• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
mattkw80

C# - Question about OOP , using objects across multiple forms

13 posts in this topic

I'm having trouble understanding OOP in general, but specifically in C#.

If I have a player object created on my main form... (Form1), how do I talk to that
same player object in another form? ie: FormInventory.

Hopefully I've worded all that ok.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pass a handle to the player object to the FormInventory object. This can be part of the FormInventory's constructor or another function or even a property or variable.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've never heard of handles, maybe this is why I'm having trouble doing this.

I will try to to figure this out, thanks SiCrane.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sorry, in C# they're called references. I think you're overthinking this. It's really as simple as something like:
[code]
Player player = new Player;
FormInventory inventory = new FormInventory;
inventory.SetPlayer(player);
[/code]
or something similar (assuming Player is a reference type).
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In C#, any variable with a 'reference type' (i.e. the variable's type is a class or string) could be considered 'handles'.

In C#, the code inside a method can 'see':[list]
[*]Variables that got passed to the method.
[*]Variables that got created in the method.
[*]Member variables of the class that contains the method.
[*]Public Static (or "global") variables inside any class.
[/list]
There are several possible ways to make your two classes 'share' data:[list]
[*]When you 'new' a class, you can pass data via the constructor.
[*]If you have a reference to a class, you can assign to any of its public fields or public property setters.
[*]If you have a reference to a class, you can call any of its public methods and pass your data as an argument (SiCrane's example).
[*]You can make your data 'public static' and then any class can access it directly (try to avoid using this unless you have to).
[/list]
Examples:

FormInventory inventory = new FormInventory(player); // Passing it via the constructor.

inventory.Player = player; // Using a field/property setter.

inventory.SetPlayer(player); // Passing it to a method.

var player = Form1.Player; // Accessing it via a global (public static) field/property. (This code would be written in FormInventory's methods)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What I don't understand is why your InventoryForm needs to access the player Object?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='TheTroll' timestamp='1334543437' post='4931615']
What I don't understand is why your InventoryForm needs to access the player Object?
[/quote]

At a guess, I'd say it would be to retrieve the contents of the player's inventory and other parameters like carrying capacity?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Postie' timestamp='1334551443' post='4931631']
[quote name='TheTroll' timestamp='1334543437' post='4931615']
What I don't understand is why your InventoryForm needs to access the player Object?
[/quote]

At a guess, I'd say it would be to retrieve the contents of the player's inventory and other parameters like carrying capacity?
[/quote]

That would mean the player object would need to access the inventory, not the other way around. I can't see a reason inventory needs to access the player.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hypothetically, if InventoryForm was also used to display other entity's inventory, such as a shop keeper or someone you're pick pocketing, you could pass a reference to the person whose inventory you're going to be displaying to the form and have it sort it out.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for all the reply's, I'll read these through and make sure I understand.

And yeah... the Inventory needs to see the player's inventory, so it can display the player's inventory. I've done the inventory this way....

player.hasSword = true
player.hasShield = false
player.qtyFood = 5
player.gold = 5

(The inventory item's are variables in the player class - for simplicity sake)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Nypyren' timestamp='1334531363' post='4931576']
In C#, any variable with a 'reference type' (i.e. the variable's type is a class or string) could be considered 'handles'.

In C#, the code inside a method can 'see':[list]
[*]Variables that got passed to the method.
[*]Variables that got created in the method.
[*]Member variables of the class that contains the method.
[*]Public Static (or "global") variables inside any class.
[/list]
There are several possible ways to make your two classes 'share' data:[list]
[*]When you 'new' a class, you can pass data via the constructor.
[*]If you have a reference to a class, you can assign to any of its public fields or public property setters.
[*]If you have a reference to a class, you can call any of its public methods and pass your data as an argument (SiCrane's example).
[*]You can make your data 'public static' and then any class can access it directly (try to avoid using this unless you have to).
[/list]
Examples:

FormInventory inventory = new FormInventory(player); // Passing it via the constructor.

inventory.Player = player; // Using a field/property setter.

inventory.SetPlayer(player); // Passing it to a method.

var player = Form1.Player; // Accessing it via a global (public static) field/property. (This code would be written in FormInventory's methods)
[/quote]


I think my big problem is - VB.NET let me get away with alot of bad tricks to make this work. C# seems to be pretty strict - OOP or nothing.
It's going to take me a while to re-learn the proper way.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='mattkw80' timestamp='1334630113' post='4932002']
Thanks for all the reply's, I'll read these through and make sure I understand.

And yeah... the Inventory needs to see the player's inventory, so it can display the player's inventory. I've done the inventory this way....

player.hasSword = true
player.hasShield = false
player.qtyFood = 5
player.gold = 5

(The inventory item's are variables in the player class - for simplicity sake)
[/quote]

The InventoryForm has to see the player's inventory, not the player. I would have an inventory class, that the player has as part of it. Then when you create the InventoryForm you use the Form constructor to pass the player's inventory. InventoryForm inform = new InventoryForm(player.Inventory);

So why do this? Because then you can have other things with inventories. Merchants, monsters, chests, doesn't matter. They could all be handled by a single InventoryForm.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not a bad idea at all. For the moment, I need to keep it really simple - but long term - that is where I will go with it.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='mattkw80' timestamp='1334639270' post='4932023']
Not a bad idea at all. For the moment, I need to keep it really simple - but long term - that is where I will go with it.
[/quote]

Since you are learning, I would suggest you do it the "right" way when ever possible. It take a little bit more work but you will learn more that way.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0