• Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Popular Now

  • Advertisement
  • Similar Content

    • By isu diss
      I'm following rastertek tutorial 14 (http://rastertek.com/tertut14.html). The problem is, slope based texturing doesn't work in my application. There are plenty of slopes in my terrain. None of them get slope color.
      float4 PSMAIN(DS_OUTPUT Input) : SV_Target { float4 grassColor; float4 slopeColor; float4 rockColor; float slope; float blendAmount; float4 textureColor; grassColor = txTerGrassy.Sample(SSTerrain, Input.TextureCoords); slopeColor = txTerMossRocky.Sample(SSTerrain, Input.TextureCoords); rockColor = txTerRocky.Sample(SSTerrain, Input.TextureCoords); // Calculate the slope of this point. slope = (1.0f - Input.LSNormal.y); if(slope < 0.2) { blendAmount = slope / 0.2f; textureColor = lerp(grassColor, slopeColor, blendAmount); } if((slope < 0.7) && (slope >= 0.2f)) { blendAmount = (slope - 0.2f) * (1.0f / (0.7f - 0.2f)); textureColor = lerp(slopeColor, rockColor, blendAmount); } if(slope >= 0.7) { textureColor = rockColor; } return float4(textureColor.rgb, 1); } Can anyone help me? Thanks.

    • By cozzie
      Hi all,
      As a part of the debug drawing system in my engine,  I want to add support for rendering simple text on screen  (aka HUD/ HUD style). From what I've read there are a few options, in short:
      1. Write your own font sprite renderer
      2. Using Direct2D/Directwrite, combine with DX11 rendertarget/ backbuffer
      3. Use an external library, like the directx toolkit etc.
      I want to go for number 2, but articles/ documentation confused me a bit. Some say you need to create a DX10 device, to be able to do this, because it doesn't directly work with the DX11 device.  But other articles tell that this was 'patched' later on and should work now.
      Can someone shed some light on this and ideally provide me an example or article on  how to set this up?
      All input is appreciated.
    • By stale
      I've just started learning about tessellation from Frank Luna's DX11 book. I'm getting some very weird behavior when I try to render a tessellated quad patch if I also render a mesh in the same frame. The tessellated quad patch renders just fine if it's the only thing I'm rendering. This is pictured below:
      However, when I attempt to render the same tessellated quad patch along with the other entities in the scene (which are simple triangle-lists), I get the following error:

