Sign in to follow this  
L. Spiro

OpenGL Rendering to Textures is Up-Side Down

Recommended Posts

What is the best way to solve this?
glPixelZoom() does not work because I am not using glReadPixels() and friends (using FBO’s with glCopyTexSubImage2D() as a fallback).

I don’t want to mess with the projection matrix unless that is the only solution. Such a system means setting a flag to generically Y-invert the projection matrix on render, reversing the culling, etc.
A system prone to error, I think.

I am looking for a way in OpenGL to either flip my image on render or to quickly Y-invert the FBO after render.


Regards,
Yogurt Emperor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"A system prone to error, I think."

Why?

You're only going to have two routines; one which sets up FBO rendering and one which sets up main display rendering and you call the appropriate one when needed. They aren't going to be very long; there shouldn't really be a lot of room for error.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In my opinion, the correct solution is, as obvious as it may seem, to do everything correct from the beginning and play by OpenGL's natural rules and conventions.

The typical problem is that you use a texture coordinate space with origin in the upper left corner, while OpenGL typically favors the lower left origin convention. The result of mixing these up is a vertically flipped texture. There are many ways to handle it, but play with OpenGL's convention, instead of prying it into your convention, and everything will come out not only correct, but also naturally and with little problems.

The actual problem is likely that you don't really know and have control of where the origin of your images are. Since you have a 50% chance to get it right the first time (vertical mirroring is typically the only issue you encounter) and the solution when its wrong is simple, you just go ahead and don't think more about it anymore once it's "working".

There are many pieces that works together to orient the image properly, like the order of the source data, the direction of the texture coordinate axes relative the object, the direction of the vertex coordinate axes relative the screen, and if you don't have full control and knowledge of each and every one of them, you will end up with these kinds of problems sooner or later. The solution may be in any of those pieces that orients an image, so your best option is to learn and do it right all the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Katie, I have enough control over my system that I could indeed implement it in a safe and organized way. I guess I should have said it would feel hacky to do it that way, but I am prepared to do it if necessary.

Brother Bob, I guess I should have mentioned my reason for wanting to do this, because I guess I did come off as sounding like a newbie who encounters one thing acting strangely and then just hacking it to get it to work the way he or she wants.

I do know why it is that way and I have a solid reason for wanting to change it in this particular case.
My engine supports DirectX (9 and above) and they render-to-texture without Y-inverting the image (because they assume upper-left origin of the frame buffer).

I know why they are doing what they are doing, but I do need the same series of function calls to yield the same result. That is imperative.
Now, I can choose to go either way, but the DirectX way is more intuitive for the (somewhat specialized) feature I am trying to implement.

This type of render-to-texture is meant for visual use, not internal workings such as generating shadow maps or something else that is a small part of a larger operation. Typical use would be to take a screenshot, apply the image to a bunch of triangles that initially cover the whole screen, and have the triangles fall off like broken glass for a nifty-puff menu effect.
The effect should work just as nicely if the image comes from a file instead of a screenshot, so you can understand my desire to go with the DirectX way here.


Also, flipped textures do have a use, especially for mapping onto models. I will have a flag set to optionally not flip the texture in OpenGL, and to flip it in DirectX. But either way, I need a way to flip it in both OpenGL and DirectX.

I am guessing that this will be through the projection matrix. Drat it.


Thank you,
Yogurt Emperor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you for the suggestions but I need this to be transparent to the user, work under any projection (orthogonal and perspective), and require no change in the user’s code to get the same result in both Direct3D and OpenGL.

I have organized my renderer so that one function is used to make the final render.
In this function I combine matrices to create the model-view, model-view-projection, etc.

I have added a flag the user can change to Y-invert the render(s). If this flag is set, I, for the duration of that call to render, Y-invert the projection matrix and invert the cull mode, then switch them back when the render function exits.

At first I thought this would be hacky but it works out as an engine feature and gives me flexibility since it also works for Direct3D.
I added a flag to the render-target textures so the user can decide if the resulting texture should be right-side up or up-side down, and the resulting textures are consistent between API’s.


Thank you for all the input.


Yogurt Emperor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Announcements

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      628354
    • Total Posts
      2982230
  • Similar Content

    • By test opty
      Hi all,
       
      I'm starting OpenGL using a tut on the Web. But at this point I would like to know the primitives needed for creating a window using OpenGL. So on Windows and using MS VS 2017, what is the simplest code required to render a window with the title of "First Rectangle", please?
       
