• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Deprecated

How to handle update-rate?

2 posts in this topic

Have been working a little on a tile-based game/simulator to test and display different AI behaviour on my laptop. When running the simulator on my regular computer an uncapped framerate will obviously make the simulation go much faster.

The most obvious solution to the problem with too fast framerate was time.sleep(0.5) which made it run at (about) 2 FPS.

The second, also obvious, solution was to get the time it took to iterate one step, then subtract that from 1000 / 60 which made it run at (almost exactly) 60 FPS.

But what happends the other way around? Assume that I have two computers and tell them both at exactly the same time to move from A to B (without either of them being connected to the other, ultimatly controlled by a server). The first computer runs at 2 FPS and the second runs at 2000 FPS. How can I calculate the relative speed per update if I want them both to arrive at B, at the same time?

Writing this, I'm assuming that I'd have to multiply the time it took for each update with a distance per second value. But as it's tile-based both the minimum and maximum movement is 1. It would of course be possible to increase dx, dy until they were greater than 1, but that doesn't seem good enough as it could still differ as much as 1 / FPS seconds between the results.


[i]As my above thoughs might seem a little messy, [b]how can I normalize update-rate between different hardwares?[/b][/i]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Use a fixed timestep. Explained here: [url="http://gafferongames.com/game-physics/fix-your-timestep/"]http://gafferongames.com/game-physics/fix-your-timestep/[/url]

This will decouple rendering framerate from the logic update rate.
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks!

As it is tile-based and I'm only working with integers for positions and angles I figure each entity should have internal "countdowns" for the amount of updates needed before moving or communicating with other entities (assuming it takes more than 1 timestep)?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='colinhect' timestamp='1325633442' post='4899430']
Use a fixed timestep. Explained here: [url="http://gafferongames.com/game-physics/fix-your-timestep/"]http://gafferongames...-your-timestep/[/url]

This will decouple rendering framerate from the logic update rate.
[/quote]

+1 for the mention of this article. I found it very helpful myself.

In my first game prototype, I had coupled the frame rate and update rate. It worked okay for a prototype, but it's not correct. So when I rebooted my project (threw away a lot of the prototype code), decoupling the render and update timers was the first thing I did, thanks to this article. As a side effect, it also forced me to correctly model my physics simulations (making every movement _time_ dependent, instead of _tick_ dependent).
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0