• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL OpenGL and support for switchable graphics - Qt Examples

This topic is 2041 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I'm working on a software project that uses OpenGL to create high-resolution results of an image stiching process. For that job, we engage FBOs or pBuffers, depending on the availability.

Recently, we've been told that there are compatibility problems on systems with support for switchable graphics. Apperantly, this technology gains importance, also on Windows platforms. The technology has been supported from Vista onwards. My reference system (Lenovo W500) runs Win7.

Since we are using the Qt framework for software development, I did a few tests with examples coming along with Qt (4.7.4 and 4.8.0). I tested the OpenGL examples "[url="http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7-snapshot/opengl-framebufferobject.html"]framebufferobject[/url]" and "[url="http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.7-snapshot/opengl-pbuffers.html"]pBuffers[/url]" on a system with switchable graphics.

In the Bios, I chose the type of GPU driver. On a system that supports switchable graphics, you have usually three different choices:
1) Discrete Graphics (ATI Mobility FireGL V7500)
2) Integrated Graphics (Mobile Intel 4 Express Chipset Family)
3) Switchable Graphics (switch between ATI and Intel graphics without reboot)

The Qt examples ran smoothly in modes 1) or 2). Case 3) was special: If the "first" adapter (discrete GPU) was attached, the examples ran successfully. If I switched to the "second" adapter however (integrated GPU) the applications quitted with an error message stating that the required extension (fbo, pbuffer respectively) do not exist.

I know, the first thing everyone will think of is "driver problem". Of course, this might be the case also for my system. (Be assured that I checked for the most recent drivers thoroughly enough!) But I would like to learn more about the general state of support for switchable graphics:[list]
[*]Do the examples work on your machines?
[*]Do you know something one has to take into consideration in order to ensure support for switchable graphics?
[*]It seems that the OpenGL capabilities are not updated correctly for the new device after switching graphics. Some Intel [url="http://software.intel.com/file/34436"]tech-sheet[/url] (section 3.9) recommends to handle somehow D3DERR_DEVICELOST or WM_DISPLAYCHANGE messages - but is there some way to re-connect OpenGL to new hardware explicitly?
[*]On Windows, it's possible to query the available adapters with [url="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa394512%28v=VS.85%29.aspx"]Win32_VideoController[/url] class. As with all [url="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa394554%28v=vs.85%29.aspx"]WMI Classes[/url], one gets a list of objects. For switchable graphics this list is at least of length two. But which device refers to the current adapter?
[/list]
From bug-reports, we get the impression that there are a lot of compatibility problems related to systems with switchable graphics. However, searching the internet about this issue lead me only to support pages of HP or Lenovo offering some specific driver or BIOS updates for specific products. I wonder if there is some general "what-you-need-to-know-about" for switchable graphics and OpenGL...

THANKS to everyone contributing to this topic!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
I've access to a switchable graphics machine and have tested code using a more-or-less completely-featured GL3.3 program on it, but I did disable switchable graphics in the Bios, and did use an AMD-provided driver (rather than the vendor-provided one) that is not supported for use with switchable graphics but which worked despite that. It's a bit of a hairy thing to expect end-users to have to do, but I considered it fine enough (and accepted the risks involved) for my own personal use.

My best guess is that the driver for the low-power Intel GPU includes either no or downlevel GL support, but I haven't tested this. I can do a quick check to confirm later on if you're interested.

The Intel-recommended D3DERR_DEVICELOST handling would be roughly equivalent - in this case - to destroying and recreating the GL context, and could be handled by your standard display mode changing code. You would have to get a new HDC for your window, create a new pixel format, etc too. This is also something I can test later on.

[b]Update[/b]

I haven't been able to test fully as the Intel was unable to compile my shaders and was missing some other extensions/core GL3.3 stuff I use. It does report support for GL_ARB_framebuffer_object however, so I can knock up some code later on that uses FBOs and see what happens. Edited by mhagain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you very much for your response.

