• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Gama_Quant

DX11
ID3D11DeviceContext::OMSetRenderTargetsAndUnorderedAccessViews(...)

5 posts in this topic

Hi,

I'm trying to implement Order Independent Transparency in DX11 as described [url="http://www4.atword.jp/cathy39/category/direct3d11/oit-direct3d11/"]here[/url] , but I've got stuck with following problem: It seems that my app is unable to bind UnorderedAccessView to proper slot of the pixel shader. (I'm using DX11 Effect framework for shaders...)
Although I think I bind them correctly, I'm getting this debug message:
[quote]
D3D11: INFO: ID3D11DeviceContext::DrawIndexed: The Pixel Shader unit expects an Unordered Access View at Slot 0, but none is bound. This is OK, as reads of an unbound Unordered Access View are defined to return 0 and writes are ignored. It is also possible the developer knows the data will not be used anyway. This is only a problem if the developer actually intended to bind a Unordered Access View here. [ EXECUTION INFO #2097374: DEVICE_UNORDEREDACCESSVIEW_NOT_SET ]
[/quote]

relevant pixel shader part (just write value of 5 to every affected pixel...), compiled under ps_5_0:
[CODE]
...
RWByteAddressBuffer OIT_StartOffsetBuffer : register( u0 );
[earlydepthstencil]
void PS_StoreFragments( PS_INPUT input)
{
uint x = input.position.x;
uint y = input.position.y;

// Read and update Start Offset Buffer.
uint uIndex = y * iScreenWidth + x; // get offset from position
uint uStartOffsetAddress = 4 * uIndex;
uint uOldStartOffset;
OIT_StartOffsetBuffer.InterlockedExchange( uStartOffsetAddress, 5, uOldStartOffset );
return;
}
...
[/CODE]

Here is how my app is trying to bind the UAVs:
[CODE]
ID3D11RenderTargetView* pViewNULL[ 1 ] = { NULL };
ID3D11DepthStencilView* pDSVNULL = NULL;
m_pDevCon->OMSetRenderTargets( 1, pViewNULL, pDSVNULL );
ID3D11UnorderedAccessView * apUAVs[1] = { m_pDX_UAV };

// Initialize UAV counters
UINT initCounters[] = { 0 };
// bind render targets & UAVs m_pDevCon->OMSetRenderTargetsAndUnorderedAccessViews(0,NULL, NULL, 0, 1, &(apUAVs[0]), initCounters);
[/CODE]

Here is how I create m_pDX_UAV:
[CODE]
bool CreateUAV(UINT uiWidth, UINT uiHeight, UINT uiItemByteSize)
{
uiWidth = max(1,uiWidth);
uiHeight = max(1,uiHeight);
lx_uint32 itemCount = uiWidth * uiHeight;
uiByteSize = itemCount * uiItemByteSize;

// create buffer
D3D11_BUFFER_DESC descBuf;
memset( &descBuf, 0, sizeof( descBuf ) );
descBuf.StructureByteStride = uiItemByteSize;
descBuf.ByteWidth = uiByteSize;
descBuf.MiscFlags = D3D11_RESOURCE_MISC_BUFFER_ALLOW_RAW_VIEWS;
descBuf.BindFlags = D3D11_BIND_UNORDERED_ACCESS | D3D11_BIND_SHADER_RESOURCE;
if (FAILED( m_pDev->CreateBuffer( &descBuf, NULL, &m_pDX_Buffer ) ))
{
return false;
}
// create UAV
D3D11_UNORDERED_ACCESS_VIEW_DESC descUAV;
memset( &descUAV, 0, sizeof( descUAV ) );
descUAV.ViewDimension = D3D11_UAV_DIMENSION_BUFFER;
descUAV.Buffer.FirstElement = 0;
descUAV.Format = DXGI_FORMAT_R32_TYPELESS;
descUAV.Buffer.NumElements = itemCount;
descUAV.Buffer.Flags = D3D11_BUFFER_UAV_FLAG_RAW;
if (FAILED( m_pDev->CreateUnorderedAccessView( m_pDX_Buffer, &descUAV, &m_pDX_UAV ) ))
{
return false;
}
// create SRV
D3D11_SHADER_RESOURCE_VIEW_DESC descSRV;
descSRV.ViewDimension = D3D11_SRV_DIMENSION_BUFFER;
descSRV.Buffer.FirstElement = 0;
descSRV.Buffer.NumElements = itemCount;
descSRV.Format = DXGI_FORMAT_R32_UINT;
descSRV.BufferEx.Flags = D3D11_BUFFEREX_SRV_FLAG_RAW;
descSRV.BufferEx.FirstElement =0;
descSRV.BufferEx.NumElements = itemCount;
if (FAILED( m_pDev->CreateShaderResourceView( m_pDX_Buffer, &descSRV, &m_pDX_SRV ) ))
{
return false;
}
return true;
}
[/CODE]

