• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
benp444

interpolation of normal on low polygon useless

4 posts in this topic

I have created a tetrahedron using 4 vertices and 12 indices. I have then calculated the normals for each vertex and passed it to the shader to do ambient and diffuse lighting. The results are shown in the picture below and as you can see I get dark sections where I expected lit sections:

[attachment=9981:tetra bad shade.png]

I am assuming that this is because of interpolation of normals. As I say my approach to create this tetrahedron was to use only 4 vertices and let the indices do the rest. Should I actually define 4 faces (12 vertices) and define the normals for each face. I know this latter approach would work but my question is should the former approach also work, or should I reserve the low vertex count solution only for high polygon count objects?

My code for defining the vertices, indices and normal is below:

[CODE]
PrimitiveVertexStruct vertices[]=
{
{ D3DXVECTOR3(0.0f,1.0f,0.0f), WHITE_VECTOR, ZERO_VECTOR3 }, //1
{ D3DXVECTOR3(1.0f,-1.0f,0.0f), RED_VECTOR, ZERO_VECTOR3 }, //2
{ D3DXVECTOR3(-1.0f,-1.0f,0.0f),BLUE_VECTOR, ZERO_VECTOR3 }, //3
{ D3DXVECTOR3(0.0f,0.0f,2.0f), BLACK_VECTOR, ZERO_VECTOR3 }, //4
};
m_numTetraVertices = sizeof(vertices) / sizeof(PrimitiveVertexStruct);

m_numTetraIndices=12;
DWORD indices[] =
{
0,1,3, //1,2,4
1,2,3, //2,3,4
2,0,3, //3,1,4
0,2,1 //1,3,2
};
//compute average normals
for(int i=0;i<m_numTetraVertices;i++) {
//indices of triangle
int i0=indices[i*3+0];
int i1=indices[i*3+1];
int i2=indices[i*3+2];
//vertices of triangle
D3DXVECTOR3 v0=vertices[i0].Pos;
D3DXVECTOR3 v1=vertices[i1].Pos;
D3DXVECTOR3 v2=vertices[i2].Pos;
//compute face normal
D3DXVECTOR3 e0=v1 - v0;
D3DXVECTOR3 e1=v2 - v0;
D3DXVECTOR3 normal;
D3DXVECTOR3 cross;
D3DXVec3Cross(&normal, &e0, &e1);
//add to any existing normals for that vertex
vertices[i0].Normal+=normal;
vertices[i1].Normal+=normal;
vertices[i2].Normal+=normal;
}
[/CODE] Edited by benp444
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For a low polygon object like that, you want to use face normals. So yeah, that means you'll want a separate vertex for each vertex on each face, with normals that don't vary across the 3 vertices of each face.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If the angle between adjacent faces is more than a certain threshold, you really need to switch to using face normals. If you want a hard edge, use face normals. If you want a smooth edge, use averaged vertex normals.

Also, don't forget to re-normalise the normals after summing them together.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks, I was actually re-normalizing (in c++, not shader) I just didn't paste the code. Anyhow you have answered my question and I will now define the full faces for all my low polygon shapes.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0