[quote name='mhagain' timestamp='1336062210' post='4937135']
I've access to a switchable graphics machine and have tested code using a more-or-less completely-featured GL3.3 program on it, but I did disable switchable graphics in the Bios, and did use an AMD-provided driver (rather than the vendor-provided one) that is not supported for use with switchable graphics but which worked despite that. It's a bit of a hairy thing to expect end-users to have to do, but I considered it fine enough (and accepted the risks involved) for my own personal use.
[/quote]

This is also the best practice we have found until now. But the problem is that for our users (and we have to consider our typical user to be very numb) this is not really an option... [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/sad.png[/img]

[quote name='mhagain' timestamp='1336062210' post='4937135']
The Intel-recommended D3DERR_DEVICELOST handling would be roughly equivalent - in this case - to destroying and recreating the GL context, and could be handled by your standard display mode changing code. You would have to get a new HDC for your window, create a new pixel format, etc too. This is also something I can test later on.
[/quote]

Ok, since we create an OpenGL context only for the stitching and rendering purpose and close it right away (so the OpenGL context does not have to persist over a long time anyway), recovering from a "device loss" it is not really the biggest concern we have now. For the same reason, the switching from one adapter to another is not an issue now. The problem we currently face at is that our app works only for one of the two display adapters in switchable mode. For the "second" adapter (the integrated one) it looks as if the supported OpenGL version is 1.1, but we require to have at least 1.4. Look at the attachement "SwitchableGraphicsDrivers.png": This is what our software and the Qt examples sees. However, if I check an OpenGL extension viewer such as [url="http://www.realtech-vr.com/glview/download.html"]realtech VR's[/url] one can read support for OpenGL 2.1 (see screenshot). Also, if I start the rendering tests, all tests for OpenGL 1.1 up to 2.1 run all successfully. In other words: all the OpenGL functionality is around for 2.1, but Qt cannot access it.

I checked the Qt functions that try to assess the OpenGL capabilities. But apparently it is not a problem of Qt, it simply gets the wrong information when calling to glGetString[color=#000000]([/color]GL_EXTENSIONS[color=#000000])...[/color]

How is that possible???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That sounds more like a problem in Qt's context creation to me. I don't use Qt myself so can't double-check this, but getting a GL_VERSION of 1.1 is normally indicative of the program using Microsoft's generic software implementation. A quick check of GL_VENDOR and/or GL_RENDERER should be all you need to confirm that.

It's also possible to get a context that's not hardware accelerated even if using regular context creation, in which case you'll also be given the MS generic software implementation rather than the vendor's. I've seen this happen on an Intel 4 series before but can't recall exactly what triggered it, although accumulation buffers are ringing a wee bell in the back of my head. Edited by mhagain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi mhagain,

I investigated a little further based on your inputs. On the problematic system, Mircrosoft's Generic GDI renderer is in use. I used following code for the context creation (so no Qt code is involved anymore):

[CODE]
void EnableOpenGL(HWND hWnd, HDC * hDC, HGLRC * hRC)
{
PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd;
int format;
// get the device context (DC)
*hDC = GetDC( hWnd );
// set the pixel format for the DC
ZeroMemory( &pfd, sizeof( pfd ) );
pfd.nSize = sizeof( pfd );
pfd.nVersion = 1;
pfd.dwFlags = PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER;
pfd.iPixelType = PFD_TYPE_RGBA;
pfd.cColorBits = 24;
pfd.cDepthBits = 16;
pfd.iLayerType = PFD_MAIN_PLANE;
format = ChoosePixelFormat( *hDC, &pfd );
SetPixelFormat( *hDC, format, &pfd );
// create and enable the render context (RC)
*hRC = wglCreateContext( *hDC );
wglMakeCurrent( *hDC, *hRC );
}
[/CODE]

What might be the reason that OpenGL is connected to the GDI renderer and not to the the vendor's one???
Just to recall: Based on [url="http://www.realtech-vr.com/glview/download.html"]realtech's extension viewer[/url] the functionality of OpenGL 2.1 is available on that system..!

As a next step, I'll check the web for an open-source equivalent of this viewer to see how the OpenGL context has to be set up on such a system...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Most likely reason is that a hardware accelerated pixel format is not available for the options you've chosen. Here's my setup that gives me a 3.3 context on Windows 7 with switchable graphics:[code] memset (&pfd, 0, sizeof (PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR));

pfd.nSize = sizeof (PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR);
pfd.nVersion = 1;
pfd.dwFlags = PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER | PFD_SUPPORT_COMPOSITION;
pfd.iPixelType = PFD_TYPE_RGBA;
pfd.cColorBits = 32;
pfd.cDepthBits = 24;
pfd.cStencilBits = 8;
pfd.iLayerType = PFD_MAIN_PLANE;[/code]

You can call DescribePixelFormat in a loop, with format numbers starting at 1 and terminating the loop when you get a return of 0, to see what formats are available and which are hardware accelerated. This may be more helpful in determining exactly what formats the Intel does and doesn't support hardware accelerated OpenGL with. See [url="http://www.gamedev.net/topic/136233-pixel-formats-ogl/"]this post[/url] for info on decoding the flags you get back. Edited by mhagain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I checked out your hints, but I did not really get a step further.

