• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Waaayoff

Why does Israel get so much special treatment when it comes down to nuclear weapons?

42 posts in this topic

I understand that being surrounded by Arab countries, some of which are hostile towards it, Israel has to protect itself. (Yet again they're the ones who chose to displace the Palestinians and establish their country in the middle of the middle-east in the first place). And so the world turned a blind eye to Israel's nuclear program. Israel even destroyed an Iraqi nuclear reactor in 1981 which was under construction and only capable of peaceful scientific research according to France, the one who sold Iraq the reactor.

Now Jordan, Israel's peaceful neighbour, is planning on building 4 nuclear power plants for peaceful purposes. Jordan has no oil reserves and can really benefit from nuclear energy. It even asked the US for permission as a sign of goodwill. Something it does not have to do since unlike Israel, it is a signatory to NPT.

Israel has objected and the US took Israel's position. Jordan and the US have been negotiating this matter since 2008.

My question is this. Why the double standards?

Is it for the fear that Jordan might use nuclear weapons against Israel? Any nuclear attack on Israel would devastate Jordan, seeing as how both are very small neighbouring countries. Is it because of radical Islam? Jordan isn't even considered an Islamist country. It was ranked as the most liberal Arab country with a pro-secular government. It has no history of terrorism, a peace treaty with Israel and good relations with everyone. And i do mean everyone.

I honestly have nothing against Israel but i'm just sick of all the special treatment it gets.

/rant
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's very simple. The middle east is the modern day Colosseum, USA are the Roman lanistas, Israel are the gladiators and the Arabs are the filthy criminals who are supposed to die.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I do think it is a double stranded for the most part. Although I really didn't buy Iran's story when they said the wanted Nuclear power for "peaceful Proposes".

I'd like to point out though that Jordan and Israel do not get along and historically have not been peaceful with one another. Jordan was one of Israels enemies in the Six Day war. Israel has a right to be paranoid, but in this case Jordan deserves to have Nuclear power I think.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There are double standards, have been since the creation of Israel. Now it's getting harder for Israel to label everyone who opposes them as terrorists it will be interesting to see what happens. The double standards are in the news reports. What about Sabra and Chatilla? It's not talked about much. What about all the UN resolutions Israel has broken, what about the illegal settlements?
Nuclear weapons aren't for peaceful purposes, they are for killing many many people, and as a result they become a political bargaining chip that can create a favourable peace for the side with those weapons. Now it's perhaps time the region wasn't so polarised by Israel and the US, the region may be able to move forward to better pastures.
But Israel will find it difficult not being the one dictating how this happens. There against the Palestinians being a soverign nation, and perhaps need brutal dictatorships in order to carry on with there own brutal policies, interesting times ahead.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why stop at just bitching about nukes?
What about the apartheid? Martial law? Racial discrimination? Illegal occupation? Massive collective punishment? Convention on Cluster Munitions? Geneva conventions? Chemical Weapons Convention? Forgery of allied passports? Espionage? Assassination? Political imprisonment?

C'mon, you can rant more.
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='EgoDeath' timestamp='1317298581' post='4867158']
There are double standards, have been since the creation of Israel. Now it's getting harder for Israel to label everyone who opposes them as terrorists it will be interesting to see what happens. The double standards are in the news reports. What about Sabra and Chatilla? It's not talked about much. What about all the UN resolutions Israel has broken, what about the illegal settlements?
Nuclear weapons aren't for peaceful purposes, they are for killing many many people, and as a result they become a political bargaining chip that can create a favourable peace for the side with those weapons. Now it's perhaps time the region wasn't so polarised by Israel and the US, the region may be able to move forward to better pastures.
But Israel will find it difficult not being the one dictating how this happens. There against the Palestinians being a soverign nation, and perhaps need brutal dictatorships in order to carry on with there own brutal policies, interesting times ahead.
[/quote]

I going to have to say a little about this. Israel's policies aren't brutal, there just over reactive, they certainly aren't dictators. With what has happened to them it's understandable why they have gotten to the point where they are now. They do not oppose the creation of a sovereign Palestinian nation, because of racism, religious hatred etc. They are opposed to it because they are already a small country, and their afraid of Palestine slowly chipping away their territory, as they already have done. Also if Palestine becomes sovereign they will be able to have there own standing army and such. I can only imagine how much fighting would result if that happened.

