Followers 0

OpenGL Problem with matrix math for camera

7 posts in this topic

I've been struggling with getting the matrix math down for translating and rotating a camera through 3D space. I've got an OpenGL program that places the camera in the middle of a box at 0,0,0. I want to be able to both translate and rotate (first person shooter-style) through the box using the keyboard. I've got it working except I can't translate/rotate and keep the coordinates the same for both (only one or the other). For example, I can move through the box just fine (using the WSAD keys), but if I rotate my view to the left by 90 degrees, "forward" now goes to the right.

The problem is, I multiply the modelview matrix by the translation matrix first, and then by the rotation matrix. This works except that by rotating the scene 90 degrees, it throws the translation coordinates off by 90 degrees! In other words, translation occurs under the assumption that the scene has [i]not been rotated.[/i]

I only need to rotate the scene on the Y axis, Wolfenstein/Doom style. Here is my code so far:

[CODE]
mat4x4 mat_model,mat_tran,mat_rot,mat_temp;

mat4x4_identity(mat_model);
mat4x4_identity(mat_tran);
mat4x4_identity(mat_rot);
mat4x4_identity(mat_temp);

//create translation matrix
mat4x4_translate(mat_tran, strafe, 0.0, dolly);

//create rotation matrix
mat4x4_rotate_Y(mat_rot,mat_temp,-rot_y);

//apply the matrices to the modelview matrix
mat4x4_mul(mat_temp,mat_tran,mat_rot);
mat4x4_dup(mat_model,mat_temp);

[/CODE]

What am I missing?
0

Share on other sites
[quote name='Synthetix' timestamp='1341224731' post='4954855']
I can move through the box just fine (using the WSAD keys), but if I rotate my view to the left by 90 degrees, "forward" now goes to the right.
[/quote]

"Forward" should modify a direction vector in local coordinates, which can then be transformed by the rotation matrix to generate the approprite translation vector.
0

Share on other sites
[quote name='Goran Milovanovic' timestamp='1341268329' post='4955084']
"Forward" should modify a direction vector in local coordinates, which can then be transformed by the rotation matrix to generate the approprite translation vector.
[/quote]

Thanks. I tried that, but now the scene only rotates around the origin (0,0,0). Actually, this gives the same result as pre-multiplying the rotation/translation matrices.

Let me just confirm: the "eye point" is the X,Y (assuming Z-up) coordinates of the camera, looking down, correct? And the "look at" point, or the camera's orientation, is the eye point vector multiplied by the rotation matrix, yes?

I'm sorry I can't be more helpful. I am really having a hard time grasping this. Edited by Synthetix
0

Share on other sites
[quote name='Synthetix' timestamp='1341285643' post='4955150']

Thanks. I tried that, but now the scene only rotates around the origin (0,0,0). Actually, this gives the same result as pre-multiplying the rotation/translation matrices.
[/quote]

It sounds like you're not translating other objects in the scene. You have to transform everything in your scene to create the illusion of a "camera" moving through space. Typically, you would have a 4x4 transform matrix that describes orientation/translation of the camera. You would also have a 4x4 matrix for every object in the scene. Then, to create the illusion of a camera moving through space, you have to transform the matrix of each and every object, by the inverse matrix of the camera.

Why inverse? -> In the real world, you would have an actual camera that you would rotate left (if you wanted to see the portion of the scene on the left). However, in the OpenGL world, in order to look left, you have to "rotate the world" to the right, creating the illusion of a camera that is rotating to the left.

I don't know if you had the chance to research this in more depth, but I think this page should still be helpful: http://www.opengl.org/wiki/Viewing_and_Transformations

[quote name='Synthetix' timestamp='1341285643' post='4955150']
Let me just confirm: the "eye point" is the X,Y (assuming Z-up) coordinates of the camera, looking down, correct? And the "look at" point, or the camera's orientation, is the eye point vector multiplied by the rotation matrix, yes
[/quote]

In the context of gluLookAt? Both the "eye point" and the "look at point" should be vectors in object/world space coordinates.
0

Share on other sites
Okay, I can grab both the camera's current position vector and direction (the direction it's pointing) vector from the modelview matrix. Assuming I have this data on each loop iteration, how do I get the camera to rotate around its current position as opposed to 0,0,0? I have been reading a lot of tutorials that say you have to rotate the direction vector by the rotation matrix used to rotate the scene so when you apply the translation, it goes in the correct direction. I think I understand that part perfectly well, as I'm able to derive the forward/back direction vector from the modelview matrix, normalize it, and add it to the translation matrix along with the speed value. I do the same for the strafe vector, which is the cross product of the fwd/back vector and the Y direction (currently -1.0).

