• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jerrinx

Stream Multiplication Performance with Functions

3 posts in this topic

Hey guys,

I made a test program to check out performance of stream multiplication using normal, virtual, inline functions, and as a single function.

These are the results when Multiplying 1000,000,000 Floats

[u][b]Results[/b][/u]


[CUtil] ## PROFILE Stream Product normal function : 6.663393837 sec(s) ##
[CUtil] ## PROFILE Stream Product virtual function : 6.608961085 sec(s) ##
[CUtil] ## PROFILE Stream Product inline function : 6.584697760 sec(s) ##
[CUtil] ## PROFILE [b]Stream Product in function[/b] : 12.363450801 sec(s) ##

What I don't understand is why [b]Stream Product in a function[/b] takes twice as much !!???
Maybe its just my setup or something wrong with the code... I don't know.
Can somebody try this out ?

VS 2010 Express
Release Build
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you want to gauge the performance difference, just look at the assembly difference between your different versions - if you see it calling out to a function on the inside of the loop as opposed to running it inline, then you have a perf hit right there.

As ApochPiQ pointed out, the values in memory can have some heavy impact on the performance of your functionality.

But, assembly and data aside, theres also the layout of your memory & whether or not your data is being pre-fetched from the cache in time. Edited by Digitalfragment
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Guys,

Thanks for the replies.

I wanted to make a particle system and wanted to test out the performance difference when we call a function to operate on an element vs doing it all together in a single function.

@ApochPiQ
The data set is output[i] = input1[i] * input2[i]
So if in case theres an inconsistency in the multiplication, its going to affect the other test cases also.
I think loops can be unrolled only if you know the data set size before hand. Correct me if I am wrong.

Maybe I need to upcast that class in order to avoid devirtualisation.
Not sure about branch and cache warming though.

When I switched to debug mode, it gave me some sane results. Seems like release mode shuffled the code around a bit.

[u][b]Debug Mode on 10000000 data set size[/b][/u]


[CUtil] ## PROFILE Stream Product normal function : 0.549368595 sec(s) ##
[CUtil] ## PROFILE Stream Product virtual function : 0.582704152 sec(s) ##
[CUtil] ## PROFILE Stream Product inline function : 0.522523487 sec(s) ##
[CUtil] ## PROFILE Stream Product in function : 0.238292751 sec(s) ##

[u][b]Release with Optimisation turned off on 1000000000 Data Set[/b][/u]

[CUtil] ## PROFILE Stream Product normal function : 19.569217771 sec(s) ##
[CUtil] ## PROFILE Stream Product virtual function : 22.762712440 sec(s) ##
[CUtil] ## PROFILE Stream Product inline function : 16.949578101 sec(s) ##
[CUtil] ## PROFILE Stream Product in function : 17.004290188 sec(s) ##

But then again I would like to gauge the performance on release.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0