       
    • By DejayHextrix
      Hi, New here. 
      I need some help. My fiance and I like to play this mobile game online that goes by real time. Her and I are always working but when we have free time we like to play this game. We don't always got time throughout the day to Queue Buildings, troops, Upgrades....etc.... 
      I was told to look into DLL Injection and OpenGL/DirectX Hooking. Is this true? Is this what I need to learn? 
      How do I read the Android files, or modify the files, or get the in-game tags/variables for the game I want? 
      Any assistance on this would be most appreciated. I been everywhere and seems no one knows or is to lazy to help me out. It would be nice to have assistance for once. I don't know what I need to learn. 
      So links of topics I need to learn within the comment section would be SOOOOO.....Helpful. Anything to just get me started. 
      Thanks, 
      Dejay Hextrix 
    • By mellinoe
      Hi all,
      First time poster here, although I've been reading posts here for quite a while. This place has been invaluable for learning graphics programming -- thanks for a great resource!
      Right now, I'm working on a graphics abstraction layer for .NET which supports D3D11, Vulkan, and OpenGL at the moment. I have implemented most of my planned features already, and things are working well. Some remaining features that I am planning are Compute Shaders, and some flavor of read-write shader resources. At the moment, my shaders can just get simple read-only access to a uniform (or constant) buffer, a texture, or a sampler. Unfortunately, I'm having a tough time grasping the distinctions between all of the different kinds of read-write resources that are available. In D3D alone, there seem to be 5 or 6 different kinds of resources with similar but different characteristics. On top of that, I get the impression that some of them are more or less "obsoleted" by the newer kinds, and don't have much of a place in modern code. There seem to be a few pivots:
      The data source/destination (buffer or texture) Read-write or read-only Structured or unstructured (?) Ordered vs unordered (?) These are just my observations based on a lot of MSDN and OpenGL doc reading. For my library, I'm not interested in exposing every possibility to the user -- just trying to find a good "middle-ground" that can be represented cleanly across API's which is good enough for common scenarios.
      Can anyone give a sort of "overview" of the different options, and perhaps compare/contrast the concepts between Direct3D, OpenGL, and Vulkan? I'd also be very interested in hearing how other folks have abstracted these concepts in their libraries.
    • By aejt
      I recently started getting into graphics programming (2nd try, first try was many years ago) and I'm working on a 3d rendering engine which I hope to be able to make a 3D game with sooner or later. I have plenty of C++ experience, but not a lot when it comes to graphics, and while it's definitely going much better this time, I'm having trouble figuring out how assets are usually handled by engines.
      I'm not having trouble with handling the GPU resources, but more so with how the resources should be defined and used in the system (materials, models, etc).
      This is my plan now, I've implemented most of it except for the XML parts and factories and those are the ones I'm not sure of at all:
      I have these classes:
      For GPU resources:
      Geometry: holds and manages everything needed to render a geometry: VAO, VBO, EBO. Texture: holds and manages a texture which is loaded into the GPU. Shader: holds and manages a shader which is loaded into the GPU. For assets relying on GPU resources:
      Material: holds a shader resource, multiple texture resources, as well as uniform settings. Mesh: holds a geometry and a material. Model: holds multiple meshes, possibly in a tree structure to more easily support skinning later on? For handling GPU resources:
      ResourceCache<T>: T can be any resource loaded into the GPU. It owns these resources and only hands out handles to them on request (currently string identifiers are used when requesting handles, but all resources are stored in a vector and each handle only contains resource's index in that vector) Resource<T>: The handles given out from ResourceCache. The handles are reference counted and to get the underlying resource you simply deference like with pointers (*handle).  
      And my plan is to define everything into these XML documents to abstract away files:
      Resources.xml for ref-counted GPU resources (geometry, shaders, textures) Resources are assigned names/ids and resource files, and possibly some attributes (what vertex attributes does this geometry have? what vertex attributes does this shader expect? what uniforms does this shader use? and so on) Are reference counted using ResourceCache<T> Assets.xml for assets using the GPU resources (materials, meshes, models) Assets are not reference counted, but they hold handles to ref-counted resources. References the resources defined in Resources.xml by names/ids. The XMLs are loaded into some structure in memory which is then used for loading the resources/assets using factory classes:
      Factory classes for resources:
      For example, a texture factory could contain the texture definitions from the XML containing data about textures in the game, as well as a cache containing all loaded textures. This means it has mappings from each name/id to a file and when asked to load a texture with a name/id, it can look up its path and use a "BinaryLoader" to either load the file and create the resource directly, or asynchronously load the file's data into a queue which then can be read from later to create the resources synchronously in the GL context. These factories only return handles.
      Factory classes for assets:
      Much like for resources, these classes contain the definitions for the assets they can load. For example, with the definition the MaterialFactory will know which shader, textures and possibly uniform a certain material has, and with the help of TextureFactory and ShaderFactory, it can retrieve handles to the resources it needs (Shader + Textures), setup itself from XML data (uniform values), and return a created instance of requested material. These factories return actual instances, not handles (but the instances contain handles).
       
       
      Is this a good or commonly used approach? Is this going to bite me in the ass later on? Are there other more preferable approaches? Is this outside of the scope of a 3d renderer and should be on the engine side? I'd love to receive and kind of advice or suggestions!
      Thanks!
    • By nedondev
      I 'm learning how to create game by using opengl with c/c++ coding, so here is my fist game. In video description also have game contain in Dropbox. May be I will make it better in future.
      Thanks.
  • Popular Now