• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL [discussion]DirectX 9 or 10 or 11?

This topic is 2368 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.


Recommended Posts

So I think I finally answered my self about OpenGL or DirectX, and as you see, I've chose DX. Now, I am facing a question just as big. 9, 10 or 11? I have the graphic card 8400GS and I know it is weak and won't work with DX11, but I am upgrading it, hopefully in a month.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
DX11 has "features levels" that allows you to support any graphics card down to DX9 level ones ([i]GeForce6+?[/i]).
The only downside is that DX11 applications do not run on Windows XP.

On the other hand, DX9 does run on Windows XP.

There is no reason to use DX10.

In a nutshell, if you want to support XP, use DX9, otherwise use DX11.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wait, so why not use DX10? Cuz untill I won't upgrade I still want to run more advanced stuff than a triangle.

And no, I rather use what's really best. Windows XP is too old anyway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[font="Calibri"][size="3"]DirectX 11 supports older hardware (DX9; DX 10), too. Therefore you don’t need DirectX 10 anymore as you can do anything with DirectX 11. [/size]

[/font]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Geri' timestamp='1311601637' post='4839981']
9
[/quote]

How 'bout an explenation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ignore Dx10. On Dx11 You have something called "feature levels" that let you run on Dx10 and Dx9 hardware (the Dx9 level is a bit more limitied compared to original Dx9). If you want to write a 2D game or a relatively simple 3D game, I would go for Dx9. Otherwise Dx11.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Guns' timestamp='1311602856' post='4839989']
Ignore Dx10. On Dx11 You have something called "feature levels" that let you run on Dx10 and Dx9 hardware (the Dx9 level is a bit more limitied compared to original Dx9). If you want to write a 2D game or a relatively simple 3D game, I would go for Dx9. Otherwise Dx11.
[/quote]

I think I'll go DX10 cuz I don't want DX9, it is kinda old like I see it, and I can't run any f*cking sampals from the SDK.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='iYossi' timestamp='1311603024' post='4839993']
[quote name='Guns' timestamp='1311602856' post='4839989']
Ignore Dx10. On Dx11 You have something called "feature levels" that let you run on Dx10 and Dx9 hardware (the Dx9 level is a bit more limitied compared to original Dx9). If you want to write a 2D game or a relatively simple 3D game, I would go for Dx9. Otherwise Dx11.
[/quote]

I think I'll go DX10 cuz I don't want DX9, it is kinda old like I see it, and I can't run any f*cking sampals from the SDK.
[/quote]

lol.. 4 votes for 9, 5 votes for 11... 0 votes for 10.. and you'll go for 10 [img]http://public.gamedev.net/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif[/img]

forum users never stop to amaze me.

btw.. of course i voted for 11.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='kunos' timestamp='1311606885' post='4840017']
lol.. 4 votes for 9, 5 votes for 11... 0 votes for 10.. and you'll go for 10 [img]http://public.gamedev.net/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif[/img]

forum users never stop to amaze me.
[/quote]

In order to maintain faith in humanity I'm hoping that was a typo on his part :P

My vote? All the way up to 11 baby!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't fucking run a triangle! And I really don't want 9. But, OK. Anyone has any good tuts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Firstly, calm the language down, there is no need for the swearing.

Secondly; what OS are you running? Are you drivers up to date?

Finally, run the examples via the debugger and see what errors it spits out, this might give you a clue as to why it isn't working.

The DX11 [b]API[/b] will work fine on your card assuming the OS and drivers are up to date and the examples are coded to use the feature levels correctly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I once had the same card as you got! It was the Laptop-Version, though.

And yes, I developed using the DX11 API on that thing. :)


My friend, with a HD4890 had some problems with running DX11 stuff at feature level 10, though. But a driver update did the trick.
You should try that, too. Probably you're running some kind of driver from at least 100 years ago which doesn't even know what DX11 is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='iYossi' timestamp='1311611014' post='4840035']
I can't fucking run a triangle! And I really don't want 9. But, OK. Anyone has any good tuts?
[/quote]

Just like you asked someone for an explanation as to why use "9", please give us an explanation as to why you "really don't want 9". Also, you can find good tuts in several places. Google and Bing are your friends. And if you would like help with why you "can't run a triangle", we'll need more information... does your code even compile and link? Does it crash somewhere? Does it run, but with a blank/black screen?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(no flame intended)

why don't you use opengl?
It'd run on windows xp vista & 7 (and on other platforms as well) you'd get full dx10 level features with that graphics card until you get a dx11 level card, and the transition would be seamless. You wouldn't have to worry about whether you're on XP or Vista or 7 you'd get the same visuals and same features... Plus, as I recently experienced, the two API are like twins (or at least DX 9 and OpenGL 2.1), the same features, same workflow, etc. Although I felt like dx was harder to learn due to the lack of good tutorials.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OpenGL has it's own share of driver problems, and besides: the OP has already evaluated the two and chosen Direct3D (see the first post) so the question is really irrelevant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I was actually aiming on OpenGL 3.x and unlike DX9/10/11, the was absoulutly NOTHING.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The decision is easy: If you want to run on Windows XP or Xbox 360: DX9. Else: DX11.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
While DirectX 11 is the latest and obvious most "high tech" release of DirectX, as others have pointed out using DX10 or 11 will cripple your game on windows XP, aka it won't work. (DX10/11 is not supported on Windows XP)


