• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
f8k8

Another Matrix Order Question :)

0 posts in this topic

I'm trying to get my head around row/column major matrices and row/column vectors. Mostly, I'm using the following for reference:
[url="http://www.j3d.org/matrix_faq/matrfaq_latest.html"]http://www.j3d.org/matrix_faq/matrfaq_latest.html[/url]

So, trying to write a 4x4 matrix class, I have a class with an array of values:

float m_Values[16];

Now, I'm going to be using column vectors, so:

[b]1) Am I right in saying the following:[/b]

Multiplication should be written like so: Matrix * Vector
Combining rotation matrices should be written (for example): Projection * View * World

[b]2) Row/Column major matrices refers to the order the data is stored in memory, NOT whether or not the translation component should be down the right hand side / along the bottom.[/b]

The translation is down the right hand side of the matrix when using column vectors, and across the bottom when using row vectors. Is this correct?

[b]3) OpenGL uses column vectors, and uses column major matrices, and we want to upload the matrices to OpenGL using [/b][b]glUniformMatrix4fv[/b]

I'm pretty sure this is right, so does that mean that the translation component should be in m_Values[12], m_Values[13] and m_Values[14]?

[b]4) When multiplying two matrices together, the operator* should have something like the following[/b]


final.m_Values[0] = (this.m_Values[0] * other.m_Values[0]) + (this.m_Values[1] * other.m_Values[4]) + (this.m_Values[2] * other.m_Values[8]) + (this.m_Values[3] * other.m_Values[12]);

final.m_Values[1] = (this.m_Values[0] * other.m_Values[1]) + (this.m_Values[1] * other.m_Values[5]) + (this.m_Values[2] * other.m_Values[9]) + (this.m_Values[3] * other.m_Values[13]);

final.m_Values[2] = (this.m_Values[0] * other.m_Values[2]) + (this.m_Values[1] * other.m_Values[6]) + (this.m_Values[2] * other.m_Values[10]) + (this.m_Values[3] * other.m_Values[14]);

I'm not sure if this order is right, or if I need to multiply a different way because the matrices are stored in column major order in memory. Can anyone clarify if this is the right way or not?

[b]5) The Matrix Quaternion FAQ I linked to at the top seems to be using column vectors, so vectors are multiplied on the right, as shown in Q13 of the FAQ. Q35 appears to suggest that matrices should be multiplied the other way though.[/b]

Q35 states that in order to get an X rotation, followed by a Y rotation, followed by a Z rotation, you multiply:

M = X.Y.Z

But I thought that, because it is using column vectors, the first transformation should be at the right hand side. I.e.:

M = Z.Y.X

In fact, looking at the function calls listed at the start of Q36, it seems to be multiplying in the order I'd think was correct (i.e. Z * Y * X), but still goes on to state that M = X.Y.Z.

Are Qs 35 & 36 wrong, or is it just a difference in notation for multiplying matrices instead of vectors (as Q13 says that V' = M.V, which seems like the right way round to me). Or is it just that I'm very confused? ;)

Hopefully someone can help me out on this, it would be very useful. Thanks :)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0