Example:

[CODE]
//calculate strafe vector using cross product of Z and Y
vec4 direction_strafe;
vec4_cross(direction_strafe,direction_move,(vec4){0.0,-1.0,0.0,0.0});

camera_position[z] += (direction_move[z] * speed); //WS keys (fwd/back)
camera_position[x] += (direction_strafe[x] * speed); //AD keys (strafe)

//construct translation matrix
mat4x4 translate;
mat4x4_translate(translate, camera_position[x], 0.0, camera_position[z]); //Y is 0.0 since we never go up/down
[/CODE]

I then multiply the translation matrix by the rotation matrix and drop the result into the modelview matrix. Problem is, when I rotate the scene, it is always rotating around 0,0,0 so when I move around, the camera always rotates around the world's origin and not its own. Edited by Synthetix
0

Share on other sites
direction_move should be calculated by using the sin/cos of the camera angle. Looks like you have a cross product calculating it?
0

Share on other sites
direction_move should be calculated by using the sin/cos of the camera angle. Looks like you have a cross product calculating it?
[/quote]

I'm calculating the strafe vector using the cross product of the foward (Z) direction and the up (Y) direction. So, the strafe vector is basically 90 degrees from the forward vector. I then add this to the translation matrix when the user presses one of the WSAD move keys, and then multiply the modelview matrix with it before rendering the scene.

I'm using a rotation matrix which contains the rotation angle when the user rotates the camera view left/right on the Y/up axis.

All of this works perfectly for either movement or rotation only, but I can't get the two working together! [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/sad.png[/img]
0

Share on other sites
Did you look at Goran Milovanovic's second post about using the inverse?

You've defined your camera transformation as:
Translate * Rotation
Which means your view matrix should be:
Rotation' * Translation' (i.e. the inverse)

[source lang="cpp"]
mat4x4 invTran_mat, invRot_mat, temp_mat, modelView_mat;

mat4x4_identity(temp_mat);
mat4x4_identity(invTran_mat);

// Inverse of your original rotation matrix
mat4x4_rotate_Y(invRot_mat, temp_mat, rot_y);

// Inverse of your original translation matrix
mat4x4_translate(invTran_mat, -strafe, 0.0, -dolly);

//apply the matrices to the model matrix
mat4x4_mul(temp_mat, invRot_mat, invTran_mat);
mat4x4_mul(modelView_mat, temp_mat, model_mat);
[/source] Edited by scniton
0

Create an account

Register a new account

Followers 0

• Similar Content

• So it's been a while since I took a break from my whole creating a planet in DX11. Last time around I got stuck on fixing a nice LOD.
A week back or so I got help to find this:
https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD
In general this is what I'm trying to recreate in DX11, he that made that planet LOD uses OpenGL but that is a minor issue and something I can solve. But I have a question regarding the code
He gets the position using this row
vec4d pos = b.var.vec4d["position"]; Which is then used further down when he sends the variable "center" into the drawing function:
if (pos.len() < 1) pos.norm(); world::draw(vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z));
Inside the draw function this happens:
draw_recursive(p3[0], p3[1], p3[2], center); Basically the 3 vertices of the triangle and the center of details that he sent as a parameter earlier: vec3d(pos.x, pos.y, pos.z)
Now onto my real question, he does vec3d edge_center[3] = { (p1 + p2) / 2, (p2 + p3) / 2, (p3 + p1) / 2 }; to get the edge center of each edge, nothing weird there.
But this is used later on with:
vec3d d = center + edge_center[i]; edge_test[i] = d.len() > ratio_size; edge_test is then used to evaluate if there should be a triangle drawn or if it should be split up into 3 new triangles instead. Why is it working for him? shouldn't it be like center - edge_center or something like that? Why adding them togheter? I asume here that the center is the center of details for the LOD. the position of the camera if stood on the ground of the planet and not up int he air like it is now.

Full code can be seen here:
https://github.com/sp4cerat/Planet-LOD/blob/master/src.simple/Main.cpp
If anyone would like to take a look and try to help me understand this code I would love this person. I'm running out of ideas on how to solve this in my own head, most likely twisted it one time to many up in my head
Toastmastern

• I googled around but are unable to find source code or details of implementation.
What keywords should I search for this topic?
Things I would like to know:
A. How to ensure that partially covered pixels are rasterized?
Apparently by expanding each triangle by 1 pixel or so, rasterization problem is almost solved.
But it will result in an unindexable triangle list without tons of overlaps. Will it incur a large performance penalty?
How to ensure proper synchronizations in GLSL?
GLSL seems to only allow int32 atomics on image.
C. Is there some simple ways to estimate coverage on-the-fly?
In case I am to draw 2D shapes onto an exisitng target:
1. A multi-pass whatever-buffer seems overkill.
2. Multisampling could cost a lot memory though all I need is better coverage.
Besides, I have to blit twice, if draw target is not multisampled.

• By mapra99
Hello

I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

Thanks!

• Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
• By KarimIO
EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));

• 19
• 14
• 23
• 11
• 28