• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
metsfan

OpenGL
Up axis problem with 3d Models [OpenGL]

6 posts in this topic

Hello all,

I am having a problem with a discrepancy between a set of 3D models which I have purchased and the OpenGL coordinate system. All of the models were exported with the Z axis pointing up, while OpenGL by default has the Y axis pointing up. The way I see it there are two options:

1) Modify the OpenGL coordinate system so that the Z axis points up
2) Modify the 3D models so that the Y axis points up

Neither task sounds like fun (option 1 forces me to modify the way OpenGL works by default, which I take no pleasure in doing, option 2 forces me to use a program like Maya, which I know absolutely nothing about). I'm just trying to get a sense of what is more commonplace in the game industry. Is it up to the programming team to make the coordinate system match the 3D models, or is it on the art team to make sure that the 3D models come in the proper coordinate system? Additionally, which of the 2 possibilities is the recommended path to take?

Thanks,
-Adam
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In my 3D studio max exporter I have a flag that makes Y up because Max's up is +Z. What the flag does is applies a +90 rotation about the +X axis (right handed) to the object (or models skeleton root) transform, this rotates Max's +Y (my Max forward convention) to align with opengl +Y up, and swings the Max -Z (down) up to become the opengl forward (-Z is forward in opengl for me). If the objects transform is translated away from the origin you may have to swap its z and y, and then negate the new z.

There are many places where you can solve it. Flag it on export if you can. Flag it on the model when loading. Manually rotate the object before exporting. I wouldnt mess with opengl, Id rather tweak the data. I do it this way because it doesnt have an impact on animations, its just an additional transform at the root so that objects are not on their side (or face down on floor). Overall its just a pain.

I think maya is Y up by default but can be changed, Max doesnt allow it to be changed, in case you do import into Maya, initially you might have the same problem as with opengl.
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you for the reply, this makes a lot of sense. I wish I knew more about 3D studio max, since I have absolutely no idea how to apply a transformation on export. Are there any resources you recommend that can help me set up this modification to the exporter?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The exporter is one that I wrote for Max, I added the Y up functionality because Max +Z is up, so of course any transforms or data that comes out of Max by default will be laying on its back, its face or side.
If you have models already made and dont want to or cant re-export, then the simplest way would be to rotate them in code by manipulating the objects world matrix that gets used for rendering. If you have some sort of scene graph like transform hierarchy, you can just apply the transforms i mentioned to the objects local transform then when you calculate the objects world transform for rendering it will draw correctly.
If you decide to re-export, apply the appropriate transforms at the end just before exporting. Which might mean (in the case of 3DS max) rotating the object to be face down (or up or whatever) just before exporting. I doubt anyone working on the models would want to build objects on their side, so do the flip at the end before exporting once the models done.
Which ever way you do it is gonna produce the same result, if you do and 90 degree correction in Max/Maya just before export using the rotate widget after selecting the object, the underlying operation is the same 90 degree rotation you'd be doing in code on the objects local transform.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote]All of the models were exported with the Z axis pointing up, while OpenGL by default has the Y axis pointing up.[/quote]
OpenGL does not specify a default up axis. It depends soley on your camera transform.

[quote]Is it up to the programming team to make the coordinate system match the 3D models, or is it on the art team to make sure that the 3D models come in the proper coordinate system? Additionally, which of the 2 possibilities is the recommended path to take?[/quote]

Both. The artists need to make sure they model things the correct way up, however the programmers should make sure that they can transform geometry. We are just talking about a 90 degree rotation around X here, so assuming you have a matrix transform for each mesh, it's not actually a problem. Mind you, writing a tool to rotate some vertices & normals in your files, is something that should only take you a couple of minutes.

[quote]I added the Y up functionality because Max +Z is up,[/quote]
Because the changing the up axis in the 3ds max properties is too hard?

[quote]Neither task sounds like fun (option 1 forces me to modify the way OpenGL works by default, which I take no pleasure in doing,[/quote]
Again, you can use any up axis you want. This is not a limitation of OpenGL.

[quote]option 2 forces me to use a program like Maya,[/quote]
No it doesn't. It means you need to use some trivial matrix maths. Using Maya/Max et al, is just over-complicating a trivial problem.

