This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

OpenGL Constant Performance of OpenGL

This topic is 5947 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I have implemented something in OpenGL and tested this on different PC with different graphic-cards. During my testing session i recognized that the FPS (=Performance) is very different from one graphic-card to the other. I think this has also to do with the memory of the graphic card. But now on to the problem: How can i hold the performance constant on any PC with any different video-card (of course not for the oldest ones)? For example how creates the developers of some well-known 3D-Action Games like Half-Life to run on PC with a bad graphic-card just as good as on a PC with a better graphic-card(for example with more graphics memory)? Exists there common techniques to achieve that? Hope anybody can help me. thanks. Peter Gmeiner

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
I have begun to run into this problem with my programs I have written in openGL.

I wrote a simple terrian program on a geforce 3 PC and it runs fine but as soon as I switch to my older voodoo 2 PC the programs runs very slow and the same program runs slow on a matrox g450 PC.

I got to thinking about my voodoo 2 pc and it runs half-life and quake 2 really fast it will even run quake3 at a playable framerate.

So why does my terrian demo run so slow but it runs quake 2 and 3 fine. Well the only thing I can think of at this point is code optimization. Or it could be something else we are just overlooking.

Gaming is a way of life believe it

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
the techniques used in half-life and quake2/3 are actually pretty simple. they use a LOD (level of detail) system to moderate the stress put on the video card. For example, if you go into quake3, go into the settings and you should be able to find a menu with the LOD options (filtering options, lighting options, geometric detail options, etc.). if you want to try this out for yourself, go onto one of those slower computers, and boot up half life. but before playing, go into the settings and set it on software rendering. then if you play the game, you''ll notice its not in full detail. the textures will be all blocky, weapons wont look as smooth, things look really ugly from far away, ladder''s may not show up right. same goes for quake3, just screw around with the settings and you''ll see what i mean. Unreal Tournament is a bad example, because even in software mode UT doesnt lose much detail and runs at a high framerate (UT ROX! ). If you want to implement your own LOD system, just make sure your app supports multiple rendering techniques and such. Stuff like if the system is sluggish, you can resize the textures smaller before using them, this will put less stress on the system. If the system has alot of memory but not alot of speed, try MIP mapping. if its a high end system, you could use effects like Bilinear or Trilinear filtering to make the textures look good from a distance. these are just examples with textures, theres plenty of other things that could have a LOD system implemented.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
You have to load 3dfxvgl.dll to use Opengl on a voodoo/voodoo2 card

if you don''t the application will use a standard unaccelerated OpenGL driver (very very slow)

A new world, dark without the false light ....

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
one more thing ,, if you wan''t really really high framerates you will have to turn off Vsync if you don''t your fps will be limited to the refresh rate of the monitor

A new world, dark without the false light ....

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
    • By pr033r
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article ( inspirate from another code (here: but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch):
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      Thanks for any help...

    • By Andrija
      I am currently trying to implement shadow mapping into my project , but although i can render my depth map to the screen and it looks okay , when i sample it with shadowCoords there is no shadow.
      Here is my light space matrix calculation
      mat4x4 lightViewMatrix; vec3 sun_pos = {SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[0], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[1], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[2]}; mat4x4_look_at(lightViewMatrix,sun_pos,player->pos,up); mat4x4_mul(lightSpaceMatrix,lightProjMatrix,lightViewMatrix); I will tweak the values for the size and frustum of the shadow map, but for now i just want to draw shadows around the player position
      the_sun->direction is a normalized vector so i multiply it by a constant to get the position.
      player->pos is the camera position in world space
      the light projection matrix is calculated like this:
      mat4x4_ortho(lightProjMatrix,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,NEAR,SHADOW_FAR); Shadow vertex shader:
      uniform mat4 light_space_matrix; void main() { gl_Position = light_space_matrix * transfMatrix * vec4(position, 1.0f); } Shadow fragment shader:
      out float fragDepth; void main() { fragDepth = gl_FragCoord.z; } I am using deferred rendering so i have all my world positions in the g_positions buffer
      My shadow calculation in the deferred fragment shader:
      float get_shadow_fac(vec4 light_space_pos) { vec3 shadow_coords = / light_space_pos.w; shadow_coords = shadow_coords * 0.5 + 0.5; float closest_depth = texture(shadow_map, shadow_coords.xy).r; float current_depth = shadow_coords.z; float shadow_fac = 1.0; if(closest_depth < current_depth) shadow_fac = 0.5; return shadow_fac; } I call the function like this:
      get_shadow_fac(light_space_matrix * vec4(position,1.0)); Where position is the value i got from sampling the g_position buffer
      Here is my depth texture (i know it will produce low quality shadows but i just want to get it working for now):
      sorry because of the compression , the black smudges are trees ...
      EDIT: Depth texture attachment:
  • Popular Now