• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

tollingbell

OpenGL
OpenGL32 - what is it, where do I get it, and is it worth it?

9 posts in this topic

I realize this question might be slightly newbie-ish for this forum. If I offend anyone, I apologize. I am a college grad who has used SGI''s OpenGL on IRIX machines, as well as the wimpy GLUT for beginners on Linux. Of course, I''d used these for classes, and game development is an entirely different beast. From my brief use of Direct3D, I understand that Direct3D is much lower level, and OpenGL is (sort of) more like a Direct3D retained mode implementation, except MUCH better and faster so it can be used in games. What exactly is OpenGL32? Does it have a downloadable SDK? Is it a good idea to make a preliminary game engine in OpenGL32 as opposed to Direct3D? The reason I ask this is that I''m not really aware of any games since Quake3 that run in OpenGL; nowadays everything seems to be Direct3D. Thanks for taking time to read this guys. **************************************** A Linux user... by decision, by destiny, and by doom.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Games aren''t made in OpenGL? Anyway: why not use it? It''s just as fast (even a little faster than Direct3D on NVidia based cards, since NVidia''s OpenGL drivers are extremely well written), cross-platform, easy to use, et cetera. You shouldn''t need to download anything to use OpenGL, it comes with just about every compiler (on a 32bit machine OpenGL is OpenGL32). In Windows only 1.1 is supported, but you can access features in 1.3+ through extensions (they''re discussing 2.0 and simply ignoring Microsoft and releasing their own libraries and DLL''s, if you read the notes). NVidia has an SDK for it, but it isn''t needed. The last 7 rewrites of my engine have used OpenGL, and I haven''t found a reason to stop yet .

[Resist Windows XP''s Invasive Production Activation Technology!]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
opengl + d3d have about the same level of abstraction from the hardware. though with opengl u have the option of hardware specific extensions ie which enable u to extract the full power speed from a card. (something that d3d lacks)

Quake 3: Arena; Serious Sam; Baldur''s Gate 2; Tribes 2; Alice; Descent 3; Homeworld; Soldier of Fortune;
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don''t doubt there are lots of games, especially those based off of ID''s action game engines (e.g. Quakes, Half-life, etc.) that use OpenGL. Come to think of it, OpenGL is most popular in action game engines. I wonder what Warcraft3, Independence War 2, Black and White, and other more recent non-action games use... I''d have to go look it up.

I could be totally wrong about this, but I have heard that Direct3D is slightly better at handling lots of polygons and textures (depending on its implementation with the video cards), so even though it is slightly slower than OpenGL, it is better for making detailed games with less emphasis on frame-rate. Any ideas about that?

Other than that, I''m pretty much anti-Microsoft. I''d sooner use a product that is compatible with everything (and I actually have a little OpenGL experience to boot). Still, making a game engine is a big time investment, and I don''t want to have to start from scratch any more than necessary!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OpenGL has a nice book and a good website you can learn off of.

A god name Jeff Molofee created this site:

nehe.gamedev.net

And the book is "OpenGL Game Programming"

Direct X has alot more books that are pretty good, and thats pretty depressing because I think OpenGL is alot better ( but I also didnt use DX8, I used 7 so things may be different... )

If you really want to learn Direct X, go to

www.PrimaGameDev.com and check out thier Direct X books, they are the best out there..
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
whatever number polycounts/texture u can push is all dependant on the card, theres no difference in the api''s in this respect.
the problem with opengl is there used to be shitty pc drivers for it from a lot of companies but since the advent of the quake series q2/q3a things have improved heaps, cause a lot of cards get judged in reviews by how fast can they do q3a. I expect this is gonna continue in the future with the release of doom3 + quake4 (both opengl only).

personally if i was u + were wanting to make a game.
ild look at using an already existing engine eg the tribes2 one or make a mod for an existing game eg halflife or q3a.
these all support opengl + d3d (except q3a) itll save u a lot of time + let u realise your goal much sooner.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for those tips. You''re definitely right about lack of OpenGL books. It''s sort of unfortunate that OpenGL seems to be viewed just as an educational tool for students in 3D graphics, and as far as game development is concerned no one wants to even suggest that it''s possible to create [gasp] GAMES with OpenGL. On the other hand, all those Direct3D books have "games games games!" in their titles, and many of them do an admirable job showing you how to set up a good game loop as well as throw together Direct3D code.