Querying the available pixel formats with DescribePixelFormat just returns the pixel formats of the GDI renderer. This is how I verified this:[list=1]
[*]Query the pixel formats in a loop (see attached file)
[*]Compared with pixel formats visible to [url="http://www.realtech-vr.com/glview/download.html"]OpenGL Extension Viewer 4.0[/url]
[*]Compared with pixel formats visible to [url="http://www.softonic.de/s/download-kostenlos-opengl-extensions-viewer?ab=5"]OpenGL Extension Viewer 2.11[/url] (also developed by realtech VR)
[/list]
On point 3) : I found out that extension viewer 2.11 has the same problem as the vast majority of the tested software so far (Qt examples, some 3D games, our software). If I want to check the extensions with this viewer, it shows only the capabilities of the GDI renderer.
However, if I check with version 4.0 I get the caps of the integrated device (see screenshot)!

So there must be a way to correctly create a render context (unless those guys cheat in some way...)!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let me link my problem with [url="http://www.gamedev.net/topic/610854-windows-opengl-and-choosing-from-multiple-video-cards/"]this gamedev topic[/url] as it seems to be related... I've added a few comments there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmm. Seems to be a really awkward situation with switchable graphics. Getting slowly frustrated with this topic. This technology is up-and-coming, but yet very immature.

I found more resources [url="https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-27999?"]here[/url] (bug tracker of Second Life) and [url="http://www.frictionalgames.com/forum/thread-9942.html"]here[/url] (forum frictionalgames).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It turned out that the reported issue indeed [i]WAS [/i]a driver problem. The ATI switchable graphics driver runs fine for 64-bit applications, however there seems to be a problem with 32bit OpenGL apps on 64bit systems. I found no 32bit example that would run correctly.

The described utility "OpenGL Extension Viewer" (which I claimed to run smoothly on the problematic system above) was 64bit, this is why it always worked. (Mean about this tool: it installs by default in the x86 program folder - so this is why I always assumed that it is a 32bit app...)

I verified the above statement with a test application that I've built for 32bit and 64bit architectures. For the 64bit version of that app, all hardware supported OpenGL functionality was available on the problematic system (see above). For the 32bit version however, I got the same behavior (OpenGL is connected to the Generic GDI driver, most of the OpenGL functionality is not available).

Since the most recent driver update for the switchable graphics [url="http://support.lenovo.com/en_US/detail.page?LegacyDocID=MIGR-73641"]driver[/url] (dated on 27th May 2012) did not improve the problem, we decided to render things in software in case of missing OpenGL support.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Advertisement
  • Similar Content

    • By reenigne
      For those that don't know me. I am the individual who's two videos are listed here under setup for https://wiki.libsdl.org/Tutorials
      I also run grhmedia.com where I host the projects and code for the tutorials I have online.
      Recently, I received a notice from youtube they will be implementing their new policy in protecting video content as of which I won't be monetized till I meat there required number of viewers and views each month.

      Frankly, I'm pretty sick of youtube. I put up a video and someone else learns from it and puts up another video and because of the way youtube does their placement they end up with more views.
      Even guys that clearly post false information such as one individual who said GLEW 2.0 was broken because he didn't know how to compile it. He in short didn't know how to modify the script he used because he didn't understand make files and how the requirements of the compiler and library changes needed some different flags.

      At the end of the month when they implement this I will take down the content and host on my own server purely and it will be a paid system and or patreon. 

      I get my videos may be a bit dry, I generally figure people are there to learn how to do something and I rather not waste their time. 
      I used to also help people for free even those coming from the other videos. That won't be the case any more. I used to just take anyone emails and work with them my email is posted on the site.

