OpenGL Quake 2 texture problem

Recommended Posts

Hello! I've tried to apply a Quake 2 texture to a Quake 2 MD2 model in my OpenGL texture.

This works, fine, but the texture doesn't look like it should. I have converted the PCX to a BMP file, because of the simplicity. Can I do so? Or how do I do it? I simply wanna use a BMP or TGA file, not a PCX file.

[img]http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/6001/asdcm.png[/img]

Any ideas?

Share on other sites
No idea how quake does things, but have you tried flipping the UV coords on the U,V or both axis?

Share on other sites
[quote name='n3Xus' timestamp='1312549650' post='4844989']
No idea how quake does things, but have you tried flipping the UV coords on the U,V or both axis?
[/quote]

Nope, although the PCX file works just fine. But because of simplicity and reduce my lines of code, I want to use a BMP or TGA file.

Like I said, PCX works fine, and therefore should the UV mapping not be wrong.

Share on other sites
I think you misunderstood me, Mr. Assange [img]http://public.gamedev.net/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif[/img]

I wasn't talking about textures but UV coordinates: have you even tried flipping them?

Share on other sites
[quote name='n3Xus' timestamp='1312553248' post='4845015']
I think you misunderstood me, Mr. Assange [img]http://public.gamedev.net/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif[/img]

I wasn't talking about textures but UV coordinates: have you even tried flipping them?
[/quote]

How do you mean by "flipping them"?

I know you weren't talking about textures , but since the PCX files works like intended I assume the texture coords are okay.

Share on other sites
[quote name='JulianAssange' timestamp='1312553558' post='4845017']
[quote name='n3Xus' timestamp='1312553248' post='4845015']
I think you misunderstood me, Mr. Assange [img]http://public.gamedev.net/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif[/img]

I wasn't talking about textures but UV coordinates: have you even tried flipping them?
[/quote]

How do you mean by "flipping them"?

I know you weren't talking about textures , but since the PCX files works like intended I assume the texture coords are okay.
[/quote]

Not always the case. Some (most, actually) BMPs are stored "upside-down", so - assuming standard OpenGL naming conventions of s and t for texcoords - you need to set "t = 1.0f - t" in order to correct this.

Share on other sites
[quote name='mhagain' timestamp='1312554052' post='4845019']
[quote name='JulianAssange' timestamp='1312553558' post='4845017']
[quote name='n3Xus' timestamp='1312553248' post='4845015']
I think you misunderstood me, Mr. Assange [img]http://public.gamedev.net/public/style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif[/img]

I wasn't talking about textures but UV coordinates: have you even tried flipping them?
[/quote]

How do you mean by "flipping them"?

I know you weren't talking about textures , but since the PCX files works like intended I assume the texture coords are okay.
[/quote]

Not always the case. Some (most, actually) BMPs are stored "upside-down", so - assuming standard OpenGL naming conventions of s and t for texcoords - you need to set "t = 1.0f - t" in order to correct this.
[/quote]

Thanks, that did the trick! Thanks

Create an account

Register a new account

• Partner Spotlight

• Forum Statistics

• Total Topics
627654
• Total Posts
2978451
• Similar Content

• Both functions are available since 3.0, and I'm currently using glMapBuffer(), which works fine.
But, I was wondering if anyone has experienced advantage in using glMapBufferRange(), which allows to specify the range of the mapped buffer. Could this be only a safety measure or does it improve performance?
Note: I'm not asking about glBufferSubData()/glBufferData. Those two are irrelevant in this case.
• By xhcao
Before using void glBindImageTexture(    GLuint unit, GLuint texture, GLint level, GLboolean layered, GLint layer, GLenum access, GLenum format), does need to make sure that texture is completeness.
• By cebugdev
hi guys,
are there any books, link online or any other resources that discusses on how to build special effects such as magic, lightning, etc. in OpenGL? i mean, yeah most of them are using particles but im looking for resources specifically on how to manipulate the particles to look like an effect that can be use for games,. i did fire particle before, and I want to learn how to do the other 'magic' as well.
Like are there one book or link(cant find in google) that atleast featured how to make different particle effects in OpenGL (or DirectX)? If there is no one stop shop for it, maybe ill just look for some tips on how to make a particle engine that is flexible enough to enable me to design different effects/magic
let me know if you guys have recommendations.
• By dud3
How do we rotate the camera around x axis 360 degrees, without having the strange effect as in my video below?
Mine behaves exactly the same way spherical coordinates would, I'm using euler angles.
Tried googling, but couldn't find a proper answer, guessing I don't know what exactly to google for, googled 'rotate 360 around x axis', got no proper answers.

References:
Code: https://pastebin.com/Hcshj3FQ
The video shows the difference between blender and my rotation:

• By Defend
I've had a Google around for this but haven't yet found some solid advice. There is a lot of "it depends", but I'm not sure on what.
My question is what's a good rule of thumb to follow when it comes to creating/using VBOs & VAOs? As in, when should I use multiple or when should I not? My understanding so far is that if I need a new VBO, then I need a new VAO. So when it comes to rendering multiple objects I can either:
* make lots of VAO/VBO pairs and flip through them to render different objects, or
* make one big VBO and jump around its memory to render different objects.
I also understand that if I need to render objects with different vertex attributes, then a new VAO is necessary in this case.
If that "it depends" really is quite variable, what's best for a beginner with OpenGL, assuming that better approaches can be learnt later with better understanding?

• 10
• 12
• 22
• 13
• 33