• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
WarAmp

Atmospheric Scattering - Out-scattering integral solution?

5 posts in this topic

I'm not sure if this should be here or in the Math & Physics forum, if the mods want to move it, I won't complain. :)

I think I may have solved the Out-scattering integral as given in the [url="http://http.developer.nvidia.com/GPUGems2/gpugems2_chapter16.html"]GPU-Gems 2 article on atmospheric scattering.[/url]

I've written a solution and explanation on my [url="http://dan-hein.blogspot.com/2011/09/out-scattering-integral-solution.html"]crappy blog[/url].

I would love it if some of you fine folks could go over my solution for me and let me know if I'm right, and perhaps even figure out how to apply it to solving the full In-scattering integral as well.

Thanks!
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi WarAmp,

Looking at your results it seems like your analytical solution is correct. The strange thing is that in all of the atmospheric scatting papers I've read, none have mentioned that this integral can by solved this way. They always rely on look-up tables or different sampling techniques. Funny thing is that I think Sean O'neil was getting close to analytically solving the integral in the article itself (section 16.4.1).

Inigo Quilez presents a solution similar to yours on an article on his website ([url="http://iquilezles.org/www/articles/fog/fog.htm"]link[/url]) if you would like to compare.

Victor
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yea, his look-up table solution is pretty similar isn't it? And so is Inigo's. That's good, it makes me a bit more confident that I'm on the right track :)

Thanks for taking the time to look at it.

I think I can solve the In-scattering portion as well, I just need a way to figure out how to determine the distance to the edge of a circle along a line in 2D, given very limited information. I'll post more here if I can ever figure it out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybe I misunderstood something, but IMHO:

h =/= ((A + (C*x/N)) - R)

i.e. altitude is not a linear function. You can start from upper atmosphere (A), go through point at sea level and end in upper atmosphere again (B).

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='WarAmp' timestamp='1316939999' post='4865729']
Yea, his look-up table solution is pretty similar isn't it? And so is Inigo's. That's good, it makes me a bit more confident that I'm on the right track :)

Thanks for taking the time to look at it.

I think I can solve the In-scattering portion as well, I just need a way to figure out how to determine the distance to the edge of a circle along a line in 2D, given very limited information. I'll post more here if I can ever figure it out.


[/quote]
...Isn't the distance to a circle from a line just part of a collision check?

OTOH, I'm probably misunderstanding something.

Are you going to put this in an article when you're done?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Lauris Kaplinski' timestamp='1316983620' post='4865852']
Maybe I misunderstood something, but IMHO:

h =/= ((A + (C*x/N)) - R)

i.e. altitude is not a linear function. You can start from upper atmosphere (A), go through point at sea level and end in upper atmosphere again (B).


[/quote]
Oohhhhh shiiiitttt. You are right. Seems like my solution is only good for flat-plane surfaces. :(

Well, thats why I posted it on here in the first place :) So I guess the proper solution would actually involve taking the magnitude of the point, not just the interpolated value. I'll see if I can figure that out.

Thanks for noticing! I guess it's still valid for planes though, which is something.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0