Israel and Palestine really should just morph into one nation. That would be the most peaceful solution in the long run. Of course the chances of that happening are slim to none.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Discount_Flunky' timestamp='1317299305' post='4867166']...[/quote]Oh man, I actually laughed out loud half way through that!
I'm not "taking sides" with the Palestinians here, but... who has been teaching you history?

[i]--With what has happened to them it's understandable why they have gotten to the point where they are now--[/i]
By the same token, I assume this also applies to the Palestinians? Including the ones who were forced from their homes during the creation of Israel within their land? Both sides have been through hell at each other's hands, but it's pretty hard to argue that the Palestinian side hasn't been worse off.

[i]--They do not oppose the creation of a sovereign Palestinian nation, because of racism, religious hatred etc--[/i]
They just take every effort to stop the Palestinians from seeking recognition as a sovereign nation...
The Israel/Palestine division was created out of racism and religious hatred.

[i]--They are opposed to it because they are already a small country, and their afraid of Palestine slowly chipping away their territory, as they already have done.--[/i]
Ok. That's where I LOLed.
Here's the original lines for the part of Palestine that Israel was to claim: [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UN_Partition_Plan_For_Palestine_1947.png"]http://en.wikipedia....estine_1947.png[/url]
Here's the current lines: [url="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6a/West_Bank_%26_Gaza_Map_2007_%28Settlements%29.png/482px-West_Bank_%26_Gaza_Map_2007_%28Settlements%29.png"]http://upload.wikime...tlements%29.png[/url]
N.B. that the majority of the green area is occupied by Israeli forces, with the Palestinian residents living under martial law and apartheid. Palestine is being chipped away at constantly by new settlements.

[i]--Israel and Palestine really should just morph into one nation--[/i]
You know that's where the conflict started from right? The zionists wanted their own state just for Jews, and a civil war broke out, which has never really ended.
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Hodgman' timestamp='1317300237' post='4867170']
[quote name='Discount_Flunky' timestamp='1317299305' post='4867166']...[/quote]Oh man, I actually laughed out loud half way through that!
I'm not "taking sides" with the Palestinians here, but... who has been teaching you history?

[i]--With what has happened to them it's understandable why they have gotten to the point where they are now--[/i]
By the same token, I assume this also applies to the Palestinians? Including the ones who were forced from their homes during the creation of Israel within their land? Both sides have been through hell at each other's hands, but it's pretty hard to argue that the Palestinian side hasn't been worse off.

[i]--They do not oppose the creation of a sovereign Palestinian nation--[/i]
Except that they're taking every effort to stop the Palestinians from seeking recognition as a sovereign nation...

[i]--They are opposed to it because they are already a small country, and their afraid of Palestine slowly chipping away their territory, as they already have done.--[/i]
That's where I LOLed.
Here's the original lines of the part of Palestine that Israel was created within: [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UN_Partition_Plan_For_Palestine_1947.png"]http://en.wikipedia....estine_1947.png[/url]
Here's the current lines: [url="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6a/West_Bank_%26_Gaza_Map_2007_%28Settlements%29.png/482px-West_Bank_%26_Gaza_Map_2007_%28Settlements%29.png"]http://upload.wikime...tlements%29.png[/url]
N.B. that the majority of the green area is occupied by Israeli forces, with the Palestinian residents living under martial law and apartheid. It's being chipped away at constantly by new settlements.

[i]--Israel and Palestine really should just morph into one nation--[/i]
You know that's where the conflict started from right? The zionists wanted their own state just for Jews, and a civil war broke out, which has never really ended.
[/quote]

You really didn't address half of what I said in fact you miss quoted me a few times. He called Israel a brutal dictatorship. 1. This a lie. 2. It means he is on the side of the Palestinians, a neutral person would not have said that.

