Jump to content
  • Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  
WarAmp

Atmospheric Scattering - Out-scattering integral solution?

This topic is 2633 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if this should be here or in the Math & Physics forum, if the mods want to move it, I won't complain. :)

I think I may have solved the Out-scattering integral as given in the GPU-Gems 2 article on atmospheric scattering.

I've written a solution and explanation on my crappy blog.

I would love it if some of you fine folks could go over my solution for me and let me know if I'm right, and perhaps even figure out how to apply it to solving the full In-scattering integral as well.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
Hi WarAmp,

Looking at your results it seems like your analytical solution is correct. The strange thing is that in all of the atmospheric scatting papers I've read, none have mentioned that this integral can by solved this way. They always rely on look-up tables or different sampling techniques. Funny thing is that I think Sean O'neil was getting close to analytically solving the integral in the article itself (section 16.4.1).

Inigo Quilez presents a solution similar to yours on an article on his website (link) if you would like to compare.

Victor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yea, his look-up table solution is pretty similar isn't it? And so is Inigo's. That's good, it makes me a bit more confident that I'm on the right track :)

Thanks for taking the time to look at it.

I think I can solve the In-scattering portion as well, I just need a way to figure out how to determine the distance to the edge of a circle along a line in 2D, given very limited information. I'll post more here if I can ever figure it out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe I misunderstood something, but IMHO:

h =/= ((A + (C*x/N)) - R)

i.e. altitude is not a linear function. You can start from upper atmosphere (A), go through point at sea level and end in upper atmosphere again (B).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea, his look-up table solution is pretty similar isn't it? And so is Inigo's. That's good, it makes me a bit more confident that I'm on the right track :)

Thanks for taking the time to look at it.

I think I can solve the In-scattering portion as well, I just need a way to figure out how to determine the distance to the edge of a circle along a line in 2D, given very limited information. I'll post more here if I can ever figure it out.



...Isn't the distance to a circle from a line just part of a collision check?

OTOH, I'm probably misunderstanding something.

Are you going to put this in an article when you're done?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I misunderstood something, but IMHO:

h =/= ((A + (C*x/N)) - R)

i.e. altitude is not a linear function. You can start from upper atmosphere (A), go through point at sea level and end in upper atmosphere again (B).



Oohhhhh shiiiitttt. You are right. Seems like my solution is only good for flat-plane surfaces. :(

Well, thats why I posted it on here in the first place :) So I guess the proper solution would actually involve taking the magnitude of the point, not just the interpolated value. I'll see if I can figure that out.

Thanks for noticing! I guess it's still valid for planes though, which is something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!