Sign in to follow this  
MattSmith_79985

DX11 Couple of DX10 Questions

Recommended Posts

So When I first learned Direct X it was DX11, but there wasn't a TON of resources available so I started going off Frank Luna's DX10 book. I feel that I understand everything besides a "few" select things (mainly differences between DX10 and 11)

Anyways here they go:
For Vertex and Index buffers I noticed this:

[code]
D3D10_BUFFER_DESC vbd;
vbd.Usage = D3D10_USAGE_IMMUTABLE;
vbd.ByteWidth = sizeof(Vertex) * mNumVertices;
vbd.BindFlags = D3D10_BIND_VERTEX_BUFFER;
vbd.CPUAccessFlags = 0;
vbd.MiscFlags = 0;
D3D10_SUBRESOURCE_DATA vinitData;
vinitData.pSysMem = &vertices[0]; <-------
HR(md3dDevice->CreateBuffer(&vbd, &vinitData, &mVB));[/code]

What exactly does the piece I have an arrow pointed at do? I think in DX11 it was something completely different (like 3 lines worth) I think we used something like:

[code]
D3D11_MAPPED_SUBRESOURCE ms;
devcon->Map(pVBuffer, NULL, D3D11_MAP_WRITE_DISCARD, NULL, &ms); // map the buffer
memcpy(ms.pData, OurVertices, sizeof(OurVertices)); // copy the data
devcon->Unmap(pVBuffer, NULL);[/code]


ok secondly is dealing with HLSL in DX11 I would compile the shader and do something like this:

[code]
ID3D10Blob *VS, *PS;
D3DX11CompileFromFile(L"shaders.hlsl", 0, 0, "VShader", "vs_5_0", 0, 0, 0, &VS, 0, 0);
D3DX11CompileFromFile(L"shaders.hlsl", 0, 0, "PShader", "ps_5_0", 0, 0, 0, &PS, 0, 0);

// create the shader objects
dev->CreateVertexShader(VS->GetBufferPointer(), VS->GetBufferSize(), NULL, &pVS);
dev->CreatePixelShader(PS->GetBufferPointer(), PS->GetBufferSize(), NULL, &pPS);

// set the shader objects
devcon->VSSetShader(pVS, 0, 0);
devcon->PSSetShader(pPS, 0, 0);[/code]


but in the DX10 code it's like:

[code]
D3D10_TECHNIQUE_DESC techDesc;
mTech->GetDesc( &techDesc );
for(UINT p = 0; p < techDesc.Passes; ++p)
{
mWVP = mView*mProj;
mfxWVPVar->SetMatrix((float*)&mWVP);
mTech->GetPassByIndex( p )->Apply(0);
mLand.draw();
}[/code]


and this:

[code]
mTech = mFX->GetTechniqueByName("ColorTech");

mfxWVPVar = mFX->GetVariableByName("gWVP")->AsMatrix();[/code]


I've looked around the book, and it doesnt really explain what these do.
also here's the HLSL for reference for the DX10 book

[code]
//=============================================================================
// color.fx by Frank Luna (C) 2008 All Rights Reserved.
//
// Transforms and colors geometry.
//=============================================================================


cbuffer cbPerObject
{
float4x4 gWVP;
};

void VS(float3 iPosL : POSITION,
float4 iColor : COLOR,
out float4 oPosH : SV_POSITION,
out float4 oColor : COLOR)
{
// Transform to homogeneous clip space.
oPosH = mul(float4(iPosL, 1.0f), gWVP);

// Just pass vertex color into the pixel shader.
oColor = iColor;
}

float4 PS(float4 posH : SV_POSITION,
float4 color : COLOR) : SV_Target
{
return color;
}
/*
RasterizerState Wireframe
{
FillMode = Wireframe;
CullMode = Back;
FrontCounterClockwise = false;
};*/

technique10 ColorTech
{
pass P0
{
SetVertexShader( CompileShader( vs_4_0, VS() ) );
SetGeometryShader( NULL );
SetPixelShader( CompileShader( ps_4_0, PS() ) );

//SetRasterizerState(Wireframe);
}
}[/code]


I've never seen a "technique" mentioned in DX11....and i'd def. never seen anything like this:

mTech = mFX->GetTechniqueByName("ColorTech");

mfxWVPVar = mFX->GetVariableByName("gWVP")->AsMatrix();

seems like creating an input layout and such is ALOT easier in DX11...

anyone care to explain what these are?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The line where the arrow is pointing at just stores the adress of your first vertex in vinitData.pSysMem.
This is one of the things that vinitData stores.
If I am not wrong you can also just map it like in DX11.

The part you show about HLSL in DX11 is when initializing, while the DX10 code you posted is for drawing it.

The techniques are indead not used in DX11 (although you can use them).
In DX11 you work directly with the pixel and vertex shader, you can also do this in DX10 and then you don't have to use techniques.