Now if you're focus is not to sell to the "masses" and just learning for now go for the latest version that works on your machine.
Do take heed though and yes it is easy enough to write two rendering .dlls and attach your application to the proper one at load time based on the OS (slightly advanced topic) creating a game in DX9 is what I recommend as a starting foundation. It doesn't require half as many complexities as DX11 does in setting up or rendering and still teaches you the foundation.


You also can learn to use Pixel and Vertex Shaders once you have a firm grasp which is basically what DX11 requires for everything to be rendered. So transitioning to DX11 once you grasp DX9 will be fairly easy. Going backwards ... eh possible but the DX9 -> 11 , again in my opinion is easier. Don't have to swallow as much to get your first app up and running etc etc etc.
If you want to support Windows XP and plan on selling your game/app or having friends run your app if they don't have XP and you create it with DX11 well too bad for them. On the other hand this link:
[url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Desktop_and_laptop_computers"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems#Desktop_and_laptop_computers[/url]

while the %'s have shifted since that was last updated, I'm sure Vista/Win7 have not taken over in a combined % over XP and if you refuse to create the DirectX 9 rendering .dll (read above) you are in essence cutting out at least 1/2 of your potential buyer base which is crazy. You'll have to learn DirectX 9 anyways to support them, so might as well start there. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='grazing' timestamp='1311633365' post='4840230']while the %'s have shifted since that was last updated, I'm sure Vista/Win7 have not taken over in a combined % over XP and if you refuse to create the DirectX 9 rendering .dll (read above) you are in essence cutting out at least 1/2 of your potential buyer base which is crazy. You'll have to learn DirectX 9 anyways to support them, so might as well start there. :)
[/quote]

According to the latest Steam hardware survey, users with both Vista/Win7 and DirectX 10/11 GPUs are now on 56%. Total Vista/Win7 is 71%/72%. XP is down to 20%. DX11 looks more like the reasonable choice every day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='mhagain' timestamp='1311637806' post='4840268']
[quote name='grazing' timestamp='1311633365' post='4840230']while the %'s have shifted since that was last updated, I'm sure Vista/Win7 have not taken over in a combined % over XP and if you refuse to create the DirectX 9 rendering .dll (read above) you are in essence cutting out at least 1/2 of your potential buyer base which is crazy. You'll have to learn DirectX 9 anyways to support them, so might as well start there. :)
[/quote]

According to the latest Steam hardware survey, users with both Vista/Win7 and DirectX 10/11 GPUs are now on 56%. Total Vista/Win7 is 71%/72%. XP is down to 20%. DX11 looks more like the reasonable choice every day.
[/quote]



You have a link to the survey? Wondering if it's a "poll." that was given e.g. the results will not be that accurate by a long shot. Only amongst those who voted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The OS + hardware data is generated by Steam itself, which queries the OS + drivers. They have the results here: [url="http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey"]http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey[/url]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='MJP' timestamp='1311647024' post='4840342']
The OS + hardware data is generated by Steam itself, which queries the OS + drivers. They have the results here: [url="http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey"]http://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey[/url]
[/quote]


So it's based on those who actually have this 'steam' installed. Gotcha.




Thank you for the link though. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Another statistics form those who has installed Unity Web Player: http://unity3d.com/webplayer/hardware-stats.html
There XP is 51.7% from all Windows'es.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Advertisement
  • Similar Content

    • By reenigne
      For those that don't know me. I am the individual who's two videos are listed here under setup for https://wiki.libsdl.org/Tutorials
      I also run grhmedia.com where I host the projects and code for the tutorials I have online.
      Recently, I received a notice from youtube they will be implementing their new policy in protecting video content as of which I won't be monetized till I meat there required number of viewers and views each month.

      Frankly, I'm pretty sick of youtube. I put up a video and someone else learns from it and puts up another video and because of the way youtube does their placement they end up with more views.
      Even guys that clearly post false information such as one individual who said GLEW 2.0 was broken because he didn't know how to compile it. He in short didn't know how to modify the script he used because he didn't understand make files and how the requirements of the compiler and library changes needed some different flags.

      At the end of the month when they implement this I will take down the content and host on my own server purely and it will be a paid system and or patreon. 