Does anybody have any idea, why is this happening? Is the binding of UAVs to shader and applying shader pass via: ID3DX11EffectPass::Apply(...) order sensitive? (now I first bind UAVs and then ::Apply() shader.). Do I need to bind DepthStencilView?

Thanks for any suggestion.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As far as I know the effects framework won't touch render targets, but I could be wrong. I would just capture the frame in PIX, and look at the API calls + device state leading up to your draw call.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote]
ID3D11RenderTargetView* pViewNULL[ 1 ] = { NULL };
ID3D11DepthStencilView* pDSVNULL = NULL;
m_pDevCon->OMSetRenderTargets( 1, pViewNULL, pDSVNULL );
ID3D11UnorderedAccessView * apUAVs[1] = { m_pDX_UAV };

// Initialize UAV counters
UINT initCounters[] = { 0 };
// bind render targets & UAVs m_pDevCon->OMSetRenderTargetsAndUnorderedAccessViews(0,NULL, NULL, 0, 1, &(apUAVs[0]), initCounters);
[/quote]

FYI - Looking at the documentation it is redundant to OMSetRenderTargets to NULL as the call to OMSetRenderTargetsAndUnorderedAccessViews should clear any conflicting render and depth stencil views. Edited by Hornsj3
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh, it's just a bad copy&paste... Of course in the code the call is uncommented like this:
[CODE]
ID3D11UnorderedAccessView * apUAVs[1] = { m_pDX_UAV };
// Initialize UAV counters
UINT initCounters[] = { 0 };
// bind render targets & UAVs
m_pDevCon->OMSetRenderTargetsAndUnorderedAccessViews(0,NULL, NULL, 0, 1, &(apUAVs[0]), initCounters);
[/CODE]

The previous setting of render targets to NULL is really redundant. Thanks. But it doesn't solve the binding problem.

I used PIX to track the API calls and found out, that DX Effect framework is actually working with UAVs and binding them to shaders. Now I'm confused twice more, than I was before... [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/biggrin.png[/img] It seems, that Effect framework completely overrides standard API calls. Oh my...

Does anybody have any experience with Effect framework and using UAVs?

When I used PIX, the app crashed. This is a part of log that proves, that UAVs are set by Effect framework, thus making apps UAV related calls redundant:

