• Advertisement
Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL OpenGL viewport / rendering partial tiles

This topic is 2084 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hello,

Apologies if this is a somewhat idiotic question, I'm still somewhat new to OpenGL programming. In fact, I'm not even sure if this is the right forum or if it should have been posted in Beginners!

Firstly, some background.

I currently have a basic 2D tiling engine which uses OpenGL via the OpenTK bindings. For drawing textures, the engine is currently using the somewhat obsolete vertex arrays rather than VBO's (one challenge at a time!)

Each map is a simple 2D array of tiles. I define a field size which is the visible viewport on the screen, and set up an array of vertexes which describe each tile position in the viewport. This is defined once. There is also an origin, which is simply the top/left co-ordinate of the map in relation to the player.

Then, each update, the engine cycles through the visible tiles in the current map and updates the vertex array with texture coordinates from a tile sheet texture. If the player moves and the origin changes, this is naturally handled as part of the cycle through visible tiles. It's a very simple system [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png[/img]

So far so good.

However, the disadvantage is that it "scrolls" in full tiles. So if the character charges from one side of the screen to the other, it will jump along one block at a time.

What I wanted to do was implement a form a smooth scrolling, so that instead of jumping the entire width of a tile, it will jump a smaller increment until it has reached the desired end position.

I tried implementing smooth scrolling in a test project some months ago, and while it worked, it had one nasty drawback - on one side of the scroll you'd have a gap as technically the subsquent column wasn't visible so it wouldn't be drawn. And on the other side of the scroll you'd have an excess because it was trying to draw the last column beyond the boundaries of the view port. So assuming you had UI elements, they could be overwritten.

If I was using GDI, then I might just set a clip region and then just draw the visible tiles +/- 1 column/row and everything would be displayed without overwriting any element. Of course, that would mean extra rendering being done for no purpose which is a bit daft.

Not really sure I'm explaining this terribly well, so here's a couple of images to partially demonstrate:

[attachment=8688:jwlrush 2012-05-05 13-49-45-90.png]

[attachment=8689:jwlrush 2012-05-05 13-49-47-30.png]

In the second screen shot, the player has moved one tile to the right. As the engine currently tries to keep the player character centred in the map, it automatically scrolls it along one tile. Which is fine, as the end result - but I want to smoothly bump it along instead of it just jumping.

[attachment=8693:OpenGLTileMap 2012-05-05 14-23-26-95.png]

This third image demonstrates a test program I did which tried smoothly scrolling the background from right to left and also scrolling the water from left to right. The jagged edges at the top and bottom show how my rendering is currently flawed.

So, my questions would be:

Firstly, does OpenGL support anything like GDI's clip regions so I could draw extra tiles without them going beyond what I define as a view port. [The lazy approach I suppose]

-or-

Should I recalculate the first/last column/row and draw only the visible portion of the texture [The hurt-your-brain-with-maths approach]

-or-

Is there another technique that other developers use that I haven't thought of?

Again, apologies if this is a really dumb question, but thanks in advance for any advice that could be offered.

Regards;
Richard Moss

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advertisement
The viewport already clips your tiles (I assume, since you mentioned vertex arrays, that they aren't drawn as pixel rectangles).

The easy solution isn't really that difficult. I get the feeling that you may be thinking too much about complex solutions to this.[list=1]
[*]Define the viewport as the region of the screen where you want the game to be drawn. I see in your first two screen shots that the map covers the whole screen except for the top row. What I mean here is that your viewport should only cover the region of the screen where the map is to be drawn. Make a separate viewport for the score board in a second pass, but I will not consider that here.
[*]Set the coordinate system (for example with glOrtho) such that the desired part of the map is visible within the viewport. All you need to do to scroll the map is to adjust the coordinate system. No need to touch the viewport itself.
[*]Draw the visible tiles. You know the bounds of the visible region of the map, so draw only those tiles if you want to do some primitive culling. You can draw the entire map as well if you want, since the viewport is clipping anyway. If you want partial-tile-scrolling, then you just round the visible region's left and bottom borders down to nearest tile-border, and the right and upper borders up to nearest tile-border.
[/list]
With these steps where you separate the viewport, the coordinate system and the drawing, you really don't have to do much to implement scrolling and clipping. It's all handled pretty much automatically.

edit: By the way, what the name of the game in the first two images? It was one of my favorite games way back, but I just can't remember the name now. Edited by Brother Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the reply.

I do set a co-ordinate system, but I set that once when the window is created (and I reset it if the window is resized). Didn't think about creating a sub co-ordinate system as such.

