Sign in to follow this  
L. Spiro

OpenGL Rendering to Textures is Up-Side Down

Recommended Posts

L. Spiro    25638
What is the best way to solve this?
glPixelZoom() does not work because I am not using glReadPixels() and friends (using FBO’s with glCopyTexSubImage2D() as a fallback).

I don’t want to mess with the projection matrix unless that is the only solution. Such a system means setting a flag to generically Y-invert the projection matrix on render, reversing the culling, etc.
A system prone to error, I think.

I am looking for a way in OpenGL to either flip my image on render or to quickly Y-invert the FBO after render.

Yogurt Emperor

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Katie    2244
"A system prone to error, I think."


You're only going to have two routines; one which sets up FBO rendering and one which sets up main display rendering and you call the appropriate one when needed. They aren't going to be very long; there shouldn't really be a lot of room for error.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Brother Bob    10344
In my opinion, the correct solution is, as obvious as it may seem, to do everything correct from the beginning and play by OpenGL's natural rules and conventions.

The typical problem is that you use a texture coordinate space with origin in the upper left corner, while OpenGL typically favors the lower left origin convention. The result of mixing these up is a vertically flipped texture. There are many ways to handle it, but play with OpenGL's convention, instead of prying it into your convention, and everything will come out not only correct, but also naturally and with little problems.

The actual problem is likely that you don't really know and have control of where the origin of your images are. Since you have a 50% chance to get it right the first time (vertical mirroring is typically the only issue you encounter) and the solution when its wrong is simple, you just go ahead and don't think more about it anymore once it's "working".

There are many pieces that works together to orient the image properly, like the order of the source data, the direction of the texture coordinate axes relative the object, the direction of the vertex coordinate axes relative the screen, and if you don't have full control and knowledge of each and every one of them, you will end up with these kinds of problems sooner or later. The solution may be in any of those pieces that orients an image, so your best option is to learn and do it right all the way.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
L. Spiro    25638
Katie, I have enough control over my system that I could indeed implement it in a safe and organized way. I guess I should have said it would feel hacky to do it that way, but I am prepared to do it if necessary.

Brother Bob, I guess I should have mentioned my reason for wanting to do this, because I guess I did come off as sounding like a newbie who encounters one thing acting strangely and then just hacking it to get it to work the way he or she wants.

I do know why it is that way and I have a solid reason for wanting to change it in this particular case.
My engine supports DirectX (9 and above) and they render-to-texture without Y-inverting the image (because they assume upper-left origin of the frame buffer).

I know why they are doing what they are doing, but I do need the same series of function calls to yield the same result. That is imperative.
Now, I can choose to go either way, but the DirectX way is more intuitive for the (somewhat specialized) feature I am trying to implement.

This type of render-to-texture is meant for visual use, not internal workings such as generating shadow maps or something else that is a small part of a larger operation. Typical use would be to take a screenshot, apply the image to a bunch of triangles that initially cover the whole screen, and have the triangles fall off like broken glass for a nifty-puff menu effect.
The effect should work just as nicely if the image comes from a file instead of a screenshot, so you can understand my desire to go with the DirectX way here.

Also, flipped textures do have a use, especially for mapping onto models. I will have a flag set to optionally not flip the texture in OpenGL, and to flip it in DirectX. But either way, I need a way to flip it in both OpenGL and DirectX.

I am guessing that this will be through the projection matrix. Drat it.

Thank you,
Yogurt Emperor

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
mhagain    13430
Do this before drawing (pick the appropriate call)::
[code]glOrtho (x, width, height, y, zn, zf); // top-left is the origin
glOrtho (x, width, y, height, zn, zf); // bottom-left is the origin[/code]

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
triangles    106

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
L. Spiro    25638
Thank you for the suggestions but I need this to be transparent to the user, work under any projection (orthogonal and perspective), and require no change in the user’s code to get the same result in both Direct3D and OpenGL.

I have organized my renderer so that one function is used to make the final render.
In this function I combine matrices to create the model-view, model-view-projection, etc.

I have added a flag the user can change to Y-invert the render(s). If this flag is set, I, for the duration of that call to render, Y-invert the projection matrix and invert the cull mode, then switch them back when the render function exits.

