Sign in to follow this  

OpenGL OpenGL version?

This topic is 2046 days old which is more than the 365 day threshold we allow for new replies. Please post a new topic.

If you intended to correct an error in the post then please contact us.

Recommended Posts

Hiya,

Coming from Direct3D, I decided to make a simple game a while back in OpenGL. The tutorials I used were (I believe) in OpenGL 2.0, using the fixed-function pipeline... glBegin(), glVertex(), glEnd() etc.

I'd like to remake the game using a more recent and applicable version of OpenGL, so I can put it on my portfolio. I need to support Windows XP onwards and DirectX 9 era graphics cards with GLSL. Could anyone advise me on which version I should be looking at? From the posts I've read on GD, it looks like either 3.x or 4.x?

There's a video of my original game [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs4LUq8QwzQ"]here[/url], which shows what I'm trying to achieve - although I'd like to extend the game with a couple of features and GLSL effects.

Cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think DirectX 9 corresponds to OpenGL 2, the legacy ways of doing things.

DirectX 10 (require Vista?) corresponds to OpenGL 3, but you can run OpenGL 3 on Windows XP.

OpenGL 4 adds some nice features, but it is basically compatible with OpenGL 3.3.

For an up-to-date excellent tutorial, see [url="http://www.arcsynthesis.org/gltut/"]Learning Modern 3D Graphics Programming[/url].

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks, that's great - from the wikipedia page it looks like the earliest cards I need to support can handle 3.0.

Appreciate the tutorials too!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I recommend ignoring all legacy and deprecated features (OpenGL2 and older). Take OpenGL 3 (or rather, 3.2 Core Profile) as the API to work against, and GLSL 1.50. See this page: [url="http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Core_And_Compatibility_in_Contexts"]http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Core_And_Compatibility_in_Contexts[/url] . Without compatibility features enabled, you can make sure you're not even accidentally using any old functionality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Another way of looking at it, if you want to expand to mobile devices (OpenGL ES) later, is to look how OpenGL ES 2.0 maps to desktop OpenGL, and use only those features available in both. It should be a pretty close match to the non-deprecated parts of OpenGL 2.0 / 2.1 (ie. always use GLSL shaders, always use vertex/index buffer objects.)

If you want to support those minimum requirement GPUs even with old drivers, then using an OpenGL 2.0 context may yield better compatibility than OpenGL 3.0.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='Telios' timestamp='1339321530' post='4947864']
Hiya,

Coming from Direct3D, I decided to make a simple game a while back in OpenGL. The tutorials I used were (I believe) in OpenGL 2.0, using the fixed-function pipeline... glBegin(), glVertex(), glEnd() etc.

I'd like to remake the game using a more recent and applicable version of OpenGL, so I can put it on my portfolio. I need to support Windows XP onwards and DirectX 9 era graphics cards with GLSL. Could anyone advise me on which version I should be looking at? From the posts I've read on GD, it looks like either 3.x or 4.x?

There's a video of my original game [url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vs4LUq8QwzQ"]here[/url], which shows what I'm trying to achieve - although I'd like to extend the game with a couple of features and GLSL effects.

Cheers!
[/quote]

For the record, glBegin, glVertex etc is the immediate mode from OpenGL 1.0.
in 1.1 you used glDrawArrays instead and in 1.5 you got VBOs. 2.0 added high level shader support.

In general you can write fairly modern OpenGL for DX9 level cards using OpenGL 2.1 (and support is far better than for OpenGL 3.x/4.x), the main problem is that the old junk from 1.0 is still available for you so learning the correct way of doing things can be harder. (most OpenGL tutorials on the net are pure junk)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks, good info. Based on the posts here, I've got a copy of the red book for OpenGL 3. If at all possible I'd like to support OpenGL 2.1 / DX9 generation hardware, at least for this project. Hopefully I can figure out from this book what was deprecated, and ignore those parts.

[quote name='SimonForsman' timestamp='1339335702' post='4947912']
For the record, glBegin, glVertex etc is the immediate mode from OpenGL 1.0.
in 1.1 you used glDrawArrays instead and in 1.5 you got VBOs. 2.0 added high level shader support.

In general you can write fairly modern OpenGL for DX9 level cards using OpenGL 2.1 (and support is far better than for OpenGL 3.x/4.x), the main problem is that the old junk from 1.0 is still available for you so learning the correct way of doing things can be harder. (most OpenGL tutorials on the net are pure junk)
[/quote]

Wow, apparently I was doing it the [i]really[/i] old way! I agree that most tutorials are outdated and not particularly helpful.

