• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

Trigonometry question

This topic is 2099 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

If i had a 3D arrow model pointing upwards (0, 1, 0) and i set this:
[code]
D3DXMATRIX world, rot;
D3DXMatrixIdentity(&world);
D3DXMatrixRotationAxis(&rot, &D3DXVECTOR3(1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f), 0.3f);
world = rot * world;
...
[/code]

How can i obtain new direction arrow is pointing?

Thanks for your time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
Make a vector pointing (0, 1, 0), i.e. the same direction as your arrow model, and rotate it in the same way. The rotated vector will give you the direction of the arrow model after rotation...

Putting it a different way, choose two vertices on your original arrow model, a vertex on the "bottom" of the arrow and a vertex of the "top" (the pointy end) of the arrow. These two points define a vector, which points in the arrow's direction. Once your model is rotated, find those two same vertices, they define another vector, which still represents the arrow's direction (obviously). The conclusion trivially follows...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[code]
D3DXMatrixRotationAxis(&rot, &D3DXVECTOR3(1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f), 0.1f);

D3DXVECTOR4 orgDir(0.0f, 1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f);
D3DXVECTOR4 outDir;
D3DXVec4Transform(&outDir, &orgDir, &rot);
[/code]

Is this what you mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, although you want to use

[CODE]D3DXMatrixRotationAxis(&rot, &D3DXVECTOR3(1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f), 0.3f);[/CODE]

as the rotation matrix (says 0.1 in your last post but 0.3 in the first one)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It was my mistake, It was a typo. Thanks for your help. [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png[/img]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Or, since you already know that your model was pointing along one of the coordinate system axes, you could just read out the second column of the world matrix. (Transformation) matrices aren't magic, they are just four vectors: right, up, forward, position. (depending on your handedness and as what you define your x,y,z axes).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't see how that would be correct?
I tried it and its almost similar, apart that 'z' axis is negative if i extract it from second column of world.

[img]http://www.dodaj.rs/f/9/ON/OShz0Ol/direction.jpg[/img]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Read the values from your world matrix before applying the rotation, just to be sure you are looking at the correct column. My point is that after setting it to identity, the second column must be (0,1,0,0). I see no reason why applying the same transformation to the same vectors should return different results just because one is transforming the whole matrix and the other a standalone vector.

Though I notice you are transforming orgDir by rot instead of the world matrix. How would that help if your world matrix has already acumulated several rotations? I can't imagine you want to keep track of (and update) a ton of vectors every time you apply a rotation to the world matrix.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement