OpenGL help me to finde the track in opengl game industry

Recommended Posts

hello every one

i am new in this scop, the scop of game development i want to learn it and start comercial projects but i am confused, i can't find the truck myself so please help me to find the start point.

i am an average c++ programer, i use vc++ 6 and i want to keep using it for learnning and for building my comercial project with opengl.
i want to start programing for windows xp and maybe also windows 7

what i need to know is the libraries and header files i should update to start (dll, lib, h and any other libraries i will need) and it will be better if you tell me also about the old libraries and about the programs and libraries that are not reliable to build big and safe projects to avoid it.

also any other information i should know but i didn't asked you about, will be a big help from you even small informations.

thank you very much in advence

Share on other sites
Hidden
i will be stoned for this, but dont use visualc. Its a huge unusable mamuth. Use some gcc based c compiler instead, like codeblocks, or even the legacy devcpp.

Libraries and headers for OpenGL is included by default in all modern (younger than 14 years) c compiler.

check these tutorials:
http://nehe.gamedev.net/

if you dont want native winapi (and i suggest to forget win32 at all) i suggest to use glut for windowing/keyboard/mouse input.

-You will find at nehe a lot of examples how to handle opengl.

[quote name='Geri' timestamp='1306591259' post='4816769']
i will be stoned for this, but dont use visualc. Its a huge unusable mamuth. Use some gcc based c compiler instead, like codeblocks, or even the legacy devcpp. [/quote]

Eh? MSVC may be big, but it is also hands-down the best development toolset you can get, either for \$ or to download an Express version at no charge. And get this - it's not the best because of any conspiracy theories that the makers may or may not have been involved in; it's the best because it's just flat-out better than anything else. You quite clearly have no idea what you're talking about, sorry.

Share on other sites
one thing to keep in mind though when working with VC,
if you want to keep your project crossplatform check wether the source compiles with GCC because i found that VC sometimes accepts things GCC doesnt

Share on other sites
VC++ is the only choice.
There use to be Borland which got renamed to Inprise but they seemed to have disappeared (no one talks about them). http://www.borland.com

All the rest : Eclipse, Develop Builder, Devcpp, codeblocks, gcc, are amateurish.

Share on other sites
[quote name='Geri' timestamp='1306591259' post='4816769']
i will be stoned for this, but dont use visualc. Its a huge unusable mamuth.[/quote]
Countless people use Visual Studio quite successfully, so clearly it's not unusable ;)

[quote name='blubberbert' timestamp='1306612133' post='4816880']
one thing to keep in mind though when working with VC,
if you want to keep your project crossplatform check wether the source compiles with GCC because i found that VC sometimes accepts things GCC doesnt
[/quote]
Indeed - even with extensions off there's some variation in what the two compilers will and will not compile, so when targeting both compilers, it's advisable to regularly compile using both.

Share on other sites
Have to say that I code mainly Java but I think C++ programmers are missing so much out what IDEs can do. VS is a very poor IDE in my opinion Netbeans and also Eclipse are so much better(even for C++). Everybody who thinks Intelli Sens is a good auto complition didn't use any other^^

Share on other sites
[quote name='V-man' timestamp='1306612815' post='4816884']<br />VC++ is the only choice.<br />There use to be Borland which got renamed to Inprise but they seemed to have disappeared (no one talks about them). <a href='http://www.borland.com' class='bbc_url' title='External link' rel='nofollow external'>http://www.borland.com</a><br /><br />All the rest : Eclipse, Develop Builder, Devcpp, codeblocks, gcc, are amateurish.<br />[/quote]<br /><br /><br />

I don't agree, I've been using kdevelop for years, and so far I think it is the best IDE (I use VC as well). To add, Qt creator is also a great IDE, it has I think the best user interface ever. I don't think Eclipse is amateurish, because when it comes to Android development it is simply the best choice (even Google advises the usage of it).
There are many great IDEs, and it is only up to you which will you find the best. So my advice is to try out every one of them, and decide which was the best and stick to it. Don't give it up at the first try, because for example to use kdevelop I had to learn how to write cmake makefiles, which isn't the easiest thing, but I did manage.

Share on other sites
All I'll say is that a lot of people mustn't be using their debuggers much...

Share on other sites
? needn't?
sry but could u rephrase it

Create an account

Register a new account

• Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
628303
• Total Posts
2981923
• Similar Content

• By mellinoe
Hi all,
First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
• By aejt
I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
I have these classes:
For GPU resources:
Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).
And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
Factory classes for resources:
For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
Factory classes for assets:
Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).

Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
Thanks!
• By nedondev
I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
Thanks.

• So I've recently started learning some GLSL and now I'm toying with a POM shader. I'm trying to optimize it and notice that it starts having issues at high texture sizes, especially with self-shadowing.
Now I know POM is expensive either way, but would pulling the heightmap out of the normalmap alpha channel and in it's own 8bit texture make doing all those dozens of texture fetches more cheap? Or is everything in the cache aligned to 32bit anyway? I haven't implemented texture compression yet, I think that would help? But regardless, should there be a performance boost from decoupling the heightmap? I could also keep it in a lower resolution than the normalmap if that would improve performance.
Any help is much appreciated, please keep in mind I'm somewhat of a newbie. Thanks!

• Hi,
I'm trying to learn OpenGL through a website and have proceeded until this page of it. The output is a simple triangle. The problem is the complexity.
I have read that page several times and tried to analyse the code but I haven't understood the code properly and completely yet. This is the code: