• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
makuto

Comparing axes in a SAT based collision resolution method

5 posts in this topic

I've implemented a Separating Axis Theorem-based collision detection function (in C++) and am now dealing with resolving collisions. What I need to figure out is how to detect which axis is best to resolve the collision.
What would be a good way to compare several vectors to an inverted translation vector in order to determine which axis will result in the best possible collision (basically the axis closest to the translation vector)?

I think I could use something like each normal in the static object stored an angle (0-360, probably 9 bits, or an int, whatever) and the translation vector structure also contained an angle (for now it's limited to increments of 45 because of keyboard-based controls). The static angles would all be compared to the translation angle, and the closest static normal would be used as the resolution vector.

Is there anything more efficient/better to use to compare the vectors, or should I use a completely different method in order to resolve the collisions?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote]What I need to figure out is how to detect which axis is best to resolve the collision.[/quote]
In SAT it's axis with minimal projection overlaping.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If there is a collision the objects have no separating axis. Maybe you want to find the direction along which two overlapping objects need to be displaced by the minimum amount to cease overlapping, but it's a mere hack.
For an exact collision response you have to compute the time of impact and the position of objects when they touch. At that time and place, the objects bounce, start deforming, etc.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote]In SAT it's axis with minimal projection overlaping.[/quote]
The reason why I don't do that is because when the objects near each other's corners the minimal axis becomes the axis on the wrong side of the shape, making a horrible tunneling effect.

I'm not really making an exact collision detection method, just a simple, versatile one for basic game collisions.

How difficult is it on the CPU to compute the time/position of impact? I'd imagine to use a method where it splits the total translation in half, sees if there is a collision or not, then splits a portion of that in half and so on.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote]The reason why I don't do that is because when the objects near each other's corners the minimal axis becomes the axis on the wrong side of the shape, making a horrible tunneling effect.[/quote]
Then you definitelly need time prediction algorithm. The same SAT is good. I wrote a post long time ago - check it out
[url="http://volgogradetzzz.blogspot.com/"]http://volgogradetzzz.blogspot.com/[/url]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Great tutorial! It ws a little hard to read, but your English is pretty good. Thanks for the help!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0