[quote]I'm just trying to get a sense of what is more commonplace in the game industry.[/quote]
Transformation matrices, and a consistant approach to working.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote name='RobTheBloke' timestamp='1343385773' post='4963591']
[quote]option 2 forces me to use a program like Maya,[/quote]
No it doesn't. It means you need to use some trivial matrix maths. Using Maya/Max et al, is just over-complicating a trivial problem.
[/quote]
Exactly, I agree.

[quote]
OpenGL does not specify a default up axis. It depends soley on your camera transform.
[/quote]

Just some nit picking, but you can program OpenGL without any matrices or transforms at all, if you want. OpenGL no longer has a "camera transform" concept, and 'y' is up on the screen as default.

[quote name='Geometrian' timestamp='1343506211' post='4964080']
glRotated(90.0,1.0,0.0,0.0); or glRotated(-90.0,1.0,0.0,0.0)
[/quote]

This is deprecated OpenGL functionality, please don't recommend it. And if you would use it anyway, it is not recommended as it use double precision. That may cost a lot of performance. Edited by larspensjo
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Similar Content

    • By mapra99
      Hello

      I am working on a recent project and I have been learning how to code in C# using OpenGL libraries for some graphics. I have achieved some quite interesting things using TAO Framework writing in Console Applications, creating a GLUT Window. But my problem now is that I need to incorporate the Graphics in a Windows Form so I can relate the objects that I render with some .NET Controls.

      To deal with this problem, I have seen in some forums that it's better to use OpenTK instead of TAO Framework, so I can use the glControl that OpenTK libraries offer. However, I haven't found complete articles, tutorials or source codes that help using the glControl or that may insert me into de OpenTK functions. Would somebody please share in this forum some links or files where I can find good documentation about this topic? Or may I use another library different of OpenTK?

      Thanks!
    • By Solid_Spy
      Hello, I have been working on SH Irradiance map rendering, and I have been using a GLSL pixel shader to render SH irradiance to 2D irradiance maps for my static objects. I already have it working with 9 3D textures so far for the first 9 SH functions.
      In my GLSL shader, I have to send in 9 SH Coefficient 3D Texures that use RGBA8 as a pixel format. RGB being used for the coefficients for red, green, and blue, and the A for checking if the voxel is in use (for the 3D texture solidification shader to prevent bleeding).
      My problem is, I want to knock this number of textures down to something like 4 or 5. Getting even lower would be a godsend. This is because I eventually plan on adding more SH Coefficient 3D Textures for other parts of the game map (such as inside rooms, as opposed to the outside), to circumvent irradiance probe bleeding between rooms separated by walls. I don't want to reach the 32 texture limit too soon. Also, I figure that it would be a LOT faster.
      Is there a way I could, say, store 2 sets of SH Coefficients for 2 SH functions inside a texture with RGBA16 pixels? If so, how would I extract them from inside GLSL? Let me know if you have any suggestions ^^.
    • By KarimIO
      EDIT: I thought this was restricted to Attribute-Created GL contexts, but it isn't, so I rewrote the post.
      Hey guys, whenever I call SwapBuffers(hDC), I get a crash, and I get a "Too many posts were made to a semaphore." from Windows as I call SwapBuffers. What could be the cause of this?
      Update: No crash occurs if I don't draw, just clear and swap.
      static PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR pfd = // pfd Tells Windows How We Want Things To Be { sizeof(PIXELFORMATDESCRIPTOR), // Size Of This Pixel Format Descriptor 1, // Version Number PFD_DRAW_TO_WINDOW | // Format Must Support Window PFD_SUPPORT_OPENGL | // Format Must Support OpenGL PFD_DOUBLEBUFFER, // Must Support Double Buffering PFD_TYPE_RGBA, // Request An RGBA Format 32, // Select Our Color Depth 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, // Color Bits Ignored 0, // No Alpha Buffer 0, // Shift Bit Ignored 0, // No Accumulation Buffer 0, 0, 0, 0, // Accumulation Bits Ignored 24, // 24Bit Z-Buffer (Depth Buffer) 0, // No Stencil Buffer 0, // No Auxiliary Buffer PFD_MAIN_PLANE, // Main Drawing Layer 0, // Reserved 0, 0, 0 // Layer Masks Ignored }; if (!(hDC = GetDC(windowHandle))) return false; unsigned int PixelFormat; if (!(PixelFormat = ChoosePixelFormat(hDC, &pfd))) return false; if (!SetPixelFormat(hDC, PixelFormat, &pfd)) return false; hRC = wglCreateContext(hDC); if (!hRC) { std::cout << "wglCreateContext Failed!\n"; return false; } if (wglMakeCurrent(hDC, hRC) == NULL) { std::cout << "Make Context Current Second Failed!\n"; return false; } ... // OGL Buffer Initialization glClear(GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT | GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT); glBindVertexArray(vao); glUseProgram(myprogram); glDrawElements(GL_TRIANGLES, indexCount, GL_UNSIGNED_SHORT, (void *)indexStart); SwapBuffers(GetDC(window_handle));  
    • By Tchom
      Hey devs!
       