As a non-developer, I picked up a copy of "The Zen of Direct3D Game Programming" by Peter Walsh. I was not disappointed. Unlike any of those puny college textbooks, or even good OpenGL resources like the OpenGL superbible, it is very specific in its goal: to teach you to make games.

So far, in my brief jaunt with OpenGL gaming, I''ve checked out some lessons at:

http://nehe.gamedev.net/topengl1.asp
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Zedzeek,

Thanks for the idea. I thought of picking up and modifying a pre-made engine. Unfortunately, that requires making a big money deal with ID Software, Epic, or some gaming behemoth. Also, the kind of game I''m interested in making really is not an action game. Suffice to say, the best kind of game engine would be one capable of powering Black&White, Sacrifice, and a true-3D SimCity at the same time. Even the most versatile form of the Quake 2 or 3 engine would probably not be right for this game.

So basically, I''ll need to go all out for this! Time to make an engine!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you are looking for an existing engine to mess around with, visit www.garagegames.com. They are licensing the engine used to power Tribes 2 for $100 with restrictions on how you can use it. But I think this could be very good for a pure learning purpose.

Edited by - Pabu on September 25, 2001 3:54:48 AM
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By Toastmastern
      So it's been a while since I took a break from my whole creating a planet in DX11. Last time around I got stuck on fixing a nice LOD.
      A week back or so I got help to find this:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD
      In general this is what I'm trying to recreate in DX11, he that made that planet LOD uses OpenGL but that is a minor issue and something I can solve. But I have a question regarding the code
      He gets the position using this row
      vec4d pos = b.var.vec4d["position"]; Which is then used further down when he sends the variable "center" into the drawing function:
      if (pos.len() < 1) pos.norm(); world::draw(vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z));  
      Inside the draw function this happens:
      draw_recursive(p3[0], p3[1], p3[2], center); Basically the 3 vertices of the triangle and the center of details that he sent as a parameter earlier: vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z)
      Now onto my real question, he does vec3d edge_center[3] = { (p1 + p2) / 2, (p2 + p3) / 2, (p3 + p1) / 2 }; to get the edge center of each edge, nothing weird there.
      But this is used later on with:
      vec3d d = center + edge_center[i]; edge_test[i] = d.len() > ratio_size; edge_test is then used to evaluate if there should be a triangle drawn or if it should be split up into 3 new triangles instead. Why is it working for him? shouldn't it be like center - edge_center or something like that? Why adding them togheter? I asume here that the center is the center of details for the LOD. the position of the camera if stood on the ground of the planet and not up int he air like it is now.

      Full code can be seen here:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD/blob/master/src.simple/Main.cpp
      If anyone would like to take a look and try to help me understand this code I would love this person. I'm running out of ideas on how to solve this in my own head, most likely twisted it one time to many up in my head
      Thanks in advance
      Toastmastern
       
       
    • By fllwr0491
      I googled around but are unable to find source code or details of implementation.
      What keywords should I search for this topic?
      Things I would like to know:
      A. How to ensure that partially covered pixels are rasterized?
         Apparently by expanding each triangle by 1 pixel or so, rasterization problem is almost solved.
         But it will result in an unindexable triangle list without tons of overlaps. Will it incur a large performance penalty?
      B. A-buffer like bitmask needs a read-modiry-write operation.
         How to ensure proper synchronizations in GLSL?
         GLSL seems to only allow int32 atomics on image.
      C. Is there some simple ways to estimate coverage on-the-fly?
         In case I am to draw 2D shapes onto an exisitng target:
         1. A multi-pass whatever-buffer seems overkill.
         2. Multisampling could cost a lot memory though all I need is better coverage.
            Besides, I have to blit twice, if draw target is not multisampled.
       
    • By mapra99
      Hello

      I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

      To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

      Thanks!
    • By Solid_Spy
      Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
      In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
      My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
      Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
    • By KarimIO
      EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
      Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
      Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
      static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));  
  • Popular Now