I don't have much experience with it so I don't know whether you can use those variables without an effect in DX10.

Sorry that I edited this post a few times, but I accidentaly posted it to early.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[color="#1C2837"][size="2"][color="#000000"]vinitData Is a pointer to the initial data to place inside the buffer once it's been created[/color][/size][/color]

[size="2"]And techniques are ways of calling different shaders for example...[/size]

[size="2"][code]
technique10 Tech1
{
Pass P0
{
SetVertexShader(CompileShader(vs_4_0, VS()));
SetGeometryShader(NULL);
SetPixelShader(CompileShader(ps_4_0, PixelShaderWithNoEffects())); <---
}
}

technique10 Tech2
{
Pass P0
{

SetVertexShader(CompileShader(vs_4_0, VS()));
SetGeometryShader(NULL);
SetPixelShader(CompileShader(ps_4_0, PixelShaderWithEffects())); <---
}
}
[/code]
[/size][size="2"]And then in your main code you would just select a technique on which you would want to use[/size]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You can still use memcpy to map data into a buffer... just the 2nd parameter in [color="#1C2837"][font="CourierNew, monospace"][size="2"][color="#000000"]md3dDevice[/color][color="#666600"]->[/color][color="#660066"]CreateBuffer[/color][color="#666600"](&[/color][color="#000000"]vbd[/color][color="#666600"],[/color] [color="#666600"]&[/color][color="#000000"]vinitData[/color][color="#666600"],[/color] [color="#666600"]&[/color][color="#000000"]mVB) is used to set initial data in the buffer you can just set it to NULL [/color][/size][/font][/color][font="CourierNew, monospace"][size="2"][color="#000000"]md3dDevice[/color][color="#666600"]->[/color][color="#660066"]CreateBuffer[/color][color="#666600"](&[/color][color="#000000"]vbd[/color][color="#666600"],[/color][color="#000000"] NULL[/color][color="#666600"],[/color] [color="#666600"]&[/color][color="#000000"]mVB)[/color][/size][/font]
[font="CourierNew, monospace"] [/font]
[font="CourierNew, monospace"][size="2"][color="#000000"]Oh and fail in my last post...[/color][/size][/font]
[font="CourierNew, monospace"] [/font]
[font="CourierNew, monospace"][size="2"][color="#000000"]Edit:[/color][/size][/font]
[font="CourierNew, monospace"] [/font]
[font="CourierNew, monospace"][size="2"][color="#000000"]Here's an example of copying data in dx10[/color][/size][/font]
[font="CourierNew, monospace"] [/font][font="CourierNew, monospace"][size="2"][code]
bool CVertexBuffer::MapIndexData(UINT numIndex, void* pData)
{
void* pVoid;
IndexBuffer->Map(D3D10_MAP_WRITE_DISCARD, 0, &pVoid); // map the vertex buffer
memcpy(pVoid, pData, sizeof(int) * numIndex); // copy the vertices to the buffer
IndexBuffer->Unmap();

this->numIndexes = numIndex;

return true;
}
[/code][/size][/font]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Mercfh' timestamp='1305645480' post='4811953']
^^ Ya thats what I did in the DX11. Ok that makes sense then.

the technique thing.......for DX10 is a whole different other mess tho.
[/quote]

Haha, yeah it's basically just a way to call different shader functions. It's mainly used for selecting which shaders to use on different graphics cards... If i remember correctly DX actually provides you with a function that decides which technique is better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Announcements

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628367
    • Total Posts
      2982284
  • Similar Content

