Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL WorldViewProj?

Recommended Posts

First, sorry for my bad English..

I have question about GLSL,
I have a HLSL shader, In this shader, I use a World and a WorldViewProj matrices.
In DirectX, I can easily get these Matrices with this codes;



D3DXMatrixLookAtLH(&[b]View[/b], &Position, &Target, &Up);

D3DXMatrixPerspectiveFovLH( &[b]Proj[/b], D3DX_PI /4, ScreenWidth / ScreenHeight, 1.0f, 1000.0f );

[b]World [/b]*[b] View [/b]*[b] Proj[/b]

I've converted my HLSL shader to GLSL with "HLSL2GLSL" tool.
My shader compiles with no errors. But I need this matrices to use my shader..
And I don't know how to get these Matrices in OpenGL.. [img][/img]

I've searched but I couldn't find a solution.
Can anyone tell me how can I get these matrices in OpenGL?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
[color="#FF0000"] D3DXMatrixIdentity(&[b]World[/b]);[/color] --> [color="#2E8B57"]glLoadIdentity(....[/color]

[color="#FF0000"]D3DXMatrixLookAtLH(&[b]View[/b], &Position, &Target, &Up);[/color] --> [color="#2E8B57"]gluLookAt(...

[/color][color="#FF0000"]D3DXMatrixPerspectiveFovLH[/color] -->[color="#2E8B57"]gluPerspective(....

[/color][color="#FF0000"][b]World [/b]*[b] View [/b]*[b] Proj[/b][/color] --> [color="#2E8B57"][b]MODELVIEW [/b]*[b] PROJECTION[/b][/color]

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Depends on the opengl version. Older versions of opengl provided them as built in uniforms, in the newer versions of opengl you have to calculate them yourself and pass them to the shader. Most math libs built with graphics in mind should have calls to calculate them.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
See my link. Look for functions like glhLoadIdentityf2.
Build your matrix and upload to your shader.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='V-man' timestamp='1306196354' post='4814818']
See my link. Look for functions like glhLoadIdentityf2.
Build your matrix and upload to your shader.

I think this library is for Windows, but i'm using Linux :(


I have some matrices in GLSL shader..
For example:

What is ModelView Matrix?? is that same with ViewMatrix in DX?
Ok, I think gl_ModelViewProjectionMatrix is WorldViewProj matrix, is it right?

But how can I get the World matrix?

A part of my Shader is like this.. very simple..

uniform vec4 LightColor;
uniform vec4 LightPosition;
uniform vec4 MatColor;
uniform mat4 [b]World[/b];
uniform mat4 [b]WorldViewProjection[/b];

void VS( in A2V IN, out V2P OUT ) {

OUT.Pos = [b][color="#ff0000"]I NEED HELP HERE..[/color][/b] (in DX, it is [b]mul(IN.Position, WorldViewProj); [/b])
OUT.WorldPos = [color="#ff0000"][b]I NEED HELP HERE TOO..[/b][/color] (in DX it is [b]mul(IN.Position, World);[/b] )
OUT.LightDir = vec3( (LightPosition - OUT.WorldPos));
OUT.WorldNormal = normalize( ( IN.Normal * xlat_lib_constructMat3( World) ) );
OUT.Diffuse = (MatColor * LightColor);
OUT.TexCoord0 = IN.Tex0;

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Regarding the terminology, with the fixed-function pipeline, the 'world' matrix in D3D corresponds to the 'model' matrix in OpenGL, so:

D3D: world->view->projection
OpenGL: model->view->projection

Furthermore, OpenGL collapses the model and view matrices into a single 'modelview' matrix, whereas D3D keeps the world and view matrices separate, so:

D3D: world->view->projection
OpenGL: modelview->projection

With modern shader code, all of this disappears and you just construct and use whatever matrices you need. Typically there'll still be 'model', 'view', and 'projection' transforms in one form or another, but which ones you upload and what you do with them exactly is up to you. (That said, the simplest possible vertex program will typically transform all incoming geometry by a single matrix that represents a concatenation of the model/world, camera/view, and projection transforms.)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok, Its working [img][/img]

I used so, and I don't need Model Matrix anymore [img][/img]

OUT.Pos = gl_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * gl_Vertex;
OUT.WorldPos = gl_ModelViewMatrix * gl_Vertex;
OUT.LightDir = LightPosition - OUT.WorldPos;
OUT.WorldNormal = normalize(gl_NormalMatrix * gl_Normal);
OUT.Diffuse = LightColor;
OUT.TexCoord0 = IN.Tex0;

Thanks guys..