When I said "[i]With what has happened to them it's understandable why they have gotten to the point where they are now" [/i]I was referring to their [b]entire[/b] history. The Jews are [i]the [/i]most hated people who have ever existed. It's easier to make a list of the nations who [i]haven't [/i]tried to wipe them off the face of the earth. They didn't just appear out of some Tarsus gate somewhere and start slaughtering hundreds of "innocent" Palestinians. Fist they were persecuted all over Europe and then six million of them where killed in the Holocaust. After that happened (and this is the most important part) [b]Britain [/b]felt sorry for them and[b] [/b]forced the Palestinians out of their homes so that the Jews could have back their ancient ancestral home. It wasn't the Jews, it was the British. That's the part that everyone forgets.


I clearly did not deny that they are opposing Palestine becoming a sovereign nation as you miss quoted me saying.

Yes the Jews land did start small, but then Palestine and Israel fought a war. Guess what, Israel won, that's the way it is. It also doesn't matter how much they [i]used[/i] to have. They only care about what they have now, and their land is the main reason they oppose Palestine's sovereignty.

Your last point doesn't even address what I said at all. You said them trying to join together caused it, then you said the Zionist caused it all in the same sentence. That's a compelelty redundant statement. Also how does them failing to come together then change the fact that it's a good Idea now?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Discount_Flunky' timestamp='1317302011' post='4867181']
When I said "[i]With what has happened to them it's understandable why they have gotten to the point where they are now" [/i]I was referring to their [b]entire[/b] history. The Jews are [i]the [/i]most hated people who have ever existed. It's easier to make a list of the nations who [i]haven't [/i]tried to wipe them off the face of the earth. They didn't just appear out of some Tarsus gate somewhere and start slaughtering hundreds of "innocent" Palestinians. Fist they were persecuted all over Europe and then six million of them where killed in the Holocaust. After that happened (and this is the most important part) [b]Britain [/b]felt sorry for them and[b] [/b]forced the Palestinians out of their homes so that the Jews could have back their ancient ancestral home. It wasn't the Jews, it was the British. That's the part that everyone forgets.

I clearly did not deny that they are opposing Palestine becoming a sovereign nation as you miss quoted me saying.

Yes the Jews land did start small, but then Palestine and Israel fought a war. Guess what, Israel won, that's the way it is. It also doesn't matter how much they [i]used[/i] to have. They only care about what they have now, and their land is the main reason they oppose Palestine's sovereignty.
[/quote]

On the creation of the current middle east nations. A big problem with the middle east is because of the way many countries had their boundaries set post-wwII. They were split generally geographically rather than culturally, and a lot of middle east conflict stems from that.

Though there is a lot to be said for the fact that the palestinians repeatedly either start wars and lose or join wars on the eventual losing side resulting in their continued loss of land. I cannot really say Israel has been any more out of line than the Palestinians have been. Neither side is willing to bend, so one of them has to break eventually or they have to change their outlook, which won't happen. It's a shitstorm in which both sides are in the wrong and neither side is willing to admit it.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well as far as being even.. This does not mean we cannot take sides? If we were to be even handed about WW2, would we sit on the fence?


The history that people hear is often twisted far out of it's original shape, sadly.
While many make good arguments, they are often based on lies and propaganda.

Yea the boundaries were made by the west post ww2, for example, Afghani's do not recognise the borders of Afghanistan, it is tribal and tribal lands span across these borders, it is much the same story all-over the middle east and a major source of the problems.




[i]"After that happened (and this is the most important part) [b]Britain [/b]felt sorry for them and[b] [/b]forced the Palestinians out of their homes so that the Jews could have back their ancient ancestral home. It wasn't the Jews, it was the British. That's the part that everyone forgets."[/i]

Yea, many Palestinians still hold the papers that legally entitle them to there land. (Now in Israel), but don't forget the jewish gangs who blew Palestinians apart with home-made bombs as part of the Zionist movement. (Or maybe, find out about these things)

The thing is, the Israeli's keep taking their land.... Yes still, that's what the illegal settlements are, or what are they called these days??? Jewish settlements..
Their water is taken also, their infrastructure is systematically destroyed every few years as well. If Palestine becomes a sovereign nation, well Israel might find it a little more tricky systematically tearing them apart.