      I get my videos may be a bit dry, I generally figure people are there to learn how to do something and I rather not waste their time. 
      I used to also help people for free even those coming from the other videos. That won't be the case any more. I used to just take anyone emails and work with them my email is posted on the site.

      I don't expect to get the required number of subscribers in that time or increased views. Even if I did well it wouldn't take care of each reoccurring month.
      I figure this is simpler and I don't plan on putting some sort of exorbitant fee for a monthly subscription or the like.
      I was thinking on the lines of a few dollars 1,2, and 3 and the larger subscription gets you assistance with the content in the tutorials if needed that month.
      Maybe another fee if it is related but not directly in the content. 
      The fees would serve to cut down on the number of people who ask for help and maybe encourage some of the people to actually pay attention to what is said rather than do their own thing. That actually turns out to be 90% of the issues. I spent 6 hours helping one individual last week I must have asked him 20 times did you do exactly like I said in the video even pointed directly to the section. When he finally sent me a copy of the what he entered I knew then and there he had not. I circled it and I pointed out that wasn't what I said to do in the video. I didn't tell him what was wrong and how I knew that way he would go back and actually follow what it said to do. He then reported it worked. Yea, no kidding following directions works. But hey isn't alone and well its part of the learning process.

      So the point of this isn't to be a gripe session. I'm just looking for a bit of feed back. Do you think the fees are unreasonable?
      Should I keep the youtube channel and do just the fees with patreon or do you think locking the content to my site and require a subscription is an idea.

      I'm just looking at the fact it is unrealistic to think youtube/google will actually get stuff right or that youtube viewers will actually bother to start looking for more accurate videos. 
    • By Balma Alparisi
      i got error 1282 in my code.
      sf::ContextSettings settings; settings.majorVersion = 4; settings.minorVersion = 5; settings.attributeFlags = settings.Core; sf::Window window; window.create(sf::VideoMode(1600, 900), "Texture Unit Rectangle", sf::Style::Close, settings); window.setActive(true); window.setVerticalSyncEnabled(true); glewInit(); GLuint shaderProgram = createShaderProgram("FX/Rectangle.vss", "FX/Rectangle.fss"); float vertex[] = { -0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,0.0f, -0.5f,-0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,1.0f, 0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,0.0f, 0.5,-0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,1.0f, }; GLuint indices[] = { 0,1,2, 1,2,3, }; GLuint vao; glGenVertexArrays(1, &vao); glBindVertexArray(vao); GLuint vbo; glGenBuffers(1, &vbo); glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vbo); glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(vertex), vertex, GL_STATIC_DRAW); GLuint ebo; glGenBuffers(1, &ebo); glBindBuffer(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, ebo); glBufferData(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(indices), indices,GL_STATIC_DRAW); glVertexAttribPointer(0, 3, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)0); glEnableVertexAttribArray(0); glVertexAttribPointer(1, 2, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)(sizeof(float) * 3)); glEnableVertexAttribArray(1); GLuint texture[2]; glGenTextures(2, texture); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageOne = new sf::Image; bool isImageOneLoaded = imageOne->loadFromFile("Texture/container.jpg"); if (isImageOneLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageOne->getSize().x, imageOne->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageOne->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageOne; glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageTwo = new sf::Image; bool isImageTwoLoaded = imageTwo->loadFromFile("Texture/awesomeface.png"); if (isImageTwoLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageTwo->getSize().x, imageTwo->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageTwo->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageTwo; glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureOne"), 0); glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureTwo"), 1); GLenum error = glGetError(); std::cout << error << std::endl; sf::Event event; bool isRunning = true; while (isRunning) { while (window.pollEvent(event)) { if (event.type == event.Closed) { isRunning = false; } } glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); if (isImageOneLoaded && isImageTwoLoaded) { glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glUseProgram(shaderProgram); } glBindVertexArray(vao); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, 6, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, nullptr); glBindVertexArray(0); window.display(); } glDeleteVertexArrays(1, &vao); glDeleteBuffers(1, &vbo); glDeleteBuffers(1, &ebo); glDeleteProgram(shaderProgram); glDeleteTextures(2,texture); return 0; } and this is the vertex shader
      #version 450 core layout(location=0) in vec3 inPos; layout(location=1) in vec2 inTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; void main() { gl_Position=vec4(inPos,1.0); TexCoord=inTexCoord; } and the fragment shader
      #version 450 core in vec2 TexCoord; uniform sampler2D inTextureOne; uniform sampler2D inTextureTwo; out vec4 FragmentColor; void main() { FragmentColor=mix(texture(inTextureOne,TexCoord),texture(inTextureTwo,TexCoord),0.2); } I was expecting awesomeface.png on top of container.jpg

    • By khawk
      We've just released all of the source code for the NeHe OpenGL lessons on our Github page at https://github.com/gamedev-net/nehe-opengl. code - 43 total platforms, configurations, and languages are included.
      Now operated by GameDev.net, NeHe is located at http://nehe.gamedev.net where it has been a valuable resource for developers wanting to learn OpenGL and graphics programming.

