Sign in to follow this  
Asesh

OpenGL OpenGL 3.x/4.x static libraries?

Recommended Posts

Asesh    276
Where can I get static libraries for OpenGL 3.x/4.x so that I can easily call the OpenGL functions just by linking to it w/o using wglGetProcAddress or GLEW?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brother Bob    10344
As far as I'm aware, there are none.

You have to understand that, on Windows, there is typically only one OpenGL library that you use, which is Microsoft's own. Hardware drivers that you install just hook into that library to provide another [i]implementation[/i] of the library. That is why you, no matter what hardware you have, always link against opengl32.lib and your program depends on opengl32.dll. Those files are provided by Microsoft, and not by your hardware driver. If you find a static library that provides OpenGL 3+, it is likely a software renderer, or tailored for a specific hardware.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Asesh    276
So I have no other option but to use wglGetProcAddress or GLEW right? Don't driver manufacturers provide one? My laptop has Radeon HD 5730 and it does support OpenGL 4.1. I saw this tutorial: [url="http://nehe.gamedev.net/article/glsl_an_introduction/25007/"]http://nehe.gamedev....oduction/25007/[/url] and it doesn't use wglGetProcAddress but simply calls the APIs like glCreateShaderObjectARB. And one more question: I looked at that documentation of OpenGL 4.2 and there's no glCreateShaderObjectARB API but there is glCreateShader so does that mean glCreateShaderObjectARB is deprecated?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brother Bob    10344
[quote name='Asesh' timestamp='1318675666' post='4872785']
So I have no other option but to use wglGetProcAddress or GLEW right? Don't driver manufacturers provide one? My laptop has Radeon HD 5730 and it does support OpenGL 4.1.
[/quote]
No, there are no other options. As I said, you may find some software renderer or a library tailored specifically for some hardware, but I will not consider that an option here. The hardwrare manufacturers don't provide an OpenGL library, only what is effectively hooks into Microsoft's OpenGL library.
[quote name='Asesh' timestamp='1318675666' post='4872785']
I saw this tutorial: [url="http://nehe.gamedev.net/article/glsl_an_introduction/25007/"]http://nehe.gamedev....oduction/25007/[/url] and it doesn't use wglGetProcAddress but simply calls the APIs like glCreateShaderObjectARB.
[/quote]
That tutorial explains how you use the shaders. Whether or not you have to load the functions, how you use the shaders doesn't change and that is what the tutorial is about.

[quote name='Asesh' timestamp='1318675666' post='4872785']
And one more question: I looked at that documentation of OpenGL 4.2 and there's no glCreateShaderObjectARB API but there is glCreateShader so does that mean glCreateShaderObjectARB is deprecated?
[/quote]
Yes, you have to use the new API. There are some minor changes, but if you learn the idea of how to use shaders, then if the function is called glCreateShaderObjectARB or glCreateShader is mostly irrelevant for the purpose of learning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
V-man    813
There isn't any advantage to having a static library or a dll. MS provides GL 1.1 and that is something that will never change. Get use to using GLEW or any other function loader. People have been asking for a new lib and dll since GL 1.2 and that has been 11 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Asesh    276
Thanks guys. What about on Linux and OS X? It's the same case with them too? Hopefully not. I am a Direct3D programmer and planning to move to OS X and Linux because I just hate Windows and don't want to use it any more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NicoG    172
@V-Man
Glew is a bad idea for OpenGL 3 and 4 since it uses deprecated ways to get the extensions and causes Warnings.

@Asesh
GL3w works on Windows and Linux as far as I can see. Yes, it is the same case.
The python script generates a file dependant on your platform which you can include into your project.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SimonForsman    7642
[quote name='Asesh' timestamp='1318687738' post='4872846']
Thanks guys. What about on Linux and OS X? It's the same case with them too? Hopefully not. I am a Direct3D programmer and planning to move to OS X and Linux because I just hate Windows and don't want to use it any more
[/quote]

OS X doesn't support OpenGL 4 yet, Linux is pretty much the same as Windows if you use nvidia or intel gpus. (intel has had fairly weak OpenGL drivers on both platforms in the past though and i havn't bothered looking at their more recent offerings (There is a big risk that they still suck with anything other than D3D)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
V-man    813
OSX will support GL 3.2 according to apple. But that doesn't matter. You still need to link to a dll or whatever it is and I'm assuming that by default, it is 1.1 or 1.2.
If you need higher functions, you have to get function pointers.

I think the only different thing about OSX is that if you want gl 3.2, you can only make a forward compatible context.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By povilaslt2
      Hello. I'm Programmer who is in search of 2D game project who preferably uses OpenGL and C++. You can see my projects in GitHub. Project genre doesn't matter (except MMO's :D).
    • By ZeldaFan555
      Hello, My name is Matt. I am a programmer. I mostly use Java, but can use C++ and various other languages. I'm looking for someone to partner up with for random projects, preferably using OpenGL, though I'd be open to just about anything. If you're interested you can contact me on Skype or on here, thank you!
      Skype: Mangodoor408
    • By tyhender
      Hello, my name is Mark. I'm hobby programmer. 
      So recently,I thought that it's good idea to find people to create a full 3D engine. I'm looking for people experienced in scripting 3D shaders and implementing physics into engine(game)(we are going to use the React physics engine). 
      And,ye,no money =D I'm just looking for hobbyists that will be proud of their work. If engine(or game) will have financial succes,well,then maybe =D
      Sorry for late replies.
      I mostly give more information when people PM me,but this post is REALLY short,even for me =D
      So here's few more points:
      Engine will use openGL and SDL for graphics. It will use React3D physics library for physics simulation. Engine(most probably,atleast for the first part) won't have graphical fron-end,it will be a framework . I think final engine should be enough to set up an FPS in a couple of minutes. A bit about my self:
      I've been programming for 7 years total. I learned very slowly it as "secondary interesting thing" for like 3 years, but then began to script more seriously.  My primary language is C++,which we are going to use for the engine. Yes,I did 3D graphics with physics simulation before. No, my portfolio isn't very impressive. I'm working on that No,I wasn't employed officially. If anybody need to know more PM me. 
       
    • By Zaphyk
      I am developing my engine using the OpenGL 3.3 compatibility profile. It runs as expected on my NVIDIA card and on my Intel Card however when I tried it on an AMD setup it ran 3 times worse than on the other setups. Could this be a AMD driver thing or is this probably a problem with my OGL code? Could a different code standard create such bad performance?
    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      Question:
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
       
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
  • Popular Now