• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
c_olin

Issues interpolating quaternions from Bullet

4 posts in this topic

My game has a fixed time-step and interpolates translations and rotations between updates. My quaternion slerp function works fine for my own rotations, but when converting Bullet's quaternions to my own quaternion structure I get strange artifacts occasionally when slerping. The body will appear to slerp the wrong direction for a split second. Here is a video demonstrating it (the jerking in the beginning is due to the video capture process).

[url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHueytww10k"][url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHueytww10k"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHueytww10k[/url][/url]


Here is my code for getting the rigid body's rotation and for slerping:

[code]

const Quaternion<> RigidBody::getOrientation() const {
return Physics::fromQuaternion(rigidBody->getWorldTransform().getRotation());
}

const Quaternion<> Physics::fromQuaternion(const btQuaternion& q) {
return Quaternion<double>(-q.w(), Vector<3, double>(q.x(), q.y(), q.z()));
}

template <class T>
const Quaternion<T> Quaternion<T>::slerp(const Quaternion<T>& a, const Quaternion<T>& b, T delta) {
T w1, w2;

T cosTheta = dot(a, b);
T theta = (T)acos(cosTheta);
T sinTheta = (T)sin(theta);

if (sinTheta > 0.001) {
w1 = (T)(sin((1.0 - delta) * theta) / sinTheta);
w2 = (T)(sin(delta * theta) / sinTheta);
} else {
w1 = 1.0 - delta;
w2 = delta;
}

Quaternion<T> result(a * w1 + b * w2);
result.normalize();

return result;
}

template const Quaternion<double> Quaternion<double>::slerp(const Quaternion<double>&, const Quaternion<double>&, double);
[/code]



My slerp code works fine for my own rotations. This only seems to happen on quaternions converted from Bullet.

Any ideas?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Since [i]q[/i] and [i]-q[/i] represent the same orientation, a typical implementation of quaternion SLERP will first check the dot product of the input quaternions and negate one of them if the dot product is negative (this ensures that the interpolation takes place over the shortest arc).

Although I can't say for sure that that's what's causing the problems you're seeing, it seems likely that it is, so that's probably the first thing I'd try.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='jyk' timestamp='1308109763' post='4823450']
Since [i]q[/i] and [i]-q[/i] represent the same orientation, a typical implementation of quaternion SLERP will first check the dot product of the input quaternions and negate one of them if the dot product is negative (this ensures that the interpolation takes place over the shortest arc).

Although I can't say for sure that that's what's causing the problems you're seeing, it seems likely that it is, so that's probably the first thing I'd try.
[/quote]

Thank you very much for the response. Here is my updated code:

[code]

template <class T>
const Quaternion<T> Quaternion<T>::slerp(const Quaternion<T>& a, const Quaternion<T>& b, T delta) {
T w1, w2;

T cosTheta = dot(a, b);
T theta = (T)acos(cosTheta);
T sinTheta = (T)sin(theta);

if (sinTheta > 0.001) {
w1 = (T)(sin((1.0 - delta) * theta) / sinTheta);
w2 = (T)(sin(delta * theta) / sinTheta);
} else {
w1 = 1.0 - delta;
w2 = delta;
}

Quaternion<T> b1;

if (cosTheta < 0.0) {
b1 = -b;
} else {
b1 = b;
}

Quaternion<T> result(a * w1 + b1 * w2);
result.normalize();

return result;
}
[/code]

This gives me [i]much [/i]better results. However there are still moments where the rotation will stutter (it looks way better than rotating the opposite direction though). Here is a quick video demonstrating it (the framerate is constant here, the stuttering is only on the rotating rigid bodies).

[url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iP2csdzlXQ"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9iP2csdzlXQ[/url]


However, I tried just using linear interpolation and I don't get this stuttering effect (and honestly I cannot observe any difference between slerp and lerp). I am just going to use lerp for now since it has no visual artifacts. But if you have any ideas as to why my slerp is stuttering I'd love to hear them.

I really appreciate the help. I'm pretty sure you have answered the majority of my (everyone's?) math-related questions on this board.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The main difference between SLERP and NLERP is that the latter doesn't interpolate with constant angular velocity (assuming the interpolation parameter changes at a constant rate, the speed of the rotation will increase and then decrease over the course of the interpolation). In many cases this effect is not noticeable though. Furthermore, NLERP has the advantage of being less expensive than SLERP.

Regarding the artifacts you're seeing, try checking the dot product and performing the negation (if necessary) as the first step in the function, rather than towards the end. (As is, you're computing some of the initial values using the 'uncorrected' input quaternions, which I imagine could cause some problems.)
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='jyk' timestamp='1308156077' post='4823680']
The main difference between SLERP and NLERP is that the latter doesn't interpolate with constant angular velocity (assuming the interpolation parameters changes at a constant rate, the speed of the rotation will increase and then decrease over the course of the interpolation). In many cases this effect is not noticeable though. Furthermore, NLERP has the advantage of being less expensive than SLERP.

Regarding the artifacts you're seeing, try checking the dot product and performing the negation (if necessary) as the first step in the function, rather than towards the end. (As is, you're computing some of the initial values using the 'uncorrected' input quaternions, which I imagine could cause some problems.)
[/quote]

Ahh that was a silly mistake. Thanks once again for the help. It works great now.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0