• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
xynapse

Post processing - approaches

5 posts in this topic

Guys is there any paper or art that describes possible approach techniques / ideas for implementing postprocessing techniques ?

I think of having a set of 'effects' like bloom, blur, motion blur, dof - and would like them to be applied at anytime during the game like:

[CODE]
m_pEngine->GetEffectsManager()->AddFX(CEffect::Bloom);
m_pEngine->GetEffectsManager()->AddFX(CEffect::DOF);
[/CODE]

What i think can be done is:

[CODE]

<<preprocessing rendering>>
- Render frame to textureA


<<postprocessing>>
- iterate through effects in std::vector
- for every effect
- bind textureA
- pass in the textureA as the sampler
- run effect shader on a quad with textureA bound
- store the results in textureA
- unbind textureA

<<final output>>
- render full screen quad with textureA bound

[/CODE]

This approach will in final return a texture based on a sum of all effects output that were in the std::vector.

Not bad, but will require me to add effects carefully as the position of the effect on the std::vector is very important.


How do you think?
Any better tested solution ? Edited by xynapse
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
its not that easy... for bloom you have an input texture, you have to downsample it, next you have to blur it, which includes a horizontal and a vertical pass (if done separately)
for motion blur you probably want to store which pixel has what motion (2D vector) and blur accordingly.
for dof its the same thing, but you want to do this using the depth buffer to determine which pixels to blur to what extent.
You probably don't want to generalize this thing, but rather hard-code it and give each effect an option to render it or not, and give them parameters as well so you can control them.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote]
- pass in the textureA as the sampler
- run effect shader on a quad with textureA bound
- store the results in textureA[/quote]
This is not possible. You can't read and write to the same texture at the same time. What you should do is store the results to the screen (the normal framebuffer). Bloom can be done that way
because it is added to the scene, depth of field you might have to take textureA and render it to textureB with DOF applied,
then take textureB and bloom it. Focus on the techniques and shaders, then you will have an idea on how to design your engine. Edited by dpadam450
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dpadam - hi again ;)

true, you're right but i can

[CODE]

// Imagine Blur here, first Blur Horizontal, second Blur Vertical

// Vertical gets input from Horizontal output in this situation..

for(effectN = 0; effectN < effects_size; effectN++)
{
pass the resulting texture of effectN-1 to effectN as the input.
}

then i can multiply the last effectN output texture with the original frame texture.
[/CODE]


Yes, this won't be a 'typical' blur as we're bluring in Vertical from Horizontal instead of original - but it can be tweeked a bit to achieve it.
And i believe few other effects can be also achieved with this approach.. Will have to check,

Anyways, seems like you say there is no good effects management solution around to have a look?

So when people code effects in their engines, how do they manage them ? Edited by xynapse
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='xynapse' timestamp='1336387669' post='4938029']
Guys is there any paper or art that describes possible approach techniques / ideas for implementing postprocessing techniques ?
[/quote]
I use a multiple pass system, where I can define per pass what is rendered to which render target.
Example:
[CODE]
<pass id="geometry" models="all" >
<render_target channel="0" id="image_buffer" />
<render_target channel="1" id="normal_buffer" />
</pass>
<pass id="bloom" models="full_screen_quad" >
<render_target channel="0" id="image_buffer" />
<render_target channel="1" id="normal_buffer" />
</pass>
<pass id="shadow" models="all" >
<render_target channel="0" id="depth_buffer" />
</pass>

[/CODE]
In a shader I can access the render targets as texture (refered by id). The benefit is, that you can mix post processing steps with geometry rendering passes (sometimes useful for deferred lighting, shadow mapping, geometry edge detection etc.).
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
@Ashaman73 - thanks, looks like a nice idea - will have a closer look to a similar thing after the weekend.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0