• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
d h k

Blending DXT1 textures correctly (UPDATE: now about DXT5 as well!)

9 posts in this topic

Hi there, I'm trying to draw a number of billboards with textures that use DXT1 compression (with 1-bit alpha channel - ie. a transparent color/color key) and I can't get them to render properly. I'm unsure if there's a way around having to sort these by distance but I've tried doing that as well as using the z-buffer normally and neither way looks correct. These are the render states that I'm using to get the transparency to work:

[source lang="cpp"]
GetDevice ( )->SetRenderState ( D3DRS_SRCBLEND, D3DBLEND_SRCALPHA );
GetDevice ( )->SetRenderState ( D3DRS_DESTBLEND, D3DBLEND_INVSRCALPHA );
[/source]

Then I try any combination of using or not using the z-buffer and sorting or not sorting my std::vector of billboards:

[source lang="cpp"]
GetDevice ( )->SetRenderState ( D3DRS_ZENABLE, true );
std::sort ( billboards.begin ( ), billboards.end ( ) );
[/source]

For reference, this is how I overload the < operator for my billboards that makes the std::sort call work:

[source lang="cpp"]
bool operator < ( Object rhs )
{
D3DXVECTOR3 pos_a = this->GetPosition ( );
D3DXVECTOR3 pos_b = rhs.GetPosition ( );

D3DXVECTOR3 distance_a ( camera->position.x - pos_a.x, camera->position.y - pos_a.y, camera->position.z - pos_a.z );
D3DXVECTOR3 distance_b ( camera->position.x - pos_b.x, camera->position.y - pos_b.y, camera->position.z - pos_b.z );

return D3DXVec3Length ( &distance_a ) > D3DXVec3Length ( &distance_b );
}
[/source]

However I always get this render output, no matter whether or not I use the z-buffer and/or sort the std::vector by distance:

[img]http://i.imgur.com/AQpUa.png[/img]

As you can see, the parts of the billboard texture that are transparent cut out parts of the billboards behind. Additionally, the actual draw order only works correctly when I use the z-buffer and still sort by distance to the camera.

I'd love some clarification: what's the easiest way to render a number of DXT1 compressed textures with 1-bit alpha channel correctly on top of each other? Is manual sorting necessary? What am I doing wrong here?

Thanks ahead of time!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
One trick you can use is turning on [url="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb172254%28v=vs.85%29.aspx"]D3DRS_ALPHATESTENABLE[/url] - that will stop the z-buffer getting written to for transparent pixels, and therefore when you don't have any pixels which aren't either solid or opaque you can get away without any depth sorting at all.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That worked, I only had to ALPHAREF and ALPHAFUNC as well, just like in the MSDN article you posted!

Thanks, I wouldn't have thought of this little trick myself! Edited by d k h
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[b]UPDATE[/b]

Now I want to render explosions, these are DXT5 textures with 8-bit alpha channel. Additive blending is trivial but I don't want to do that, I just want to render them straight up while still taking their 8-bit alpha channel into consideration of course.

Same problem, explosions cookie cut everything behind them out. The solution of disregarding pixels based on their alpha value that works fine for DXT1 1-bit alpha channel textures doesn't work here anymore for obvious reasons (I can disregard all pixels with, say, 100 or less in the alpha buffer and it helps the cookie cutter problem but that compromises the 8-bit alpha channel information of course). Is there anything I can do to blend explosions correctly in the described manner?

Any help is greatly appreciated! Edited by d k h
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Turn off depth writes, but keep depth tests available, then draw all explosions from back-to-front with whichever alpha blend you like, and alpha test disabled

[code]
pd3dDevice->SetRenderState(D3DRS_ZENABLE, TRUE);
pd3dDevice->SetRenderState(D3DRS_ZWRITEENABLE, FALSE);
[/code]
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Works perfectly! Thanks a ton! I really need to sort out my blend mode knowledge from the looks of it! :)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No problem :) But I've thought of a good way for you to improve performance. In my last post I told you to turn off alpha-testing. See how many explosions you can set off simultaneously before it starts slowing down. Then add this to the render states code,

[code]
pd3dDevice->SetRenderState(D3DRS_ALPHAFUNC, D3DCMP_GREATEREQUAL);
pd3dDevice->SetRenderState(D3DRS_ALPHAREF, 1);
pd3dDevice->SetRenderState(D3DRS_ALPHATESTENABLE, TRUE);
[/code]

and try the same test. You should see an improvement, because this stops transparent pixels from being processed, which should improve performance depending on your explosion textures.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, that alpha test trick to disregard transparent pixels was suggested by the first poster. It works fine for 1-bit alpha (ie. DXT1 textures) but with an 8-bit alpha channel it doesn't work anymore. It would have to disregard all pixels with an alpha value of 254 or lower for it to work and then you would be back to having a 1-bit alpha channel essentially.

Hope this makes sense, if I'm wrong please let me know. It would always be preferred to not have to sort by distance manually for performance reasons of course!
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The code I gave will reject any pixels with 100% transparency, which could potentially save a lot of fillrate/shader time (again, depending on the textures you use). The alphafunc and alpharef render states define the condition required for a pixel to be accepted - GREATEREQUAL and 1 means a pixel must have an alpha value of greater than or equal to 1, but remember that alpha ranges from 0 to 255. Trust me, it works
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ohhh okay, you meant doing this in addition to what you suggested earlier. That makes perfect sense, sorry. Misunderstanding
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0