      I have no idea why this is happening, and google searches have given me no leads at all. I use the following code to render the tessellated quad patch:
      ID3D11DeviceContext* dc = GetGFXDeviceContext(); dc->IASetPrimitiveTopology(D3D11_PRIMITIVE_TOPOLOGY_4_CONTROL_POINT_PATCHLIST); dc->IASetInputLayout(ShaderManager::GetInstance()->m_JQuadTess->m_InputLayout); float blendFactors[] = { 0.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f }; // only used with D3D11_BLEND_BLEND_FACTOR dc->RSSetState(m_rasterizerStates[RSWIREFRAME]); dc->OMSetBlendState(m_blendStates[BSNOBLEND], blendFactors, 0xffffffff); dc->OMSetDepthStencilState(m_depthStencilStates[DSDEFAULT], 0); ID3DX11EffectTechnique* activeTech = ShaderManager::GetInstance()->m_JQuadTess->Tech; D3DX11_TECHNIQUE_DESC techDesc; activeTech->GetDesc(&techDesc); for (unsigned int p = 0; p < techDesc.Passes; p++) { TerrainVisual* terrainVisual = (TerrainVisual*)entity->m_VisualComponent; UINT stride = sizeof(TerrainVertex); UINT offset = 0; GetGFXDeviceContext()->IASetVertexBuffers(0, 1, &terrainVisual->m_VB, &stride, &offset); Vector3 eyePos = Vector3(cam->m_position); Matrix rotation = Matrix::CreateFromYawPitchRoll(entity->m_rotationEuler.x, entity->m_rotationEuler.y, entity->m_rotationEuler.z); Matrix model = rotation * Matrix::CreateTranslation(entity->m_position); Matrix view = cam->GetLookAtMatrix(); Matrix MVP = model * view * m_ProjectionMatrix; ShaderManager::GetInstance()->m_JQuadTess->SetEyePosW(eyePos); ShaderManager::GetInstance()->m_JQuadTess->SetWorld(model); ShaderManager::GetInstance()->m_JQuadTess->SetWorldViewProj(MVP); activeTech->GetPassByIndex(p)->Apply(0, GetGFXDeviceContext()); GetGFXDeviceContext()->Draw(4, 0); } dc->RSSetState(0); dc->OMSetBlendState(0, blendFactors, 0xffffffff); dc->OMSetDepthStencilState(0, 0); I draw my scene by looping through the list of entities and calling the associated draw method depending on the entity's "visual type":
      for (unsigned int i = 0; i < scene->GetEntityList()->size(); i++) { Entity* entity = scene->GetEntityList()->at(i); if (entity->m_VisualComponent->m_visualType == VisualType::MESH) DrawMeshEntity(entity, cam, sun, point); else if (entity->m_VisualComponent->m_visualType == VisualType::BILLBOARD) DrawBillboardEntity(entity, cam, sun, point); else if (entity->m_VisualComponent->m_visualType == VisualType::TERRAIN) DrawTerrainEntity(entity, cam); } HR(m_swapChain->Present(0, 0)); Any help/advice would be much appreciated!
    • By KaiserJohan
      Am trying a basebones tessellation shader and getting unexpected result when increasing the tessellation factor. Am rendering a group of quads and trying to apply tessellation to them.
      OutsideTess = (1,1,1,1), InsideTess= (1,1)

      OutsideTess = (1,1,1,1), InsideTess= (2,1)