      I've been working on a OpenGL ES 2.0 android engine and I have begun implementing some simple (point) lighting. I had something fairly simple working, so I tried to get fancy and added color-tinting light. And it works great... with only one or two lights. Any more than that, the application drops about 15 frames per light added (my ideal is at least 4 or 5). I know implementing lighting is expensive, I just didn't think it was that expensive. I'm fairly new to the world of OpenGL and GLSL, so there is a good chance I've written some crappy shader code. If anyone had any feedback or tips on how I can optimize this code, please let me know.
       
      Vertex Shader
      uniform mat4 u_MVPMatrix; uniform mat4 u_MVMatrix; attribute vec4 a_Position; attribute vec3 a_Normal; attribute vec2 a_TexCoordinate; varying vec3 v_Position; varying vec3 v_Normal; varying vec2 v_TexCoordinate; void main() { v_Position = vec3(u_MVMatrix * a_Position); v_TexCoordinate = a_TexCoordinate; v_Normal = vec3(u_MVMatrix * vec4(a_Normal, 0.0)); gl_Position = u_MVPMatrix * a_Position; } Fragment Shader
      precision mediump float; uniform vec4 u_LightPos["+numLights+"]; uniform vec4 u_LightColours["+numLights+"]; uniform float u_LightPower["+numLights+"]; uniform sampler2D u_Texture; varying vec3 v_Position; varying vec3 v_Normal; varying vec2 v_TexCoordinate; void main() { gl_FragColor = (texture2D(u_Texture, v_TexCoordinate)); float diffuse = 0.0; vec4 colourSum = vec4(1.0); for (int i = 0; i < "+numLights+"; i++) { vec3 toPointLight = vec3(u_LightPos[i]); float distance = length(toPointLight - v_Position); vec3 lightVector = normalize(toPointLight - v_Position); float diffuseDiff = 0.0; // The diffuse difference contributed from current light diffuseDiff = max(dot(v_Normal, lightVector), 0.0); diffuseDiff = diffuseDiff * (1.0 / (1.0 + ((1.0-u_LightPower[i])* distance * distance))); //Determine attenuatio diffuse += diffuseDiff; gl_FragColor.rgb *= vec3(1.0) / ((vec3(1.0) + ((vec3(1.0) - vec3(u_LightColours[i]))*diffuseDiff))); //The expensive part } diffuse += 0.1; //Add ambient light gl_FragColor.rgb *= diffuse; } Am I making any rookie mistakes? Or am I just being unrealistic about what I can do? Thanks in advance
    • By yahiko00
      Hi,
      Not sure to post at the right place, if not, please forgive me...
      For a game project I am working on, I would like to implement a 2D starfield as a background.
      I do not want to deal with static tiles, since I plan to slowly animate the starfield. So, I am trying to figure out how to generate a random starfield for the entire map.
      I feel that using a uniform distribution for the stars will not do the trick. Instead I would like something similar to the screenshot below, taken from the game Star Wars: Empire At War (all credits to Lucasfilm, Disney, and so on...).

      Is there someone who could have an idea of a distribution which could result in such a starfield?
      Any insight would be appreciated
  • Popular Now