• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL OpenGL 3.x/4.x static libraries?

This topic is 2317 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Where can I get static libraries for OpenGL 3.x/4.x so that I can easily call the OpenGL functions just by linking to it w/o using wglGetProcAddress or GLEW?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
As far as I'm aware, there are none.

You have to understand that, on Windows, there is typically only one OpenGL library that you use, which is Microsoft's own. Hardware drivers that you install just hook into that library to provide another implementation of the library. That is why you, no matter what hardware you have, always link against opengl32.lib and your program depends on opengl32.dll. Those files are provided by Microsoft, and not by your hardware driver. If you find a static library that provides OpenGL 3+, it is likely a software renderer, or tailored for a specific hardware.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So I have no other option but to use wglGetProcAddress or GLEW right? Don't driver manufacturers provide one? My laptop has Radeon HD 5730 and it does support OpenGL 4.1. I saw this tutorial: http://nehe.gamedev....oduction/25007/ and it doesn't use wglGetProcAddress but simply calls the APIs like glCreateShaderObjectARB. And one more question: I looked at that documentation of OpenGL 4.2 and there's no glCreateShaderObjectARB API but there is glCreateShader so does that mean glCreateShaderObjectARB is deprecated?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I have no other option but to use wglGetProcAddress or GLEW right? Don't driver manufacturers provide one? My laptop has Radeon HD 5730 and it does support OpenGL 4.1.

No, there are no other options. As I said, you may find some software renderer or a library tailored specifically for some hardware, but I will not consider that an option here. The hardwrare manufacturers don't provide an OpenGL library, only what is effectively hooks into Microsoft's OpenGL library.

I saw this tutorial: http://nehe.gamedev....oduction/25007/ and it doesn't use wglGetProcAddress but simply calls the APIs like glCreateShaderObjectARB.

That tutorial explains how you use the shaders. Whether or not you have to load the functions, how you use the shaders doesn't change and that is what the tutorial is about.


And one more question: I looked at that documentation of OpenGL 4.2 and there's no glCreateShaderObjectARB API but there is glCreateShader so does that mean glCreateShaderObjectARB is deprecated?

Yes, you have to use the new API. There are some minor changes, but if you learn the idea of how to use shaders, then if the function is called glCreateShaderObjectARB or glCreateShader is mostly irrelevant for the purpose of learning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There isn't any advantage to having a static library or a dll. MS provides GL 1.1 and that is something that will never change. Get use to using GLEW or any other function loader. People have been asking for a new lib and dll since GL 1.2 and that has been 11 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks guys. What about on Linux and OS X? It's the same case with them too? Hopefully not. I am a Direct3D programmer and planning to move to OS X and Linux because I just hate Windows and don't want to use it any more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
@V-Man
Glew is a bad idea for OpenGL 3 and 4 since it uses deprecated ways to get the extensions and causes Warnings.

@Asesh
GL3w works on Windows and Linux as far as I can see. Yes, it is the same case.
The python script generates a file dependant on your platform which you can include into your project.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys. What about on Linux and OS X? It's the same case with them too? Hopefully not. I am a Direct3D programmer and planning to move to OS X and Linux because I just hate Windows and don't want to use it any more


OS X doesn't support OpenGL 4 yet, Linux is pretty much the same as Windows if you use nvidia or intel gpus. (intel has had fairly weak OpenGL drivers on both platforms in the past though and i havn't bothered looking at their more recent offerings (There is a big risk that they still suck with anything other than D3D)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OSX will support GL 3.2 according to apple. But that doesn't matter. You still need to link to a dll or whatever it is and I'm assuming that by default, it is 1.1 or 1.2.
If you need higher functions, you have to get function pointers.

I think the only different thing about OSX is that if you want gl 3.2, you can only make a forward compatible context.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Tags

