Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL [GLSL] Problem with Simple Shading Example

Recommended Posts

Hello, I just got the 3rd Ed of the Orange book (learning GLSL) and I have some problems running the first example :(. The code is as follows:

int installBrickShaders(const GLchar *brickVertex, const GLchar *brickFragment)
GLuint brickVS, brickFS, brickProg; // handles to objects
GLint vertCompiled, fragCompiled;
GLint linked;

// Create a vertex shader object and a fragment shader object
brickVS = glCreateShader(GL_VERTEX_SHADER);
brickFS = glCreateShader(GL_FRAGMENT_SHADER);

// load source code strings into shaders
glShaderSource(brickVS, 1, &brickVertex, NULL);
glShaderSource(brickFS, 1, &brickFragment, NULL);

// Coompile the brick vertex shader and print out
// the compiler log file

glGetShaderiv(brickVS, GL_COMPILE_STATUS, &vertCompiled);

// Compile the brick fragment shader and print out
// the compiler log file

glGetShaderiv(brickFS, GL_COMPILE_STATUS, &fragCompiled);

if(!vertCompiled || !fragCompiled)
return 0;

// Create a program object and attach the two compiled shaders

brickProg = glCreateProgram();
glAttachShader(brickProg, brickVS);
glAttachShader(brickProg, brickFS);

// Bind user-defined in variable to vertex attribute

glBindAttribLocation(brickProg, 1, "MCvertex");
glBindAttribLocation(brickProg, 2, "MCnormal");

// Bind user-defined out variable to data buffer

glBindFragDataLocation(brickProg, 0, "FragColor");

// Link the program object and print out the info log



glGetProgramiv(brickProg, GL_LINK_STATUS, &linked);

// Install program object as part of current state


// Set up initial uniform values

glUniform3f(getUniLoc(brickProg, "BrickColor"), 1.0, .3, .2);
glUniform3f(getUniLoc(brickProg, "MortarColor"), .85, .86, .84);
glUniform2f(getUniLoc(brickProg, "BrickSize"), .3, .15);
glUniform2f(getUniLoc(brickProg, "BrickPct"), .90 , .85);
glUniform3f(getUniLoc(brickProg, "LightPosition"), .0, .0, 4.0);
void main(int argc, char **argv)
int success = 0;
int gl_major, gl_minor;

GLchar *VertexShaderSource, *FragmentShaderSource;

glutInit( &argc, argv );
glutInitDisplayMode( GLUT_RGB | GLUT_DEPTH | GLUT_DOUBLE);
glutInitWindowSize( 500, 500);
window = glutCreateWindow( "3Dlabs Brick Shader" );

glutIdleFunc( play );
glutDisplayFunc( display );
glutKeyboardFunc( key );
glutReshapeFunc( reshape );
glutMotionFunc( motion );
glutMouseFunc( mouse );
glutSpecialFunc( special );

glutTimerFunc(TIMER_FREQUENCY_MILLIS, timer, 0);

// Initialize the "OpenGL Extension Wrangler" library

// Make sure that OpenGL 2.0 is supported by the driver
getGlVersion(&gl_major, &gl_minor);
printf("GL_VERSION major=%d minor=%d\n", gl_major, gl_minor);

if(gl_major < 2)
printf("GL_VERSION major=%d minor=%d\n", gl_major, gl_minor);
printf("Support for OpenGL 2.0 is required for this demo... exiting\n");


key('?', 0, 0); // display help

readShaderSource("shader", &VertexShaderSource, &FragmentShaderSource);
success = installBrickShaders(VertexShaderSource, FragmentShaderSource);


#version 140

in vec4 MCvertex;
in vec3 MCnormal;

uniform mat4 MVMatrix;
uniform mat4 MVPMatrix;
uniform mat3 NormalMatrix;

uniform vec3 LightPosition;

const float SpecularContribution = .3;
const float DiffuseContribution = 1. - SpecularContribution;

out float LightIntensity;
out vec2 MCposition;

void main()
vec3 ecPosition = vec3(MVMatrix * MCvertex);
vec3 tnorm = normalize(NormalMatrix * MCnormal);
vec3 lightVec = normalize(LightPosition - ecPosition);
vec3 reflectVec = reflect(-lightVec, tnorm);
vec3 viewVec = normalize(-ecPosition);
float diffuse = max(dot(lightVec, tnorm), 0.);
float spec = 0.;

if(diffuse > 0.)
spec = max(dot(reflectVec,viewVec), 0.);
spec = pow(spec, 16.);

LightIntensity = DiffuseContribution * diffuse +
SpecularContribution * spec;

MCposition = MCvertex.xy;
gl_Position = MVPMatrix * MCvertex;

#version 140

uniform vec3 BrickColor, MortarColor;
uniform vec2 BrickSize;
uniform vec2 BrickPct;

in vec2 MCposition;
in float LightIntensity;

out vec4 FragColor;

void main()
vec3 color;
vec2 position, useBrick;

position = MCposition / BrickSize;

if (fract(position.y * .5) > .5)
position.x += .5;

position = fract(position);
useBrick = step(position, BrickPct);

color = mix(MortarColor, BrickColor, useBrick.x * useBrick.y);

color *= LightIntensity;

FragColor = vec4(color, 1.);

When the program reaches simpleShaderExample.cpp::::glBindFragDataLocation(brickProg, 0, "FragColor"); it gets an Unhandled Exception
Unhandled exception at 0x00000000 in emptyExample.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation.