As far as either side willing to bend, well the Palestinians have been conceding and conceding for years now, especially under Arafat.

At the end of the day it highlights one of life's lessons. If you want to know, really know something.. You have to find out for yourself.

And il finish by recounting what an Israeli said to me, an old girl who made it through Auschwitz.

"Hitler won, we (Israel) have become just like the Nazi's, Hitler has won"

I could go on, but what's the point, the truth speaks for itself. Im just looking forward to a world where the Arabs start working together, and refuse to be controlled by the west.
Viva la revolution :)
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Discount_Flunky' timestamp='1317302011' post='4867181']1) Your last point doesn't even address what I said at all. 2) You said them trying to join together caused it, then you said the Zionist caused it all in the same sentence. That's a compelelty redundant statement. 3) Also how does them failing to come together then change the fact that it's a good Idea now?[/quote]1) I wasn't addressing what you said, or the discussion between yourself and EgoDeath. I was having a good laugh at the bizarro world described in your post. Big difference in intent. Seriously, I actually burst out laughing, which takes a lot, so I had to comment.
2) lol what? The time before "starting a civil war" is called "joining together" now? You can't really join together if you've not been separated by the civil war yet, right? I said the civil war grew out of a desire for a jewish state. That's not a contradiction. It's also not a statement that places blame on either side - I didn't say zionist's *caused* it. Lern2comprehend.
3) You're imagining that I said a one-state solution is a bad idea? I was asking if you knew they used to be "one state" not because it's a bad idea, but because by the imaginary world you were describing, it seemed you were unaware of the fact.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Bregma' timestamp='1317300108' post='4867168']
Here's the simple answer: if you think there are any simple answers to any questions regarding the Middle East, you're wrong.

It's just that simple.
[/quote]

There are simple answers, but no-one in power has the heart or courage to ask the right questions.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='EgoDeath' timestamp='1317313875' post='4867249']
[quote name='Bregma' timestamp='1317300108' post='4867168']
Here's the simple answer: if you think there are any simple answers to any questions regarding the Middle East, you're wrong.

It's just that simple.
[/quote]

There are simple answers, but no-one in power has the heart or courage to ask the right questions.
[/quote]
No. There are plenty of simplistic answers. There are no simple answers. If you don't know the difference, your answers will be simplistic.
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Hodgman' timestamp='1317309427' post='4867227']
[quote name='Discount_Flunky' timestamp='1317302011' post='4867181']1) Your last point doesn't even address what I said at all. 2) You said them trying to join together caused it, then you said the Zionist caused it all in the same sentence. That's a compelelty redundant statement. 3) Also how does them failing to come together then change the fact that it's a good Idea now?[/quote]1) I wasn't addressing what you said, or the discussion between yourself and EgoDeath. I was having a good laugh at the bizarro world described in your post. Big difference in intent. Seriously, I actually burst out laughing, which takes a lot, so I had to comment.
2) lol what? The time before "starting a civil war" is called "joining together" now? You can't really join together if you've not been separated by the civil war yet, right? I said the civil war grew out of a desire for a jewish state. That's not a contradiction. It's also not a statement that places blame on either side - I didn't say zionist's *caused* it. Lern2comprehend.
3) You're imagining that I said a one-state solution is a bad idea? I was asking if you knew they used to be "one state" not because it's a bad idea, but because by the imaginary world you were describing, it seemed you were unaware of the fact.
[/quote]



[color=#1C2837][size="2"]--Israel and Palestine really should just morph into one nation--
You know that's where the conflict started from right? [/size][/color][color=#1C2837][size=2]The zionists wanted their own state just for Jews, and a civil war broke out, which has never really ended.[/size][/color]
[color=#1C2837][size=2]
[/size][/color]
[color=#1C2837][size=2]I said that Israel and Palestine should be unified.[/size][/color]
[color=#1C2837][size=2]
[/size][/color]
[color=#1C2837][size=2]First you said "[/size][/color][color="#1c2837"][size="2"]You know that's where the conflict started from right?" this implies the conflict started [/size][/color][size="2"][color="#1c2837"][i]because [/i]they were unified. Then you said this "[/color][/size][color="#1c2837"][size="2"]The zionists wanted their own state just for Jews, and a civil war broke out" which implies that the conflict started because they were divided. As written the two statements contradict each other. [/size][/color]
[color="#1c2837"][size="2"]
[/size][/color]
[color="#1c2837"][size="2"]Imaginary world you say? You clearly stated in the first post that the Jews started it and that they were acting on their own. Completely leaving out the part about the British. Implieing that the Jews invaded the area like some hoard. No body who really knows anything about the subject would leave the British out. It was the way that British handled it that [/size][i]really [/i][size="2"]started it. "O hi Palestinians, we want the Jews to live here now, so we're going to take away all your land and give it to them. Now I want you guys to play nice so if I catch you messing with the Jews I'm going to SHOOT you." Not exactly a good way to introduce to groups. [/size][/color]
[color="#1c2837"][size="2"]
[/size][/color]
[color="#1c2837"][size="2"]Also I like to point out that Palestinian is not a nationality, it's an ethnic group. There has never been a Palestinian nation. That area of the world, until recently, has been ruled by someone else going all the way back to when the Jews where first thrown out of Israel. That's another factor in why it's taking them so long for them to become a real nation. They don't have as legitimate of claim to lands compared to the Jews. The Jews have ruled the area for over 3000 years while the Palestinians are just descendants of Arab settlers that came there in like the 10th century who have never had a real nation. If you can really determine who should own land based on "who used it more" then the Jews win every time. [/size][/color]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Bregma' timestamp='1317315281' post='4867251']
[quote name='EgoDeath' timestamp='1317313875' post='4867249']
[quote name='Bregma' timestamp='1317300108' post='4867168']
Here's the simple answer: if you think there are any simple answers to any questions regarding the Middle East, you're wrong.

It's just that simple.
[/quote]

There are simple answers, but no-one in power has the heart or courage to ask the right questions.
[/quote]
No. There are plenty of simplistic answers. There are no simple answers. If you don't know the difference, your answers will be simplistic.
[/quote]


I rather think the old, 'no simple answer' routine is merely just the mask of impotence. Or the answer of someone who has reneged on their values and now finds themselves weighing both the 'devil' and the 'divine'.

How about;
Stop building Illegal 'settlements'.

Is this too simplistic for you?
How about, hold Israel accountable to International law?

I know it get's awfully complicated when one has double standards.
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='EgoDeath' timestamp='1317319456' post='4867278']
[quote name='Bregma' timestamp='1317315281' post='4867251']
[quote name='EgoDeath' timestamp='1317313875' post='4867249']
[quote name='Bregma' timestamp='1317300108' post='4867168']
Here's the simple answer: if you think there are any simple answers to any questions regarding the Middle East, you're wrong.

It's just that simple.
[/quote]

There are simple answers, but no-one in power has the heart or courage to ask the right questions.
[/quote]
No. There are plenty of simplistic answers. There are no simple answers. If you don't know the difference, your answers will be simplistic.
[/quote]


I rather think the old, 'no simple answer' routine is merely just the mask of impotence. Or the answer of someone who has reneged on their values and now finds themselves weighing both the 'devil' and the 'divine'.

How about;
Stop building Illegal 'settlements'.

Is this too simplistic for you?
How about, hold Israel accountable to International law?

I know it get's awfully complicated when one has double standards.
[/quote]



I love how everyone throws around all of Israel's supposed "War crimes" and completely ignores the car bombings, suicide bombings, beheading's, and stoning's, committed by the completely innocent and defenseless [color=#1C2837][size=2]Palestinians[/size][/color].
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Discount_Flunky' timestamp='1317320049' post='4867280']
I love how everyone throws around all of Israel's supposed "War crimes" and completely ignores the car bombings, suicide bombings, beheading's, and stoning's, committed by the completely innocent and defenseless [color="#1c2837"][size="2"]Palestinians[/size][/color].
[/quote]

Defending one states actions by saying 'but the other guys do it too!' is no defense.

Both sides are killing each other and Israel's continued taking of land is not helping matters and are pushing one group who have no other voice or backing into their actions.

If Israel was to stop their actions then they would have a leg to stand on and would more than likely get more backing if the Palestinians didn't stop their actions.

Right now however what is happening is that one nation, with the backing of another, is stealing land and forcing people from their homes, that group have no other recourse and are fighting back as best they can.

"One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" has never rung so true.

And there is no 'supposed' about it, just that while the US is backing them they will never be brought to account on them.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='EgoDeath' timestamp='1317319456' post='4867278']
How about;
Stop building Illegal 'settlements'.

Is this too simplistic for you?
How about, hold Israel accountable to International law?
[/quote]

Those aren't answers. Those are simple parts of complex answers. Doing either of those won't suddenly make rainbows appear over jerusalem as moslems, jews, and christians run through the street. These are deep seeded cultural problems that extend beyond the legal and political problems, and there are, in fact, no simple answers.

[quote] And there is no 'supposed' about it, just that while the US is backing them they will never be brought to account on them.[/quote]
Ron Paul for president? <_<

I would actually be curious what would happen if israel didn't have the us backing it in more than a being-on-the-security-council capacity.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='way2lazy2care' timestamp='1317321140' post='4867291']
and there are, in fact, no simple answers.
[/quote]

Indeed; the whole thing is a mess.

It's resolveable, but it won't be easy and it's going to require give and take on both sides... the problem is, as it stands, it would seem neither side wants to do that and, from Israel's stand point why would they want to? Lets face it, right now, they are 'winning'...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Hodgman' timestamp='1317300237' post='4867170']
[quote name='Discount_Flunky' timestamp='1317299305' post='4867166']...[/quote]Oh man, I actually laughed out loud half way through that!
I'm not "taking sides" with the Palestinians here, but... who has been teaching you history?

[i]--With what has happened to them it's understandable why they have gotten to the point where they are now--[/i]
By the same token, I assume this also applies to the Palestinians? Including the ones who were forced from their homes during the creation of Israel within their land? Both sides have been through hell at each other's hands, but it's pretty hard to argue that the Palestinian side hasn't been worse off.
[/quote]

This really cuts to the core of these debates: yes, the Palestanians are worse off. Similarly, the germans were far worse off than the allied forces coming to firebomb their cities. But its not in everybody's world that taking hits automagically makes you the good guy.

The arabs fought and initiated many a war over that piece of land; and they lost them. If they would have gotten over that fact, they might have picked up the pieces by now. Imagine what germany would have looked like if it would have kept blowing up american GIs for decades; it wouldnt have been pretty.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Eelco' timestamp='1317321577' post='4867295']
This really cuts to the core of these debates: yes, the Palestanians are worse off. Similarly, the germans were far worse off than the allied forces coming to firebomb their cities. But its not in everybody's world that taking hits automagically makes you the good guy.

The arabs fought and initiated many a war over that piece of land; and they lost them. If they would have gotten over that fact, they might have picked up the pieces by now. Imagine what germany would have looked like if it would have kept blowing up american GIs for decades; it wouldnt have been pretty.
[/quote]
This is something I've thought about a lot. The situation over there seems like a whoever gives up first wins situation. I feel like all palestine is doing by resisting is making themselves look hostile enough for nobody to have to step in. If they did nothing and Israel tried to march over them, then perhaps there would be more action on the table. If you hit a bear with a stick, the bear won't just run away. Similarly if Israel backed down and took a firm stand toward defense without lashing out every time they were attacked. the rest of the world would probably sympathize with them.

[quote name='EgoDeath' timestamp='1317321962' post='4867298']
[quote]
Those aren't answers. Those are simple parts of complex answers. Doing either of those won't suddenly make rainbows appear over jerusalem as moslems, jews, and christians run through the street.
[/quote]
No they are simple answers.[/quote]
No. They are not answers. They are answers to isolated problems that make up a much larger problem.

[quote]
There are no deep [i]seated[/i] cultural problems, Jews and Arabs have long been brothers and [b]the majority still feel this way[/b]. The problem is 'Zionism'.
[/quote]

Do you have a source for that? I have [url="http://my.auburnjournal.com/detail/142247.html"]one[/url] against it.