      I expected 4 triangles in the quad, not two. Any idea of whats wrong?
      struct PatchTess { float mEdgeTess[4] : SV_TessFactor; float mInsideTess[2] : SV_InsideTessFactor; }; struct VertexOut { float4 mWorldPosition : POSITION; float mTessFactor : TESS; }; struct DomainOut { float4 mWorldPosition : SV_POSITION; }; struct HullOut { float4 mWorldPosition : POSITION; }; Hull shader:
      PatchTess PatchHS(InputPatch<VertexOut, 3> inputVertices) { PatchTess patch; patch.mEdgeTess[ 0 ] = 1; patch.mEdgeTess[ 1 ] = 1; patch.mEdgeTess[ 2 ] = 1; patch.mEdgeTess[ 3 ] = 1; patch.mInsideTess[ 0 ] = 2; patch.mInsideTess[ 1 ] = 1; return patch; } [domain("quad")] [partitioning("fractional_odd")] [outputtopology("triangle_ccw")] [outputcontrolpoints(4)] [patchconstantfunc("PatchHS")] [maxtessfactor( 64.0 )] HullOut hull_main(InputPatch<VertexOut, 3> verticeData, uint index : SV_OutputControlPointID) { HullOut ret; ret.mWorldPosition = verticeData[index].mWorldPosition; return ret; }  
      Domain shader:
      [domain("quad")] DomainOut domain_main(PatchTess patchTess, float2 uv : SV_DomainLocation, const OutputPatch<HullOut, 4> quad) { DomainOut ret; const float MipInterval = 20.0f; ret.mWorldPosition.xz = quad[ 0 ].mWorldPosition.xz * ( 1.0f - uv.x ) * ( 1.0f - uv.y ) + quad[ 1 ].mWorldPosition.xz * uv.x * ( 1.0f - uv.y ) + quad[ 2 ].mWorldPosition.xz * ( 1.0f - uv.x ) * uv.y + quad[ 3 ].mWorldPosition.xz * uv.x * uv.y ; ret.mWorldPosition.y = quad[ 0 ].mWorldPosition.y; ret.mWorldPosition.w = 1; ret.mWorldPosition = mul( gFrameViewProj, ret.mWorldPosition ); return ret; }  
      Any ideas what could be wrong with these shaders?
    • By simco50
      I've stumbled upon Urho3D engine and found that it has a really nice and easy to read code structure.
      I think the graphics abstraction looks really interesting and I like the idea of how it defers pipeline state changes until just before the draw call to resolve redundant state changes.
      This is done by saving the state changes (blendEnabled/SRV changes/RTV changes) in member variables and just before the draw, apply the actual state changes using the graphics context.
      It looks something like this (pseudo):
      void PrepareDraw() { if(renderTargetsDirty) { pD3D11DeviceContext->OMSetRenderTarget(mCurrentRenderTargets); renderTargetsDirty = false } if(texturesDirty) { pD3D11DeviceContext->PSSetShaderResourceView(..., mCurrentSRVs); texturesDirty = false } .... //Some more state changes } This all looked like a great design at first but I've found that there is one big issue with this which I don't really understand how it is solved in their case and how I would tackle it.
      I'll explain it by example, imagine I have two rendertargets: my backbuffer RT and an offscreen RT.
      Say I want to render my backbuffer to the offscreen RT and then back to the backbuffer (Just for the sake of the example).
      You would do something like this:
      //Render to the offscreen RT pGraphics->SetRenderTarget(pOffscreenRT->GetRTV()); pGraphics->SetTexture(diffuseSlot, pDefaultRT->GetSRV()) pGraphics->DrawQuad() pGraphics->SetTexture(diffuseSlot, nullptr); //Remove the default RT from input //Render to the default (screen) RT pGraphics->SetRenderTarget(nullptr); //Default RT pGraphics->SetTexture(diffuseSlot, pOffscreenRT->GetSRV()) pGraphics->DrawQuad(); The problem here is that the second time the application loop comes around, the offscreen rendertarget is still bound as input ShaderResourceView when it gets set as a RenderTargetView because in Urho3D, the state of the RenderTargetView will always be changed before the ShaderResourceViews (see top code snippet) even when I set the SRV to nullptr before using it as a RTV like above causing errors because a resource can't be bound to both input and rendertarget.
      What is usually the solution to this?
  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

This topic is 2487 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I am working on a level editor and I would like to render my viewports (ranging from one to four) at different sizes. However, while thinking of an efficient way to do this I have ran into a wall. From what I can determine the best way to do this wold be

Set D3DContext's D3D11_VIEWPORT to be the size of the "Render View Port One"'s size
Render the first viewport

Set D3DContext's D3D11_VIEWPORT to be the size of the "Render View Port Two"'s size
Render the second viewport

Set D3DContext's D3D11_VIEWPORT to be the size of the "Render View Port Three"'s size
Render the third viewport

Set D3DContext's D3D11_VIEWPORT to be the size of the "Render View Port Fours"'s size
Render the fourth viewport

This seems rather inefficient though. Does anyone have any better suggestions?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does this sound inefficient to you?

It seems inefficient due to having to change the viewport over and over.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
In D3D11 you can have multiple viewports (and render targets) bound simultaneously, and in a geometry shader you can replicate your triangle to each viewport using SV_ViewportArrayIndex and SV_RenderTargetArrayIndex. However this typically only ends up saving you CPU time, and not GPU tiime. So I would not bother implementing that unless CPU performance becomes an issue.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
I would say 'no' to the original question - it doesn't sound inefficient to me. There really is no way to get around it, and I am sure that a change to the view port is not that big of a deal. Building on the technique that Matt mentioned, you could use an array of viewports, and then have multiple copies of your geometry which each have the corresponding viewport index specified as a vertex attribute.

That would eliminate the need to reset your view ports, but honestly that would be a colossal waste of memory. After you spend some time on the API, you will see that those four calls will be the least of your problems :)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement