• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
strivingJuno

OpenGL
OpenGL and support for switchable graphics - Qt Examples

9 posts in this topic

Hi all,

I'm working on a software project that uses OpenGL to create high-resolution results of an image stiching process. For that job, we engage FBOs or pBuffers, depending on the availability.

Recently, we've been told that there are compatibility problems on systems with support for switchable graphics. Apperantly, this technology gains importance, also on Windows platforms. The technology has been supported from Vista onwards. My reference system (Lenovo W500) runs Win7.

Since we are using the Qt framework for software development, I did a few tests with examples coming along with Qt (4.7.4 and 4.8.0). I tested the OpenGL examples "[url="http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7-snapshot/opengl-framebufferobject.html"]framebufferobject[/url]" and "[url="http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7-snapshot/opengl-pbuffers.html"]pBuffers[/url]" on a system with switchable graphics.

In the Bios, I chose the type of GPU driver. On a system that supports switchable graphics, you have usually three different choices:
1) Discrete Graphics (ATI Mobility FireGL V7500)
2) Integrated Graphics (Mobile Intel 4 Express Chipset Family)
3) Switchable Graphics (switch between ATI and Intel graphics without reboot)

The Qt examples ran smoothly in modes 1) or 2). Case 3) was special: If the "first" adapter (discrete GPU) was attached, the examples ran successfully. If I switched to the "second" adapter however (integrated GPU) the applications quitted with an error message stating that the required extension (fbo, pbuffer respectively) do not exist.

I know, the first thing everyone will think of is "driver problem". Of course, this might be the case also for my system. (Be assured that I checked for the most recent drivers thoroughly enough!) But I would like to learn more about the general state of support for switchable graphics:[list]
[*]Do the examples work on your machines?
[*]Do you know something one has to take into consideration in order to ensure support for switchable graphics?
[*]It seems that the OpenGL capabilities are not updated correctly for the new device after switching graphics. Some Intel [url="http://software.intel.com/file/34436"]tech-sheet[/url] (section 3.9) recommends to handle somehow D3DERR_DEVICELOST or WM_DISPLAYCHANGE messages - but is there some way to re-connect OpenGL to new hardware explicitly?
[*]On Windows, it's possible to query the available adapters with [url="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa394512%28v=VS.85%29.aspx"]Win32_VideoController[/url] class. As with all [url="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa394554%28v=vs.85%29.aspx"]WMI Classes[/url], one gets a list of objects. For switchable graphics this list is at least of length two. But which device refers to the current adapter?
[/list]
From bug-reports, we get the impression that there are a lot of compatibility problems related to systems with switchable graphics. However, searching the internet about this issue lead me only to support pages of HP or Lenovo offering some specific driver or BIOS updates for specific products. I wonder if there is some general "what-you-need-to-know-about" for switchable graphics and OpenGL...

THANKS to everyone contributing to this topic!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've access to a switchable graphics machine and have tested code using a more-or-less completely-featured GL3.3 program on it, but I did disable switchable graphics in the Bios, and did use an AMD-provided driver (rather than the vendor-provided one) that is not supported for use with switchable graphics but which worked despite that. It's a bit of a hairy thing to expect end-users to have to do, but I considered it fine enough (and accepted the risks involved) for my own personal use.

My best guess is that the driver for the low-power Intel GPU includes either no or downlevel GL support, but I haven't tested this. I can do a quick check to confirm later on if you're interested.

The Intel-recommended D3DERR_DEVICELOST handling would be roughly equivalent - in this case - to destroying and recreating the GL context, and could be handled by your standard display mode changing code. You would have to get a new HDC for your window, create a new pixel format, etc too. This is also something I can test later on.

[b]Update[/b]

I haven't been able to test fully as the Intel was unable to compile my shaders and was missing some other extensions/core GL3.3 stuff I use. It does report support for GL_ARB_framebuffer_object however, so I can knock up some code later on that uses FBOs and see what happens. Edited by mhagain
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you very much for your response.

[quote name='mhagain' timestamp='1336062210' post='4937135']
I've access to a switchable graphics machine and have tested code using a more-or-less completely-featured GL3.3 program on it, but I did disable switchable graphics in the Bios, and did use an AMD-provided driver (rather than the vendor-provided one) that is not supported for use with switchable graphics but which worked despite that. It's a bit of a hairy thing to expect end-users to have to do, but I considered it fine enough (and accepted the risks involved) for my own personal use.
[/quote]

This is also the best practice we have found until now. But the problem is that for our users (and we have to consider our typical user to be very numb) this is not really an option... [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/sad.png[/img]

[quote name='mhagain' timestamp='1336062210' post='4937135']
The Intel-recommended D3DERR_DEVICELOST handling would be roughly equivalent - in this case - to destroying and recreating the GL context, and could be handled by your standard display mode changing code. You would have to get a new HDC for your window, create a new pixel format, etc too. This is also something I can test later on.
[/quote]

Ok, since we create an OpenGL context only for the stitching and rendering purpose and close it right away (so the OpenGL context does not have to persist over a long time anyway), recovering from a "device loss" it is not really the biggest concern we have now. For the same reason, the switching from one adapter to another is not an issue now. The problem we currently face at is that our app works only for one of the two display adapters in switchable mode. For the "second" adapter (the integrated one) it looks as if the supported OpenGL version is 1.1, but we require to have at least 1.4. Look at the attachement "SwitchableGraphicsDrivers.png": This is what our software and the Qt examples sees. However, if I check an OpenGL extension viewer such as [url="http://www.realtech-vr.com/glview/download.html"]realtech VR's[/url] one can read support for OpenGL 2.1 (see screenshot). Also, if I start the rendering tests, all tests for OpenGL 1.1 up to 2.1 run all successfully. In other words: all the OpenGL functionality is around for 2.1, but Qt cannot access it.

I checked the Qt functions that try to assess the OpenGL capabilities. But apparently it is not a problem of Qt, it simply gets the wrong information when calling to glGetString[color=#000000]([/color]GL_EXTENSIONS[color=#000000])...[/color]

How is that possible???
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That sounds more like a problem in Qt's context creation to me. I don't use Qt myself so can't double-check this, but getting a GL_VERSION of 1.1 is normally indicative of the program using Microsoft's generic software implementation. A quick check of GL_VENDOR and/or GL_RENDERER should be all you need to confirm that.

It's also possible to get a context that's not hardware accelerated even if using regular context creation, in which case you'll also be given the MS generic software implementation rather than the vendor's. I've seen this happen on an Intel 4 series before but can't recall exactly what triggered it, although accumulation buffers are ringing a wee bell in the back of my head. Edited by mhagain
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi mhagain,

I investigated a little further based on your inputs. On the problematic system, Mircrosoft's Generic GDI renderer is in use. I used following code for the context creation (so no Qt code is involved anymore):

[CODE]
void EnableOpenGL(HWND hWnd, HDC * hDC, HGLRC * hRC)
{
PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd;
int format;
// get the device context (DC)
*hDC = GetDC( hWnd );
// set the pixel format for the DC
ZeroMemory( &pfd, sizeof( pfd ) );
pfd.nSize = sizeof( pfd );
pfd.nVersion = 1;
pfd.dwFlags = PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER;
pfd.iPixelType = PFD_TYPE_RGBA;
pfd.cColorBits = 24;
pfd.cDepthBits = 16;
pfd.iLayerType = PFD_MAIN_PLANE;
format = ChoosePixelFormat( *hDC, &pfd );
SetPixelFormat( *hDC, format, &pfd );
// create and enable the render context (RC)
*hRC = wglCreateContext( *hDC );
wglMakeCurrent( *hDC, *hRC );
}
[/CODE]

What might be the reason that OpenGL is connected to the GDI renderer and not to the the vendor's one???
Just to recall: Based on [url="http://www.realtech-vr.com/glview/download.html"]realtech's extension viewer[/url] the functionality of OpenGL 2.1 is available on that system..!

As a next step, I'll check the web for an open-source equivalent of this viewer to see how the OpenGL context has to be set up on such a system...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Most likely reason is that a hardware accelerated pixel format is not available for the options you've chosen. Here's my setup that gives me a 3.3 context on Windows 7 with switchable graphics:[code] memset (&pfd, 0, sizeof (PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR));

pfd.nSize = sizeof (PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR);
pfd.nVersion = 1;
pfd.dwFlags = PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER | PFD_SUPPORT_COMPOSITION;
pfd.iPixelType = PFD_TYPE_RGBA;
pfd.cColorBits = 32;
pfd.cDepthBits = 24;
pfd.cStencilBits = 8;
pfd.iLayerType = PFD_MAIN_PLANE;[/code]

You can call DescribePixelFormat in a loop, with format numbers starting at 1 and terminating the loop when you get a return of 0, to see what formats are available and which are hardware accelerated. This may be more helpful in determining exactly what formats the Intel does and doesn't support hardware accelerated OpenGL with. See [url="http://www.gamedev.net/topic/136233-pixel-formats-ogl/"]this post[/url] for info on decoding the flags you get back. Edited by mhagain
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I checked out your hints, but I did not really get a step further.

Querying the available pixel formats with DescribePixelFormat just returns the pixel formats of the GDI renderer. This is how I verified this:[list=1]
[*]Query the pixel formats in a loop (see attached file)
[*]Compared with pixel formats visible to [url="http://www.realtech-vr.com/glview/download.html"]OpenGL Extension Viewer 4.0[/url]
[*]Compared with pixel formats visible to [url="http://www.softonic.de/s/download-kostenlos-opengl-extensions-viewer?ab=5"]OpenGL Extension Viewer 2.11[/url] (also developed by realtech VR)
[/list]
On point 3) : I found out that extension viewer 2.11 has the same problem as the vast majority of the tested software so far (Qt examples, some 3D games, our software). If I want to check the extensions with this viewer, it shows only the capabilities of the GDI renderer.
However, if I check with version 4.0 I get the caps of the integrated device (see screenshot)!