Radical islam is just as much a problem as zionism btw.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Israel is aggressive, they won't stop trying (and succeeding) to kick out Palestinians if the Palestinians stopped attacking.

[quote][color=#1C2837][size=2]Yes the Jews land did start small, but then Palestine and Israel fought a war. Guess what, Israel won, that's the way it is. It also doesn't matter how much they [i]used[/i] to have. They only care about what they have now, and their land is the main reason they oppose Palestine's sovereignty. [/quote][/size][/color]

[size="2"][color="#1c2837"]
[/color][/size]
[size="2"][color="#1c2837"]The Jews lost it fair and square a long time ago and only got it back because it was given to them. They probably would have never earnt it back through their own military efforts if Big Brother wasn't giving out his hand-me-downs. The Palestinians aren't just fighting for land they lost, they are fighting to keep the land they have.[/color][/size]
[size="2"][color="#1c2837"]
[/color][/size]
[size="2"][color="#1c2837"]The World-hates-the-Jews card is old, it's torn, it's like a marked card in poker or go-fish and is just not acceptable in this game. Everyone had to fight for their existence in the history of the world and many civilisations were [/color][/size][size="2"][color="#1c2837"]annihilated from existence. I bet they feel more hated than the Jews, if you [i]could[/i] ask them. Why should anyone feel sorry for people alive today for something that didn't actually happen to them? They probably wouldn't have even been born if those things didn't happen! Heck, with the way of slaves and conquests, I bet there are plenty of people with a Jewish line if we choose to look that far back.[/color][/size]
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='GMuser' timestamp='1317338722' post='4867391']
Israel is aggressive, they won't stop trying (and succeeding) to kick out Palestinians if the Palestinians stopped attacking.

[quote][color="#1C2837"][size="2"]Yes the Jews land did start small, but then Palestine and Israel fought a war. Guess what, Israel won, that's the way it is. It also doesn't matter how much they [i]used[/i] to have. They only care about what they have now, and their land is the main reason they oppose Palestine's sovereignty. [/quote][/size][/color]

[size="2"] [/size]
[size="2"][color="#1c2837"]The Jews lost it fair and square a long time ago and only got it back because it was given to them. They probably would have never earnt it back through their own military efforts if Big Brother wasn't giving out his hand-me-downs. The Palestinians aren't just fighting for land they lost, they are fighting to keep the land they have.[/color][/size]
[size="2"] [/size]
[size="2"][color="#1c2837"]The World-hates-the-Jews card is old, it's torn, it's like a marked card in poker or go-fish and is just not acceptable in this game. Everyone had to fight for their existence in the history of the world and many civilisations were [/color][/size][size="2"][color="#1c2837"]annihilated from existence. I bet they feel more hated than the Jews, if you [i]could[/i] ask them. Why should anyone feel sorry for people alive today for something that didn't actually happen to them? They probably wouldn't have even been born if those things didn't happen! Heck, with the way of slaves and conquests, I bet there are plenty of people with a Jewish line if we choose to look that far back.[/color][/size]
[/quote]



Big Brother? Reread 1984 and you'll discover that name doesn't apply here.

Well if they didn't win it fair and square back then they share have now. They won the struggle for Independence. At the time they had very little outside help after the British left. Then pretty much the entire Middle East invaded them and they beat them all in [b]SIX[/b] days. The thing is most reasoning's for one nation work for the other nation if you look at it a different.

[size="2"][color="#1c2837"]"The World-hates-the-Jews card is old, it's torn, it's like a marked card in poker or go-fish and is just not acceptable in this game." Say that to the Jews. It doesn't matter what the world thinks. They fell threatened on every side, and now they have an army. Why would they not strike back? [/color][/size]
[size="2"][color="#1c2837"]
[/color][/size]
[color="#1c2837"][size="2"]The last point is a good point. If you look back you kind of have to conclude that almost everyone has Jewish blood somewhere in their veins. They have just been scattered so much throughout history. [/size][/color]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0