_curPos);

//get slope
lv_m = (lv_curY-lv_destY)/(lv_curX-lv_destX);

//get y intercept
lv_b = lv_y - (lv_m * lv_x);

//clicked to right
if(lv_destX > lv_curX)
{
lv_destX = lv_destX + 50.0;
lv_destY = (lv_m * lv_destX) + lv_b;
}else
{
//clicked to left
if(lv_destX < lv_curX)
{
lv_destX = lv_destX - 50.0;
lv_destY = (lv_m * lv_destX) + lv_b;
}else
{
//clicked below
if(lv_destY > lv_curY)
{
lv_destY = lv_destY+50;
lv_destX = (lv_destY - lv_b)/lv_m;
}else
{
//clicked above
lv_destY = lv_destY-50;
lv_destX = (lv_destY - lv_b)/lv_m;
}
}
}

lv_destPos = Point(lv_destX, lv_destY);[/code]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Emergent    982
Any point on the line containing points p1 and p2 can be written as,

p = (1 - t) p1 + t p2

for some real number t. When t=0, you get p1. When t=1, you get p2. When 0 < t < 1, you get a point in-between (e.g., when t=1/2, you get the midpoint). When t is negative, or when it is greater than 1, you get a point beyond p1 or p2 on the line, respectively.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
alvaro    21246
What Emergent said. Maybe you'll find it easier to think of that formula as
P3 = P1 + t*(P2-P1)

Plugging in t=2 will give you a P3 that satisfies everything you asked for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
homer_3    173
[quote][color=#1C2837][size=2]P3 = P1 + t*(P2-P1)[/quote][/size][/color]
[color=#1C2837][size=2]
[/size][/color]
[color=#1C2837][size=2]I remember doing this before and I thought it was P1 * t*(P2-P1). But that didn't work for me so I tried just getting the line formula and going from there. I'll try this out though, thanks. Just to be clear[/size][/color]
[color=#1C2837][size=2]
[/size][/color]
[color=#1C2837][size=2]P3.X = P1.X + t*(P2.X-P1.X)[/size][/color]
[color=#1C2837][size=2]P3.Y = P1.Y + t*(P2.Y-P1.Y)[/size][/color]
[color=#1C2837][size=2]
[/size][/color]
[color=#1C2837][size=2]correct?[/size][/color]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jyk    2094
[quote name='homer_3' timestamp='1302304232' post='4796133']
[[color="#1C2837"][size="2"]P3.X = P1.X + t*(P2.X-P1.X)[/size][/color]
[color="#1C2837"][size="2"]P3.Y = P1.Y + t*(P2.Y-P1.Y)[/size][/color]

[color="#1C2837"][size="2"]correct?[/size][/color]
[/quote]
As far as the parametric line form goes, yes, that looks correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this