How about unbaptized infants go to purgatory for eternity vs. nevermind, they go to heaven? Or female clergy are expressly forbidden vs. it's fine to let women respond to a call? Or priests shouldn't ever marry vs. they should probably be allowed to?
Demanding examples of inconsistencies in religious thought, particularly examples of inconsistencies between interpretations of scriptures, is like asking if there's such a thing as wind while a hurricane is barreling down on you.
I always ask for examples as I have yet to encounter issues that are more than a simple lack of understanding. People either have not been told the whole story or simply lack the background and assume based upon information they don't have.
No where in scripture have I read that unbaptized infants go to purgatory. The no female clergy thing is a misunderstanding of the culture and time that was written. There is no scriptural mandate that a priest must be unwed.
Scripture was not written to be a dogmatic stick to beat people with generation after generation. It's highly contextually sensitive as it was written for the specific culture and time it was written. Concerning infants there is a standard that says that in order to saved you have to accept Jesus as your lord and savior after you reach the age of accountability. The Bible does not mention when this is but it is commonly accepted to be when a child can reasonably define right from wrong within themselves. As such this exact moment is determined only by God since he is the only being designated to be all-knowing that we know of. Prior to that is sort of a gray area. Scripture is silent on the specific but the Bible does say that God is love. If he is love then should a young person die before they reached this age then it only makes sense that God would accept them exactly as they are. I believe this because in the garden of Eden Adam and Eve were in a naive state as they were without knowledge of good and evil. In this state they were sinless and in a state of such grace that the Father himself literally walked with them and conversed with them face to face. It is only after they disobeyed God and gained knowledge they were naked and hid from their father that they were punished not because God suddenly hated them but because they broke God's law and since everything in the universe has a natural order of things what followed was them simply no longer being able to be in God's presence as they once were because they were now tainted from his original design.
The single scripture concerning not suffering a woman to speak in church was written during a time when there was a sect of priestesses of some other deity, I'd have to look it up, that went into churches and actively disrupted the services such that others could not receive the word of God. So, for that area in that time to whom that letter was written there was a very plain answer to the problem: not to let them speak. The reason this is not a blanket mandate is because Christ himself often times helped women and healed them letting us know that women as well can beseech him. Paul also met with a sect of female Christians in Greece that were spreading the gospel and he praised their efforts. In the Old Testament as well there were female prophets and I believe a king or two. The fact is there is a pattern of women taking the same roles as men in the Christian faith. That letter was written to address a specific circumstance to a specific church.
The issue with priests not marrying is an entirely man-made mandate. In the scritpures where it lists requirements for the officers of the church very specific wording is used: "to only be the husband of one wife." This was to combat polygamy. The reason the Catholic church implements a no marriage rule is because Paul made a comment that in the choice between marrying or not marrying he said he would rather not marry. This is because when you are married you and your wife and literally one so she is literally your other half in God's sight. However, when you devote your life to spreading the gospel you can't just go and do because you have another person to consider. God respects this because it is his law, "for this reason a man leaves his family and takes a wife and they become one flesh," so this could potentially limit how he could use you. To keep the priest as flexible and as susceptible to God's will as possible the Catholic church implemented this rule so they could focus entirely on the church, their ministry and God and not be weighed down with the concerns of marriage. At one point they were allowed to marry but this was changed over time as there were issues with polygamy, perversions and such that weren't Christian.
The Bible is not a literal text but a framework in the sense that it's content was written to the people at the time it was written. The proper way to draw from scripture is to take its precepts and examples and see how they apply to ourselves instead of literally holding the letter of the books contained at face value without considering why they were written.