      I don't expect to get the required number of subscribers in that time or increased views. Even if I did well it wouldn't take care of each reoccurring month.
      I figure this is simpler and I don't plan on putting some sort of exorbitant fee for a monthly subscription or the like.
      I was thinking on the lines of a few dollars 1,2, and 3 and the larger subscription gets you assistance with the content in the tutorials if needed that month.
      Maybe another fee if it is related but not directly in the content. 
      The fees would serve to cut down on the number of people who ask for help and maybe encourage some of the people to actually pay attention to what is said rather than do their own thing. That actually turns out to be 90% of the issues. I spent 6 hours helping one individual last week I must have asked him 20 times did you do exactly like I said in the video even pointed directly to the section. When he finally sent me a copy of the what he entered I knew then and there he had not. I circled it and I pointed out that wasn't what I said to do in the video. I didn't tell him what was wrong and how I knew that way he would go back and actually follow what it said to do. He then reported it worked. Yea, no kidding following directions works. But hey isn't alone and well its part of the learning process.

      So the point of this isn't to be a gripe session. I'm just looking for a bit of feed back. Do you think the fees are unreasonable?
      Should I keep the youtube channel and do just the fees with patreon or do you think locking the content to my site and require a subscription is an idea.

      I'm just looking at the fact it is unrealistic to think youtube/google will actually get stuff right or that youtube viewers will actually bother to start looking for more accurate videos. 
    • By Balma Alparisi
      i got error 1282 in my code.
      sf::ContextSettings settings; settings.majorVersion = 4; settings.minorVersion = 5; settings.attributeFlags = settings.Core; sf::Window window; window.create(sf::VideoMode(1600, 900), "Texture Unit Rectangle", sf::Style::Close, settings); window.setActive(true); window.setVerticalSyncEnabled(true); glewInit(); GLuint shaderProgram = createShaderProgram("FX/Rectangle.vss", "FX/Rectangle.fss"); float vertex[] = { -0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,0.0f, -0.5f,-0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,1.0f, 0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,0.0f, 0.5,-0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,1.0f, }; GLuint indices[] = { 0,1,2, 1,2,3, }; GLuint vao; glGenVertexArrays(1, &vao); glBindVertexArray(vao); GLuint vbo; glGenBuffers(1, &vbo); glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vbo); glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(vertex), vertex, GL_STATIC_DRAW); GLuint ebo; glGenBuffers(1, &ebo); glBindBuffer(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, ebo); glBufferData(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(indices), indices,GL_STATIC_DRAW); glVertexAttribPointer(0, 3, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)0); glEnableVertexAttribArray(0); glVertexAttribPointer(1, 2, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)(sizeof(float) * 3)); glEnableVertexAttribArray(1); GLuint texture[2]; glGenTextures(2, texture); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageOne = new sf::Image; bool isImageOneLoaded = imageOne->loadFromFile("Texture/container.jpg"); if (isImageOneLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageOne->getSize().x, imageOne->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageOne->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageOne; glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageTwo = new sf::Image; bool isImageTwoLoaded = imageTwo->loadFromFile("Texture/awesomeface.png"); if (isImageTwoLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageTwo->getSize().x, imageTwo->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageTwo->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageTwo; glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureOne"), 0); glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureTwo"), 1); GLenum error = glGetError(); std::cout << error << std::endl; sf::Event event; bool isRunning = true; while (isRunning) { while (window.pollEvent(event)) { if (event.type == event.Closed) { isRunning = false; } } glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); if (isImageOneLoaded && isImageTwoLoaded) { glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glUseProgram(shaderProgram); } glBindVertexArray(vao); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, 6, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, nullptr); glBindVertexArray(0); window.display(); } glDeleteVertexArrays(1, &vao); glDeleteBuffers(1, &vbo); glDeleteBuffers(1, &ebo); glDeleteProgram(shaderProgram); glDeleteTextures(2,texture); return 0; } and this is the vertex shader
      #version 450 core layout(location=0) in vec3 inPos; layout(location=1) in vec2 inTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; void main() { gl_Position=vec4(inPos,1.0); TexCoord=inTexCoord; } and the fragment shader
      #version 450 core in vec2 TexCoord; uniform sampler2D inTextureOne; uniform sampler2D inTextureTwo; out vec4 FragmentColor; void main() { FragmentColor=mix(texture(inTextureOne,TexCoord),texture(inTextureTwo,TexCoord),0.2); } I was expecting awesomeface.png on top of container.jpg

    • By khawk
      We've just released all of the source code for the NeHe OpenGL lessons on our Github page at https://github.com/gamedev-net/nehe-opengl. code - 43 total platforms, configurations, and languages are included.
      Now operated by GameDev.net, NeHe is located at http://nehe.gamedev.net where it has been a valuable resource for developers wanting to learn OpenGL and graphics programming.