So there must be a way to correctly create a render context (unless those guys cheat in some way...)!!!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let me link my problem with [url="http://www.gamedev.net/topic/610854-windows-opengl-and-choosing-from-multiple-video-cards/"]this gamedev topic[/url] as it seems to be related... I've added a few comments there.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmm. Seems to be a really awkward situation with switchable graphics. Getting slowly frustrated with this topic. This technology is up-and-coming, but yet very immature.

I found more resources [url="https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-27999?"]here[/url] (bug tracker of Second Life) and [url="http://www.frictionalgames.com/forum/thread-9942.html"]here[/url] (forum frictionalgames).
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It turned out that the reported issue indeed [i]WAS [/i]a driver problem. The ATI switchable graphics driver runs fine for 64-bit applications, however there seems to be a problem with 32bit OpenGL apps on 64bit systems. I found no 32bit example that would run correctly.

The described utility "OpenGL Extension Viewer" (which I claimed to run smoothly on the problematic system above) was 64bit, this is why it always worked. (Mean about this tool: it installs by default in the x86 program folder - so this is why I always assumed that it is a 32bit app...)

I verified the above statement with a test application that I've built for 32bit and 64bit architectures. For the 64bit version of that app, all hardware supported OpenGL functionality was available on the problematic system (see above). For the 32bit version however, I got the same behavior (OpenGL is connected to the Generic GDI driver, most of the OpenGL functionality is not available).

Since the most recent driver update for the switchable graphics [url="http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/detail.page?LegacyDocID=MIGR-73641"]driver[/url] (dated on 27th May 2012) did not improve the problem, we decided to render things in software in case of missing OpenGL support.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By Toastmastern
      So it's been a while since I took a break from my whole creating a planet in DX11. Last time around I got stuck on fixing a nice LOD.
      A week back or so I got help to find this:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD
      In general this is what I'm trying to recreate in DX11, he that made that planet LOD uses OpenGL but that is a minor issue and something I can solve. But I have a question regarding the code
      He gets the position using this row
      vec4d pos = b.var.vec4d["position"]; Which is then used further down when he sends the variable "center" into the drawing function:
      if (pos.len() < 1) pos.norm(); world::draw(vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z));  
      Inside the draw function this happens:
      draw_recursive(p3[0], p3[1], p3[2], center); Basically the 3 vertices of the triangle and the center of details that he sent as a parameter earlier: vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z)
      Now onto my real question, he does vec3d edge_center[3] = { (p1 + p2) / 2, (p2 + p3) / 2, (p3 + p1) / 2 }; to get the edge center of each edge, nothing weird there.
      But this is used later on with:
      vec3d d = center + edge_center[i]; edge_test[i] = d.len() > ratio_size; edge_test is then used to evaluate if there should be a triangle drawn or if it should be split up into 3 new triangles instead. Why is it working for him? shouldn't it be like center - edge_center or something like that? Why adding them togheter? I asume here that the center is the center of details for the LOD. the position of the camera if stood on the ground of the planet and not up int he air like it is now.

      Full code can be seen here:
      https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD/blob/master/src.simple/Main.cpp
      If anyone would like to take a look and try to help me understand this code I would love this person. I'm running out of ideas on how to solve this in my own head, most likely twisted it one time to many up in my head
      Thanks in advance
      Toastmastern
       
       
    • By fllwr0491
      I googled around but are unable to find source code or details of implementation.
      What keywords should I search for this topic?
      Things I would like to know:
      A. How to ensure that partially covered pixels are rasterized?
         Apparently by expanding each triangle by 1 pixel or so, rasterization problem is almost solved.
         But it will result in an unindexable triangle list without tons of overlaps. Will it incur a large performance penalty?
      B. A-buffer like bitmask needs a read-modiry-write operation.
         How to ensure proper synchronizations in GLSL?
         GLSL seems to only allow int32 atomics on image.
      C. Is there some simple ways to estimate coverage on-the-fly?
         In case I am to draw 2D shapes onto an exisitng target:
         1. A multi-pass whatever-buffer seems overkill.
         2. Multisampling could cost a lot memory though all I need is better coverage.
            Besides, I have to blit twice, if draw target is not multisampled.
       
    • By mapra99
      Hello

      I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

      To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

      Thanks!
    • By Solid_Spy
      Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
      In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
      My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
      Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
    • By KarimIO
      EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
      Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
      Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
      static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));  
  • Popular Now