I have looked through google and I can't find any solution hope you can help me on what to do because I'm badly stuck in this error.

Thank you very much for your help

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Never thought of that :blink: so I did a check with [url=""]OpenGL Extensions Viewer 4.02[/url] and I got the following report ([url=""]for a complete report[/url])

Renderer: GeForce GT 240/PCI/SSE2
Vendor: NVIDIA Corporation
Memory: 1024 MB
Version: 3.3.0
Shading language version: 3.30 NVIDIA via Cg compiler
Extension verification:
GL_APPLE_vertex_array_object was not found, but has the entry point glBindFragDataLocationIndexed
GL_VERSION_3_0 was not found, but has the entry point glBindFragDataLocation

I look at the API for the [url=""]glBindFragDataLocation[/url] and it appears that's supported on the GLSL version that I have, so I don't know what's really happening :(

Any suggestions?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Your card may support it, but maybe it was missed by whatever extension linker you are using. Are you using GLEW? Can you make sure that it is loading glBindFragDataLocation?

Maybe you can try using glBindFragDataLocationExt instead.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='karwosts' timestamp='1313425340' post='4849445']
Are you using GLEW?
Yes, glew 1.6

[quote name='karwosts' timestamp='1313425340' post='4849445']
Can you make sure that it is loading glBindFragDataLocation?
I'm not sure how can I do that, but if I go to the definition on VS 2010 I found the header definition of the function

[quote name='karwosts' timestamp='1313425340' post='4849445']
Maybe you can try using glBindFragDataLocationExt instead.
It worked, at least no compile errors, though I don't see anything :(

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
    • Total Posts
  • Similar Content

    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
    • By Abecederia
      So I've recently started learning some GLSL and now I'm toying with a POM shader. I'm trying to optimize it and notice that it starts having issues at high texture sizes, especially with self-shadowing.
      Now I know POM is expensive either way, but would pulling the heightmap out of the normalmap alpha channel and in it's own 8bit texture make doing all those dozens of texture fetches more cheap? Or is everything in the cache aligned to 32bit anyway? I haven't implemented texture compression yet, I think that would help? But regardless, should there be a performance boost from decoupling the heightmap? I could also keep it in a lower resolution than the normalmap if that would improve performance.
      Any help is much appreciated, please keep in mind I'm somewhat of a newbie. Thanks!
    • By test opty
      I'm trying to learn OpenGL through a website and have proceeded until this page of it. The output is a simple triangle. The problem is the complexity.
      I have read that page several times and tried to analyse the code but I haven't understood the code properly and completely yet. This is the code:
      #include <glad/glad.h> #include <GLFW/glfw3.h> #include <C:\Users\Abbasi\Desktop\std_lib_facilities_4.h> using namespace std; //****************************************************************************** void framebuffer_size_callback(GLFWwindow* window, int width, int height); void processInput(GLFWwindow *window); // settings const unsigned int SCR_WIDTH = 800; const unsigned int SCR_HEIGHT = 600; const char *vertexShaderSource = "#version 330 core\n" "layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos;\n" "void main()\n" "{\n" " gl_Position = vec4(aPos.x, aPos.y, aPos.z, 1.0);\n" "}\0"; const char *fragmentShaderSource = "#version 330 core\n" "out vec4 FragColor;\n" "void main()\n" "{\n" " FragColor = vec4(1.0f, 0.5f, 0.2f, 1.0f);\n" "}\n\0"; //******************************* int main() { // glfw: initialize and configure // ------------------------------ glfwInit(); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_CONTEXT_VERSION_MAJOR, 3); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_CONTEXT_VERSION_MINOR, 3); glfwWindowHint(GLFW_OPENGL_PROFILE, GLFW_OPENGL_CORE_PROFILE); // glfw window creation GLFWwindow* window = glfwCreateWindow(SCR_WIDTH, SCR_HEIGHT, "My First Triangle", nullptr, nullptr); if (window == nullptr) { cout << "Failed to create GLFW window" << endl; glfwTerminate(); return -1; } glfwMakeContextCurrent(window); glfwSetFramebufferSizeCallback(window, framebuffer_size_callback); // glad: load all OpenGL function pointers if (!gladLoadGLLoader((GLADloadproc)glfwGetProcAddress)) { cout << "Failed to initialize GLAD" << endl; return -1; } // build and compile our shader program // vertex shader int vertexShader = glCreateShader(GL_VERTEX_SHADER); glShaderSource(vertexShader, 1, &vertexShaderSource, nullptr); glCompileShader(vertexShader); // check for shader compile errors int success; char infoLog[512]; glGetShaderiv(vertexShader, GL_COMPILE_STATUS, &success); if (!success) { glGetShaderInfoLog(vertexShader, 512, nullptr, infoLog); cout << "ERROR::SHADER::VERTEX::COMPILATION_FAILED\n" << infoLog << endl; } // fragment shader int fragmentShader = glCreateShader(GL_FRAGMENT_SHADER); glShaderSource(fragmentShader, 1, &fragmentShaderSource, nullptr); glCompileShader(fragmentShader); // check for shader compile errors glGetShaderiv(fragmentShader, GL_COMPILE_STATUS, &success); if (!success) { glGetShaderInfoLog(fragmentShader, 512, nullptr, infoLog); cout << "ERROR::SHADER::FRAGMENT::COMPILATION_FAILED\n" << infoLog << endl; } // link shaders int shaderProgram = glCreateProgram(); glAttachShader(shaderProgram, vertexShader); glAttachShader(shaderProgram, fragmentShader); glLinkProgram(shaderProgram); // check for linking errors glGetProgramiv(shaderProgram, GL_LINK_STATUS, &success); if (!success) { glGetProgramInfoLog(shaderProgram, 512, nullptr, infoLog); cout << "ERROR::SHADER::PROGRAM::LINKING_FAILED\n" << infoLog << endl; } glDeleteShader(vertexShader); glDeleteShader(fragmentShader); // set up vertex data (and buffer(s)) and configure vertex attributes float vertices[] = { -0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, // left 0.5f, -0.5f, 0.0f, // right 0.0f, 0.5f, 0.0f // top }; unsigned int VBO, VAO; glGenVertexArrays(1, &VAO); glGenBuffers(1, &VBO); // bind the Vertex Array Object first, then bind and set vertex buffer(s), //and then configure vertex attributes(s). glBindVertexArray(VAO); glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, VBO); glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(vertices), vertices, GL_STATIC_DRAW); glVertexAttribPointer(0, 3, GL_FLOAT, GL_FALSE, 3 * sizeof(float), (void*)0); glEnableVertexAttribArray(0); // note that this is allowed, the call to glVertexAttribPointer registered VBO // as the vertex attribute's bound vertex buffer object so afterwards we can safely unbind glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, 0); // You can unbind the VAO afterwards so other VAO calls won't accidentally // modify this VAO, but this rarely happens. Modifying other // VAOs requires a call to glBindVertexArray anyways so we generally don't unbind // VAOs (nor VBOs) when it's not directly necessary. glBindVertexArray(0); // uncomment this call to draw in wireframe polygons. //glPolygonMode(GL_FRONT_AND_BACK, GL_LINE); // render loop while (!glfwWindowShouldClose(window)) { // input // ----- processInput(window); // render // ------ glClearColor(0.2f, 0.3f, 0.3f, 1.0f); glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); // draw our first triangle glUseProgram(shaderProgram); glBindVertexArray(VAO); // seeing as we only have a single VAO there's no need to // bind it every time, but we'll do so to keep things a bit more organized glDrawArrays(GL_TRIANGLES, 0, 3); // glBindVertexArray(0); // no need to unbind it every time // glfw: swap buffers and poll IO events (keys pressed/released, mouse moved etc.) glfwSwapBuffers(window); glfwPollEvents(); } // optional: de-allocate all resources once they've outlived their purpose: glDeleteVertexArrays(1, &VAO); glDeleteBuffers(1, &VBO); // glfw: terminate, clearing all previously allocated GLFW resources. glfwTerminate(); return 0; } //************************************************** // process all input: query GLFW whether relevant keys are pressed/released // this frame and react accordingly void processInput(GLFWwindow *window) { if (glfwGetKey(window, GLFW_KEY_ESCAPE) == GLFW_PRESS) glfwSetWindowShouldClose(window, true); } //******************************************************************** // glfw: whenever the window size changed (by OS or user resize) this callback function executes void framebuffer_size_callback(GLFWwindow* window, int width, int height) { // make sure the viewport matches the new window dimensions; note that width and // height will be significantly larger than specified on retina displays. glViewport(0, 0, width, height); } As you see, about 200 lines of complicated code only for a simple triangle. 
      I don't know what parts are necessary for that output. And also, what the correct order of instructions for such an output or programs is, generally. That start point is too complex for a beginner of OpenGL like me and I don't know how to make the issue solved. What are your ideas please? What is the way to figure both the code and the whole program out correctly please?
      I wish I'd read a reference that would teach me OpenGL through a step-by-step method. 
  • Popular Now