      View full story
    • By TheChubu
      The Khronos™ Group, an open consortium of leading hardware and software companies, announces from the SIGGRAPH 2017 Conference the immediate public availability of the OpenGL® 4.6 specification. OpenGL 4.6 integrates the functionality of numerous ARB and EXT extensions created by Khronos members AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA into core, including the capability to ingest SPIR-V™ shaders.
      SPIR-V is a Khronos-defined standard intermediate language for parallel compute and graphics, which enables content creators to simplify their shader authoring and management pipelines while providing significant source shading language flexibility. OpenGL 4.6 adds support for ingesting SPIR-V shaders to the core specification, guaranteeing that SPIR-V shaders will be widely supported by OpenGL implementations.
      OpenGL 4.6 adds the functionality of these ARB extensions to OpenGL’s core specification:
      GL_ARB_gl_spirv and GL_ARB_spirv_extensions to standardize SPIR-V support for OpenGL GL_ARB_indirect_parameters and GL_ARB_shader_draw_parameters for reducing the CPU overhead associated with rendering batches of geometry GL_ARB_pipeline_statistics_query and GL_ARB_transform_feedback_overflow_querystandardize OpenGL support for features available in Direct3D GL_ARB_texture_filter_anisotropic (based on GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic) brings previously IP encumbered functionality into OpenGL to improve the visual quality of textured scenes GL_ARB_polygon_offset_clamp (based on GL_EXT_polygon_offset_clamp) suppresses a common visual artifact known as a “light leak” associated with rendering shadows GL_ARB_shader_atomic_counter_ops and GL_ARB_shader_group_vote add shader intrinsics supported by all desktop vendors to improve functionality and performance GL_KHR_no_error reduces driver overhead by allowing the application to indicate that it expects error-free operation so errors need not be generated In addition to the above features being added to OpenGL 4.6, the following are being released as extensions:
      GL_KHR_parallel_shader_compile allows applications to launch multiple shader compile threads to improve shader compile throughput WGL_ARB_create_context_no_error and GXL_ARB_create_context_no_error allow no error contexts to be created with WGL or GLX that support the GL_KHR_no_error extension “I’m proud to announce OpenGL 4.6 as the most feature-rich version of OpenGL yet. We've brought together the most popular, widely-supported extensions into a new core specification to give OpenGL developers and end users an improved baseline feature set. This includes resolving previous intellectual property roadblocks to bringing anisotropic texture filtering and polygon offset clamping into the core specification to enable widespread implementation and usage,” said Piers Daniell, chair of the OpenGL Working Group at Khronos. “The OpenGL working group will continue to respond to market needs and work with GPU vendors to ensure OpenGL remains a viable and evolving graphics API for all its customers and users across many vital industries.“
      The OpenGL 4.6 specification can be found at https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php. The GLSL to SPIR-V compiler glslang has been updated with GLSL 4.60 support, and can be found at https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glslang.
      Sophisticated graphics applications will also benefit from a set of newly released extensions for both OpenGL and OpenGL ES to enable interoperability with Vulkan and Direct3D. These extensions are named:
      GL_EXT_memory_object GL_EXT_memory_object_fd GL_EXT_memory_object_win32 GL_EXT_semaphore GL_EXT_semaphore_fd GL_EXT_semaphore_win32 GL_EXT_win32_keyed_mutex They can be found at: https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php
      Industry Support for OpenGL 4.6
      “With OpenGL 4.6 our customers have an improved set of core features available on our full range of OpenGL 4.x capable GPUs. These features provide improved rendering quality, performance and functionality. As the graphics industry’s most popular API, we fully support OpenGL and will continue to work closely with the Khronos Group on the development of new OpenGL specifications and extensions for our customers. NVIDIA has released beta OpenGL 4.6 drivers today at https://developer.nvidia.com/opengl-driver so developers can use these new features right away,” said Bob Pette, vice president, Professional Graphics at NVIDIA.
      "OpenGL 4.6 will be the first OpenGL release where conformant open source implementations based on the Mesa project will be deliverable in a reasonable timeframe after release. The open sourcing of the OpenGL conformance test suite and ongoing work between Khronos and X.org will also allow for non-vendor led open source implementations to achieve conformance in the near future," said David Airlie, senior principal engineer at Red Hat, and developer on Mesa/X.org projects.

      View full story
    • By _OskaR
      Hi,
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
  • Advertisement