When I say "viewport", I'm just referring to the region of screen that I'm drawing in, I'm not actually creating view ports with OpenGL - but your reply in point 3 seems to infer that OpenGL can in fact do them. Guess I need to go and look over the API reference to find out how [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/smile.png[/img]

The screenshots are from my clone of a old arcade game called Boulder Dash that I used to play on an Atari 800XL, using some custom graphics I'm currently trying to draw too.

Thanks again for your reply!

Regards;
Richard Moss

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What you want it for the viewport is glViewport; one for the map and one for the score board. I forgot to mention that function in point 1.

And cheers for the name. I couldn't stop trying to remember it since my reply :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks for the follow up. I didn't realize you can have multiple viewports - I was setting up a default one once when the game started to the window size. Cool, the solution does seem to be easier that what I was thinking [no horrible calculations to work out bits of tiles!], I shall go do some more experimenting :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Advertisement
  • Advertisement
  • Popular Now

  • Advertisement
  • Similar Content

    • By Balma Alparisi
      i got error 1282 in my code.
      sf::ContextSettings settings; settings.majorVersion = 4; settings.minorVersion = 5; settings.attributeFlags = settings.Core; sf::Window window; window.create(sf::VideoMode(1600, 900), "Texture Unit Rectangle", sf::Style::Close, settings); window.setActive(true); window.setVerticalSyncEnabled(true); glewInit(); GLuint shaderProgram = createShaderProgram("FX/Rectangle.vss", "FX/Rectangle.fss"); float vertex[] = { -0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,0.0f, -0.5f,-0.5f,0.0f, 0.0f,1.0f, 0.5f,0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,0.0f, 0.5,-0.5f,0.0f, 1.0f,1.0f, }; GLuint indices[] = { 0,1,2, 1,2,3, }; GLuint vao; glGenVertexArrays(1, &vao); glBindVertexArray(vao); GLuint vbo; glGenBuffers(1, &vbo); glBindBuffer(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, vbo); glBufferData(GL_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(vertex), vertex, GL_STATIC_DRAW); GLuint ebo; glGenBuffers(1, &ebo); glBindBuffer(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, ebo); glBufferData(GL_ELEMENT_ARRAY_BUFFER, sizeof(indices), indices,GL_STATIC_DRAW); glVertexAttribPointer(0, 3, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)0); glEnableVertexAttribArray(0); glVertexAttribPointer(1, 2, GL_FLOAT, false, sizeof(float) * 5, (void*)(sizeof(float) * 3)); glEnableVertexAttribArray(1); GLuint texture[2]; glGenTextures(2, texture); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageOne = new sf::Image; bool isImageOneLoaded = imageOne->loadFromFile("Texture/container.jpg"); if (isImageOneLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageOne->getSize().x, imageOne->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageOne->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageOne; glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); sf::Image* imageTwo = new sf::Image; bool isImageTwoLoaded = imageTwo->loadFromFile("Texture/awesomeface.png"); if (isImageTwoLoaded) { glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, GL_RGBA, imageTwo->getSize().x, imageTwo->getSize().y, 0, GL_RGBA, GL_UNSIGNED_BYTE, imageTwo->getPixelsPtr()); glGenerateMipmap(GL_TEXTURE_2D); } delete imageTwo; glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureOne"), 0); glUniform1i(glGetUniformLocation(shaderProgram, "inTextureTwo"), 1); GLenum error = glGetError(); std::cout << error << std::endl; sf::Event event; bool isRunning = true; while (isRunning) { while (window.pollEvent(event)) { if (event.type == event.Closed) { isRunning = false; } } glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); if (isImageOneLoaded && isImageTwoLoaded) { glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[0]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, texture[1]); glUseProgram(shaderProgram); } glBindVertexArray(vao); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, 6, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, nullptr); glBindVertexArray(0); window.display(); } glDeleteVertexArrays(1, &vao); glDeleteBuffers(1, &vbo); glDeleteBuffers(1, &ebo); glDeleteProgram(shaderProgram); glDeleteTextures(2,texture); return 0; } and this is the vertex shader
      #version 450 core layout(location=0) in vec3 inPos; layout(location=1) in vec2 inTexCoord; out vec2 TexCoord; void main() { gl_Position=vec4(inPos,1.0); TexCoord=inTexCoord; } and the fragment shader
      #version 450 core in vec2 TexCoord; uniform sampler2D inTextureOne; uniform sampler2D inTextureTwo; out vec4 FragmentColor; void main() { FragmentColor=mix(texture(inTextureOne,TexCoord),texture(inTextureTwo,TexCoord),0.2); } I was expecting awesomeface.png on top of container.jpg

    • By khawk
      We've just released all of the source code for the NeHe OpenGL lessons on our Github page at https://github.com/gamedev-net/nehe-opengl. code - 43 total platforms, configurations, and languages are included.
      Now operated by GameDev.net, NeHe is located at http://nehe.gamedev.net where it has been a valuable resource for developers wanting to learn OpenGL and graphics programming.