I'll have a looksie through the Doom 3 source as well, and see how they use the API.

Cheers! Edited by Telios

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='SimonForsman' timestamp='1339335702' post='4947912']
In general you can write fairly modern OpenGL for DX9 level cards using OpenGL 2.1 (and support is far better than for OpenGL 3.x/4.x), the main problem is that the old junk from 1.0 is still available for you so learning the correct way of doing things can be harder. (most OpenGL tutorials on the net are pure junk)
[/quote]

Correct me if I am wrong, but even though much recent functionality is available for OpenGL2.1 cards, you are still stuck with the old version ([color=#000000][font=sans-serif][size=3]GLSL 1.20) [/size][/font][/color]of the shader programming language?

Also, you can't take for granted that recent functionality is available, you have to verify each of them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Would be useful to know, if anyone can clarify that :)

[quote name='larspensjo' timestamp='1339356825' post='4947998']
Also, you can't take for granted that recent functionality is available, you have to verify each of them?
[/quote]

Can you give any examples of this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='larspensjo' timestamp='1339356825' post='4947998']
[quote name='SimonForsman' timestamp='1339335702' post='4947912']
In general you can write fairly modern OpenGL for DX9 level cards using OpenGL 2.1 (and support is far better than for OpenGL 3.x/4.x), the main problem is that the old junk from 1.0 is still available for you so learning the correct way of doing things can be harder. (most OpenGL tutorials on the net are pure junk)
[/quote]

Correct me if I am wrong, but even though much recent functionality is available for OpenGL2.1 cards, you are still stuck with the old version ([color=#000000][font=sans-serif][size=3]GLSL 1.20) [/size][/font][/color]of the shader programming language?

Also, you can't take for granted that recent functionality is available, you have to verify each of them?
[/quote]

This is indeed the case, OpenGL 2.1 only guarantees roughly DX9 level features, everything else (including newer GLSL versions) can be accessed through extensions IF your card/driver supports it.
which is why i said fairly modern, the problem with OpenGL 3.x / 4.x is that support is pretty awful on Intel GPUs and on OS X (Lion is the only version with 3.2 support, the rest only have 2.1 and no OS X version have OpenGL 4 support yet) so in general if you are going cross platform with OpenGL you want to stick with 2.1 + extensions for a bit longer. (Most modern extensions are available in OS X if the hardware supports them) Edited by SimonForsman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By xhcao
      Does sync be needed to read texture content after access texture image in compute shader?
      My simple code is as below,
      glUseProgram(program.get());
      glBindImageTexture(0, texture[0], 0, GL_FALSE, 3, GL_READ_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glBindImageTexture(1, texture[1], 0, GL_FALSE, 4, GL_WRITE_ONLY, GL_R32UI);
      glDispatchCompute(1, 1, 1);
      // Does sync be needed here?
      glUseProgram(0);
      glBindFramebuffer(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, framebuffer);
      glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0,
                                     GL_TEXTURE_CUBE_MAP_POSITIVE_X + face, texture[1], 0);
      glReadPixels(0, 0, kWidth, kHeight, GL_RED_INTEGER, GL_UNSIGNED_INT, outputValues);
       
      Compute shader is very simple, imageLoad content from texture[0], and imageStore content to texture[1]. Does need to sync after dispatchCompute?
    • By Jonathan2006
      My question: is it possible to transform multiple angular velocities so that they can be reinserted as one? My research is below:
      // This works quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); quat quaternion2 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion1, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2)); quat quaternion3 = GEMultiplyQuaternions(quaternion2, GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromQuaternion(quaternion3).array); // The first two work fine but not the third. Why? quat quaternion1 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector1); vec3 vector1 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion1, angularVelocity1); quat quaternion2 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector2); vec3 vector2 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion2, angularVelocity2); // This doesn't work //quat quaternion3 = GEQuaternionFromAngleRadians(angleRadiansVector3); //vec3 vector3 = GETransformQuaternionAndVector(quaternion3, angularVelocity3); vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, vector2); // Does not work: vec3 angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(vector1, GEAddVectors(vector2, vector3)); static vec3 angleRadiansVector; vec3 angularAcceleration = GESetVector(0.0, 0.0, 0.0); // Sending it through one angular velocity later in my motion engine angleVelocity = GEAddVectors(angleVelocity, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angularAcceleration, timeStep)); angleRadiansVector = GEAddVectors(angleRadiansVector, GEMultiplyVectorAndScalar(angleVelocity, timeStep)); glMultMatrixf(GEMat4FromEulerAngle(angleRadiansVector).array); Also how do I combine multiple angularAcceleration variables? Is there an easier way to transform the angular values?
    • By dpadam450
      I have this code below in both my vertex and fragment shader, however when I request glGetUniformLocation("Lights[0].diffuse") or "Lights[0].attenuation", it returns -1. It will only give me a valid uniform location if I actually use the diffuse/attenuation variables in the VERTEX shader. Because I use position in the vertex shader, it always returns a valid uniform location. I've read that I can share uniforms across both vertex and fragment, but I'm confused what this is even compiling to if this is the case.
       