      View full story
    • By TheChubu
      The Khronos™ Group, an open consortium of leading hardware and software companies, announces from the SIGGRAPH 2017 Conference the immediate public availability of the OpenGL® 4.6 specification. OpenGL 4.6 integrates the functionality of numerous ARB and EXT extensions created by Khronos members AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA into core, including the capability to ingest SPIR-V™ shaders.
      SPIR-V is a Khronos-defined standard intermediate language for parallel compute and graphics, which enables content creators to simplify their shader authoring and management pipelines while providing significant source shading language flexibility. OpenGL 4.6 adds support for ingesting SPIR-V shaders to the core specification, guaranteeing that SPIR-V shaders will be widely supported by OpenGL implementations.
      OpenGL 4.6 adds the functionality of these ARB extensions to OpenGL’s core specification:
      GL_ARB_gl_spirv and GL_ARB_spirv_extensions to standardize SPIR-V support for OpenGL GL_ARB_indirect_parameters and GL_ARB_shader_draw_parameters for reducing the CPU overhead associated with rendering batches of geometry GL_ARB_pipeline_statistics_query and GL_ARB_transform_feedback_overflow_querystandardize OpenGL support for features available in Direct3D GL_ARB_texture_filter_anisotropic (based on GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic) brings previously IP encumbered functionality into OpenGL to improve the visual quality of textured scenes GL_ARB_polygon_offset_clamp (based on GL_EXT_polygon_offset_clamp) suppresses a common visual artifact known as a “light leak” associated with rendering shadows GL_ARB_shader_atomic_counter_ops and GL_ARB_shader_group_vote add shader intrinsics supported by all desktop vendors to improve functionality and performance GL_KHR_no_error reduces driver overhead by allowing the application to indicate that it expects error-free operation so errors need not be generated In addition to the above features being added to OpenGL 4.6, the following are being released as extensions:
      GL_KHR_parallel_shader_compile allows applications to launch multiple shader compile threads to improve shader compile throughput WGL_ARB_create_context_no_error and GXL_ARB_create_context_no_error allow no error contexts to be created with WGL or GLX that support the GL_KHR_no_error extension “I’m proud to announce OpenGL 4.6 as the most feature-rich version of OpenGL yet. We've brought together the most popular, widely-supported extensions into a new core specification to give OpenGL developers and end users an improved baseline feature set. This includes resolving previous intellectual property roadblocks to bringing anisotropic texture filtering and polygon offset clamping into the core specification to enable widespread implementation and usage,” said Piers Daniell, chair of the OpenGL Working Group at Khronos. “The OpenGL working group will continue to respond to market needs and work with GPU vendors to ensure OpenGL remains a viable and evolving graphics API for all its customers and users across many vital industries.“
      The OpenGL 4.6 specification can be found at https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php. The GLSL to SPIR-V compiler glslang has been updated with GLSL 4.60 support, and can be found at https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glslang.
      Sophisticated graphics applications will also benefit from a set of newly released extensions for both OpenGL and OpenGL ES to enable interoperability with Vulkan and Direct3D. These extensions are named:
      GL_EXT_memory_object GL_EXT_memory_object_fd GL_EXT_memory_object_win32 GL_EXT_semaphore GL_EXT_semaphore_fd GL_EXT_semaphore_win32 GL_EXT_win32_keyed_mutex They can be found at: https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php
      Industry Support for OpenGL 4.6
      “With OpenGL 4.6 our customers have an improved set of core features available on our full range of OpenGL 4.x capable GPUs. These features provide improved rendering quality, performance and functionality. As the graphics industry’s most popular API, we fully support OpenGL and will continue to work closely with the Khronos Group on the development of new OpenGL specifications and extensions for our customers. NVIDIA has released beta OpenGL 4.6 drivers today at https://developer.nvidia.com/opengl-driver so developers can use these new features right away,” said Bob Pette, vice president, Professional Graphics at NVIDIA.
      "OpenGL 4.6 will be the first OpenGL release where conformant open source implementations based on the Mesa project will be deliverable in a reasonable timeframe after release. The open sourcing of the OpenGL conformance test suite and ongoing work between Khronos and X.org will also allow for non-vendor led open source implementations to achieve conformance in the near future," said David Airlie, senior principal engineer at Red Hat, and developer on Mesa/X.org projects.

      View full story
    • By _OskaR
      Hi,
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
  • Advertisement