• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Harry Lee

Some confuse about the mip-map and unconstrained anisotropic filtering?

4 posts in this topic

Hi,all.[img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png[/img]
As I read the <Real time rendering,3rd>,I get two confuse that: (and I assume the API is DX9)

1.While the hardware can generate mipmaps automatically,do I have the motivation to pre-generated it by DxTex or PhotoShop's plugin?
I heared that the auto way doesn't have a good visual and sometimes may cause some bad effects(and even maybe effect the performance?--I don't clear.).As opposed to,the pre-way can get best visual,but also suffer more memory consumed.So,what's the most recommended way is used nowadays?

2.In the RTR.3rd,it said the Unconstrained Anisotropic Filtering can replace the mipmap,and takes less memory and has better visual.Though it's a further improve way as it declares.So,I want to ask is it now be the mainstream?If not,is it because of the hardware capacity?

Thanks very much!
Harry
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You could easily pre-generate your textures using the DirectX Texture Tool. It creates mip-maps automatically as dx would.
There are pro and cons on pre-generating it
+less loading time(i think so, but I am not sure)
-more memory usage on the hard drive

I hope that helps you!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='IceBreaker23' timestamp='1330291313' post='4916800']
You could easily pre-generate your textures using the DirectX Texture Tool. It creates mip-maps automatically as dx would.
There are pro and cons on pre-generating it
+less loading time(i think so, but I am not sure)
-more memory usage on the hard drive
[/quote]
Yep,it's helpful to me.Thanks![img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png[/img]
And more if you can tell me is:
We can use the photoshop's powerful plugin to pre-generate a more perfect mipmap,so if compare to this approach,which way we usually better choose?And maybe the motivation I'm eager to get the answer is what's the mainstream approach this industry now using.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Automatic mipmap generation is really intended for GPU-writeable textures such as render targets, and not static textures. If you can, you probably want to generate the mipmaps yourself. If you do it yourself you can ensure proper handling of things like sRGB conversion, normal maps, and alpha-tested textures. You also can't use auto-generated mipmaps for compressed texture formats, which is a major downside.

Anisotropic filtering doesn't [i]replace[/i] mipmapping, it works alongside it. The basic idea is that you retrieve prefiltered texels when you can, and take additional samples for high degrees of anisotropy. Technically you could eliminate the need for mipmaps by taking LOTS of samples to cover the entire sampled region, but this would be really expensive without much benefit.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='MJP' timestamp='1330309843' post='4916874'] Automatic mipmap generation is really intended for GPU-writeable textures such as render targets, and not static textures. If you can, you probably want to generate the mipmaps yourself. If you do it yourself you can ensure proper handling of things like sRGB conversion, normal maps, and alpha-tested textures. You also can't use auto-generated mipmaps for compressed texture formats, which is a major downside. Anisotropic filtering doesn't [i]replace[/i] mipmapping, it works alongside it. The basic idea is that you retrieve prefiltered texels when you can, and take additional samples for high degrees of anisotropy. Technically you could eliminate the need for mipmaps by taking LOTS of samples to cover the entire sampled region, but this would be really expensive without much benefit. [/quote]
Thanks very much!You make me a deeply understood about this topic.And I'm clear now.[img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png[/img]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0