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
The only problem with that is that you are using built in variables. Why don't you use a math library instead?
From, there is the GLM library that is available for *nix. It is object orientated (compared to mine which is a C library). I don't like the OO approach but have a look. There are a lot of others too if you look at the big list at

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
@The OP: You can find another list of game math libraries [url=""]here[/url].

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Similar Content

    • By DelicateTreeFrog
      Hello! As an exercise for delving into modern OpenGL, I'm creating a simple .obj renderer. I want to support things like varying degrees of specularity, geometry opacity, things like that, on a per-material basis. Different materials can also have different textures. Basic .obj necessities. I've done this in old school OpenGL, but modern OpenGL has its own thing going on, and I'd like to conform as closely to the standards as possible so as to keep the program running correctly, and I'm hoping to avoid picking up bad habits this early on.
      Reading around on the OpenGL Wiki, one tip in particular really stands out to me on this page:
      For something like a renderer for .obj files, this sort of thing seems almost ideal, but according to the wiki, it's a bad idea. Interesting to note!
      So, here's what the plan is so far as far as loading goes:
      Set up a type for materials so that materials can be created and destroyed. They will contain things like diffuse color, diffuse texture, geometry opacity, and so on, for each material in the .mtl file. Since .obj files are conveniently split up by material, I can load different groups of vertices/normals/UVs and triangles into different blocks of data for different models. When it comes to the rendering, I get a bit lost. I can either:
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUseProgram to use a different shader for that particular geometry (so a unique shader just for the material that is shared by this triangle group). or
      Between drawing triangle groups, call glUniform a few times to adjust different parameters within the "master shader", such as specularity, diffuse color, and geometry opacity. In both cases, I still have to call glBindTexture between drawing triangle groups in order to bind the diffuse texture used by the material, so there doesn't seem to be a way around having the CPU do *something* during the rendering process instead of letting the GPU do everything all at once.
      The second option here seems less cluttered, however. There are less shaders to keep up with while one "master shader" handles it all. I don't have to duplicate any code or compile multiple shaders. Arguably, I could always have the shader program for each material be embedded in the material itself, and be auto-generated upon loading the material from the .mtl file. But this still leads to constantly calling glUseProgram, much more than is probably necessary in order to properly render the .obj. There seem to be a number of differing opinions on if it's okay to use hundreds of shaders or if it's best to just use tens of shaders.
      So, ultimately, what is the "right" way to do this? Does using a "master shader" (or a few variants of one) bog down the system compared to using hundreds of shader programs each dedicated to their own corresponding materials? Keeping in mind that the "master shaders" would have to track these additional uniforms and potentially have numerous branches of ifs, it may be possible that the ifs will lead to additional and unnecessary processing. But would that more expensive than constantly calling glUseProgram to switch shaders, or storing the shaders to begin with?
      With all these angles to consider, it's difficult to come to a conclusion. Both possible methods work, and both seem rather convenient for their own reasons, but which is the most performant? Please help this beginner/dummy understand. Thank you!
    • By JJCDeveloper
      I want to make professional java 3d game with server program and database,packet handling for multiplayer and client-server communicating,maps rendering,models,and stuffs Which aspect of java can I learn and where can I learn java Lwjgl OpenGL rendering Like minecraft and world of tanks
    • By AyeRonTarpas
      A friend of mine and I are making a 2D game engine as a learning experience and to hopefully build upon the experience in the long run.

      -What I'm using:
          C++;. Since im learning this language while in college and its one of the popular language to make games with why not.     Visual Studios; Im using a windows so yea.     SDL or GLFW; was thinking about SDL since i do some research on it where it is catching my interest but i hear SDL is a huge package compared to GLFW, so i may do GLFW to start with as learning since i may get overwhelmed with SDL.  
      Knowing what we want in the engine what should our main focus be in terms of learning. File managements, with headers, functions ect. How can i properly manage files with out confusing myself and my friend when sharing code. Alternative to Visual studios: My friend has a mac and cant properly use Vis studios, is there another alternative to it?  
    • By ferreiradaselva
      Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using `glMapBuffer()`, which works fine.
      But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using `glMapBufferRange()`, which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
      Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
    • By xhcao
      Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness. 
  • Popular Now