# Weired Acis transformation matrix

## Recommended Posts

dgcoventry    184
I have queried an ACIS solid in AutoCAD using autolisp and have extracted what appears to be a transformation matrix:

[quote]transform $-1 0.965925826289068 -0.258819045102521 0 0.258819045102521 0.965925826289068 0 0 0 1 -1.63832380999416 3.11204436836534 0 1 rotate no_reflect no_shear # [/quote] Dose anyone recognise this kind of entity? It sort of looks like a 4x4 transformation matrix (regarding the 0 0 0 1 line in the middle), but the arguments only have fourteen reals. #### Share this post ##### Link to post ##### Share on other sites haegarr 7372 No documentation found, but a transform description can be anything (see e.g. the transform node of X3D). [quote]transform$-1 0.965925826289068 -0.258819045102521 0 0.258819045102521 0.965925826289068 0 0 0 1 -1.63832380999416 3.11204436836534 0 1 rotate no_reflect no_shear # [/quote]
I'd say that
0.965925826289068 -0.258819045102521 0
0.258819045102521 0.965925826289068 0
0 0 1
is a 3D rotation by 15 degree around the z axis, given as a affine matrix. I'd further assume that the subsequent
1.63832380999416 3.11204436836534 0
defines a affine position. I have no clue what the leading -1 and trailing 1 mean. The latter one may perhaps be a scaling factor, but then for uniform scaling only. If you want to investigate this w/o having access to a documentation, try to apply well known transformations and look at the resulting numbers.

##### Share on other sites
dgcoventry    184
[quote name='haegarr' timestamp='1302944134' post='4799071']
No documentation found, but a transform description can be anything (see e.g. the transform node of X3D).

[quote]transform \$-1 0.965925826289068 -0.258819045102521 0 0.258819045102521 0.965925826289068 0 0 0 1 -1.63832380999416 3.11204436836534 0 1 rotate no_reflect no_shear # [/quote]
I'd say that
0.965925826289068 -0.258819045102521 0
0.258819045102521 0.965925826289068 0
0 0 1
is a 3D rotation by 15 degree around the z axis, given as a affine matrix. I'd further assume that the subsequent
1.63832380999416 3.11204436836534 0
defines a affine position. I have no clue what the leading -1 and trailing 1 mean. The latter one may perhaps be a scaling factor, but then for uniform scaling only. If you want to investigate this w/o having access to a documentation, try to apply well known transformations and look at the resulting numbers.
[/quote]

Thanks Haegarr,

That does sound very likely.

I have searched for documentation on this but have been unable to find any.

I'll do what you suggest and see if the numbers tally.