Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Transparent Texture

Recommended Posts

I'm setting an ortho projection and am drawing a texture plane. Now I want the texture for that plane to be transparent.
ILuint image = 0;
ilGenImages(1, &image);

int w = ilGetInteger(IL_IMAGE_WIDTH);
int h = ilGetInteger(IL_IMAGE_HEIGHT);
BYTE *bits = new BYTE[w * h * 4];
ilCopyPixels(0, 0, 0, w, h, 1, IL_RGBA, IL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, bits);

GLuint textureID[1];

glGenTextures(1, &textureID[0]);//generate texture
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textureID[0]);//work with this texture

GL_LINEAR );//set the min filter
GL_LINEAR );//set the mag filter
glTexImage2D (GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, w, h, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, (GLvoid*)bits);
I use DeviL to load the image. The image in question is this:

Following an article I found on opengl's site
[b]15.080 [/b][b]How can I make part of my texture maps transparent or translucent?[/b] It depends on the effect you're trying to achieve.

If you want blending to occur after the texture has been applied, then use the OpenGL blending feature. Try this:

[indent] glEnable (GL_BLEND); glBlendFunc (GL_ONE, GL_ONE); [/indent] You might want to use the alpha values that result from texture mapping in the blend function. If so, (GL_SRC_ALPHA,GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA) is always a good function to start with.

[b]However, if you want blending to occur when the primitive is texture mapped (i.e., you want parts of the texture map to allow the underlying color of the primitive to show through), then don't use OpenGL blending. Instead, you'd use glTexEnv(), and set the texture environment mode to GL_BLEND. In this case, you'd want to leave the texture environment color to its default value of (0,0,0,0).[/b]

So thats what im doing.Blending is disabled (glDisable(GL_BLEND). I set up the texture environment like it says in the article.
int w, h;
glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, (int)textid);
glGetTexLevelParameteriv(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_TEXTURE_WIDTH, &w);
glGetTexLevelParameteriv(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_TEXTURE_HEIGHT, &h);
glTexCoord2i(0, 1);glVertex2f(x, y);
glTexCoord2i(0, 0);glVertex2f(x, y + h);
glTexCoord2i(1, 0);glVertex2f(x + w, y + h);
glTexCoord2i(1, 1);glVertex2f(x + w, y);

This is the code I use to draw my plane. with that the result i get is :


This is what I want to get:
Can anyone help me? The block color is how it should be. And the alpha is being loaded correctly. Its values from 0 to 255.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Except for a very big fps drop the alphatest did nothing
//Enable Z buffering
//Enable alpha testing
glAlphaFunc(GL_LEQUAL, 1);//glAlphaFunc(GL_LEQUAL, 255) doesnt work either.
These are all the things im enabling when starting opengl
The result is still the same.

And the fps drop is from 670 fps to 233 fps. Why such a huge fps drop. All I'm doing is drawing vertex buffered blocks (36 blocks 8 verts GL_QUADS non textured)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Not only does it not work
but now fps is down to 183

Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 1.8GHz 2mb L2 Cache
Ati Radeon HD4670 1764 mb vram

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Get rid of "[font="Lucida Console"]glTexEnvf( GL_TEXTURE_ENV, GL_TEXTURE_ENV_MODE, GL_BLEND );[/font]" -- that's doing weird things that you don't want it to do. The documentation you've quoted is describing how to configure the fixed function shader to blend the texture over the top of other primitive colors ([i]e.g. from [font="Courier New"]glColor[/font][/i]), not how to make your primitives transparent.

If that doesn't help, it sounds like your texture doesn't actually have an alpha channel. Inspect your [font="Courier New"]bits[/font] array and make sure the data is valid.

Turning on alpha-blending ([i]translucency[/i]) or alpha-testing ([i]transparency[/i]) is expected to hurt performance somewhat - the fragment shader/[url=""]ROP[/url] have to do extra work. Are you only enabling it for your transparent overlay quad, or are you leaving it enabled for the entire scene?

BTW, an FPS drop from 670 to 233 is an increase of 2.8ms. Never use FPS as a measure of performance because it's very misleading - always convert to milliseconds.
[font="arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif"][size="2"][quote name='Bow_vernon' timestamp='1302350009' post='4796294']
[code]glBlendFunc(GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);[/code]
I think it should be:
[code]glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);[/code][/quote]The former is pre-multiplied alpha blending, the latter is traditional alpha blending. Either of them should induce [i]some[/i] form of translucency assuming the fragment shading stage is outputting useful alpha values.[/size][/font][quote name='Solano' timestamp='1302344617' post='4796268'][size="2"][font="arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif"]All I'm doing is drawing vertex buffered blocks (36 blocks 8 verts GL_QUADS non textured)[/quote]Never use [/font][font="Lucida Console"]GL_QUADS[/font] - use some form of triangles instead.
[/size][font="arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif"][size="2"]GPUs don't support quads, so your graphics driver has to use the CPU to convert them into triangles on the fly every time you submit a draw-call.[/size][/font]
[size="2"]Also, in high performance code, you shouldn't use the immediate mode renderer either (i.e. [font="Lucida Console"]glBegin[/font]/[font="Lucida Console"]glEnd[/font]) because it involves making the graphics driver to a large amount of work on the CPU.[/size]

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
+1 for getting rid of immediate Mode. That is deprecated since roughly 10 Years. :)
No offense though.

Use OpenGL 2.x with VBO or use at least the "old" Vertex Arrays.
Also, alpha testing could also be done with GLSL:

#version 330

uniform sampler2D NL_TextureID;

smooth in vec4 theColor;
smooth in vec2 theTextureCoord;

out vec4 outputColor;

void main()
vec4 value = texture2D(NL_TextureID, theTextureCoord);

if ( value.a <= 0.01 ){

outputColor = value;

Sample from one of my Shaders.
This simply discards all fragments which have a lower Alpha Value than 0.01.
Shaders can make your life really easy :).

Image with a Shader that has no Alpha Testing:

Same Image with above Code:

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Announcements

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Similar Content

    • By test opty
      Hi all,
      I'm starting OpenGL using a tut on the Web. But at this point I would like to know the primitives needed for creating a window using OpenGL. So on Windows and using MS VS 2017, what is the simplest code required to render a window with the title of "First Rectangle", please?
    • By DejayHextrix
      Hi, New here. 
      I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc.... 
      I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn? 
      How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want? 
      Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn. 
      So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started. 
      Dejay Hextrix 
    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
  • Popular Now