      #define NUM_LIGHTS 2
      struct Light
      {
          vec3 position;
          vec3 diffuse;
          float attenuation;
      };
      uniform Light Lights[NUM_LIGHTS];
       
       
    • By pr033r
      Hello,
      I have a Bachelor project on topic "Implenet 3D Boid's algorithm in OpenGL". All OpenGL issues works fine for me, all rendering etc. But when I started implement the boid's algorithm it was getting worse and worse. I read article (http://natureofcode.com/book/chapter-6-autonomous-agents/) inspirate from another code (here: https://github.com/jyanar/Boids/tree/master/src) but it still doesn't work like in tutorials and videos. For example the main problem: when I apply Cohesion (one of three main laws of boids) it makes some "cycling knot". Second, when some flock touch to another it scary change the coordination or respawn in origin (x: 0, y:0. z:0). Just some streng things. 
      I followed many tutorials, change a try everything but it isn't so smooth, without lags like in another videos. I really need your help. 
      My code (optimalizing branch): https://github.com/pr033r/BachelorProject/tree/Optimalizing
      Exe file (if you want to look) and models folder (for those who will download the sources):
      http://leteckaposta.cz/367190436
      Thanks for any help...

    • By Andrija
      I am currently trying to implement shadow mapping into my project , but although i can render my depth map to the screen and it looks okay , when i sample it with shadowCoords there is no shadow.
      Here is my light space matrix calculation
      mat4x4 lightViewMatrix; vec3 sun_pos = {SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[0], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[1], SUN_OFFSET * the_sun->direction[2]}; mat4x4_look_at(lightViewMatrix,sun_pos,player->pos,up); mat4x4_mul(lightSpaceMatrix,lightProjMatrix,lightViewMatrix); I will tweak the values for the size and frustum of the shadow map, but for now i just want to draw shadows around the player position
      the_sun->direction is a normalized vector so i multiply it by a constant to get the position.
      player->pos is the camera position in world space
      the light projection matrix is calculated like this:
      mat4x4_ortho(lightProjMatrix,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,-SHADOW_FAR,SHADOW_FAR,NEAR,SHADOW_FAR); Shadow vertex shader:
      uniform mat4 light_space_matrix; void main() { gl_Position = light_space_matrix * transfMatrix * vec4(position, 1.0f); } Shadow fragment shader:
      out float fragDepth; void main() { fragDepth = gl_FragCoord.z; } I am using deferred rendering so i have all my world positions in the g_positions buffer
      My shadow calculation in the deferred fragment shader:
      float get_shadow_fac(vec4 light_space_pos) { vec3 shadow_coords = light_space_pos.xyz / light_space_pos.w; shadow_coords = shadow_coords * 0.5 + 0.5; float closest_depth = texture(shadow_map, shadow_coords.xy).r; float current_depth = shadow_coords.z; float shadow_fac = 1.0; if(closest_depth < current_depth) shadow_fac = 0.5; return shadow_fac; } I call the function like this:
      get_shadow_fac(light_space_matrix * vec4(position,1.0)); Where position is the value i got from sampling the g_position buffer
      Here is my depth texture (i know it will produce low quality shadows but i just want to get it working for now):
      sorry because of the compression , the black smudges are trees ... https://i.stack.imgur.com/T43aK.jpg
      EDIT: Depth texture attachment:
      glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24,fbo->width,fbo->height,0,GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT,GL_FLOAT,NULL); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_LINEAR); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_S, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_WRAP_T, GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE); glFramebufferTexture2D(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, GL_TEXTURE_2D, fbo->depthTexture, 0);
  • Popular Now