[source lang="cpp"]
...
PRE: <this=0x09fb1648>ID3D11DeviceContext::OMSetRenderTargetsAndUnorderedAccessViews(0, NULL, NULL, 0, 1, 0x00B575FC, 0x00B575F0) // this is apps call
Frame 000001 ........POST: <><this=0x09fb1648> ID3D11DeviceContext::OMSetRenderTargetsAndUnorderedAccessViews(0, NULL, NULL, 0, 1, 0x00B575FC, 0x00B575F0)
Frame 000001 ........PRE: <this=0x09fb13e0>ID3D11Device::CreateInputLayout(0x0CF86490, 3, 0x2B04514C, 26616, 0x00B5777C) D3D11: INFO: Create InputLayout: Name="unnamed", Addr=0x0872DBF4, ExtRef=1, IntRef=0 [ STATE_CREATION INFO #2097264: CREATE_INPUTLAYOUT ]
Frame 000001 ............PRE: AddObject(D3D11 Input Layout, 0x09F49988, 0x0872DBF4)
Frame 000001 ............POST: <TRUE> AddObject(D3D11 Input Layout, 0x09F49988, 0x0872DBF4)
Frame 000001 ........POST: <S_OK><this=0x09fb13e0> ID3D11Device::CreateInputLayout(0x0CF86490, 3, 0x2B04514C, 26616, 0x00B5777C)
Frame 000001 ........PRE: <this=0x09fb1648>ID3D11DeviceContext::IASetInputLayout(0x09F49988)
Frame 000001 ........POST: <><this=0x09fb1648> ID3D11DeviceContext::IASetInputLayout(0x09F49988)
Frame 000001 ........PRE: <this=0x09fb1648>ID3D11DeviceContext::IASetVertexBuffers(0, 1, 0x2ADF9768, 0x00B57770, 0x00B57764)
Frame 000001 ........POST: <><this=0x09fb1648> ID3D11DeviceContext::IASetVertexBuffers(0, 1, 0x2ADF9768, 0x00B57770, 0x00B57764) Frame 000001 ........PRE: <this=0x09fb1648>ID3D11DeviceContext::IASetIndexBuffer(0x0A0072B8, DXGI_FORMAT_R16_UINT, 0)
Frame 000001 ........POST: <><this=0x09fb1648> ID3D11DeviceContext::IASetIndexBuffer(0x0A0072B8, DXGI_FORMAT_R16_UINT, 0)
Frame 000001 ........PRE: <this=0x09fb1648>ID3D11DeviceContext::IASetPrimitiveTopology(D3D11_PRIMITIVE_TOPOLOGY_TRIANGLESTRIP)
Frame 000001 ........POST: <><this=0x09fb1648> ID3D11DeviceContext::IASetPrimitiveTopology(D3D11_PRIMITIVE_TOPOLOGY_TRIANGLESTRIP)
Frame 000001 ........PRE: <this=0x09fb1648>ID3D11DeviceContext::UpdateSubresource(0x09F55D58, 0, NULL, 0x2B0A3694, 784, 784) Frame 000001 ........POST: <><this=0x09fb1648> ID3D11DeviceContext::UpdateSubresource(0x09F55D58, 0, NULL, 0x2B0A3694, 784, 784) Frame 000001 ........PRE: <this=0x09fb1648>ID3D11DeviceContext::VSSetConstantBuffers(0, 1, 0x2B0A4BC4)
Frame 000001 ........POST: <><this=0x09fb1648> ID3D11DeviceContext::VSSetConstantBuffers(0, 1, 0x2B0A4BC4)
Frame 000001 ........PRE: <this=0x09fb1648>ID3D11DeviceContext::VSSetShader(0x09F53290, NULL, 0)
Frame 000001 ........POST: <><this=0x09fb1648> ID3D11DeviceContext::VSSetShader(0x09F53290, NULL, 0)
Frame 000001 ........PRE: <this=0x09fb1648>ID3D11DeviceContext::PSSetConstantBuffers(0, 1, 0x2B0A4BEC)
Frame 000001 ........POST: <><this=0x09fb1648> ID3D11DeviceContext::PSSetConstantBuffers(0, 1, 0x2B0A4BEC)
Frame 000001 ........PRE: <this=0x09fb1648>ID3D11DeviceContext::OMSetRenderTargetsAndUnorderedAccessViews(-1, NULL, NULL, 0, 1, 0x2B0A4BF4, 0x0D1E3860) // this is Effect framework call
...
[/source]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You should setup the OIT_StartOffsetBuffer variable on the Effect (using AsUnorderedAccessView() on the variable) and not directly using OMSetRenderTargetsAndUnorderedAccessViews. (Check Effects11/EffectRuntime.cpp:205 in the DirectX SDK).
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='xoofx' timestamp='1340095177' post='4950517']
You should setup the OIT_StartOffsetBuffer variable on the Effect (using AsUnorderedAccessView() on the variable) and not directly using OMSetRenderTargetsAndUnorderedAccessViews. (Check Effects11/EffectRuntime.cpp:205 in the DirectX SDK).
[/quote]

Yes, you're right, I've just started analyzing Effects11 and found it myself... I've also noticed, that Effects11 provide no supposrt for setting UAV Counter initial value. So I had to change it a bit... Now it seems to be working properly. :D
Thanks a lot to everyone.