  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Similar Content

    • By LifeArtist
      Good Evening,
      I want to make a 2D game which involves displaying some debug information. Especially for collision, enemy sights and so on ...
      First of I was thinking about all those shapes which I need will need for debugging purposes: circles, rectangles, lines, polygons.
      I am really stucked right now because of the fundamental question:
      Where do I store my vertices positions for each line (object)? Currently I am not using a model matrix because I am using orthographic projection and set the final position within the VBO. That means that if I add a new line I would have to expand the "points" array and re-upload (recall glBufferData) it every time. The other method would be to use a model matrix and a fixed vbo for a line but it would be also messy to exactly create a line from (0,0) to (100,20) calculating the rotation and scale to make it fit.
      If I proceed with option 1 "updating the array each frame" I was thinking of having 4 draw calls every frame for the lines vao, polygons vao and so on. 
      In addition to that I am planning to use some sort of ECS based architecture. So the other question would be:
      Should I treat those debug objects as entities/components?
      For me it would make sense to treat them as entities but that's creates a new issue with the previous array approach because it would have for example a transform and render component. A special render component for debug objects (no texture etc) ... For me the transform component is also just a matrix but how would I then define a line?
      Treating them as components would'nt be a good idea in my eyes because then I would always need an entity. Well entity is just an id !? So maybe its a component?
      Regards,
      LifeArtist
    • By QQemka
      Hello. I am coding a small thingy in my spare time. All i want to achieve is to load a heightmap (as the lowest possible walking terrain), some static meshes (elements of the environment) and a dynamic character (meaning i can move, collide with heightmap/static meshes and hold a varying item in a hand ). Got a bunch of questions, or rather problems i can't find solution to myself. Nearly all are deal with graphics/gpu, not the coding part. My c++ is on high enough level.
      Let's go:
      Heightmap - i obviously want it to be textured, size is hardcoded to 256x256 squares. I can't have one huge texture stretched over entire terrain cause every pixel would be enormous. Thats why i decided to use 2 specified textures. First will be a tileset consisting of 16 square tiles (u v range from 0 to 0.25 for first tile and so on) and second a 256x256 buffer with 0-15 value representing index of the tile from tileset for every heigtmap square. Problem is, how do i blend the edges nicely and make some computationally cheap changes so its not obvious there are only 16 tiles? Is it possible to generate such terrain with some existing program?
      Collisions - i want to use bounding sphere and aabb. But should i store them for a model or entity instance? Meaning i have 20 same trees spawned using the same tree model, but every entity got its own transformation (position, scale etc). Storing collision component per instance grats faster access + is precalculated and transformed (takes additional memory, but who cares?), so i stick with this, right? What should i do if object is dynamically rotated? The aabb is no longer aligned and calculating per vertex min/max everytime object rotates/scales is pretty expensive, right?
      Drawing aabb - problem similar to above (storing aabb data per instance or model). This time in my opinion per model is enough since every instance also does not have own vertex buffer but uses the shared one (so 20 trees share reference to one tree model). So rendering aabb is about taking the model's aabb, transforming with instance matrix and voila. What about aabb vertex buffer (this is more of a cosmetic question, just curious, bumped onto it in time of writing this). Is it better to make it as 8 points and index buffer (12 lines), or only 2 vertices with min/max x/y/z and having the shaders dynamically generate 6 other vertices and draw the box? Or maybe there should be just ONE 1x1x1 cube box template moved/scaled per entity?
      What if one model got a diffuse texture and a normal map, and other has only diffuse? Should i pass some bool flag to shader with that info, or just assume that my game supports only diffuse maps without fancy stuff?
      There were several more but i forgot/solved them at time of writing
      Thanks in advance
    • By RenanRR
      Hi All,
      I'm reading the tutorials from learnOpengl site (nice site) and I'm having a question on the camera (https://learnopengl.com/Getting-started/Camera).
      I always saw the camera being manipulated with the lookat, but in tutorial I saw the camera being changed through the MVP arrays, which do not seem to be camera, but rather the scene that changes:
      Vertex Shader:
      #version 330 core layout (location = 0) in vec3 aPos; layout (location = 1) in vec2 aTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; uniform mat4 model; uniform mat4 view; uniform mat4 projection; void main() { gl_Position = projection * view * model * vec4(aPos, 1.0f); TexCoord = vec2(aTexCoord.x, aTexCoord.y); } then, the matrix manipulated:
      ..... glm::mat4 projection = glm::perspective(glm::radians(fov), (float)SCR_WIDTH / (float)SCR_HEIGHT, 0.1f, 100.0f); ourShader.setMat4("projection", projection); .... glm::mat4 view = glm::lookAt(cameraPos, cameraPos + cameraFront, cameraUp); ourShader.setMat4("view", view); .... model = glm::rotate(model, glm::radians(angle), glm::vec3(1.0f, 0.3f, 0.5f)); ourShader.setMat4("model", model);  
      So, some doubts:
      - Why use it like that?
      - Is it okay to manipulate the camera that way?
      -in this way, are not the vertex's positions that changes instead of the camera?
      - I need to pass MVP to all shaders of object in my scenes ?
       
      What it seems, is that the camera stands still and the scenery that changes...
      it's right?
       
       
      Thank you
       
    • By dpadam450
      Sampling a floating point texture where the alpha channel holds 4-bytes of packed data into the float. I don't know how to cast the raw memory to treat it as an integer so I can perform bit-shifting operations.

      int rgbValue = int(textureSample.w);//4 bytes of data packed as color
      // algorithm might not be correct and endianness might need switching.
      vec3 extractedData = vec3(  rgbValue & 0xFF000000,  (rgbValue << 8) & 0xFF000000, (rgbValue << 16) & 0xFF000000);
      extractedData /= 255.0f;
    • By Devashish Khandelwal
      While writing a simple renderer using OpenGL, I faced an issue with the glGetUniformLocation function. For some reason, the location is coming to be -1.
      Anyone has any idea .. what should I do?
  • Advertisement