      View full story
    • By TheChubu
      The Khronos™ Group, an open consortium of leading hardware and software companies, announces from the SIGGRAPH 2017 Conference the immediate public availability of the OpenGL® 4.6 specification. OpenGL 4.6 integrates the functionality of numerous ARB and EXT extensions created by Khronos members AMD, Intel, and NVIDIA into core, including the capability to ingest SPIR-V™ shaders.
      SPIR-V is a Khronos-defined standard intermediate language for parallel compute and graphics, which enables content creators to simplify their shader authoring and management pipelines while providing significant source shading language flexibility. OpenGL 4.6 adds support for ingesting SPIR-V shaders to the core specification, guaranteeing that SPIR-V shaders will be widely supported by OpenGL implementations.
      OpenGL 4.6 adds the functionality of these ARB extensions to OpenGL’s core specification:
      GL_ARB_gl_spirv and GL_ARB_spirv_extensions to standardize SPIR-V support for OpenGL GL_ARB_indirect_parameters and GL_ARB_shader_draw_parameters for reducing the CPU overhead associated with rendering batches of geometry GL_ARB_pipeline_statistics_query and GL_ARB_transform_feedback_overflow_querystandardize OpenGL support for features available in Direct3D GL_ARB_texture_filter_anisotropic (based on GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic) brings previously IP encumbered functionality into OpenGL to improve the visual quality of textured scenes GL_ARB_polygon_offset_clamp (based on GL_EXT_polygon_offset_clamp) suppresses a common visual artifact known as a “light leak” associated with rendering shadows GL_ARB_shader_atomic_counter_ops and GL_ARB_shader_group_vote add shader intrinsics supported by all desktop vendors to improve functionality and performance GL_KHR_no_error reduces driver overhead by allowing the application to indicate that it expects error-free operation so errors need not be generated In addition to the above features being added to OpenGL 4.6, the following are being released as extensions:
      GL_KHR_parallel_shader_compile allows applications to launch multiple shader compile threads to improve shader compile throughput WGL_ARB_create_context_no_error and GXL_ARB_create_context_no_error allow no error contexts to be created with WGL or GLX that support the GL_KHR_no_error extension “I’m proud to announce OpenGL 4.6 as the most feature-rich version of OpenGL yet. We've brought together the most popular, widely-supported extensions into a new core specification to give OpenGL developers and end users an improved baseline feature set. This includes resolving previous intellectual property roadblocks to bringing anisotropic texture filtering and polygon offset clamping into the core specification to enable widespread implementation and usage,” said Piers Daniell, chair of the OpenGL Working Group at Khronos. “The OpenGL working group will continue to respond to market needs and work with GPU vendors to ensure OpenGL remains a viable and evolving graphics API for all its customers and users across many vital industries.“
      The OpenGL 4.6 specification can be found at https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php. The GLSL to SPIR-V compiler glslang has been updated with GLSL 4.60 support, and can be found at https://github.com/KhronosGroup/glslang.
      Sophisticated graphics applications will also benefit from a set of newly released extensions for both OpenGL and OpenGL ES to enable interoperability with Vulkan and Direct3D. These extensions are named:
      GL_EXT_memory_object GL_EXT_memory_object_fd GL_EXT_memory_object_win32 GL_EXT_semaphore GL_EXT_semaphore_fd GL_EXT_semaphore_win32 GL_EXT_win32_keyed_mutex They can be found at: https://khronos.org/registry/OpenGL/index_gl.php
      Industry Support for OpenGL 4.6
      “With OpenGL 4.6 our customers have an improved set of core features available on our full range of OpenGL 4.x capable GPUs. These features provide improved rendering quality, performance and functionality. As the graphics industry’s most popular API, we fully support OpenGL and will continue to work closely with the Khronos Group on the development of new OpenGL specifications and extensions for our customers. NVIDIA has released beta OpenGL 4.6 drivers today at https://developer.nvidia.com/opengl-driver so developers can use these new features right away,” said Bob Pette, vice president, Professional Graphics at NVIDIA.
      "OpenGL 4.6 will be the first OpenGL release where conformant open source implementations based on the Mesa project will be deliverable in a reasonable timeframe after release. The open sourcing of the OpenGL conformance test suite and ongoing work between Khronos and X.org will also allow for non-vendor led open source implementations to achieve conformance in the near future," said David Airlie, senior principal engineer at Red Hat, and developer on Mesa/X.org projects.

      View full story
    • By _OskaR
      Hi,
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
  • Advertisement