To sum up this topic:
[quote]If you're using Effects11 framework and want to bind UnorderedAccessView to shader to write to,do NOT use OMSetRenderTargetsAndUnorderedAccessViews (has no effect), use ID3DX11EffectUnorderedAccessViewVariable::SetUnorderedAccessView(pUAV) instead. Beware that standard Effect11 framework does NOT provide any way to set UAVs counters initial values! (but can be quickly/easily coded)[/quote]

I
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By lonewolff
      Hi Guys,
      I am revisiting an old DX11 framework I was creating a while back and am scratching my head with a small issue.
      I am trying to set the pixel shader resources and am getting the following error on every loop.
      As you can see in the below code, I am clearing out the shader resources as per the documentation. (Even going overboard and doing it both sides of the main PSSet call). But I just can't get rid of the error. Which results in the render target not being drawn.
      ID3D11ShaderResourceView* srv = { 0 }; d3dContext->PSSetShaderResources(0, 1, &srv); for (std::vector<RenderTarget>::iterator it = rtVector.begin(); it != rtVector.end(); ++it) { if (it->szName == name) { //std::cout << it->srv <<"\r\n"; d3dContext->PSSetShaderResources(0, 1, &it->srv); break; } } d3dContext->PSSetShaderResources(0, 1, &srv);  
      I am storing the RT's in a vector and setting them by name. I have tested the it->srv and am retrieving a valid pointer.
      At this stage I am out of ideas.
      Any help would be greatly appreciated
       
    • By bowerbirdcn
      hi, guys, how to understand the math used in CDXUTDirectionWidget ::UpdateLightDir 
      the  following code snippet is taken from MS DXTU source code
       
        D3DXMATRIX mInvView;
          D3DXMatrixInverse( &mInvView, NULL, &m_mView );
          mInvView._41 = mInvView._42 = mInvView._43 = 0;
          D3DXMATRIX mLastRotInv;
          D3DXMatrixInverse( &mLastRotInv, NULL, &m_mRotSnapshot );
          D3DXMATRIX mRot = *m_ArcBall.GetRotationMatrix();
          m_mRotSnapshot = mRot;
          // Accumulate the delta of the arcball's rotation in view space.
          // Note that per-frame delta rotations could be problematic over long periods of time.
          m_mRot *= m_mView * mLastRotInv * mRot * mInvView;
          // Since we're accumulating delta rotations, we need to orthonormalize 
          // the matrix to prevent eventual matrix skew
          D3DXVECTOR3* pXBasis = ( D3DXVECTOR3* )&m_mRot._11;
          D3DXVECTOR3* pYBasis = ( D3DXVECTOR3* )&m_mRot._21;
          D3DXVECTOR3* pZBasis = ( D3DXVECTOR3* )&m_mRot._31;
          D3DXVec3Normalize( pXBasis, pXBasis );
          D3DXVec3Cross( pYBasis, pZBasis, pXBasis );
          D3DXVec3Normalize( pYBasis, pYBasis );
          D3DXVec3Cross( pZBasis, pXBasis, pYBasis );
       
       
      https://github.com/Microsoft/DXUT/blob/master/Optional/DXUTcamera.cpp
    • By YixunLiu
      Hi,
      I have a surface mesh and I want to use a cone to cut a hole on the surface mesh.
      Anybody know a fast method to calculate the intersected boundary of these two geometries?
       
      Thanks.
       
      YL
       
    • By hiya83
      Hi, I tried searching for this but either I failed or couldn't find anything. I know there's D11/D12 interop and there are extensions for GL/D11 (though not very efficient). I was wondering if there's any Vulkan/D11 or Vulkan/D12 interop?
      Thanks!
    • By lonewolff
      Hi Guys,
      I am just wondering if it is possible to acquire the address of the backbuffer if an API (based on DX11) only exposes the 'device' and 'context' pointers?
      Any advice would be greatly appreciated
  • Popular Now