Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL Low Rez Effects

This topic is 2063 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

I'm trying to achieve a low-resolution effect similar to this:
[img]http://0rel.com/download/okkuplektor/img/okkuplektor_doc_stage_01a.jpg[/img]

Observe the jagged edges


I've done it in OpenGL, but only in Linux, and I want to do it in windows. In Linux, these two calls do the job

glBlitFramebuffer(0, 0, 512, 512, 256-rez/2, 256-rez/2, 256+rez/2, 256+rez/2, GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT, GL_LINEAR);
glBlitFramebuffer(256-rez/2, 256-rez/2, 256+rez/2, 256+rez/2, 0, 0, 512, 512, GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT, GL_LINEAR);

in a 512x512 window where "rez" is the edge length of a square (such as 256) that the scene is reduced to (first call) and then scaled back from (second call).

This works just fine in Linux, but crashes my program in Windows. Any ideas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Try replacing [color=#282828][font=helvetica, arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif][size=3][left][background=rgb(250, 251, 252)]GL_LINEAR with GL_NEAREST.[/background][/left][/size][/font][/color]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
First of all, the OS is completely irrelevant here. The deciding factor is your graphics hardware and what it does or doesn't support.

So, my guess here is that your Linux machine has a 3D card that supports GL_ARB_frame_buffer_object or a reasonably recent version of OpenGL (with framebuffer objects in core). Your Windows box does not - the cause of the crash is that the function pointer for glBlitFramebuffer is NULL. Upgrading the graphics card on your Windows box to one that does support this functionality will resolve it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Suds_' timestamp='1337833746' post='4942787']
Try replacing
[left][background=rgb(250, 251, 252)]GL_LINEAR with GL_NEAREST.[/background][/left]

[/quote]

That changes how nice it looks but shouldn't affect things since it is only a color buffer blit. From the OGL 3.3 docs:

"If the sizes of the source and destination rectangles are not equal, filter specifies the interpolation method that
will be applied to resize the source image , and must be GL_NEAREST or GL_LINEAR.
GL_LINEAR is only a valid interpolation method for the color buffer. If filter is not
GL_NEAREST and mask includes GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT or
GL_STENCIL_BUFFER_BIT, no data is transferred and a GL_INVALID_OPERATION error is generated."

[quote name='mhagain' timestamp='1337850836' post='4942845']
First of all, the OS is completely irrelevant here. The deciding factor is your graphics hardware and what it does or doesn't support.

So, my guess here is that your Linux machine has a 3D card that supports GL_ARB_frame_buffer_object or a reasonably recent version of OpenGL (with framebuffer objects in core). Your Windows box does not - the cause of the crash is that the function pointer for glBlitFramebuffer is NULL. Upgrading the graphics card on your Windows box to one that does support this functionality will resolve it.
[/quote]

It's the same machine...must be the drivers? Edited by gram

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sounds like the drivers alright.

For this kind of image, an alternative way might be to render to a smaller viewport (pick, say, 320x200 for a really authentic 1995/1996 grungy pixel look), then glCopyTexSubImage it to a texture, and finally draw that texture on a regular fullscreen quad. There will be a performance penalty compared to using FBOs, but on the other hand it will work on all hardware going back to OpenGL 1.1, and at the lower resolution it should still run more than fast enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Updated the drivers. Didn't crash, but didn't quite work, either:

[img]http://i.imgur.com/yZbZm.png[/img]

Since the read and write buffer are the same, there must be some implementation-specific issues.


To get it to work, I changed

glViewport( 0, 0, 512, 512);

which was only called once, during initialization,

to

glViewport( 0, 0, rez, rez);


and

glBlitFramebuffer(0, 0, 512, 512, 256-rez/2, 256-rez/2, 256+rez/2, 256+rez/2, GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT, GL_LINEAR);
glBlitFramebuffer(256-rez/2, 256-rez/2, 256+rez/2, 256+rez/2, 0, 0, 512, 512, GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT, GL_LINEAR);

which was called every frame, after drawing, to

glBlitFramebufferEXT(0, 0, 256, 256, 0, 0, 512, 512, GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT, GL_LINEAR);

resulting in the desired effect:

[img]http://i.imgur.com/vi1dN.png[/img]


But of course we can't stop there. Turning GL_LINEAR to GL_NEAREST, and lowering rez, brings us from the mid-nineties to the mid-eighties:

[img]http://i.imgur.com/suac6.png[/img]

Thanks guys! Edited by gram

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By _OskaR
      Hi,
      I have an OpenGL application but without possibility to wite own shaders.
      I need to perform small VS modification - is possible to do it in an alternative way? Do we have apps or driver modifictions which will catch the shader sent to GPU and override it?
    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
       
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
      {
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      };
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
       
       
    • By pr033r
      Hello,
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
      Thanks for any help...

  • Popular Now