    • By joeblack
      Hi,
      im reading about specular aliasing because of mip maps, as far as i understood it, you need to compute fetched normal lenght and detect now its changed from unit length. I’m currently using BC5 normal maps, so i reconstruct z in shader and therefore my normals are normalized. Can i still somehow use antialiasing or its not needed? Thanks.
    • By 51mon
      I want to change the sampling behaviour to SampleLevel(coord, ddx(coord.y).xx, ddy(coord.y).xx). I was just wondering if it's possible without explicit shader code, e.g. with some flags or so?
    • By GalacticCrew
      Hello,
      I want to improve the performance of my game (engine) and some of your helped me to make a GPU Profiler. After creating the GPU Profiler, I started to measure the time my GPU needs per frame. I refined my GPU time measurements to find my bottleneck.
      Searching the bottleneck
      Rendering a small scene in an Idle state takes around 15.38 ms per frame. 13.54 ms (88.04%) are spent while rendering the scene, 1.57 ms (10.22%) are spent during the SwapChain.Present call (no VSync!) and the rest is spent on other tasks like rendering the UI. I further investigated the scene rendering, since it takes über 88% of my GPU frame rendering time.
      When rendering my scene, most of the time (80.97%) is spent rendering my models. The rest is spent to render the background/skybox, updating animation data, updating pixel shader constant buffer, etc. It wasn't really suprising that most of the time is spent for my models, so I further refined my measurements to find the actual bottleneck.
      In my example scene, I have five animated NPCs. When rendering these NPCs, most actions are almost for free. Setting the proper shaders in the input layout (0.11%), updating vertex shader constant buffers (0.32%), setting textures (0.24%) and setting vertex and index buffers (0.28%). However, the rest of the GPU time (99.05% !!) is spent in two function calls: DrawIndexed and DrawIndexedInstance.
      I searched this forum and the web for other articles and threads about these functions, but I haven't found a lot of useful information. I use SharpDX and .NET Framework 4.5 to develop my game (engine). The developer of SharpDX said, that "The method DrawIndexed in SharpDX is a direct call to DirectX" (Source). DirectX 11 is widely used and SharpDX is "only" a wrapper for DirectX functions, I assume the problem is in my code.
      How I render my scene
      When rendering my scene, I render one model after another. Each model has one or more parts and one or more positions. For example, a human model has parts like head, hands, legs, torso, etc. and may be placed in different locations (on the couch, on a street, ...). For static elements like furniture, houses, etc. I use instancing, because the positions never change at run-time. Dynamic models like humans and monster don't use instancing, because positions change over time.
      When rendering a model, I use this work-flow:
      Set vertex and pixel shaders, if they need to be updated (e.g. PBR shaders, simple shader, depth info shaders, ...) Set animation data as constant buffer in the vertex shader, if the model is animated Set generic vertex shader constant buffer (world matrix, etc.) Render all parts of the model. For each part: Set diffuse, normal, specular and emissive texture shader views Set vertex buffer Set index buffer Call DrawIndexedInstanced for instanced models and DrawIndexed models What's the problem
      After my GPU profiling, I know that over 99% of the rendering time for a single model is spent in the DrawIndexedInstanced and DrawIndexed function calls. But why do they take so long? Do I have to try to optimize my vertex or pixel shaders? I do not use other types of shaders at the moment. "Le Comte du Merde-fou" suggested in this post to merge regions of vertices to larger vertex buffers to reduce the number of Draw calls. While this makes sense to me, it does not explain why rendering my five (!) animated models takes that much GPU time. To make sure I don't analyse something I wrong, I made sure to not use the D3D11_CREATE_DEVICE_DEBUG flag and to run as Release version in Visual Studio as suggested by Hodgman in this forum thread.
      My engine does its job. Multi-texturing, animation, soft shadowing, instancing, etc. are all implemented, but I need to reduce the GPU load for performance reasons. Each frame takes less than 3ms CPU time by the way. So the problem is on the GPU side, I believe.
    • By noodleBowl
      I was wondering if someone could explain this to me
      I'm working on using the windows WIC apis to load in textures for DirectX 11. I see that sometimes the WIC Pixel Formats do not directly match a DXGI Format that is used in DirectX. I see that in cases like this the original WIC Pixel Format is converted into a WIC Pixel Format that does directly match a DXGI Format. And doing this conversion is easy, but I do not understand the reason behind 2 of the WIC Pixel Formats that are converted based on Microsoft's guide
      I was wondering if someone could tell me why Microsoft's guide on this topic says that GUID_WICPixelFormat40bppCMYKAlpha should be converted into GUID_WICPixelFormat64bppRGBA and why GUID_WICPixelFormat80bppCMYKAlpha should be converted into GUID_WICPixelFormat64bppRGBA
      In one case I would think that: 
      GUID_WICPixelFormat40bppCMYKAlpha would convert to GUID_WICPixelFormat32bppRGBA and that GUID_WICPixelFormat80bppCMYKAlpha would convert to GUID_WICPixelFormat64bppRGBA, because the black channel (k) values would get readded / "swallowed" into into the CMY channels
      In the second case I would think that:
      GUID_WICPixelFormat40bppCMYKAlpha would convert to GUID_WICPixelFormat64bppRGBA and that GUID_WICPixelFormat80bppCMYKAlpha would convert to GUID_WICPixelFormat128bppRGBA, because the black channel (k) bits would get redistributed amongst the remaining 4 channels (CYMA) and those "new bits" added to those channels would fit in the GUID_WICPixelFormat64bppRGBA and GUID_WICPixelFormat128bppRGBA formats. But also seeing as there is no GUID_WICPixelFormat128bppRGBA format this case is kind of null and void
      I basically do not understand why Microsoft says GUID_WICPixelFormat40bppCMYKAlpha and GUID_WICPixelFormat80bppCMYKAlpha should convert to GUID_WICPixelFormat64bppRGBA in the end
       
    • By DejayHextrix
      Hi, New here. 
      I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc.... 
      I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn? 
      How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want? 
      Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn. 
      So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started. 
      Thanks, 
      Dejay Hextrix 
  • Popular Now