Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Include directive functionality in GLSL

This topic is 2467 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hey GameDev,

I see we have a new forum. Just goes to show I haven't been here for a while. Ok, I got a question -- and I am a little surprised that this topic doesn't pop up more often, or at least that it hasn't been better covered when searching google.

I'm looking for something that will give me the same behavior as the "include" directive in C++, in GLSL. By scowering "teh interwebz" I have found out that there apparently is an existing definition for the functionality in OpenGL called "[font="monospace"][size="2"]ARB_shading_language_include[/size][/font]", but according to various posts, it seems as though it might - as of right now - still be unimplemented? The specification for this extension can be found here:

[url="http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/ARB/shading_language_include.txt"]http://www.opengl.or...age_include.txt[/url]

where it also specifies that "[font="monospace"][size="2"]This extension is written against the OpenGL 3.2 (Core Profile) and[/size][/font][font="monospace"][size="2"] OpenGL Shading Language 1.50 Specifications.[/size][/font]". Does this mean that if I use the compatibility profile I am screwed? If so, can someone suggest an easy and painless alternative? I have some GLSL code I'd prefer to keep in "#version 120" since I like using some of the fixed functionality's pipeline to perform transformations. I'd also prefer if the solution does not require keeping all my GLSL code inside pre-defined strings as I love syntax highlighting.

So... I guess the straight forward question is: Does anyone have a simple solution which provides the same functionality as the include directive from C++ in the compatibility profile while still allowing me to see syntax highlighted GLSL code?

Regards,

Gazoo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It will probably be available in compatibility profile as well since both AMD and nVidia are committed to it. Sorry, I don't know of any tutorials on this extension.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's best (and really quite easy) to just do it yourself. Use the #pragma directive in GLSL with your own unique identifier (e.g. #pragma myinclude "stuff") and just pass it through a preprocessor of your own design before sending it to the GL. Scan for your custom pragma in the source string, then either replace it with the included source, or better yet simply leave the pragma as is and pass the included source as another string to glShaderSource. This is safe since according to the GL spec, any pragma directive which isn't recognized is simply ignored without error.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Gazoo101' timestamp='1302861132' post='4798720']
By scowering "teh interwebz" I have found out that there apparently is an existing definition for the functionality in OpenGL called "[font="monospace"][size="2"]ARB_shading_language_include[/size][/font]", but according to various posts, it seems as though it might - as of right now - still be unimplemented?


[/quote]

ARB_shading_language_include is implemented in NV drivers since 265.90 (maybe even earlier, but I don't have information about all drivers releases. I have a precision of about a month. ;) In 260.99 this extension is missing). I'm not sure if AMD implements it.

[quote name='Gazoo101' timestamp='1302861132' post='4798720']
...where it also specifies that "[font="monospace"][size="2"]This extension is written against the OpenGL 3.2 (Core Profile) and[/size][/font][font="monospace"][size="2"] OpenGL Shading Language 1.50 Specifications.[/size][/font]". Does this mean that if I use the compatibility profile I am screwed?

[/quote]

That means [size="2"]ARB_shading_language_include is written as an extension of GL 3.2 Core spec. Paragraphs and sections from [/size][size="2"]ARB_shading_language_include should be inserted into GL 3.2 core spec to have a complete overview. Compatibility profile enables full backward compatibility, so there is no problem in using [/size][size="2"]ARB_shading_language_include. Just one more comment, [/size][size="2"]ARB_shading_language_include is a part of GL 3.3 Core spec, although it is relatively recently implemented (9 months after the spec). [/size]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
       
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
      {
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      };
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
       
       
    • By pr033r
      Hello,
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
      Thanks for any help...

    • By Andrija
      I am currently trying to implement shadow mapping into my project , but although i can render my depth map to the screen and it looks okay , when i sample it with shadowCoords there is no shadow.
      Here is my light space matrix calculation
      mat4x4 lightViewMatrix; vec3 sun_pos = {SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[0], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[1], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[2]}; mat4x4_look_at(lightViewMatrix,sun_pos,player->pos,up); mat4x4_mul(lightSpaceMatrix,lightProjMatrix,lightViewMatrix); I will tweak the values for the size and frustum of the shadow map, but for now i just want to draw shadows around the player position
      the_sun->direction is a normalized vector so i multiply it by a constant to get the position.
      player->pos is the camera position in world space
      the light projection matrix is calculated like this:
      mat4x4_ortho(lightProjMatrix,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,NEAR,SHADOW_FAR); Shadow vertex shader:
      uniform mat4 light_space_matrix; void main() { gl_Position = light_space_matrix * transfMatrix * vec4(position, 1.0f); } Shadow fragment shader:
      out float fragDepth; void main() { fragDepth = gl_FragCoord.z; } I am using deferred rendering so i have all my world positions in the g_positions buffer
      My shadow calculation in the deferred fragment shader:
      float get_shadow_fac(vec4 light_space_pos) { vec3 shadow_coords = light_space_pos.xyz / light_space_pos.w; shadow_coords = shadow_coords * 0.5 + 0.5; float closest_depth = texture(shadow_map, shadow_coords.xy).r; float current_depth = shadow_coords.z; float shadow_fac = 1.0; if(closest_depth < current_depth) shadow_fac = 0.5; return shadow_fac; } I call the function like this:
      get_shadow_fac(light_space_matrix * vec4(position,1.0)); Where position is the value i got from sampling the g_position buffer
      Here is my depth texture (i know it will produce low quality shadows but i just want to get it working for now):
      sorry because of the compression , the black smudges are trees ... https://i.stack.imgur.com/T43aK.jpg
      EDIT: Depth texture attachment:
      glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24,fbo->width,fbo->height,0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT,GL_FLOAT,NULL); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, GL_TEXTURE_2D, fbo->depthTexture, 0);
  • Popular Now