At first I thought this would be hacky but it works out as an engine feature and gives me flexibility since it also works for Direct3D.
I added a flag to the render-target textures so the user can decide if the resulting texture should be right-side up or up-side down, and the resulting textures are consistent between API’s.

Thank you for all the input.

Yogurt Emperor

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By pseudomarvin
      I assumed that if a shader is computationally expensive then the execution is just slower. But running the following GLSL FS instead just crashes
      void main() { float x = 0; float y = 0; int sum = 0; for (float x = 0; x < 10; x += 0.00005) { for (float y = 0; y < 10; y += 0.00005) { sum++; } } fragColor = vec4(1, 1, 1 , 1.0); } with unhandled exception in nvoglv32.dll. Are there any hard limits on the number of steps/time that a shader can take before it is shut down? I was thinking about implementing some time intensive computation in shaders where it would take on the order of seconds to compute a frame, is that possible? Thanks.
    • By Arulbabu Donbosco
      There are studios selling applications which is just copying any 3Dgraphic content and regenerating into another new window. especially for CAVE Virtual reality experience. so that the user opens REvite or CAD or any other 3D applications and opens a model. then when the user selects the rendered window the VR application copies the 3D model information from the OpenGL window. 
      I got the clue that the VR application replaces the windows opengl32.dll file. how this is possible ... how can we copy the 3d content from the current OpenGL window.
      anyone, please help me .. how to go further... to create an application like VR CAVE. 
    • By cebugdev
      hi all,

      i am trying to build an OpenGL 2D GUI system, (yeah yeah, i know i should not be re inventing the wheel, but this is for educational and some other purpose only),
      i have built GUI system before using 2D systems such as that of HTML/JS canvas, but in 2D system, i can directly match a mouse coordinates to the actual graphic coordinates with additional computation for screen size/ratio/scale ofcourse.
      now i want to port it to OpenGL, i know that to render a 2D object in OpenGL we specify coordiantes in Clip space or use the orthographic projection, now heres what i need help about.
      1. what is the right way of rendering the GUI? is it thru drawing in clip space or switching to ortho projection?
      2. from screen coordinates (top left is 0,0 nd bottom right is width height), how can i map the mouse coordinates to OpenGL 2D so that mouse events such as button click works? In consideration ofcourse to the current screen/size dimension.
      3. when let say if the screen size/dimension is different, how to handle this? in my previous javascript 2D engine using canvas, i just have my working coordinates and then just perform the bitblk or copying my working canvas to screen canvas and scale the mouse coordinates from there, in OpenGL how to work on a multiple screen sizes (more like an OpenGL ES question).
      lastly, if you guys know any books, resources, links or tutorials that handle or discuss this, i found one with marekknows opengl game engine website but its not free,
      Just let me know. Did not have any luck finding resource in google for writing our own OpenGL GUI framework.
      IF there are no any available online, just let me know, what things do i need to look into for OpenGL and i will study them one by one to make it work.
      thank you, and looking forward to positive replies.
    • By fllwr0491
      I have a few beginner questions about tesselation that I really have no clue.
      The opengl wiki doesn't seem to talk anything about the details.
      What is the relationship between TCS layout out and TES layout in?
      How does the tesselator know how control points are organized?
          e.g. If TES input requests triangles, but TCS can output N vertices.
             What happens in this case?
      In this article,
      the isoline example TCS out=4, but TES in=isoline.
      And gl_TessCoord is only a single one.
      So which ones are the control points?
      How are tesselator building primitives?
    • By Orella
      I've been developing a 2D Engine using SFML + ImGui.
      Here you can see an image
      The editor is rendered using ImGui and the scene window is a sf::RenderTexture where I draw the GameObjects and then is converted to ImGui::Image to render it in the editor.
      Now I need to create a 3D Engine during this year in my Bachelor Degree but using SDL2 + ImGui and I want to recreate what I did with the 2D Engine. 
      I've managed to render the editor like I did in the 2D Engine using this example that comes with ImGui. 
      3D Editor preview
      But I don't know how to create an equivalent of sf::RenderTexture in SDL2, so I can draw the 3D scene there and convert it to ImGui::Image to show it in the editor.
      If you can provide code will be better. And if you want me to provide any specific code tell me.
  • Popular Now